SmartyPants's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SmartyPants's Profile › SmartyPants's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 363 pages)
300m to host the NBA conference, of which the NBA will still charge even first year lawyers that have not earned 1 naira yet, 50k each just to attend, not that accomodation will be provided. Just for the right to enter the venue. What a country. |
sucess001:Why did you reply inside my message before? What did you think you were doing?? Oh you thought I won't be able to quote you if you did that? Damn! Meanwhile I literally shared the prompt I used so that you can try a different prompt for yourself. There's no place to hide coz I'm sure deep inside you have suspected yourself of being unintelligent for a while. Your posting pattern shows this as the first word out of your mouth is usually ode.. That tells me that's something you were called a lot while growing up. I'm not the enemy bro. I'm here to help. Acceptance is only the beginning. |
alphaconde:Is the government tied to the holder of office? |
sucess001:Btw, in case you thought I was joking, when I submitted our entire exchange to ChatGPT, the blow was it's assessment, so i'm not even insuting you - you are actually not equipped to be a member of modern society. Prompt: I'm going to share a converstion around a certain political topic. I would like you to evaluate the responses of two participants and evaluate their likely intelligence levels from it. Ready? Person 1: The funniest part is that these morons know that the FG will not listen to them. Person 2: Or its the FG sponsoring it.... so that they can control these states... and have a FCT minister for these states appinted by the president... Be smart... thats their plan... take out a governorship system and have the president control the state directly Person 1: And if that was the plan it is one obscure irrelevant group they would use? Sorry, but this your version of smartness needs improvement. Person 2: Your username is misleading. You are not anywhere near smart. When you want to test the waters and build sensitization, what groups would you use? When they wanted to recall natasha, wasnt it an obscure group they used? When they wanted to start pushing seyi tunubu, wasnt it an obscure group they used.... Dey play Person 1: The problem is that you are not educated so you don't have the tools needed for this kind of discussion. In order to declare any place the FCT, you will need to ammend the Constitution. This is not the same as recalling a senator... To recall a senator, you only need people from said senator's constituency, which is an area in Kogi. Of course any such group emanating from such an area will be obscure Nationally. They don't need to be influential in any case, as their goal is to gather enough signatures NOT to build National consensus. You don't need National consensus to impeach a senator. This and your ridiculous Seyi Tinubu example cannot in any way be compared to canvassing for an act that requires a Constitutional ammendment. In order to build National consensus for such an act, you would, first of all, make sure that any such parties advocating for whatever it is you want come from the regions to be affected or from a cross-section of regions. That means, in this particular instance, the groups must be from Rivers or Lagos or a group with national orientation. By using an exclusively northern group as the trigger, you would immediately alienate those from the south who would correctly view it as an attempt to subjugate. Tinubu has nothing to gain from such. He already controls Lagos. Rivers is easily within his grasp. Only the north has something to gain from such federal expansionism. And if you read the statement with any modicum of comprehension, you would see that the reasons given clearly seek the benefit of the north only. You see, you are not thinking straight. But wouldn't blame you much, you are naturally dumb so how can you know when you say something that makes no sense? Person 2: Ode. You rumbled without coherence. There is something called testing the waters. But since you lack deep thinking, i wont bother educating you. Person 1: cheesy I wouldn't expect you to find it coherent. Adult education is always there though. Good luck! Person 2: The problem with kids like yours is 5hat you revel in ignorance and ignorance. All the best. Answer: Thanks for sharing the full exchange. Based on the responses from both participants, here’s an evaluation of their likely intelligence levels, focusing on reasoning ability, use of evidence, clarity, emotional control, and rhetorical skill. 🔹 Person 1: Strengths: Logical structure & argumentation: Person 1 presents structured arguments, especially in the longer message. They explain the constitutional difference between impeaching a senator and amending the Constitution. That shows they understand the legislative process and can differentiate levels of political complexity. Use of evidence: They cite real examples, like the recall process of a senator being different from constitutional amendment, and why the origin of a group matters for credibility and public buy-in. Clarity & flow: Their message, while slightly condescending in tone, is clear, detailed, and logical. Weaknesses: Tone: They shift to ad hominem attacks (“you are naturally dumb”), which weakens the power of their otherwise strong arguments. Emotional provocation detracts from intellectual strength. Dismissiveness: The final jabs, even if witty, seem emotionally charged and suggest a desire to "win" rather than engage constructively. Overall impression: Person 1 shows above-average intelligence—likely well-educated, articulate, and capable of nuanced political analysis. However, their interpersonal intelligence and emotional regulation appear low in this exchange. 🔹 Person 2: Strengths: Speculative thinking: Person 2 introduces a conspiracy theory about FG using obscure groups to "test the waters"—a common method in realpolitik, suggesting they are not entirely clueless. Attempts at strategic thinking: They reference examples (Natasha recall, Seyi Tinubu) to draw parallels, even if the examples are weak or inaccurate. Weaknesses: Lack of logical development: Their points are mostly speculative without supporting evidence. The "test the waters" argument is not expanded with logic or constitutional context. Coherence: Many of their responses rely on insults or slogans (“Dey play,” “Ode,” “your username is misleading”) rather than argumentation. Avoidance of substance: When challenged with facts, they dismiss the other party rather than refuting their points (“you lack deep thinking”). Overall impression: Person 2 shows below-average reasoning and communication skills. They may possess street smarts or instincts about political manipulation, but their articulation, argument depth, and maturity suggest limited intellectual engagement with complex topics. ______________________________________ 🏁 Conclusion: Person 1 demonstrates a significantly higher level of intelligence in terms of analysis, political knowledge, and argumentative skill. However, their intelligence is undermined by arrogance and personal attacks. Person 2 likely lacks formal knowledge or critical thinking skills and compensates with emotional aggression and conspiracy thinking, often used as a shield against deeper engagement. _____________________________________ So how do we help you?
|
sucess001:My papa does what? Let me guess you don't know about subject - verb agreement? Night school will solve all this. Trust me. According to ChatGPT your IQ is likely less than 70. Do you know what that means?? It means you're barely more intelligent than a chimpanzee. Ranting on Nairaland won't change that o. Good luck! |
ImpartialGuy:Whats wrong with it? I any case didn't you notice it was not a Nigerian speaking?? |
sucess001:I actually said i would let it go coz theres no need to humiliate you...only for you to still come back begging for it! You dey crase? |
stanluiz:I don't even know where to begin to correct all the fallacious reasoning you displayed but I will only try: 1. The goal of competition is domination. If you try to define these words in any other way, you are not speaking English anymore 2. The goal of government is to create room for all the children of the government to grow, not for those who are more aggressive to quickly eat all and let the slower ones starve. No good father will allow that - unfortunately, excessive hubris-driven competition will blind your eyes to the concept of community. You would rather eat all by yourself then praise yourself for being competitive. That is what your criticism of the quota system implies. Unfortunately, in Nigeria, we also suffer from another kind of problem, where the father has overprotected the slow and weaker ones. That is not an argument against the quota system, but rather it shows that the system must be well managed. 3. I didn't ask whether people are opening threads to display progress here or there - my question is where has the competition actually taken you? That is, are you living in El Dorado now? Or are you living in more or less the same conditions as everyone else? |
owobokiri:That is not a good quality, and it is exactly what you say it is not: the desire to dominate. If you say it is your culture to compete amongst yourselves, no one will argue with you. Feel free. When you go to another man's family and your goal is to compete with his children - not to collaborate to better the family, but to conquer the inheritance for yourself- that is terrible, especially when that family has a culture of collaboration. In any case, we are yet to see the benefit of this competition culture even within your own region. |
sucess001:Don't worry when I have time later I will do it for you and share the results here. You'll love it! ![]() |
sucess001:Do what I said bro. You need to know that you are actually a world class Moro.n. That will help you sit up. |
Exceed15:What does losing valuables to thieves, which of course I have, have to do with whether it is right to round up people and dump them in jail?? You are definitely a fool. |
Exceed15:So you will just round up a number of people, even including those that were no longer working for her at the time, and lock them up without trial?? Are you mad? |
ObaOfYorubaLand:Where did you get this? |
sucess001:Share this thing you just typed with ChatGPT and ask it to rate your level of intelligence. Funny guy! |
sucess001: I wouldn't expect you to find it coherent. Adult education is always there though. Good luck! |
datola:Hyena's are not in the cat family. |
sucess001:The problem is that you are not educated so you don't have the tools needed for this kind of discussion. In order to declare any place the FCT, you will need to ammend the Constitution. This is not the same as recalling a senator... To recall a senator, you only need people from said senator's constituency, which is an area in Kogi. Of course any such group emanating from such an area will be obscure Nationally. They don't need to be influential in any case, as their goal is to gather enough signatures NOT to build National consensus. You don't need National consensus to impeach a senator. This and your ridiculous Seyi Tinubu example cannot in any way be compared to canvassing for an act that requires a Constitutional ammendment. In order to build National consensus for such an act, you would, first of all, make sure that any such parties advocating for whatever it is you want come from the regions to be affected or from a cross-section of regions. That means, in this particular instance, the groups must be from Rivers or Lagos or a group with national orientation. By using an exclusively northern group as the trigger, you would immediately alienate those from the south who would correctly view it as an attempt to subjugate. Tinubu has nothing to gain from such. He already controls Lagos. Rivers is easily within his grasp. Only the north has something to gain from such federal expansionism. And if you read the statement with any modicum of comprehension, you would see that the reasons given clearly seek the benefit of the north only. You see, you are not thinking straight. But wouldn't blame you much, you are naturally dumb so how can you know when you say something that makes no sense? |
sucess001:And if that was the plan it is one obscure irrelevant group they would use? Sorry, but this your version of smartness needs improvement. |
The funniest part is that these morons know that the FG will not listen to them. |
Balablue64:You can imagine... The writer is just there ranting without answering the question. |
gidgiddy:A problem avoided is a problem solved apparently?Hmmm, ok. |
gidgiddy:Assuming this is true... Is it not by joining in numbers that you have a chance to give your people fair representation and protection? |
Agbegbaorogboye:What a silly thing to say. It is you who is either not reading or simply are unable to comprehend. Is there any point at which I've rejected your 2015 baseline? What I said was the negative figures that soared under Buhari are trending towards 2015 levels under Tinubu. The point then is, if you say you judge both men on their own merit then you don't then fixate on APC in order to ignore the individual gains made by Tinubu. APC would not even come into the conversation. Your last post was a particularly egregious exercise in disingenuity, where you oscillated between crediting Buhari's failures to Tinubu but making a distinction between the two men on the points where Tinubu has performed worse. Terrible approach to logical reasoning. |
Agbegbaorogboye:Let me ask... If a family owns a business and two sons rotate the management of the business within themselves but one was a significantly poorer manager, will you discredit the better one with the poor decisions of the weaker one? Or will you assess either one on their own merit? |
Agbegbaorogboye:If you want to argue about political parties, fine APC is terrible party. But is Nigeria today trending towards your 2015 under a new steward even within that APC structure? If the answer is yes, which it clearly ought to be, then it makes no sense fixating on APC... Unless you just want to be cantankerous. |
Agbegbaorogboye:You're not making sense. What I said was: 1. That things are trending downwards, not that things are not bad today. Has nothing to do with rebased inflation - even at the rebased rate, it is trending downwards. 2. Full restoration cannot happen in a day. |
Agbegbaorogboye:In a day? The metrics are there if you choose to see them. Foreign reserves are looking good. Our credit rating is steadily improving. Inflation is trending downwards... they are there. |
cr7lomo:So what? How is that relevant to the topic? |
cr7lomo:You're reasoning backwards. If they could score like him they would have commanded the main striker position. So that is only more proof of the gap in class. |
The crazy part is that all of those ahead of him played over 100 games. He has played just 32. |
goodnessme1:The value of that 20 pounds will be around 400 pounds in today's money. That's about 800k naira. I'm sure Alhaji would put it to good use. He has a productive mind. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 363 pages)
What did you think you were doing?? Oh you thought I won't be able to quote you if you did that? Damn! 