₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Holy smoke! I don't know which one of you needs to be educating the other anymore. You're enough to confuse either of you.

Let me let keb tell you.



Seems you had to say it keb.

I have a tendency to agree with most of what you you say BudaAtum, But I have my many
weaknesses. I allegedly may be confused and cheating on my girl, then there is the IQ of 27 etc, etc. There is one thing I am certain of Sir, and that is that you are afraid and fearful of the simply yet groundbreaking challenge hosted generously by Kingebukasblog for the awesome benefit of the waiting world.

I have an IQ of 27, but I beg you to signup and take on this challenge. THE WORLD NEEDS YOU.

budaatum:
Holy smoke! I don't know which one of you needs to be educating the other anymore. You're enough to confuse either of you.

Let me let keb tell you.


Yawn!

The post is a satire as Kingebukasblog said. Could it be because you proudly provided that everything goes anal SEX LINK, that made it all the more satirical?

BudaAtum your links says, "Many who are familiar with the socio-political workings of Finland point to the Lutheran Evangelical Church’s refusal to marry same-sex couples as the rallying point to pass The Richard Dawkins Act.
Same-sex marriage just became legal in Finland. BudaAtum you are proud that the failed prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins got a country to legalize one man putting his penis into another mans booty. Do you see, everything goes in Atheism. Women that have sex with each other must now buy Dongles/fake joysticks.

With all due respect BudaAtum, the link that you proudly posted is laced with satirical insanity. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2017/03/finland-votes-to-protect-children-from-christianity/#6CxKumbBMwQZmuRm.99

budaatum:
Holy smoke! I don't know which one of you needs to be educating the other anymore. You're enough to confuse either of you.

Let me let keb tell you.


Yawn!

The post is a satire as Kingebukasblog said. Could it be because you proudly provided that everything goes anal SEX LINK, that made it all the more satirical?

BudaAtum your links says, "Many who are familiar with the socio-political workings of Finland point to the Lutheran Evangelical Church’s refusal to marry same-sex couples as the rallying point to pass The Richard Dawkins Act.
Same-sex marriage just became legal in Finland. BudaAtum you are proud that the failed prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins got a country to legalize one man putting his penis into another mans booty. Do you see, everything goes in Atheism.

With all due respect BudaAtum, the link that you proudly posted is laced with satirical insanity. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/laughingindisbelief/2017/03/finland-votes-to-protect-children-from-christianity/#6CxKumbBMwQZmuRm.99

budaatum:
No! No no no no! Goddamn man. How you show your own illogicality! Though, and at the expense of the atheist, you are logical in a rather comical sense.

Any atheist who allows you to be the judge of your ability to reason is not smart at all. Since you lack the ability to reason no argument constructed can be above your purview and so the money would never be won as part of your illogicality is the inability to see logic in anyone else's argument.

Its like say you commit a jail going crime and are brought before the judge who just happens to be yourself. How much jail time do you think you would give yourself if you could find yourself guilty in the first place?

My point is not so much that you "lack the intellectual ability to refute it". In fact, you do have the intellectual ability to refute it, but your refutation lacks rational and logic and is therefore in error and dishonest (as in, in my view, you actually know better).

After a long holiday I came back to see this groundbreaking thread hosted by a man of good character, he is a highly esteemed Nairalander, Kingebukasblog.
Get a group of good men together, and they will change their school, their campus, and the world.

Every man is a work in progress, but here are 30 characteristics of a good guy. Any man can grow and become: He has integrity and character: simply put, a good guy is less talk and more action.

This is what I see in the OP, he is a man of superior action. “character" was a key word in the vocabulary of Englishmen and Americans,” and men were spoken of as having strong or weak character, good or bad character, a great deal of character or no character at all. Young people were encouraged to cultivate real character, high character or good character.

BudaAtum, why this character assassination of the King?

Modo9:
but there’s no evidence of god

Have you heard about the dude that allegedly proved that No-god is alive? He watched as the worlds largest stadiums are filled to capacity with thousands worshiping outside and millions tuned in.

He always said there is No-god so he set out to prove it. He advertised the Atheist revival. He hired the smallest stadium. only 95 worshipers attended. They sang worship songs and praised prophet Richard Dawkins for blessing their lives and making No-god known to them.

It is alleged that he said after the very successful revival that their is No-god, but it is an inferior god who only make material things.

budaatum:
ScienceWatch, Finland Votes To Protect Children From Christianity would be an example of what we were talking about.

Guh ! Your link actually point out a dreadful social nightmare. It also says, "Many who are familiar with the socio-political workings of Finland point to the Lutheran Evangelical Church’s refusal to marry same-sex couples as the rallying point to pass The Richard Dawkins Act. Same-sex marriage just became legal in Finland, making it the last Scandinavian country to recognize that homosexuals are real people with feelings and such.

One man having sex with another man in Holy matrimony is no joke Sir. After all his passionate labour, he becomes depressed because he remains childless. If they adopt a child, the poor child will be asked in class who is your mother ? What will the reaction of the class be if they hear her say, "My mothers name is John, she has a large beard with two dingalings and a polony.

What reaction do children have when they see two women having sex ? Oh, meet my father, his name is Mary. He sits on the toilet when
when he pee.

sonofthunder:
it is ENGLISH! ENGLISH! that has changed... they tell you that so that you don't get a miss guided meaning like you keep getting.

I see the problem Dalaman is giving you Sir. He has been giving his other teachers Kingebukasblog and Butterfl1on the same problems. He is one of a rare group that gets an erection from burdening his teachers. Psychologist have found that this behavior is identical
to a team member deflating his opponents soccer ball before a match.

sonofthunder:
Lol... the forth time? an 'unregistered' atheist? lemme not scatter this wonderful thread but that's ironic given the alleged relationship between atheists and 'high' IQ... Lol.

I also have a high IQ of 27, so what are they bragging about? Besides, there is something far superior than intelligence, IT IS WISDOM.

Wisdom cannot be gained by memorizing exam papers, nor from ignoring a challenge such as this one offered by a truly WISE man and esteemed Nairalander, Kingebukasblog.

sonofthunder:
and yes I would if I happen to have something to offer...

MmmMmm ! Very smart. It is alleged that a psychology clinical study proved that insanity and selfishness are synonymous.

sonofthunder:
they all seem to be dodging the challenge by attacking the integrity of the op... maybe they should see it as a means of liberating the op alongside other theists following the thread (at least they claim to want to liberate us from 'whatsoever' hence the reason they spend all their time on the RELIGION SECTION).

Yes indeed ! These Low-Level unregistered Atheists have managed to liberate me from many doubts I had about the existence of God. It is from atheists that I indirectly learned the startling difference between spiritual tuition and secular tuition.

The few High-Level Atheists are acutely aware of this bonus to believers. Hence the shocking confusion among the wannabe atheists
when they see the biggest stadiums constantly filled to the brim with new believers in God. Why do you think Atheists will never hire even the smallest stadium ? It is because one hour into the worship of No-god, the empty stadium is proof that their No- god is inferior.

I know that I can prove that No-god is real by simply using one small stadium.

sonofthunder:
the challenge didn't come up an hour ago, maybe the op doesn't have all the time in the world. Hence the challenge expires after a while. Even without the monetary incentive, I see no reason why the atheist shouldn't' want to clarify the position of the op (and all following) since that's the lie they claim brought them to the RELIGION SECTION. Besides, quite a number of atheists have seen it very early. I believe the rules by the op are clear enough for any that is willing.

Very true ! The money is making the Low-level unregistered Atheists very nervous. Did you notice, the King gave a smart example of "Satire" and it almost shut this Thread down.

So I asked my unregistered Motor mechanic who happens to also be an unregistered Atheist, what is satire? and without blinking he replied, "it is a spare Tire." I dont know what to make of it. It is the forth time that I returned to him with the same problem.

Ranchhoddas:
This robot.

No, its the next robot, then turn right.

budaatum:
See what I mean ScienceWatch? People might think it were true and lose respect for one.

Do kindly explain it to KEB if you would.

Mmmmm, The King makes sense. SATIRE !!!! Ok I could explain like this to Kingebukasblog without derailing his world changing topic.

King, I will get back to you on this.

Ranchhoddas:
What is the point of reducing the money when he clearly has no intent of giving it to anyone?

Would you participate in a game if you are the referee?

A referee is a vital participant in any game. Do you think a Tea lady is not a vital participant in business? When the mind is diseased according to the "Alleged" 22 yr clinical study on Atheists, that mind easily discriminates, hates and is fearful of challenges.

Now, when one applies experiential learning to this thread that Allegation has a resounding ring of TRUTH, hey.

budaatum:
As for you KEB, I don't believe you missed my entire conversation with ScienceWatch. I really do not believe you did!

What is going on BudaAtum? Sir, give it a break. The world is watching the deliberate derailment of this ground breaking thread, gifted freely to sane mankind and its future offspring.

Let's not loose sight of the true spirit of Kingebukasblog's liberating challenge. His superior character is what restrains him from using his AK47 to eliminate the destructive Data terrorists here.

Let us us calm down then sign-up to take up the challenge to explode the hatred, to puncture the jugular vein of deep seated ignorance and let it bleed, let it bleed.

Yes Sir, sign-up and let it bleed. Let the blood of TRUTH flow through the network's of the world.

Atheist presidents are now beheaded, Burak Obama, Jacob Zuma, Robert Mugabe and more.

budaatum:
Please provide evidence of buda mudslinging.

lol damn loud !!!. Correction, it is an allegation. Anyhow, I showed your uninvited advice to my girl who is very reserved. She said thanks and that she has still not resolved the allegation but will continue to love me because It is better to be with some one that is straight.

Wait for this, she said to tell you that I have helped her investigate her "Allegations" against me. You will be updated on this soon.

budaatum:
You are. It's just not my place to say you singlehandedly dragged him into the gutter though you probably think you were promoting his virtues.

Please inform your girlfriend (is she perchance an atheist?), that buda thinks a guy who is willing to play word games with her concerns is not exactly showing her due regard. She deserves better.

We will remain eternally grateful to Kingebukasblog's verifiable commitment to TRUTH. A great foundation has been laid by the likes of Kingebukasblog, VAXX and don't forget the passion and unique applied intelligence of Butterfly1on and many other truth seekers.

If your allegations are correct, I sincerely apologize as it will never be my intention to drag his esteemed name through the mud.

Please refrain from making such accusations till you provide proof. Lol very loud.

budaatum:
You are. It's just not my place to say you singlehandedly dragged him into the gutter though you probably think you were promoting his virtues.

Please inform your girlfriend (is she perchance an atheist?), that buda thinks a guy who is willing to play word games with her concerns is not exactly showing her due regard. She deserves better.

Yes she agree with you that she deserves better. Thank you for looking out for her interests even though you have not looked out for the urgent welfare of your lost tribe.

Signup with Kingebukasblog,s challenge. Avoid mud slinging, it is a very slippery game.

The allegations that Atheism is a mental disease must also be examined experientially as well.

budaatum:
Why must I agree please? How is it "legally correct" to say anything "based on an alleged clinical study" that has not been proven to exist?

Is there some rule that says "Thou shalt bear false witness", somewhere that I missed?

In the previous example from my personal life. My girl is not bearing false witness against me if she tells others "It is alleged that Sciencewatch is cheating on me."

blastac:
Atheist can only come to a Christian post, shout and make noise but won't do the same in a Muslim thread why??

I admire the Muslims. They are wise and know how to protect what is sacred from Satanic Atheists.
The wise Muslims have the devastating FATWA to deal with scum.

Nevertheless, it is alleged that Atheism also fights fiercely for their beliefs.

budaatum:
Why must I agree please? How is it "legally correct" to say anything "based on an alleged clinical study" that has not been proven to exist?

Is there some rule that says "Thou shalt bear false witness", somewhere that I missed?

When my girlfriend accused me of seeing two other women, I gently asked her use the term "alleged" while she has no proof.

Now she happily goes around telling many people that "It is alleged that Sciencewatch is cheating." I am not cheating but I am happy that she is applying her democratic right legally.

Let's us stop the games and go to the beating heart of this ground breaking topic and sign up for the challenge. WIN OR LOSE.

budaatum:
Why must I agree please? How is it "legally correct" to say anything "based on an alleged clinical study" that has not been proven to exist?

Is there some rule that says "Thou shalt bear false witness", somewhere that I missed?

someone mailed me to advise me that I am about to derail this awesome thread. So let's rather go to the heart of Kingebukasblog's topic which is at its core the liberation of humanity.

I had a sinking feeling when an esteemed Nairalander VAXX said he too recently offered and incredible sum of $100,000 in a similar challenge.

I am utterly convinced that the outcome will be fair. We should be thanking Nairaland to providing this internationally recognized platform.

For the sake of humanity, let's not further derail the process of Evolution.

budaatum:
I am tempted to ask you to provide a report of your perusal, but I wouldn't wish to overburden you from the prior task given to you. However, perhaps give a hint of the sources that justify your position, please?

It would be most interesting to see what you will come up with if you re-examine Kingebukasblog's rules of engagement from an unbiased creative perspective instead of a personal agenda directed at the person of the highly esteemed Nairalander Kingebukasblog.

budaatum:
I am tempted to ask you to provide a report of your perusal, but I wouldn't wish to overburden you from the prior task given to you. However, perhaps give a hint of the sources that justify your position, please?

lol real loud. You are snooping now.

budaatum:
This is not an atheist versus non-atheist issue. Nor are you presenting it as your opinion. You said, "22yr clinical study", and it is the validity of that statement itself that is in question. Especially if made by an individual with Science as part of their name.

Don't ask us to accept your word for it's existence for what it says. If there is a study, present it for scrutiny. And perhaps desist from presenting "unfounded opinions" as fact in the meantime.

Therefore, you must agree that it is legally correct to say that based on an alleged clinical study, Atheism is a mental disease.

Now you are correct that it is not opinion, yet I am loathe to say that I am experiencing the reality of that "Allegation" daily.

I do regularly sympathize with hateful atheists that battle to come to grips with the huge difference between secular and spiritual.

vaxx:
Bro , am here with you....the truth is the challenge can not be taken by any atheist who will be applying logic ,materialistic, non materialistic or scientific argument..... So which atheist will accept this challenge. And on what platform will he or she stand on.......i posted a challenge worth a one hunderd dollar too last two months but i was surprise i couldn't get an answer from most of the inteligent atheist here

I was away for awhile and unaware of the liberating challenges you mention here.

SALUTE. May your elbows be greased.

Mujtahida:
Since you say that you agree with me and at the same time say that the instructions of the op are extremely fair I have one question for you: who accesses whether an argument has been refuted or not. You? The op? Or a third party? Just who?

Kindly bear with me for a brief moment. If you switch your mind to one of many perspectives that is possible in this chaotic scenario, you be able to visualize the honest ingenuity engineered into this challenge.

I have spent a few nights perusing the rules, instructions and international context of the proposed challenge offered by the esteemed Nairalander Kingebukasblog and found it to be be extremely fair and justified.

Now let's move on, the world is waiting.
WIN or LOOSE is not what this challenge is geared for, it is for the liberation of humanity.

Mujtahida:
Aim higher. The standard I hold up to is not the standard of the 'low level unregistered atheist here' but a clearly defined legal principle that forms the basis of natural justice. If the op is going to be a judge in his own case there's no guarantee for fairness, for justice as it were. I am sure that commonsense dictates to you that you don't write an exam and at the same time mark it. If your common sense tells you that then on what basis should you hold the op to a lesser standard?

I fully agree with most of what you say here. If you look closely you will see that claustrophobic legality can never apply in this case. The circumstances, the venue, the international environment, the thousands of cons.
I have closely examined the clear instructions in the OP and have found it to be extremely fair in this bitter and hostile context.

I find Kingebukasblog to be of sound character and his extensive interactions on Nairaland convey a strong ethical and moral foundation upon which I bet my money an a fair outcome.

I can say as much for another esteemed Nairalander VAXX and BUTTERFLY1ON these guys unbiased and refrain from violent behaviour, if you know what I mean.

vaxx:
Bro , am here with you....the truth is the challenge can not be taken by any atheist who will be applying logic ,materialistic, non materialistic or scientific argument..... So which atheist will accept this challenge. And on what platform will he or she stand on.......i posted a challenge worth a one hunderd dollar too last two months but i was surprise i couldn't get an answer from most of the inteligent atheist here

Hello VAXX, it is so refreshing to see a voice of REASON appear in the dark.

Yes Sir, your astute observations leave no room for doubt. My mother will be proud of you, she too believes that one must put their money where their mouth is.

The fact that you too, like Kingebukasblog has has made huge sacrifices in service of sane humanity paints a gloomy picture of Atheism,
It seems like their foundations are indeed made of STRAW. It is telling that even the greedy ones among them are too afraid to take up this history making, humanity unifying, spiritual and mentally enlightening challenges.

I will go view your challenge and maybe win the prize. Lol.

budaatum:
Don't we have an agreement not to mention this unfounded study until evidence for it is brought forth?

Ref

What does this mean? There are hundreds of "unfounded" opinions that Atheists cruelly thrust upon humanity daily without agreement and in conflict with international law.

BudaAtum, please take the time to examine the narrowly defined context in which I mentioned that the persons behaviour makes the allegations of the so-called 22yr clinical study that revealed "That Atheism is a mental disease" appear to be correct.

KingEbukasBlog:
He learns from their leaders , that's what they do . Here is a video of Sam Harris taking a particular text out of context and how he was shamed by a brilliant theist for doing so . The humor only makes the video more interesting . Enjoy !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENtlW-LEqu8

Kingebukasblog, Thanks for sharing this video clip on the Failed side-kick of the modern day prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins.

One can rightly ask, what is in it for these Satanists to trash JESUS?

We all know that the modern prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins loves money more than truth, Why has he not taken up the challenge win or lose? This alleged Satanist is watching from a distance in fear. He has observed the mental chaos among his followers and recognized the same mental deficiencies in himself.
Richard Dawkins must be mumbling to himself, "THE END IS NEAR"

dalaman:
All these explanations are just ridiculous apologist drivels. A passage says I repent me of the evil I've done unto you while the apologist is saying it means I am satisfied with the punishment your nation has undergone, the other apologist is saying it means he has compassion over them and will change his ways and course of providence over them.

Even the apologist are all over themselves and can not even provide a single and united interpretation. All of them are just interpreting it differently.

But is this not your interpretation of the previous manufactured interpretation that was interpreted for you ?

Just sign up for the Kingebukasblog's challenge
that way you won't be guilty of derailing an awesome thread, a thread that will go down in history as ground breaking. That's why I find it strange that the honourable VAXX has not come to greet us yet.