₦airaland Forum

SirHouloo:
Nice write up, but how will this stop our politicians' high affinity for corruption. I assume most of the millionaires you mentioned got their wealth through conversion of public possessions to personal ownership.

itskinglee:
Will read this when buhari pays me my5k


Old tho

mazeltov:
laughs!!! lwkmd!! Is the the best you could give or you just want to say toodle-oo? Honestly, uprooting your ignorance is the most interesting thing I have ever done. You keep disconcerting my points because your brain has been ensconced with daftness and idiocy!!
Lolzz, Yes it was copied and that's why it was bolded.
I was expecting top-of-the-range rejoinder from you to dispute my claims - buh you keep twiddling my topnotch facts with disparaging baloney.
Son, as you can see, my argument was based on facts and not mere hypothetical beliefs which some green horns are feeding you so I'm not here to brandish hoopla or puffery, I only want to re-strategise your scrawny psyche and attentute your inanity about military hardwares and since you brought up U-2 plane issue, I will glady render few tutelage to you, probablly that would uncluttered your brainpan.
The U-2 is a jet-powered reconnaissance aircraft specially designed to fly at high altitudes of 70,000 ft approximately 21 km and It was used during the late 1950s to overfly the Soviet Union, China, the Middle East, and
Cuba - flights over the Soviet Union. The primary mission for which the plane was designed, ended in 1960 when a U-2 flown
by CIA pilot Gary Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union. This event was a major political embarrassment for the U.S. A
redesigned version of the U-2, the U-2R, was used from the late 1960s through the 1990s. The U-2R was used extensively during the Gulf War of 1991 -
Due to the magnanimity of your witlessness and lack of foresight, you brought such example to engage my point.
Now listen/read, S-400 uses different types of missile and its longest firing range is 400km for 40N6 missiles.- it uses radar homing to intercept air target at great distance but can't exceed it celing range of 400-km against AWACS [Airborne military surveillance system], J-STARs[Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System]
F-22 on the other hand is a sustained supersonic aircraft which can efficiently use afterburner [device for increasing jet's thrust] ''Reheat''.
Yes F-22 uses more fuel to travel at the same distance because supercruising needs more fuel. Later, there was need to increase its combat radius so F-22 nautical miles was reduced from 600-nautical mile (1,110km) to 450-nautical mile (830 km) while supercrusing at high altitude with stand off.
Even if S-400 whose radar range is 600km can see F-22 flying above, can it fire a missile that can engage a jet flying above 400km? Yes, any F-22 flying below aeronautical range of 400km can be shot down by SAM.
Once again, I would be glad to render tuition to you always!!

mazeltov:
it's too early to start lecturing Scully95 and his cohorts against the little time but I will do it as a charity work to extricate your resounding ignorance. From the inception of this conversation, you have been externalizing different sides and sizes of never-ending stupidity. With the fact that I have been posting numerous guidelines which are grounded on facts - you have never for once assail them with constructive criticism. Well, I will be glad to tutor you again.
First, what is electronic jamming?
[b]Electronic jamming is a form of electronic warfare where jammers radiate interfering signals toward an enemy's radar, blocking the receiver with highly concentrated
energy signals. The two main technique styles are noise echniques and repeater techniques. The three types of noise jamming are spot, sweep, and barrage. Spot jamming occurs when a jammer focuses all of its power on a single frequency and this would severely degrade the ability to track on the jammed frequency, a frequency agile radar would hardly be affected because the jammer can only jam one frequency. While multiple
jammers could possibly jam a range of frequencies, this would consume a great deal of resources to have any effect on a frequency-agile radar, and would probably
still be ineffective. Sweep jamming is when a jammer's full
power is shifted from one frequency to another. While this has the advantage of being able to jam multiple frequencies in
quick succession, it does not affect them all at the same time, and thus limits the effectiveness of this type of jamming.
Although, depending on the error
checking in the device(s) this can render a wide range of devices effectively useless.
Barrage jamming is the jamming of multiple frequencies at once by a single jammer. The advantage is that multiple frequencies can be jammed simultaneously; however, the jamming effect can be limited because this requires the jammer to spread its full power between these frequencies, as the number of frequencies covered increases
the less effectively each is jammed. Base jamming is a new type of Barrage Jamming.[/b]
However, jamming a weapon is not and can never be permanent and ability to jam a weapon depends on the SEAD [Supression of Enemy Air Defence] of the system. This trait allows a missile/weapon to lock on to a unit frequency with the Radar and it's guided as long as the radar weapon is active.
Russian KRET/ Richag-AV uses DFRM [Digital Radio Frequency Memory] and Sonar jamming [an echolation to radar system which are susceptible to echolation when non target interfere with target echoes] technology capable of jamming enemies's radar signals but this also depends on the countermeasure communication sysyem of the receiving radar signal and apart from Mechanical jamming, all jamming weapons uses the same electromagnetic radio frequency energy to knock out transmission so the battle depends Ability to jam weapons and Ability to Resist jammimg -
For example: United state's military satellite has Ultra High Frequency of 300 Mhz to 3 GHz frequency range which is an array of geosynchronous satellite that will provide narrowband connectivity for communication. It 's not just a single satellite but array of satellites but their disadvantage is high altitude of radio signal.
Even If United state tells you that it has a weapon capable of jamming another weapon, your sense should tell you that it depends on the enemies' RAD countermeasure.
Now over to S-400 - [b]uses AESA which is [Active Electronically Scanned Array] known as active phased array radar which is transceiver. It contains numerous small solid state modules which emits separete radio waves from each module that interfers at certain angles in front antenna. In fact this would allow spreading of signals emission across a band of frequencies which makes it difficult to detect over background noise and allow ship or even aircraft to broadcast powerful radar signals while remaining stealthy. PLEASE NOTE: The weight of the fielded missile depends on the aerodynamic range, for example, 400km is 40N6missile while 250km is 48N6missile.
F22 on the other hand is equipped with Synthetic Aperture Radar for mapping out any radio emitter and direction finding..
And don't forget that Russian S-400 emits radio waves modules- this implies that F22 can clearly see any S-400 and vice versa, and who will get the first look? Dove vision is the clue. One who is above sees clearlly than one sitting duck on ground. With help of APG-77, an advanced Infra Red Search and Track [AIRST] sensor, JSTARS and AWACS [Air borne Warning Control System] combined with AGM-88 HARM missile which is an air-to-surface [anti radiation missile] designed to home-in on electronic transmission coming from any SAM system.
It's a misplaced ignoranced laced with foolhardiness to think that 5th generation jets like F22 or Russian Tu-150 can't operate in Integrated air defence. Please, don't be fooled.

mazeltov:
I cancle'd it because you argu like a kid and that statement relays the deepness of your igonrance. Nobody wins a nuclear war- it's only destruction
If Russia can win nuclear war, they would have wiped out America ever since, if America can also win nuclear war, they would have wiped out Russia since
All of your comment on nairaland shows that you only read few Russian military bronchures and then you wiil run on social media and brandish your usual subterfuge to the innocent minds and to think that you've known every thing.
Again, anyone who has been involved with tactical planning knows how it's cute ti throw away comments like yours. Saying Russian IADs can neutralise fifth generation jets is just a plain tosh and demonstrates lack of understanding.
Firstly, ICBM response to F22 is strategic and the question is about Air Attack against Air Defense with S-400 and Pantsir series.
It's just so stupid to think that [b]fifth generation fighter jet such as American F-22 jet or Russian Tu-150 jet cannot evade air defence.
These are jets Which can supercruise and also have JDAM [joint Direct Attack Munition]- surely F-22A will be able to attack S-400 at the range of atleast 44 to 60 km.
2. With the help of supercruise and JDAM - ER / SDB, F-22A will be able to attack S-300 / S-400 at the range of 100 to 150 km+ and also in possession of SMACM, F-22A will be able to attack S-300 / S-400 at the range of 322 to 463 km.
There are point defense deals like Tor and Buk available but they will have to be 100% accurate as even 1 missile/bomb gets through, the damage is done to that battery of S300/S400.
Yet these S-400 has never been tested against F22 but with their specs, one could easily say F22 can invade any integrated air defence.
Like I said, S-400 only posses threat to fourth generation jets.
It's also stupid to think that modern SAM IADs like S-400 are ineffective against aircraft, meanwhile, USAf aren't stupid, they have got HARM and thought 'that'' is good enough for the next 30 years.
This would be my last reply on this thread, and I know you will dispute this facts with your usual twaddle, but before you do that, I emplore you to do some technical diggings about those weapons thanks and good night

mazeltov:
I cancle'd it because you argu like a kid and that statement relays the deepness of your igonrance. Nobody wins a nuclear war- it's only destruction
If Russia can win nuclear war, they would have wiped out America ever since, if America can also win nuclear war, they would have wiped out Russia since

mazeltov:
Scully95, we are talking about Iran and Saudi clash over Syria issue and you are talking about the war America fought and lost Can't you read? Please stop quoting me. I hate primitive argument bro!!

mazeltov:
Honestly it doesn't stop America from using the airspace but someone has to eat the humble pie. Conflict of interest in a diplomatic engagement doesn't pay

mazeltov:
Yes I was right to bring Patriot and su-24 so as to tell you any SAM is dangerous only for you to bring up production date.
Now back to the matter and i will make it as simple as possible cus I'm busy right now, S-400 is only a threat to fourth generation jets. S-400 altitude range depends on the types of its missile and the heighest ceiling range doesn't exceed 400km while is rader target is 600km, I still wonder why some people would be thinking that S-400 could shot down a stand off fighter jet like f22. S-400 can't even bring down general atomic avenger let alone F22 flying at 60,00ft.
Please save me the time, make more research how s-400 and f22.

mazeltov:
Son, as you are bluffing, you are also jumping frequency. Are we arguing about the production date of Su-24 or we are arguing about Su-400? Or do you want us to argue about the superiority of Russian and American jets? , please I hate uncivilised argument so stay focused.
That's why I am always being selective when it comes to argument an more reason why I always sidestep arguing with you due to the level at which your retrobulbar has been dovetailed by media dissimulation, deceitfulness and propaganda. Because your argument/reply lacks objectivity and technicality to neutralise the subject of my point as regards S-400 and F-22., then perhaps you could give your phone to someone who is more knowledgable and experienced about functionalities of these military weapons. And above all, I have an assignment for you. Kindly make out time to research more about the exact production date of Su-24 and MIM-Patriot missile and I hope what you will find would default your sense and don't forget to do the same for S-400 and F-22.

mazeltov:
But I can give you a confirmation to relax you bubbling mind that Russian Su-24 jet has been shot down by American Patriot missile before. Well, that is not my point, I only cited that to tell you that there is no almighty weapon.

mazeltov:
[b]I don't deceive myself just because I like something over something or swimming in the pool of illusion just because I prefer this country to that. That is the problem of many of you. You guys have been extensively hoodwinked.
I work on fact and not propaganda.
S-400 is a surface-to-air missile which is the most sophisticated integrated air defence in the world, in fact, it is the most dangerous and most advanced missile defense in the world. No doubt it is far better than American MIM-104 patriot.
Just as you have said, S-400 has not been tested in any large scale war so its capability all inclusively depends on what we read, see or hear and since Raptor like F-22 or B-2 bomber has never faced Russian S-400, then with the available facts and findings, one can easily project which is which and their survivability. But I can give you a confirmation to relax you bubbling mind that Russian Su-24 jet has been shot down by American Patriot missile before. Well, that is not my point, I only cited that to tell you that there is no almighty weapon.
I as a person, Before I could start evaluting the performance of a weapon with another, I must have done a lot of researches and findings about it in order to know many things about that particular weapon. I don't run on social media and start blowing apple over orange.
Like I said, I will advise you to take time and do a thorough research about Russian S-400 and American F-22 jet, after that, you and I can now come out and debate fully.[/b]

malele:
So hitler that attacked russians and captured some countries was caused by america.
The crisis in egypt was caused by america
The problem in syria was caused by america,
Iran that is threaten isreal is also caused by america
If there is crisis in ur country come 2015, u will still point america.

if u don't know,if not for america most countries wont be existing by now

mazeltov:
yes the people should decide and that is not the decision of neither Russia nor America but a decision must be made from somewhere - maybe frim the west or east and but if care is not taken, they will soon turn Syria to weapon lab where they can test their weapon. And for the SAM. Honestly it doesn't stop America from using the airspace but someone has to eat the humble pie. Conflict of interest in a diplomatic engagement doesn't pay

Appleyard:
It is ignorance that makes the rat thinks she can bell the cat. Satan-Arabia insisting that Assad must go before any meaningful peaceful accord can be reach, speaks volume of how stupidly audacious and pained they must be feeling towards the Syrian issue, as it relate to the Russian involvement. It is understandable, in that, years of funding and aiding of terrorism to destroy another nation for the soul of " gas, " with billions spent so far, is about going up in flames, as the Syrian regime backed by Russian air-power, is slowly but gradually making gains in retaking of some territories formally under the terrorist. If the house of Sauds thinks it can continue with the increasingly unpopular Assad must go mantra, then they can expect to lose more financial, material and human resources in trying to realize their sick dream. With Russia in Syria, it is only a zombie that would still want Assad out unilaterally!

braimeddy:
https://punchng.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The-suspects.jpg

This is really crazy. Some people on this forum have started pointed fingers.. One said Yoruba and rape, this other replied it, said Igbo and 419... Na wa o, instead of facing the real issue they decided to move decades backward. You guys should grow up.


Naija Gist

mazeltov:
yes it sounds funny to you, right? .Chill, I am not here to compare S-400/S-300 with Patriot so listen attentively. Yes I agree that S-400 is far better than Patriot missile. Patriot missile that was supplied to Isreal also shot down Russian Sukhoi Su-24. Don't be hoodwinked by media fallacy. Before any weapon can be jammed, the jammer must be stronger than the receiving radar weapon and if the weapons is countermeasured, it can't be jammed. Russian S-400 is counteremeasured so it will be difficult to be jammed except if the jammer System is stronger than S-400. American Patriot missile is also countermeasured so it can't be easily jammed. No country will be so stupid to build a surface-to-air missile system that can be jammed by enemy, it's just like building a fighter jet that can't fly

mazeltov:
Crap!!
[s]I hate to tell you this but your comment lacks objectivity, technicality, insight and depth and I lack the proper adjective to qualify your ignorance. Lolzz, ''please so sorry to say''. Arguing with you will be boring. No wonder I have been seeing threads like Russia Weapon Jams All Nato Nations on Nairaland. Good night sir!![/s]

mazeltov:
Scully9, The Klub family is just a modular family of different types of cruise missiles tasked for different roles although depending on their motors and
guidance systems.
Some types of these missiles are
used for attacking surfacewarships and others for attacking submarines. Those that are used to attack surface warships typically skim close to the sea, but they have a supersonic terminal phase and those used to attack
submarines are short range and sometimes supersonic, and launch a light anti-submarine torpedo into the sea or even near the point where the submarine has been spotted.
The land attack version of the Klub used in this attack uses a combination of inertial
and satellite guidance and in order to achieve a longer range (up to 2,500 km is claimed) so there is nothing special about a launched missiles having 147 bends while flying or even hit their target, also it uses a turbojet as opposed to a rocket engine to fly subsonically at Mach 0.8. Wow!! That's cool!!
Which is exactly analogous to the subsonic long range cruise missiles the US has regularly
used in conflicts starting with the 1990 Gulf war so Russia is not the first or only country to use that type of missiles, America has also used it before since 1991 but I don't know whether they have decommissioned it or still in service.
Even Russians have not identified the warships that America used to launch the missiles but key point about the Klub missile family is
that they are modular and this means that different versions of the missile can be launched from the same launcher.
Yed Russia’s Caspian Sea Flotilla is known to possess two Gepard class frigates and six Buyan class missile corvettes and all of which
would be capable of launching these missiles but in order to strike Islamic State targets in
Syria, the Russians will need to obtain permission from Iran and Iraq through whose their airspace the missiles would have had to fly. and if Iran and Iraq didn't give go ahead order, the missiles would be knocked down during flight operation.
The missile strike therefore confirms two things (1) that the Russians again have demonstrated a capability that previously only the US had demonstrated; and (2) that
the coalition they have created with Syria, Iran and Iraq is a fully operating reality, that is able to confer and agree on missile
strikes. Missile strikes have certain advantages over air attacks.They limit the risk of casualties, making it easier to attack fixed targets that are more likely to have strong anti-aircraft defences.
The Islamic State is known to possess man portable short range surface to air missiles including Russian made Strela and Igla
missiles. They are also known to have anti- aircraft cannon.
Whilst their air defence systems are unlikely to be very strong or sophisticated, and the Russians have well developed methods to
protect their aircraft from such systems, there is no reason why the Russians should risk their aircraft and pilots when an entirely safe alternative exists.
In addition, supplementing the aircraft strike force with long range missiles greatly increases tactical flexibility, enabling a
greater number of targets to be attacked. For obvious reasons, cruise missiles are suitable for attacking fixed targets, such as
weapons depots or headquarters. Using them to do so frees the aircraft to attack mobile targets, such as artillery or tanks.
Subsonic cruise missiles are exceptionally difficult to observe and track - and shoot down - so the element of surprise is increased. The Islamic State now knows it can be attacked anywhere and at any time -day or night - without warning. Lastly, it is significant that the Russians have chosen to launch their missiles from the Caspian Sea rather than the Mediterranean
(land based versions of long range cruise missiles are prohibited by the 1987
Intermediate Nuclear Forces (“INF”) Treaty).
The choice of the Caspian Sea is dictated by the political situation. The US has very powerful fleet and intelligence assets in the
Mediterranean - as do US allies such as Israel. Launching their missiles from the Caspian Sea enables the Russians to do so
without outside observation or interference. Also you made mention Tomahawk missiles well let me leave you to that. Also in mention is Russian EW weapons- the only weapons that can be jammed are weapons without countermeasure technology. Any weapons built with countermeasure technology can't be jammed. For example, Russian S-400 can't be jammed because it comes with countermeasure technology. After reading your post, I have come to conclude that you are one of those guys these countries use to brainwash through media propaganda.

mazeltov:
Well, I am not here to argue and for the sake of enlignhtenment. Let me say this, American MIM-104 can't be jammed.

989900:
USA:
Over 14,000 aircrafts, and 20 aircraft carriers of which 10 are Nimitz class.


China and Russia put together:

Have 3-4 aircraft carriers, and less than 9,000 aircrafts.


Forget nukes: it's MAD.

Also about nukes, the US just needs to be close enough on any of their allies' territory for anti-ICBMs to be very effective, such as intercepting nukes at lauch stage.

BobUg28:
You are playing with fire, how could you say such a thing_ Satan punish Jusus. Shm..

Rumpelstiltskin:
If Thor does not strike down DSTV........Amadioha and Sango definitely will.