Blkpanda:

I don’t agree with the crux of your arguement that you retain your full identity if you lose a piece of yourself

Does the name of an amputee change because a leg is ampiutated? No. His person as a human isn't altered based on loss of a shin. U only known as an amputated person but what makes u human doesn't change.
Remember MR NIGER D.

Blkpanda:

That said, isn’t Allah a deity? Same as Christian/Jewsih God, and not a physical one. So the same rules of worshipping Gods shin would apply to Allahs shin? What am I missing?

That is the point of divine simplicity. A God shouldn't have parts and his essence should be uniform and the same within his existence.
Otherwise there will be some areas of him that will not be God, that's the problem

We Christians don't have this problem because the Christian God is a spirit. Spirits don't have shape or form. The deity of God is the same within his existence.

Ohyoudidnt:


Perhaps but you still haven't said what the council of Ephesus was about? You claim my submissions are false and fail to say what it was.



Do you state that this council has nothing to do with the thorough cooking of the lie you call trinity in Christendom?

Very funny...confused worshipers of a composite god questioning trinity.
The audacity!!!
Allah has a shin that shouldn't be worshipped. Yet Muslims will bow to the shin of Allah on judgement day.
The shin of Allah is intrinsic to Allah but not body parts of Allah. Then what is it?

Then the Almighty will come to them in a shape other than the one which they saw the first time, and He will say, 'I am your Lord,' and they will say, 'You are not our Lord.' And none will speak: to Him then but the Prophets, and then it will be said to them, 'Do you know any sign by which you can recognize Him?' They will say. 'The Shin,' and so Allah will then uncover His Shin whereupon every believer will prostrate before Him.
Sahih al- bukhari 7349

If believers will worship the shin on judgement day why can't I start now?
Tawhid in the mud.

U guys should first sort out the body parts of your Allah and be certain he's actually one and single as U claim. Then we can discuss trinity.

[quote author=Ohyoudidnt post=129197061][/quote]

Your screen shot didn't answer my question.
Is the shin of Allah intrinsic to Allah or separate from him. That's my question.
You just repeated the answer to my initial question which is cani worship the shin of Allah? And U already said no. So why repeating the answer.

Anyway from the screenshot, it seems U agree the shin of Allah is intrinsic to allah- correct me if I'm wrong.

That means Allah's form or shape has a physical attribute called shin that doesn't share in his deity- the very reason he's God. That's why we can't worship the shin.

This automatically mean Allah is a composite being- he'd made up of parts. That's what U guys don't understand.

Allah has parts but he's not that part. Allah has a shin but he's not the shin.
Above is the definition of composite and that's the description of your god.

This automatically means Allah is not one or single in his entire being because his deity as God is not uniformly distributed within him.
There are some intrinsic physical attributes of Allah that can be cut off permanently and he will still be Allah. i.e Allah can be divided and no harm will come to the deity.
Allah as God is neither single nor one.
Tawhid is a false concept and doesn't make sense.
Simple.

Tallesty1:
This is an intriguing perspective, and I'm eager to delve deeper into it. Based on my understanding, if Jesus' mission were exclusively for the Israelites, it would contradict numerous instances in the Bible where he interacted with and ministered to people from diverse backgrounds.

Firstly, despite initially stating that he was sent to the lost sheep of Israel (Matthew 15:24), Jesus demonstrated compassion and inclusivity in his actions. For instance, when a Canaanite woman approached him seeking help for her daughter, Jesus ultimately healed the daughter, commending the woman's great faith (Matthew 15:28).

Jesus' encounter with the Samaritan woman at the well (John 4:1-42) challenges the notion of exclusivity. Despite societal and cultural barriers between Jews and Samaritans, Jesus engaged in meaningful dialogue with the woman and revealed himself as the Messiah. This interaction underscores Jesus' universal message of salvation transcending ethnic boundaries.

Jesus' response to the plea of a Roman centurion for the healing of his servant (Matthew 8:5-13) exemplifies his willingness to extend grace beyond the confines of Israel. Despite being a Gentile, the centurion's faith impressed Jesus, who commended it as greater than any he had seen in Israel.

Additionally, Jesus' commission to his disciples to make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19-20) and his declaration that he would draw all people to himself when lifted up (John 12:32) emphasize the universal scope of his mission. These verses underscore Jesus' intention to offer salvation to people of every race, ethnicity, and nationality.

The account of Peter's encounter with Cornelius in Acts 10 further reinforces the inclusivity of Jesus' message. Despite Peter's initial reluctance due to societal norms, he obeyed God's command to go to Cornelius, a Gentile, and proclaim the Gospel. This event marked a significant shift in understanding that God shows no partiality and accepts people from every nation who fear him and do what is right (Acts 10:34-35).

In essence, while Jesus' earthly ministry began with a focus on the Israelites, his ultimate purpose was to extend salvation to all humanity, thereby fulfilling the promise made to Abraham that through his offspring, all nations would be blessed (Genesis 12:3).

Therefore, to assert that Jesus was exclusively for the Israelites overlooks the abundant evidence in the Bible that demonstrates his universal love and grace for all people.

Just ignore that heretic preacher. He would soon give u a response that makes no sense ignoring all the passages U quoted.

Qasim6:


The fact that the first non Christains source we have is forgery even cast more shadow on Christainity.

Again another gbagaun. The first person we know that wrote about Jesus was thallus the Samaritan who described the events of the cruxifixion around 50s AD. Ben mara sarapion wrote about Jesus in 73AD.
Josephus' works was in late 90s AD.
So who first wrote about Christ.

Qasim6:

All these historians you mentioned were all born years after Jesus already left and non of them wrote in anything lesser than 100 years after the event. So I can argue they were only parroting the believe of Christians around them, I'm sorry, it doesn't help your case.

Seriously coming from a Muslim whose knowledge about Christ came from a forger 630 years after chrsit lived. U refuse to believe someone that wrote about Christ 100 years after his death but swallowed the tales of a desert forger who lived 600 yrs after the events he described.
U go fear the way Muslims reason. Islam can never be reconciled with common sense, it's an infinite impossibility.

Qasim6:


A dubious character u say? A whole chosen servant of God in ........

It's ok to live in delusion, U won't be the first and not the last. I'm happy to cure your delusion of Isaiah 42 if U oblige me. Bur as usual U will run away.

Qasim6:

You don't want to go to all this forging accusation, that is something peculiar with Christainity. It is silly and unwise, don't go there!

The biggest work of forgery ever known to mankind is the Koran. How Muslims believe that it's from God is a mystery to me.
The whole of story about jesus in your Koran is not any divine revelation. They are stories in our apocryphal gospels. Stories of Mary, jesus talking at birth and jesus creating life are all in our gospel books written 100 years after the said events.
Go and read the infancy gospel of Thomas and protoevangelium of James, all the stories are there.

These are gospel books we rejected because we know they are forgeries.
Now a forger forging from a forgery book into his own forged book only to turn around to lie that Allah told him the stories. U Muslims are lost.

Qasim6:

Is Christainity as a religion 100% faith and 0% common sense?, Because I don't understand how any sane person will follow a religion riddled with so much forgeries.

Tell me when did Jews start calling Ezra the son of God. because your Koran claimed they do.
Let's see the religion of zero common sense and 100% blind faith.

Qasim6:

You go wait tire!

Then your Allah is a composite god. He's a god made up of body parts. If I can't worship the shin of Allah, then your Allah isn't single.

U people should do more to learn about your religion, it's comedy at best.
Next time I'm going to ask u when did your god start calling himself Allah.

Blkpanda:


What is the significance in worshipping the shin? Why shin?

If Allah is one and single as Muslims want us to believe, then everything about Allah's form and existence should be Allah otherwise he not single.

That means his essence should be uniformly distributed in whatever form he exist.

But if U are telling me Allah has a shin but I cannot worship the shin. That means his shin doesn't have the essence of Allah.
That automatically mean Allah is a composite being who's made up of parts just like human beings even if Muslims don't want to admit.

For example my leg is not me, my hands are not me and my face isn't me. Humans are not single beings but composite beings.

That's why someone with a leg amputation still retain his full identity because the amputated leg isn't the person, it's just part of the person that no longer exist with him.
Above is the description of the god of the Muslims. A god made up of body parts, what a god!!!

Ohyoudidnt:


I deliberately didn't put all details hoping to get a strong rebuttal why it isn't so yet.

The fact that Arianism still exists today shows how much they weren't convinced otherwise or coerced to believe otherwise.



Oh boy stand well. Arian theology says Jesus is only begotten son that was created and is not a co-creator with God.

For Arius and his followers, Jesus is considered a created being who is not eternal and is not equal to the divine. This belief contrasts with the traditional Christian view of the Trinity, where Jesus is seen as co-equal and co-eternal with God the Father.

To Arians there was a time when Jesus was not,” indicating that Arians believe there was a time before which the Son existed. This perspective leads them to reject the term “homoousios,” meaning “of one substance” with the Father, as they argue that it is not scripturally supported.

What does Arianism doctrine teach about Logos?
We Christians reject Arianism because it's heresy. U Muslims are the ones who seem to have a new lover in Arianism.
So tell me what is Arianism doctrine on Logos and how is it related to Jesus Christ.

Ohyoudidnt:


When answered your closed thinking prevents you from seeing anything else. You were adequately answered and it's not my fault you don't understand or pretend not to understand. It is your understanding or lack of.

U didn't answer my question if the shin of Allah is with Allah or separate from him.
If U did, screenshot your response otherwise U are a liar.

Failure to answer means your god is a composite being. Allah made up of body parts. Simple.

Blkpanda:


What is the significance in worshipping the shin? Why shin?

According to Muslims the unique oneness of Allah means he's indivisible and he's one in it's entirety.
The concept is Tawhid ( oneness of Allah) is hinged on Allah is indivisibly one and single.

But if U now telling me Allah has a shin that's with him but not him and cannot be worshipped as Allah, then U admitting Allah is a composite being made up of parts.
His uniqueness isn't one because there are some parts of him that do not share his full essence and glory. Allah is not a unified entity.

This negates the principle of divine simplicity which states that God does not exist in parts but is one unified entity, with no distinct attributes; that is, God’s esse is identical to God’s essence.

Ohyoudidnt:
Eusebius of Caesarea interpreted John 1:1 as two distinct persons in this verse - God and the Logos (Word), suggesting a subordinationist understanding where only one could represent ultimate reality. This nuanced interpretation reflects Eusebius’ theological position within the broader Arian controversy.

Arian theology makes it clear that Jesus is the begotten son of the father. According to Arianism, Jesus is derived from the Logos which is an attribute of the God the father.

Arianism taught that the Logos was a divine being begotten by God the Father before the creation of the world, made him a medium through whom everything else was created.

As I said earlier, U don't know what I talking about. U muslims are just clutching at straws to validate your weak islamic theology.

That was how U guys believe ebionites were the true followers of Christ until that claim was bursted.

Meanwhile explain to me when did Jews start calling Ezra the son of God.
Since U can't explain to me how your Allah is a composite being, a god made of body parts.

Ohyoudidnt:



Are Logos and God 1 and the same?

No one has ever seen God; the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known” (John 1:18). This passage emphasizes that Jesus has revealed God to humanity. This is to say making those around him conscious and respectful od the almighty
Advising to live in obedience of the divine

A Muslim trying to give exegesis of the bible. U go fear.

But wouldn't explain why I can't worship the shin of Allah.
Oga explain to me is the shin of Allah with Allah or separate from Allah.
Otherwise U guys are worshipping a composite god.
A god made up of body parts. Your Allah is derived from different body parts.

gaskiyamagana:

Research about Christianity revealed a lot about the cooked beans for the fool to eat, belly full and started stooling here and there to dirty the surrounding of good faith about the creator, Allah and His chosen religion for mankind.

U mean your composite Allah. A god that's made up of parts.
Imagine worshipping a composite being, someone derived from parts.
Otherwise U have to explain to me why I cannot worship the shin of Allah.

Abeg Canada should calm down. Maybe if it was 10 yrs ago when Canada was Canada, I will accept the deportation order as genuine and in good faith.

But Canada of today is turning to dugbe market with all sorts of character entering. In the last 5 yrs, over 4 million Indians alone entered Canada. Some areas in greater Toronto now is no different from new Delhi.

What will deportation of 4 people change when almost 1 million immigrants enter every year. What will their removal change.

Even white Canadians are leaving canada due to housing and cost of living crisis.

Nothing special about Canada anymore, the special effect is gone. They should allow them to stay.

Qasim6:


You can keep deceiving yourself.
Which non biblical scholars? Do you mean the forged Testimonium Flavianum?

Ask Bart Erhman.

Hahaha this one think our only historical evidence of Jesus is Josephus. U are far behind, the rest don overtake u.

Tacitus a Roman senator spoke about Jesus
Mara bar sarapion a stoic philosopher spoke about Jesusin 73 AD.
Pliny and Suetonius both Roman historian spoke about Jesus.
Thallus a samaritan historian wrote about the events that happened the night Jesus was crucified.
Roman emperor Trajan wrote about Jesus Christ.
Phlegon of Tralles AA historian wrote about Jesus.
Both the Jewish Talmud and Mishnah wrote about Jesus.
Even Josephus wrote about the death of James the just the brother of Jesus Christ.

There's a reason all biblical scholars including atheist admits Jesus of Nazareth is a real person.

We don't need a dubious character in a desert forging the works of our apocryphal gospels to attest to historicity of Jesus.

When I say U guys know nothing about Christianity, U came here foaming in the mouth. Now see how U thoroughly embarrassed yourself.

I'm still waiting for my answer.
Why can't I worship the shin of Allah?

Ohyoudidnt:
Is it not true that at the First Council of Nicaea in 325AD, the first ecumenical council of the Christian church, meeting in ancient Nicaea (now İznik, Turkey), was called by the emperor Constantine I, an unbaptized catechumen, who presided over the opening session and took part in the discussions.? He hoped a general council of the church would solve the problem created in the Eastern church by Arianism, a heresy first proposed by Arius of Alexandria that affirmed that Christ is not divine but a created being.

Is it not true that the emphasis that Jesus, as the Son of God, was created by God and gained popularity across the Eastern and Western Roman empires was declared a heresy by the Council of Nicaea in 325?

Is it untrue that this council of Nicaea condemned Arius as a heretic and affirmed through a creed that the Son is “of one substance with the Father,” establishing orthodox Christian belief?

Was it declared in the scriptures prior to this tine that Jesus is of the same substance as God?

Only God knows what bible this guy reads.

John 1.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning.3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

John 1.18

18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.

The question is do U have this verses in your bible. Note I said bible not Koran. Don't confuse the 2.

Qasim6:


If you take your time and study how we received all the information about Jesus prior to Islam, you can't help but think

'why is everything messed up like this?'
Except if you are not been truthful with yourself.

From Matthew that witnessed the events first hand copying Marks(a disciple of Peter) to write his gospel.

Jesus claiming he was only sent to the Israelites then Paul claiming he met Jesus and he is apostle to the gentiles then start contradicting Jesus, To the extent there was bad belle between him and the original apostles.

If you compare the first of the Canonical gospel to be written ( Mark) to the last (John), you will know something is no right.

To some people sitting down 300yrs later voting on divinity of Jesus.

And you expect me to not think something is wrong smwhere?

If not for Islam, I would have doubt if Jesus of Nazareth truly walk on this earth.

We don't need Islam to confirm jesus walk on this earth.
Non biblical scholars confirmed Jesus Christ walked on this earth.

Answer my question, can I worship the shin of Allah?

Qasim6:


U don come with your
"you Muslim don't understand "
"You Muslim are parroting bla bla bla"

The good for nothing Bishops were sitting down in whopping 300 yrs after Jesus left the scene to discuss Jesus nature, they even voted on the subject to reach a conclusion. Why did they need to vote if it is crystal clear in the scripture?

Do you think you will be trinitarian if that council did not take place in history?

Do you think the original apostles believe Jesus is some part of God?

Show me Tawhid in your Koran.

Are U not the one I asked if I could worship the shin of Allah and I'm yet to get a response.

Ohyoudidnt:
Arianism, a Christological position in Christianity, was proposed by the Alexandrian presbyter Arius in the early 4th century. It emphasized that Jesus, as the Son of God, was created by God and gained popularity across the Eastern and Western Roman empires. However, it was declared a heresy by the Council of Nicaea in 325.

Beliefs of Arianism

Arianism is often viewed as a form of Unitarian theology that prioritizes God’s unity over the concept of the Trinity. Arius believed in the uniqueness of God as self-existent and immutable, contrasting this with the Son who was considered a created being without self-existence. This belief led to controversies regarding the nature and divinity of Jesus Christ.

The Council of Nicaea condemned Arius as a heretic and affirmed through a creed that the Son is “of one substance with the Father,” establishing orthodox Christian belief. Despite this, conflicts persisted for years, with various councils and emperors supporting different factions within Christianity.

@Gaskiyamagana,Explore2xmore,Sirtee15,Advocatejare,Dsinner,Tenq,Mightysparrow,Homesttalk21,Antiislam,Antichristian,MrPresident,Rightchannel,Kobojunkie, Greenholics,Malcolm10x

The problem with Muslims apologetics and also atheist is u guys don't understand Christianity and U don't care to research about it.
All U do is parrot ignorant statements passed around in our mosques or on internet.
Now if I ask U what is the trinity as defined and established by the council of nicea, U will fail woefully. The creed is online for all to see but if I ask U to define the trinity in creed, na something else U go talk.

The trinity in the Nicene creed is exactly as taught by Jesus and exactly what is in the old and new testament. Nothing was removed or added.
You are the one with a problem.
U don't believe in arainism because the theology declared jesus is divine, so debating it with U is useless.

gaskiyamagana:

Shin of Allah is your problem but the one who FOUGHT WITH BIBLICAL GOD is not an issue. Anyway, no wonder, as a NUISANCE ON NAIRALAND TO ALLAH AND ISLAM, one should not expect less from you.
Many things about your biblical God are their, you kept in the cooler of hypocrite and became MAD about Allah, I pity the one arguing with you.

Yes, shin of Allah is my problem because it proves Allah has parts.
If the shin of Allah is not Allah but it's with Allah, then it begs the question what is it?
According to the Hadith, Believers will only recognise Allah when they see his shin.
That means the shin of Allah is part of Allah.
If the shin is part of Allah, then your Allah has parts i.e he's made up of parts.
Your Allah is a composite being, He's made up of parts.
You Muslims are worshipping a god made of parts.
And if Allah is made of parts, then he cannot be one because he can be divided.

Ohyoudidnt:


Reservations to a rather uncouth response. I gave you a detailed explanation.

I checked your initial response but didn't see my answer.
Will believers see the shin of Allah with Allah or separate from Allah on judgement day.

Allah has 99 attributes which are eternal but they separate from Allah.

Is the shin of Allah separate from Allah like his attributes or the shin is with Allah.

Sahih bukhari said when Allah appears to the believers on judgement day, they won't recognise him. But when Allah reveals his shin and show the believers, they will recognise Allah and bow.

That's why I'm asking, will the shin of Allah be seen with Allah or separate from him.

Ohyoudidnt:


In your living and learning you know very well that Allah is the one, omnipotent, omnipresent God that creates and sustains all for all eternity.
Allah is absolute, eternal, misbegotten and non begetting. There is nothing or anyone that can be likened or compared to him.

The Shin or other attributes of Allah are not like that of man. You don't worship Allah in essence but Allah himself. The awe, respect and love of Allah is what is behind bowing when only the shin is revealed.

Believers will recognize Allah through the sign of the revealed shin . It is essential to understand that in Islamic theology, Allah is beyond human comprehension, and any descriptions or attributes mentioned in the Quran or Hadith are symbolic and not to be taken literally.

The concept of worshipping Allah’s shin in this context symbolizes recognition and submission to the ultimate authority and power of Allah. It signifies acknowledging His sovereignty and majesty. The mention of prostration before Allah’s shin represents complete humility and obedience to the Creator.

Thank U very much for your boldness in answering the question.
But I'm not interested in your sermon. Keep it for the mosque.
Now that U have answered the question, your response leads to bigger problem. Remember we dealing with Tawhid here.

Is the shin of Allah separate from Allah or is with Allah.

Are we going to see the shin of Allah separate from him or we will see the shin with Allah.


The will believers recognised Allah when they see his shin. Is that shin one with Allah or separate from him.

olayinka63:
We already know the motive of this thread. Muslim do not worship Saudi, we worship Allah using the guideline of his noble and last Prophet. Muhammad Peace be upon him.
Saudi can do what they like, that is not Islam. The only thing that binded Saudi with the rest of Muslim is hajj. And have you ever see them toying with every Islamic rulings of hajj? Never because they don't have such power. They won't even attempt it because if they do, they lost the only glory that made them popular in this word. So they can fuckigly do whatever they like in the other areas of life.

Why are U bitter, is it your country.
If they move the kabba to another site, what will U do.
The worst is to stop facing Mecca when U praying which is the sensible thing to do in the first place.

In case u don't know, the crown prince already announced plan to rewrite the hadiths saying the present ones are no longer fit for purpose.

Eriokanmi:
As a Christian, I love Saudi Arabia the way they uphold Islamic tenets and religion. Recently, I've not been cool the way they're deviating. Imagine them legalising alcohol.

They must sit down and retrace their steps before the western culture encroaches on them the way they successfully did in Istrael and other religious nations as seen today

If oil end, na U go borrow them money develop their countries.
Dubai is already westernised and other countries are following suit.
They just need moderation in their development,. Adopt the good things in the west and reject the bad.

kheny12:
God bless you for this.Peoples misinterprete culture with religion.Lebanon a Muslim country had been sending representative to beauty pageant since the 190s,yet they are living peacefully.

Lebanon living peacefully Hezbollah made that country hell. They nearly wiped out the Christian population in some areas. Beirut ove called the Paris of middle east almost become a daily site of suicide bombing at a time.

gaskiyamagana:

Very shameful, christians can not defend missing verses of the Bible. The removed verses are disgraceful and have strong implications on God, faith, beliefs and worship of Christianity.

U are a mad man. Seriously U need to be sectioned b4 U start roaming the street.

Ohyoudidn't I can see u, dont ignore my question.

Who is Allah.

I know he has a shin. Can I worship his shin?
If the answer is no, why?
Why can't I worship the shin of Allah?
Is Allah's shin not one with Allah?

So many question but no answer. Very sad Muslims can't defend Tawhid.

gaskiyamagana:

Solve problem of yours first, your FALLIBLE, ERRORBILE AND MISTAKEABLE Biblical God whom his sons discovered his errors and are now deleting, removing and correcting him with those missing bible verses I listed for your Master, TenQ which he can't answer.

If U not ready to answer my question stop quoting me.

Qasim6:


You can reject all you want, the fact that the root word is talal does not take away the fact that talitha could mean maiden.

Anyway leave all these Aisha- Muhammed story and let's deal with the real issue. Who is God.

Allah has a shin. As a Muslim am I permitted to worship the shin of Allah.
If the answer is no, why?
If Allah is one, why can't I worship the shin of Allah.
Is the shin of Allah not one with Allah?

Qasim6:


You can reject all you want, the fact that the root word is talal does not take away the fact that talitha could mean maiden.

Ok I've heard U.
12 yr old male was called boy in bible.
12 yr old girl was called little girl in the bible.
Even her father called her 'my little girl'. But U will want us to believe her father called her 'my maiden'
I wonder why would a father called her daughter my maiden, that sounds unhealthy.

Sincerely I really pity u guys and feel for u. because I know it's not easy.
It's a huge burden placed on Muslims to defend their prophet. It doesn't matter how atrocious or immoral the behaviour, taking the shahada is a call to defend Muhammed blindly.
The harder the argument the more foolish Muslims must become to defend their prophet.

Or is it not same Muhammed that tortured the treasurer of the Qurayza Jewish tribe to death just because be wanted to seize the Jewish money.

Muslims dey try sha following such character as Prophet.

Qasim6:


Do you expect people to keep records of their ages in 6th century Arabia?
The only reason we know the likely age of Aisha is as a result of the fact that almost everything about the life of the Prophet was recorded.
We know that even before the marriage of Aisha to the Prophet, she was proposed by Jubayr ibn Mutim which also indicates how it was completely normal back then.

My friend we not talking of engagement here. People even get engaged from birth in some cultures. But they wait for the girl to grow and mature b4 she's married off.
If Muhammed was engaged to Aisha at 6 yrs, who cares. That's a common practice everywhere.
But marriage and sex at such tender age is too extreme even for his time.
That's an immoral behaviour.

Qasim6:


You can throw the entire human race under the bus if you like.
Even Jewish sources have the age of Rebecca to be 3 while some other 14 when she married Isaac.

Another senseless dawahgandist yarn.
So a girl of 3 years old went to the well to fetch water, discussed with a stranger confidently, offered to fetch water for the stranger' camel to their satisfaction and she was 3 yrs.
This is a classic case of cognitive dissonance.
FYI, Camels can drink especially after a long journey. They drink up to 30 gallons at a times and Abraham's servant has 10 of them with him.

Qasim6:


What you guys don't understand is for believing in the absurdity 'Jesus is God', there is no way you can exonerate him from all those passages you don't like in the old testament.

Did God allow the Israelites to take people as slaves or not? You can check Deut 20 10-14 for reference.

I already told U God is not bound by our moral code of conduct. U wasting your time condemning God for his divine judgement on mankind.

Jesus is God in flesh with a human soul which connects and resonates with human morality. If he had own slaves, I will be the last to follow him.

Qasim6:

Definition of woman varies with time and location.

Even now that child marriage have become something of the past. People do use phrase like
"You are now a woman" for young girls that have just seen their first period.

So the fact that she was called a woman does not prove anything.

I repeat Define woman.
If U fail to define woman, then U don't have any moral right to condemn the LGBTQ who also choose to define woman based on their own 'time and location' since U already admitted definition of women vary.
LGBQT is clear. The past definition of woman is obsolete and in 21st century, the definition of woman should be inclusive.
That's exactly how stupi.d your argument sound. Once U move the definition of women from one post to another, then other people can also choose to redefine it; creating confusion everywhere.

But we christians know there's only one definition of woman from God. An adult female, one who has completed puberty and able to be held accountable for her actions and fulfil purpose. Book for genesis 1-4

Qasim6:

If you check Deut 21 10-14 you will see what they were supposed to do with them.

Read 2 kings 5.2-3. not every men is sex starved like those led by your prophet.
God never told anyone what to do with captives of war, each men is left to make his choice.