Scully95's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Scully95's Profile › Scully95's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 50 pages)
10. S-400 live-fire exercise [img]http://2.bp..com/-L-tJG5Cexqc/VmUHNIOZm8I/AAAAAAAAqsc/JhhN_9xOSOs/s1600/10.jpg[/img] Location: Kapustin Yar The missile systems were used to destroy maneuvering ballistic targets. 11. Eleventh S-400 regiment delivered [img]http://2.bp..com/-95QZxksXadc/VmUHNQp85CI/AAAAAAAAqss/1P7YWWw_BwM/s1600/11.jpg[/img] Location: Kapustin Yar Almaz-Antey also delivered three Buk-M2 medium-range air defense battalions this year. 12. Five MiG-31BSM delivered [img]http://4.bp..com/-rkgO8XrsDPY/VmUHNr0mD-I/AAAAAAAAqs8/BB6UYQY8HeM/s1600/12.jpg[/img] Location: Nizhniy Novgorod Russia’s VKS currently have 72 of these modernized MiG-31s, with additional 50 to be upgraded by the end of 2018. Naval Forces |
7. Army aviation reorganization [img]http://3.bp..com/-eu9sWNdP7Wk/VmUHMr_zwjI/AAAAAAAAqtc/lskAk2VjVvI/s1600/07.jpg[/img] Location: Krasnopol, Rostov, Stavropol Army aviation bases at these locations are being transformed into army aviation regiments and brigades in order to improve their ability to plan and conduct combat operations. 8. First assault engineer battalion formed [img]http://3.bp..com/--3DecDqBHYw/VmUHMlagv7I/AAAAAAAAqtY/FWbEeswpaz0/s1600/08.jpg[/img] Location: Murom, Vladimir Region The newly formed battalion is part of the Supreme Command reserve, and there are plans to form a battalion of this type in each combined arms army. The battalions’ mission is to facilitate offensive operations by overcoming enemy fortified defensive positions. 9. Increase in contract soldier staffing [img]http://3.bp..com/-22OPjIHbUUw/VmUHNLLzpnI/AAAAAAAAqtQ/GfMdQ5MOBvI/s1600/09.jpg[/img] Location: Dagestan The Dagestan-based motorized rifle brigades received 400 contract service soldiers this year, or 35% more than in the previous year. In general, contract-staffed units tend to be the more likely ones to be sent on missions abroad, and the increase in contract staffing in this case reflects the desire to improve readiness and deployability of affected units. Air Forces |
4. Two motorized rifle brigades to undergo battle drills [img]http://1.bp..com/-HSSPAzUFXFk/VmUHMZ4dzNI/AAAAAAAAqsU/ZBc6MgD7H7Y/s1600/04.jpg[/img] Location: Nizhniy Novgorod The brigades will train at the brand-new Western Military District training area patterned after the US NTC. The training will entail live-fire exercises, maneuver training, as well as a brigade-level force-on-force exercise. 5. New artillery brigade [img]http://2.bp..com/-VsLg2NlYO8w/VmUHMW7AU0I/AAAAAAAAqtU/kjHcmEH7MrA/s1600/05.jpg[/img] Location: Buryatiya It appears this is a reactivation of cadred unit, as it is equipped with mostly self-propelled systems of older manufacture, including 122mm 2S1, 152mm 2S5, and 204mm 2S7 SP howitzers. More than 85% of the brigade’s soldiers are serving on multi-year contracts as opposed to one-year draft, suggesting the brigade is intended for deployments outside the country. 6. New training regimen for peacekeeping brigade [img]http://3.bp..com/-w62CoEKd-AI/VmUHMeoWBxI/AAAAAAAAqtg/QeNDEK5CbzM/s1600/06.jpg[/img] Location: Samara The Central Military District motorized rifle brigade that is optimized for peacekeeping operations will implement a new training regimen for units that are fully staffed by contract soldiers. The combined individual and unit training cycle is scheduled to last 10 months. |
[img]http://2.bp..com/-e90VTARb0gM/VmUPdKiqGzI/AAAAAAAAquI/GQ7RhEXpm1U/s1600/Russion_military_map_04_12-1024x855.jpg[/img] Executive Summary As 2015 is drawing to a close, it is clear that the Russian military is expecting 2016 to e at least as eventful as this and last year were, with the still-smouldering conflict on the Donbass and the still-escalating war in Syria, both of which could conceivably demand a Russian military commitment up to and including a sizable ground operation. Considering the combination of the recent developments such as the formation and/or reorganization of combat units, the intensification of combat training, and the emergence of growing number of units staffed solely or mainly by contract soldiers, it is evident that plans for ground operations are being developed, so far only as contingencies. However, 2014 and 2015 showed that Russian contingency plans can very quickly become a reality should the situation demand it, and 2016 is not likely to be different. Strategic Forces 1. New command and control aircraft delivery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UlSh4kzhTc Location: Chkalovskiy; Nizhniy Novgorod The Il-86VKP is a “doomsday aircraft” intended to command Russia’s nuclear forces in wartime. It can also fulfill the role of a command aircraft for conventional military operations. 2. Strategic Rocket Forces to undergo more surprise inspections in 2016 [img]http://4.bp..com/-njUaZWGIxJ4/VmUQLxTPI4I/AAAAAAAAquQ/6xQ04Jbwmg4/s1600/2.jpg[/img] Location: Moscow While RVSN units conducted about 100 alerts and battle drills, this number will increase in 2016. Ground Forces and Airborne Forces 3. Russian units reported participating in ground fighting in Syria [img]http://3.bp..com/-ZG5yXUQyDkQ/VmUPYWiCKsI/AAAAAAAAqt4/aE_xSEb1t38/s1600/3.jpg[/img] Location: Latakia Syrian journalists Russian Naval Infantry supported by T-90A MBTs and Su-25 attack aircraft conducted offensive operations against militant strongpoints at various sectors of the front. There were separate reports that Syrian mechanized units were using T-90A MBTs which, however, could have been crewed by Russian servicemen. [img]http://1.bp..com/-tgKQ7nXaOSs/VmUPDSd4rEI/AAAAAAAAqtw/KH_pljSt9KI/s1600/lat.jpg[/img] |
2015 - Syria - Full Interview with President Bashar al-Assad by Czech TV - 1/12/15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_WrS-CNrZM This interview was first broadcast in full by Czech TV on 1 Dec 2015. __________________________________________________ (PRAGUE, Reuters, 30 Nov 2015) - There are terrorists among the Syrian refugees making their way to Europe, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad told Czech Television in an interview, excerpts of which were broadcast on Monday (30 Nov 2015). Asked whether Europeans should fear refugees from Syria, Assad said: "It's a mixture. The majority, they are good Syrians, they are patriots... But of course you have infiltration of terrorists among them, that is true." Czech Television said it had interviewed Assad in Damascus and would air the piece in full on Tuesday (1 Dec 2015). Hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees have reached Europe this year, often without documents, sparking fears in many countries that Islamic militants may be among them. Islamic State's attack on Paris on Nov. 13 has heightened calls in the EU for more controls on people arriving. Two of the Paris attackers had their fingerprints taken while traveling through Greece in October, a Paris prosecutor said. One was identified as Ahmad al-Mohammad from a Syrian passport found near his body, although it was not clear whether the passport was genuine or stolen. Turkey has promised to help stem the flow of migrants to Europe in return for cash, visas and renewed talks on joining the EU, in a deal struck on Sunday. __________________________________________________ |
jnhmaxxwell:YOu dey mind zombies ? |
Spydamannn:I really hope so.. Cos the Article is pointing to what could or would lead to U.S first strike. U.S only knows how to bully. It may also continue to spread its famous propaganda that it's building missile defense system in Europe. I think U.S should accept the recent realities and stop this pushing of its puppets, vassals, protectorate states, war mongering with Russia. Russia is obviously the wrong person to fight with. NATO expansion won't help matters either.. The Bear is awoken. Russia has put its future on the table.. A multi-polar world.. Now left for U.S to fight or just let it be.. Soviet broke without major wars.. U.S should eat the humble pie.. U.S and its puppets.. ( AngloZionist Empire) |
[img]http://1.bp..com/-jggJDbQXIV4/VmShi6QHYgI/AAAAAAAAqkQ/cLgXCyiQ-v0/s640/s-300.jpg[/img] Syria is ready to deploy the fearsome S-300 air-defence system supplied by its Russian ally. The anti-aircraft surface-to-air missiles will give Syria control over its territory and the capability to shoot down any intrusive warplane or missile. NATO warplanes beware! The fatal shoot-down of a Russian fighter jet by a Turkish F-16 two weeks ago has given urgency to installing the air-defence system. It is as much in Russia’s interest as it is in Syria’s to have air cover – and the S-300, and its newer generation, the S-400, are reckoned to be the best technology in the world for that job. “It’s a top-of-the range weapon”, says the British defence publication, IHS Jane’s, probably surpassing the American Patriot missile system. The Russian-made S-300 can take out any modern fighter plane or missile, including Cruise missiles, at a range of up 150 kilometres and an altitude of 27 kilometres. According to a senior officer at the Syria-Russia joint military operations room in Damascus, the mobile S-300 is ready for deployment at various locations across the country. Translated from Arabic language Alrai Media (thanks to the reliable Fort Russ Russian news site), the senior Syrian officer at the operations room is quoted as saying: “Soon Syria will announce that any country using the airspace without coordinating with Damascus will be viewed as hostile and [we] will shoot the jet down without warning. Those willing to fight terrorism and coordinate with the military leadership will be granted safe corridors.” This may seem like a dangerous escalation. American fighter jets have been bombing Syrian territory since September 2014, having carried out thousands of air strikes allegedly against the Islamic State (IS) terror group (also known by its Arabic name Daesh). Since the Paris terror attacks last month, France has stepped up its air strikes in Syria too. In the past week, Britain and Germany parliaments have voted for their air forces to join the other NATO members in aerial operations. The US-led bombing coalition in Syria also includes Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Russia is the only country whose military aircraft are legally deployed in Syria because Moscow has the full consent of the Syrian government. All the others do not have consent from Damascus. So we have at least seven foreign powers deploying their warplanes to bomb Syrian territory – all in violation of international law. It is irrelevant whether the US-led alliance claims to be fighting terrorists, or whether they claim it is in “self-defence” as France, Britain and Germany are. The Germany justice minister Heiko Maas, speaking after the Bundestag voted for military action this week, claimed that the United Nations Security Council resolution passed last month in the wake of the Paris attacks makes the German intervention legal. That UNSC resolution does not specifically sanction military action. In any case, the ultimate legal criterion is the position of the Syrian state authorities. Western governments and their media have done everything to discredit, demonise and delegitimise the Syrian government. That’s part of the US-led criminal enterprise for regime change in Syria. But the fact remains, Syria is a sovereign state fully entitled the legal rights of all other UN members. If the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad – which is the internationally recognised governing authority of Syria and retains its seat at the UN – does not consent to foreign military intervention, then that intervention is illegal, as Moscow and Damascus have repeatedly pointed out. Syria, with the S-300 missile system supplied by its Russian ally, now has the technical means to defend its borders and airspace from all intruders. It also has the legal right to defend the inviolability of its territory. After all, US President Barack Obama invoked this rightwith regard to Turkey after the shoot-down of the Russian Su-24. Obama said Turkey had “every right to protect its skies” (even though the evidence shows that the Russian fighter jet did not breach Turkish territory). In other words: what’s good for Turkey is good for Syria, as for any other nation. Now, some might say it is a reckless move for Syria to train its skies with the powerful S-300. If a US, French, British or German warplane is shot down then that may ignite a full-on war with the American NATO military alliance. Russia would inevitably be dragged into the fight, which could slide into a world war between nuclear powers. But hold on a minute. That logic amounts to the US and its allies using such fear as a weapon to disarm others and to prevent sovereign states from exercising their rights. Such a dynamic is a blank cheque for powers to bully and oppress others. As Russian President Vladimir Putin has said time and again, the issue is one abiding by international law. Without respect for international law then the world resorts to the law of the jungle and barbarism, as Putin said in his recent state of the nation speech. What we have seen in recent years since the US-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2001-2003 is the wholesale erosion of sovereignty. This has involved the overt deployment of military force and the covert use of “asymmetric war”, says American political analyst Randy Martin (who writes at Crookedbough.com). “The use of proxy military force by the US and its NATO allies has been seen in regime-change operations in Libya, Syria and Ukraine, combined with media propaganda campaigns and economic sanctions,” says Martin. “A key strategy here by the Washington-led powers is to erode sovereign rights of designated enemy states.” The deployment of so-called Islamist terror groups to destabilise Syria as with neo-Nazi paramilitaries in Ukraine is all part of the West’s asymmetric warfare. For whatever reason, the US bombing coalition is claiming that it is combating the IS jihadists in Syria. However, the evidence shows that Western “combat” efforts in Syria are very late in coming and not very effective, indicating a lack of commitment to genuinely defeat the terror network. There is also reason to believe that the NATO rush to bomb IS oil smuggling routes in Syria is really motivated by a need to cover up the tracks of Western collusion with the terror groups. The American CIA and British MI6, along with Turk military intelligence, have been implicated in running the terror “rat lines”. Russian intelligence is lifting the lid on this sordid racket. Western air strikes without the approval of the Syrian government are not only illegal, they lack credibility in their stated aim. But either way, the imperative here is that Syria re-establishes its sovereignty and the principles of international law. If Syria is lost, then Western state sponsored banditry and terrorism will only escalate. Russia is already being targeted by the West’s asymmetric warfare, as is Iran and China. Therefore, a line has to be drawn. And with Russia’s military support, Syria has the power to do just that. From now on, NATO warplanes violating Syrian territory should be put on notice. Keep out or get shot down. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Nairaland, and Nigeria Property. http://nigeriaproperty-real..com/2015/12/syria-right-to-hit-nato-warplanes_6.html |
mazeltov:Go and seat down.. I don't answer super zombies, dummies of the 21st century.. Empire of Dundee. Mere Effigy of Super brainwashed Pro-Neocons, Anglozionist empire and Terrorists. |
Spydamannn:You seem not to get the gig.. There won't be a good fight when it comes to nukes.. It will be the end of Both countries.. RUssia .. U.S.A.. Meanwhile, base on landmass.. Russian survival is still possible.. But forget it.. You don't know the power of that Satan.. If you detonate nukes 300-500km away from it, it will not blow it up.. The only thing that could get as near once it passed the launch stage which is just few mins.. Go and learn about the non official Satan missile.. |
mazeltov:That post on the link was 8h ago.. This post above was yesterday. I have told you.. These are posts for highly matured people. Not for kids. When foolishness is your second name and western propaganda is your first name.. You obviously do not know how google Algorithms work. mental slavery is a disease for real. It's sad that a kid like you could even be talking. I have told you several times.. You and you cohorts to grow up and stop being kids... Like I said again.. These are posts for hightly matured people with brains not for brainless crooks like @mazeltov and @vedaxcool
|
Khd95:Well, the same AngloZionist Empire.. Boko haram is a franchise of the same enemy. The Wahabi Saudi Arabia terrorist Organization backed by the Anglozionist empire.. Did anyone remember the role Hilary Clinton played in trying to legitimize Boko haram ? |
The way I see it, it’s neither the Islamic State nor the Assad regime and neither Turkey nor Saudi Arabia, that are primarily responsible for 250,000 Syrian fatalities and millions of refugees; all the aforementioned parties to the civil war are mere pawns that don’t have a choice but to react in self-defense. The Syrian Jihad is the re-enactment of the same old gory and grisly drama that had been staged before in Afghanistan in the ‘80s. The whole cast of this new drama is different though – the Syrian theater of war has taken the place of Afghanistan; Turkey is now playing a similar role of the imperialist collaborator that the Pakistani security establishment used to play during the Afghan Jihad against the erstwhile Soviet Union; the Western-backed supposedly “moderate Syrian militants” have replaced the Afghan “freedom fighters” and the Northern Alliance of Ahmed Shah Massoud and Rashid Dostum; and the Islamic State has emerged as the new bogeyman a la the al-Qaeda and Taliban militants of the Afghan theater of Cold War. Only the lead character in this grisly new drama of Syrian Jihad is still the same – the prime mover behind all the wars and conflicts since Vietnam and Afghanistan to Iraq, Libya and Syria. It’s unfortunate that we don’t learn any lessons from history at all, otherwise the telltale signs are there even for a lay person to acknowledge and draw the parallels. Fighting wars through proxies allows the international power brokers the luxury of taking the plea of “plausible deniability” in their defense and at the same time they can shift all the blame for wrongdoing on the minor regional players like the Islamic State, the Syrian regime, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia et al. The Western powers’ culpability lies in the fact that because of them we cannot build a system of international justice based on sound principles of justice and fair play in which the violators can be punished for wrongdoing and the victims of injustice, tyranny and violence can be protected. The neocolonial powers only pay a lip service to the cause of morality, justice and humanity in the international arena and their foreign policies are solely driven by the motive to protect the Western national interest without any regard for the human suffering in the remote regions of the world. Sometimes it isn’t even about protecting their “national interests,” bear in mind that the Western powers are not true democracies; they are plutocratic-oligarchies catering to the needs of their business interests that wield a disproportionate influence in the governmental decision-making and the formulation of public policy. Thus, the real core of “Western national interests” is mainly comprised of the Western corporate interests. Notwithstanding, back in the ‘80s the Afghan “freedom fighters” did not spring up spontaneously out of nowhere, some powers financed, trained, armed and internationally legitimized those militants; how else such ragtag militants could have beaten back the super power of yore? One of the party involved in training and arming the Afghan “Mujahideen” was the Pakistani security establishment, which was the other? Then in 2011 in the wake of the “Arab Spring” in Libya that same “hidden hand” once again financed, trained, armed and internationally legitimized the Libyan militants by calling them pro-democracy, “armed” activists against the supposedly “brutal and tyrannical” anticolonial Qaddafi regime. Similarly, in Syria those same powers once again had the audacity to finance, train, arm and internationally legitimize the Syrian militants; how else could peaceful and democratic protests have mutated into a full-blown armed insurrection? And even if those protests did mutate into an armed rebellion, left to their own resources the best such civilian protestors could have mustered was to get a few pistols, shotguns and rifles; where did they get all those machine gun-mounted pick-up trucks, rocket-propelled grenades and the US-made TOW antitank missiles? You don’t have to be a rocket scientist or a military strategist to understand a simple fact that unarmed civilian population and even the ragtag militant outfits lack the wherewithal to fight against the organized and professional armed forces of a country equipped with artillery, armored vehicles, battle tanks and air force. Once again, one of the party involved in financing, training and arming the Syrian militants was a few regional players, which was the other? The common denominator in all those conflict zones like Afghanistan, Libya and Syria that are separated by a distance of thousands of kilometers and fall in different geographical regions is only one that pretends to be too powerless and handicapped to be of much help to the millions of Afghan and Syrian refugees and hundreds of thousands of Afghan, Iraqi and Syrian dead. Especially, pertaining to conferring international legitimacy to an armed insurgency, like the Afghan “freedom struggle” of the yore or the so-called “moderate” Libyan and Syrian insurgencies of today, it is simply beyond the power of minor regional players and their nascent media with geographically and linguistically limited audience to cast such armed and brutal insurrections in a positive light in order to internationally legitimize them; only the Western mainstream media that has a global audience and which serves as the mouthpiece of the Western political establishments has perfected this game of legitimizing the absurd and selling the satans as saviors. - See more at: http://nigeriaproperty-real..com/2015/12/the-method-behind-madness-in-syria.html#sthash.8L0RFAy7.dpuf |
vedaxcool:Ode, super zombie.. when super propgandized zombie talks, it's always written in its forehead. Your zombiezism is really upgrading by the day. The Empire's strike is the same with what happened in Afghan.. Now check how Putin the grand chess master will checkmate these miscreants, terrorists.. Meanwhile Obama is the leader of the terrorist.. One rule to the game is... Don't use the same technique twice.. They failed trying to isolate Russia( by using the same techique).. They will fail this time around as well.. Once beating twice shy.. For those interested in how this is related to the Afghan.. Please read The method behind the madness in Syria http://nigeriaproperty-real..com/2015/12/the-method-behind-madness-in-syria.html See how the empire is falling big time.. It's sad. |
OutThere:Please tell anglozionist empire's toilet trolls, super zombies (like Fela's song) that consumes propaganda 3 square meals everyday. The likes of @mazeltov , @vedaxcool .. zombie oh zombie.. Zombie no go die unless toba darugbo zombie.. Fela lines.. Truth usually hurt the empire of lies. This is the reality today as analysed.. Russia is 2.7 times bigger (by Land-mas) than U.S.. It can survive first strike and even second strike.. Can U.S survive retaliatory strike ? Russia will never strike first. U.S is twice bigger than Russia (by population).. Again this post is not for kids like mazeltov , vedaxcool ... |
by Rakesh Krishnan Simha source: The Russia India report In June 2014, the Pentagon conducted a “table top” exercise – a sort of war game between Russia and NATO. The scenario was Russian pressure on NATO member Estonia and Latvia. Would NATO be able to defend those countries? “The results were dispiriting,” Julia Ioffe writes in Foreign Policy. Even if all US and NATO troops stationed in Europe were dispatched to the Baltics – including the 82nd Airborne, which is supposed to be ready to go on 24 hours’ notice – the US would lose. “We just don’t have those forces in Europe,” explains a senior US general. “Then there’s the fact that the Russians have the world’s best surface-to-air missiles and are not afraid to use heavy artillery.” The Russian ‘victory’ was not a one-off. The Americans conducted the exercise as many as 16 times, under various scenarios, all favourable to NATO, always with the same conclusion. The Russians were simply invincible. In this backdrop, Turkey’s rash act of shooting down a Russian Air Force jet portends grave tidings for NATO. Because Turkey is a NATO member, if the Russian Air Force pounds the living daylight out of the Turks, at least in theory all the other members of the US-led military bloc are treaty-bound to come to its defence. Although the chances that the Americans will risk New York for Istanbul are smaller than small – which leaves a very nervous Turkey on its own – one can never rule out the possibility of a NATO hothead wanting to attack Russia. A nuclear exchange will undoubtedly have catastrophic consequences for both sides – and perhaps the entire planet – but there are certain factors that could skew the fighting field in Russia’s favour. Megaton capability According to data exchanged on October 1, 2014 by Moscow and Washington, Russia has 1,643 deployed strategic warheads, compared with 1,642 for the US. Marginal difference in numbers but Russian land-based strategic forces have an explosive yield that is an order of magnitude greater than anything in the US armoury. Moscow’s primary deterrent weapon is the mighty SS-18, a single one of which can destroy an area the size of New York – the state, not just the city. To get an idea of the destructive power of the SS-18, just look at the nuclear weapon the US used to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Hiroshima bomb was a primitive 15 kiloton warhead and yet it wiped out a city of 70,000 in a few seconds. The SS-18 – code named Satan by NATO – carries 10 warheads, each having a yield of 750 to 1000 kiloton). Some of these missiles carry a single 20,000 kiloton warhead – that’s 1333 times Hiroshima. At the same time, 80 per cent of the American population resides on the eastern and western seaboards, so a few well-aimed nuclear missiles can end all human life in these densely populated coastal strips. Russia has a population only half of the US but it’s dispersed widely across the country’s massive landmass so that pockets of human inhabitation can survive both a first as well as a second strike. Russia has another trump card up its sleeve – its supersonic bomber fleet of Tupolev Tu-160s. These Mach 2 plus aircraft can take off from well-defended airbases located deep in the heart of Russia, fly over the North Pole, launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from safe standoff distances over the Atlantic, and return home to watch the destruction on CNN. That’s assuming CNN will be around. For, the Russian strategic bomber fleet can singlehandedly wipe out every major city in the US. It is because the Americans know the capability of Russia’s nuclear forces that they have tried hard to eliminate the doomsday weapons like the SS-18 through arms limitation talks. Tactical warheads Before the use of strategic weapons, Russia could cripple forward NATO bases with tactical – or battlefield – nukes. Russian military doctrine emphasises the use of small-yield nuclear weapons as a war fighting tool early on in a conflict in order to stun and confuse NATO forces, impacting their ability to think and act coherently. After tactical nuclear artillery decimates forward deployed NATO military troops, Russia could deliver small-yield warheads via intermediate range missiles that could devastate the next line of military bases, while limiting civilian casualties. At this point the US would be faced with the option of retaliating with strategic weapons and face a devastating response from Moscow. A good guess is the option won’t be used. For, no American president would risk a single US city for a dozen European ones. John F. Kennedy didn’t risk it in 1962 for the same reason – the loss of even one city was too many. State of US strategic forces How reliable is the US Strategic Nuclear Command? If you are an American, you won’t feel so reassured after reading that Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton both “reportedly lost the launch code cards that presidents are expected to have on them at all times – Clinton for months, according to a former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. Carter allegedly sent his out with a suit to the cleaners”. In any conflict – more so in a high stakes nuclear standoff – morale, training and discipline are key factors. Russian officers who have the job of deciding when and where to aim their nuclear missiles include PhD holders who are required to think on their feet. On the other hand, American personnel who have the same role are beset with alcoholism, depression and cheating. Nothing can sugar coat the crisis plaguing the US strategic forces. In October 2013, Major General Michael Carey, responsible for the command of 450 nuclear missiles, was fired after drunken behaviour on a visit to Russia. Days earlier, another military officer, Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, with high-level responsibility for the country’s nuclear arsenal, was relieved of his duties after he was caught using counterfeit gambling chips at an Iowa casino. Think that’s frightening? Check this out. A US Air Force general who supported the command mission to provide nuclear forces for the US Strategic Command was an alcoholic. General David C. Uhrich kept a vodka bottle in his desk and repeatedly drank on duty, so much so that another officer told investigators that “if he did not have his alcohol, the wheels would come off”. The rot has trickled down to US missileers who have a culture of cheating on competency tests, endangering the readiness off American ICBMs. Again, in February 2014, the US Navy revealed it was looking into allegations that enlisted sailors cheated on tests involving the nuclear reactors that power its submarines and aircraft carriers. The US strategic forces are also suffering from systemic neglect, with its ICBM bases in North Dakota and Montana reporting “leaking roofs”. The missileers, who work in blast-proof bunkers located 60 feet underground, are forced to defecate in buckets and urinate in jugs, and bring it all back up at the end of 24 hours. How ready these personnel will be when they have to react to a Russian missile strike is questionable. On the other hand, Russian Strategic Forces are treated as the very elites in the military. The quality of Russian personnel can be deduced from the actions of Russian strategic forces officer Lt Colonel Stanislav Petrov. On September 26, 1983, a Russian early-warning satellite indicated five US nuclear missile launches. Tensions were high between Washington and Moscow after the downing of a South Korean airliner weeks earlier, and Petrov had only minutes to respond. With little additional information to go on, he deemed the readings a false alarm, reasoning that “when people start a war, they don’t start it with only five missiles”. This is precisely why highly qualified personnel matter. When you’re placed squarely in the cross hairs of the enemy’s nuclear missiles and you’re holed up in a bunker 60 feet below the earth’s surface, then nervousness, insomnia and depression are part of your daily life. Unable to cope, less educated personnel will abuse alcohol and drugs and even exhibit criminal behaviour. On the other hand, educated and motivated officers will keep their cool even in the event of a thermonuclear showdown. For, a nuclear war may not necessarily involve a quick exchange of ballistic missiles. According to War Scare: Russia and America on the Nuclear Brink, by Peter Vincent Pry, Director of the US Nuclear Strategy Forum, the Russian Strategic Forces are trained to “launch pre-emptive or retaliatory nuclear strikes, survive a hammer blow from a massive enemy nuclear attack, launch follow-on nuclear strikes, and supervise military operations in a protracted nuclear war, expected to last weeks or months”. In such a drawn out, harrowing scenario, Russia’s nuclear warfare specialists clearly have the edge. Reflexive Control: Ultimate Weapon Disinformation, camouflage and stratagem are some of the ways one can influence the outcome of a war. The Russians have taken these ancient arts to another level through the use of the theory of Reflexive Control (RC). Developed by Russian military strategists in the 1960s, RC aims to convey information to an opponent that would influence them to voluntarily make a decision desired by the initiator of the action. It can be used against either human or computer-based decision-making processors. Russia employs it not only at the strategic and tactical levels in war but also in the geopolitical sphere. Russian Army Major General M.D. Ionov was among the early proponents of RC, having pursued it since the 1970s. In an article in 1995, he noted that the objective of reflexive control is to force an enemy into making decisions that lead to his defeat by influencing or controlling his decision-making process. Ionov considers this a form of high art founded of necessity on an intimate knowledge of human thinking and psychology, military history, the roots of the particular conflict, and the capabilities of competing combat assets. Timothy L. Thomas writes in the Journal of Slavic Studies: “In a war in which reflexive control is being employed, the side with the highest degree of reflex (the side best able to imitate the other side’s thoughts or predict its behaviour) will have the best chances of winning. The degree of reflex depends on many factors, the most important of which are analytical capability, general erudition and experience, and the scope of knowledge about the enemy.” If successfully achieved, reflexive control over the enemy makes it possible to influence their combat plans, their view of the situation, and how they fight. RC methods are varied and include camouflage (at all levels), disinformation, encouragement, blackmail by force, and the compromising of various officials and officers. According to Robert C. Rasmussen of the Center for International Maritime Security, “It is exactly this type of application of Reflexive Control that a young Vladimir Putin would have learned in his early development at the 401st KGB School and in his career as a KGB/FSB officer.” Because every battle is first fought in the head before a bullet is fired on the ground, Russia’s long experience with RC would be a key factor in its existential struggle with the US. |
A gold-backed ruble and gold-backed yuan could start a 'snowball exit' from dollar F. William Engdahl notes, adding that it will diminish America's ability to use the reserve dollar role to finance Washington's perpetual overseas wars. [img]http://3.bp..com/-9J3xG0DFqw8/VmMw2xTSaiI/AAAAAAAAqco/H8eTeMEo9ts/s640/gold.jpg[/img] The irony of the situation is that the central banks of China, Russia, Brazil and other countries "diametrically opposed" to US foreign policy course are forced to stockpile dollars in the form of "safe" US Treasury debt in order to protect their economies, American-German researcher, historian and strategic risk consultant F. William Engdahl stresses. The truth of the matter is that the role of the US dollar as the world's major reserve currency is the countries' economic Achilles Heel, the strategic risk consultant elaborates. At the same time, by buying US Treasury debt in dollars, they are de facto financing Washington's "endless" overseas military operations. Fortunately, "[t]hat's quietly changing. In 2014 Russia and China signed two mammoth 30-year contracts for Russian gas to China. The contracts specified that the exchange would be done in Renminbi [yuan] and Russian rubles, not in dollars. That was the beginning of an accelerating process of de-dollarization that is underway today," Engdahl writes in his article for New Eastern Outlook. The researcher points out that on November 27 Russia's Central Bank reported that it has included the Chinese Renminbi (yuan) into its official reserves for the first time. Furthermore, in August 2015 Russian currency traders bought almost 18 billion yuan and only 3 billion US dollars. It is obvious that Russia is gradually increasing the use of the yuan in Russian financial markets, substituting it for the US dollar. "But the actions of Russia and China to replace the dollar as mediating currency in their mutual trade, a trade whose volume has grown significantly since US and EU sanctions in March 2014, are not the end of it," the researcher remarks. According to Engdahl, there are clear signs showing that gold "is about to make dramatic return to the world monetary stage." And it's not all good news for Washington. While it is believed that the US Federal Reserve holds about 8,133 tons of gold, the rumors circulated that things are not what they seem and "the gold chamber of Fort Knox" are nearly empty, Engdahl narrates. Adding more fuel to the fire are doubts surrounding US' official gold statistics, a strange event occurred in 2012. "In 2012 the German Government asked the Federal Reserve to return German central bank gold 'held in custody' for the Bundesbank by the Fed. Shocking the world, the US central bank refused to give Germany her gold back, using the flimsy excuse that the Federal Reserve 'could not differentiate German gold bars from US ones…' Perhaps we are to believe the auditors of US Federal Reserve gold were laid off in the US budget cuts?" the researcher asks. Engdahl remarks, that Germany is considered the second-largest gold holder with its reserves of 3381 tons of golden ingots. Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing are boosting their gold holdings steadily. Engdahl emphasizes that from January 2013 Russia's official gold reserves increased by 129 percent to 1352 tons as of September 30, 2015, adding that during "the dark Yeltsin years" of the 1990s Russia's golden vaults contain only 343 tons. "Russia now holds as many ounces of gold as the gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do," he stresses. According to the researcher, Russia and China are decisively paving the way for the world economy de-dollarization. "A Russian-Chinese alternative to the dollar in the form of a gold-backed ruble and gold-backed Renminbi or yuan, could start a snowball exit from the US dollar, and with it, a severe decline in America's ability to use the reserve dollar role to finance her wars with other peoples' money," Engdahl concludes. |
KingMEXX:If you check my previous messages you will get it right... It's known as Military know how.. Mind you what even makes this one sweeter is, the information center is in Baghdad. A big blow again to the crooks(AngloZionist Empire) that are sponsoring the crooks in the first place.. And Yes, they are related and this one is even more deadlier. And I listed it in my previous comments . Again, always giving them new names and re-branding is Western media game. They are known as Wahhabi saudi arabia terrorist organization.. After Russia left Afghan, they probably think they could invade Russians at home.. They are obviously the same people Russia defeated during the Russian Chechnya war.. They are the same Alqeada, the same ISIL, the same crooks but changing names and re-branding.. The same franchise you see in North Africa.. The same Franchise Bokoharam.. ( Again who gave Boko haram that name bokoharam ?- The media and here they gave name to convince or block your brains from knowing the real sponsors.. Western education is forbidden meanwhile they are the real western sponsored. But normal human brain, when you hear Western education if forbidden, you will immediately forget any option that they could actually be sponsoring this outlawed miscreants. The truth is, Bokoharam is a franchise of Wahabi Saudi Arabia western backed terrorist organization. This is what they call 4th generation warfare. Well, I don't even know why some Nigerians are supporting these terrorists. It seems we have all lost it finally. It's sad. If you want to know even about the Afghan. There are obviously a lot of theories flying everywhere. Some even say it was the Stinger U.S gave them that scare the Russians away. While some said, the Russians later got to know that they were dragged into it by the U.S just to give them back example of Vietnam war.. So the main reason the Russians left, I can't say but best known to them.. Mind you Soviet union Broke into parts without major wars. Since then Russian military has been built to extend power from its boarder without travelling long and it's the reason they have more cruise missiles against those extremely expensive carriers and frigates. For the first time since it left Afghan, you see Russia first time in history of human being, extended power 1500km off boarders to hit terrorist targets.. Nah, give it up to them. Check the facts on ground, many territories have been taken back from the outlawed western-Qatari-Saudi-Arabia-Turkey-Israel sponsored, backed and trained terrorists in Syria. How many Russian combat losses ? ZERO How many Israel combat loses when it did the some thing in Hezbollah ? Now which one is bigger and deadlier ? I know you are an AngloZionist empire's sympathizer but hold on. Apply common sense. I am not really pro Russian per say but pro facts.. Despite the fact that I like Putin as a Personality because he's got normal human brains and nothing compared to those r(e)tarded sub-human neocons in U.S. |
KingMEXX:I used Super-humans on military terms. I already answered you. You said Ruskie rascals, well, I have some of them as friends, you are right some of them are really Abgero, rugged to the call. I don't even know the difference between some Ibadan Abgero and Some Russian Agberos. Now you want to compare that to butter NATO forces ? Or even Israel forces ? Again, on military terms, they are super-humans.. Meaning they deserve to be called the best instead of the western pure propaganda about Israeli forces |
vedaxcool:WHen Foolishness upgrades to another level. Stupidity is the order of the day. Another super zombie, always far away from reality. Dead brain-cells working against itself. No one needs to even smack a nail in the head cos its head is no better than a dead body's head. AngloZionist Permanent mental Slave bastard. Your foolishness is real, it passes through the focus of your image, it blocks your mental organs and this is the reason you have permanent mental slavery brain cells. A mental disorderliness, disease that is curable with facts on ground but no, this slave born by mistake has sold out its mental organ. If not, Nature could have even told him/her what right from wrong.. But a brain that is blocked forever. Neocons like brain. I shake head for you. May Ifa show you the way. Slave bastard |
KingMEXX:I did not shift it. I was not even interested in the topic but I replied the Notion in my first comment that one kid mazeltov overrating Israel and his cohorts @ValerianSteel, saying its air-force has the best in the world. ValerianSteel:That is exactly what I countered with facts on ground. When is comes to war, yes again a standing ovation to the Russians and that is what I meant by super-humans here and that they deserve to be called the best. |
mazeltov:I said it, when Ode talk you will know by foolish long meaningless unreasonable sentences... Usually typing crap.. Now common sense will not tell you that.. To compare wars or proxy wars.. 1) You can only compare Israel- Hezbolar war fighting outside Israel territory To the same Russian fighting the same war outside Russian territory.... Here territory is what is common with the two and the only judging similarities. Again outside Russian territory... Outside Israel axis.. 2) What Israel termed back then as terrorist - Hezbolar What Russia termed as Terrorist - ISIL,DEASH,RebeLS Now use your dead brain-cells to check the facts bellow. [img]http://4.bp..com/-BiNo_uL6Xpc/VkKJGy9edPI/AAAAAAAAnNQ/HEDgT06FKPQ/s1600/rus.JPG[/img] I have told you, there is no common sense on your dead brain cells. No common sense. For comparing fighting on Russian territory to Israel fighting outside.. Again, you know nothing about military and you should stop typing again. Pls grow up. |
mazeltov:Kid stop typing garbage. I have told you several times. I don't usually answer kids that copy and paste from wiki. I told you this is not playing with video games keyboard. You should be playing with xbox. Cos your brain is dead. You have not grown up yet. Your brain is dead, super brainwashed. And for you info, nobody ever said Russia never lost any war. Grow up kid. |
[s] mazeltov:[/s] After all your crap is said and done. Russia purged the miscreants away from Russia and that is the end result the reality on ground. They never stopped until the end and the end result is chechynia republic is Russian territory today. And yes the terrorists were annihilated. So you are dealing with victors of a proxy war in south Caucasus Russia. That is the reality on ground. The terrorist were killed and Russia won the war. By the way, facts are on ground that dealing with the same situation without diverting the topic to something else.. Conclusion.. Super humans when it comes to military capabilities know how and so on.. A stand-up ovation to the Russians. Facts are on ground as we speak. The similar occasion is fighting in a territory that is not yours. You should obviously expect a defeat. When you compare Israel military again to Russia ( are you insane self ?) My point is still very valid. When you compare the same situation to Israel attacking Hezbollah. There is huge margin .. In this case, your western propaganda about Israel is just what it is. Those who deserve to be called the best,super human are the Russians. |
ValerianSteel:lol.. they say head you say forehead..lol.. Russia is not fighting the war of the same weight.. Check the chart again.. over 200,000 enemy compared to just 1000 tier 1 Hezbollah fighters back in the day.. you must be day dreaming.. Russian airstrikes is backed by Syrian Army ground troops, Hezbollah forces and Iranian army coalition .. Now that is the strategy. Iranian army and Hezbollah has long been fighting the Anglozionist sponsored terrorists in Syria.. The only thing that was missing in the formation was the Air-force and on several occasions has Israel invaded Syrian airspace using Airforce, usually on where they are gaining grounds against Israel sponsored terrorists .. Now that is not possible.. The military formation backed by Russian airforce is taking back territories.. That's the reality on ground.. Again check Russian Air-force combat loses.. Big zero.. So what are you saying ?? Now that's military know how.. Not just cyber ratting that we are the best, we are the best.. These are facts on ground.. Check it again.. There is no way you can twist it one bit..It's opened to the naked eyes |
vedaxcool:For your foolish information.. Hezbollah (Israel's nightmare in the middle east) is a National(Lebanon) resistance force termed by Israel and its brainwashed Africans, mostly Christians (AngloZionist future puppets) as terrorist. In my Diary, or normal human being sense, they are National Guards or National resistance forces. Israel bullying Palestinians and the rest in middle east will definitely meet a resistance force as such in any scenario. What ever your stupidity at maximum level could say about Russian-Syrian-Iranian-Hezbollah relation is just out of the box. Cos these are the real resistance forces against the oppressor, the bullies in the middle east. Ode 101 |
KingMEXX:The chart is based on what both countries termed as terrorists. Obviously, Israel termed hezbola as terrorist the same way Russia termed those that takes arms against Assad. The chart is related in both scenario. Meanwhile when Russia used its full military hardware in the Chechnya proxy (Terrorist war).. it was total annihilation. I did not reply to Iran having military capabilities better than Israel or vice versa. I underscored the Notion, or Pure western Propaganda and it's sad, when Propaganda is too much, even the country(Israel) starts believing in its own Propaganda. But the reality is on ground. I replied to the Western Propagandist Notion that Israel Military or Air-force is next to none. Obviously, that's pure propaganda. Russia is obviously the super humans here base on facts on ground. |
ValerianSteel:Proximity of combat engagement is part of the super human Russian know how and for the most part Russian military capabilities which can't be added to the list above because in the end, how to check who's more super human will be determined by combat losses in a full fledged military engagement. Russian combat loses is Zero. Now let go back to the days Russia dealt a big blow to Saudi Arabia western backed terrorist, proxy forces that invaded Chechnya. It was total annihilation. This is the time Russia used its full military capabilities to purge away the miscreants, outlawed terrorist that killed Kadyrov's father, the present leader of the Chechnyan Islamic Russian republic. So please, i have said this before again and again. Being super glued to the western propagandist media is a deep disease in any average Nigerian Brain. These are facts on the ground.. |
ValerianSteel:let me quickly correct you base on over rating Israel forces here as pure propaganda of the west. [img]http://4.bp..com/-BiNo_uL6Xpc/VkKJGy9edPI/AAAAAAAAnNQ/HEDgT06FKPQ/s1600/rus.JPG[/img] I will never repeat this enough: the Russian military forces is a small one. Yes, they are flying an impressive amount of sorties every day (anywhere between 50 to 80). But let’s compare that to the Israeli air force effort during the war against Hezbollah in 2006 when the Israelis flew 400 (four hundred) sorties every day. Add to this the massive Israeli artillery barrage and even attacks from the Israeli Navy. Finally, let’s remember that Israel was not fighting all of Hezbollah at all, but only 2nd tier Hezbollah forces south of the Litani River totaling less than 1000 fighters (Hezbollah kept all the best trained forces north of the Litani River). So let’s compare the two operations: Keep in mind that the AngloZionist propaganda always presents the Israeli military in general and the Israeli Air Force in particular as some kind of quasi-invincible super-force of uber-trained heroes who are the best of the best. One quick look at the chart above tells you who the real super heroes are in reality. But my main point is not to ridicule the Israelis but to point out the huge difference in size between the two forces and to ask a simple question: if a huge Israeli force could not defeat about 1’000 2nd tier Hezbollah fighters, what could the small Russian force realistically achieve? This, really, is THE key question. And, the answer, is quite obvious: the Russian force was never sent to Syria to defeat Daesh or even change the course of the civil war. The real goal of the Russian interventions were very limited in purely military terms. Now this goes back to the same thing we have argued in the past. Propaganda.. By the statistic above, those who deserve to be called super humans are the Russians.. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2gh0Zerw2s According to |
.. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F65SsJEE3nk The Syrian Army and the National Defense Forces, supported by Russian air strikes, managed to drive ISIS out of a long section of the strategic Aleppo-Raqqa highway in the northern part of Syria. According to the field reports, the Syrian troops’ offensive forced the terrorists to retreat and suffer large casualties in the fighting. The clashes followed the Syrian Arab Army’s last week assault on the ISIS positions at the Siyasko Chemical Factory’s western and eastern perimeters. The Syrian Arab Army(SAA) is continuing to advance towards the Turkish border in northern Latakia. The pro-government forces capitalized the Russian air support freeing the villages of ‘Arafat, Rwaysat Al-Sheikhou and Katf Al-Salat captured by Al-Nusra militants three months ago. The goal of the military operation is to take control of the border with Turkey and to secure the Latakia-Idlib axis. The SAA, Hezbollah and the National Defense Forces (NDF) are advancing in the Aleppo province after capturing the village of ‘Aqulah over the weekend. The Syrian forces launched an assault on the ISIS positions at the Rasm Al-‘Abid Grain Silos and reportedly killed about 15 militants and destroyed 3 armored vehicles. Following the clashes with ISIS, the SAA and its allies imposed full control over the Rasm Al-‘Abid Grain Silos expanding a buffer zone at the southern perimeter of the Kuweires Military Airport and the Aleppo-Raqqa Highway. Russia is also reportedly preparing to deploy fixed-wing aircraft and about 1,000 troops to the government-controlled Shayrat Airbase in Homs Province. According to some reports, the force of guards and military engineers has already been deployed there. If it’s true, this step will significantly help to the Syrian forces’ ongoing offensive to recapture the ISIS-controlled city of Palmyra. SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence remembers France agreed to coordinate airstrikes with Russia against ISIS and share information on the disposition of armed groups in Syria. On December 1, the German cabinet backed plans for military support in the fight against ISIS militants in Syria. Tornado reconnaissance aircraft, a naval frigate and a 1,200-strong force will be sent to the region under the proposals. Germany has an agreement with France to share information on the disposition of armed groups in Syria. Thus, Russia-France-Germany trilateral cooperation in the intelligence sharing on the Syrian crisis could be described as existent. International Military Review 03.12.2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoQ9pW18Bm0 On December 1, the Free Syrian Army’s central command agree to a permanent ceasefire and evacuation for the remaining rebels inside of Al-Wa’er with the Governor of Homs – Talal Al-Barazi. The evacuation includes two phases: • 1st is to allow humanitarian aid to any remaining civilians living inside the district • 2nd is the transportation of the 600 rebel fighters from Al-Wa’er to the Idlib Governorate. The plan is supposed to take about two months. After this, the Syrian Government will be in full control of the city of Homs. The agreement has become possible due to a strategic initiative taken by the pro-government forces after the start of the Russian military operations in Syria. Earlier, SouthFront: Analysis & Intelligence has noted that despite the terrorists’ counter-attacks, the Syrian Arab Army and its allies supported by the Russian warplanes, intelligence assistance and material support has a significant edge in a fire power and the command. ISIS claimed control of al-Kafrah in a statement and are moving towards Azaz. If ISIS takes Azaz it will extend the ISIS control of bordering areas which allows greater access to smuggling routes for potential recruits and arms. It will also break the Army of Conquest military operations room, which includes Al Nusra, supply routes to the Aleppo city. The Russian Ministry of Defense has presented evidences of the Turkish involvement in the ISIS oil business. It includes photos and videos of oil delivery convoys passing the border between Syria and Turkey and information about the routes of oil smuggling from Syria and Iraq to Turkey. There are three main oil routes: 1.The western route leads to the Turkish ports in the Mediterranean 2.The northern — to Patma oil refinery 3.The eastern — to Dzhazri transfer point The town of Dier ez-Zor is one of the largest centers of oil extraction. The delivery route runs from Eastern Syria to the Batman refinery in Turkey. The size of the illegal oil trade is impressive. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said he’ll resign if Moscow can prove the Turkish participation in ISIS oil trade. Here it’s. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 50 pages)
