We dont supply 100% of Ghana's electricity. Only Niger and Togo get 100% of their supply from us

PastorFire:
We supply gas to Ghana 100%. If not for our corrupt leaders, we are supposed to be bullying all these small African countries around us like Russia.

This is a ponzi

They only paid US and Canadian residents off because they know their government will work to fish out the perpetrators of this scam if they scam their citizens. Secondly, they were running forex trading in US and Canada without being regulated by any securities or forex regulatory bodies in those countries and this is a very serious offence in the US. As for people from all other countries, they'll get nothing from IPC because they're gone. Long gone. It is a faceless scam that was incredibly perfected by blinding investors with stupendous bonuses so that they will bring other investors in and won't notice all of the schemes being perpetrated

Mrshocker:
I have 7 accounts.
Not yet crashed. They are paying off investors in some countries where The site have been ban due to forex trading sanctions. My brother I refer in U.S got both his capital and profit paid off. Because the site won't trade for U.S anymore. That's why they frozen others account to avoid panic withdrawals and congestion.

He wont respond to you bevause the scales have finally fallen from his eyes. Ive been trafing forex for 10 years and as soon as i saw this IPC i knew it was a scam. All they did was to buy a whitelabel server space from a rogue mt4 broker. It is sold for 5000 usd.it is on this server they carried out all of their manipulations, which is mainly to add fake profits. This is why you will never see their live trades. On mt4, if you dont see a bot or trader's live trades then there is no trade. On mt5, it is more difficult because one can get scammed even with live trades. Thats why i never use mt5. I have my own bots i developed using my own manual trading strategies and they dont win all the time. No bot and nobody does. Risk managent is the key to profitability in trading.

lanre316:



Mr Pay day. How business?

In the first place, there was no bot and I mentioned it in most of my earlier posts here just to warn people to keep off but most of the people promoting it on NL and who know nothing abojt forex trading saw me as enemy of progress. What they did was to buy a whitelabel server from a rogue broker on mt4, and carried out all their manipulations on that server. That's why you'll never see their live trades but only posted profits. They simply manipulate the backend of mt4 to post those profits. Also, they have no physical office and aren't regulated by any forex regulatory body in US and Canada like they claim. Yet, Nigerian celebrities and Nigerian newspapers kept promoting this ponzi. Forex doesn't give referral bonuses.

I know what they do because i can also do it

Greyworld:


They paused the registration of new members. If that is the case they won't have done that. Don't you think??

Hello gents,
It seems IPC has crashed as I earlier predicted as they're now having a hard time paying people their profits. There have been reports of several thousands of people having profit withdrawal backlogs of a week now. They have come out to sack most of the pioneering guys promoting the scheme( I think these ones dissociated themselves from IPC so there won't be anybody to hold accountable for the looming losses). Like I have mentioned in my previous posts, IPC isn't doing any forex trading. They bought a whitelabel mt4 server that they can manipulate to create any amount of profits they want. They use these fake trades to lure new unsuspecting people and pay the existing members with monies from new folks. However, it seems the influx of gullible people is slowly waning leading to the withdrawal issues.

Yes

airmark:


Will like to know how this ended. Are you still earning from this?

It is sad that an underdeveloped country like North Korea with 60% of its citizens living in abject poverty can spend the little money it has on a very few nuclear warheads that their launch bases can be taken out from US military bases in South korea and Japan. The worst part is even the fact that the president is coming out to boast that they can confront US. Biden should just ignore Kim as he's just seeking attention

While I don't support Putin's invasion, i would also want to mention here that the Ukrainian army are no match for the Russian army. However, Putin made some fundamental errors in his calculation.
1. You don't invade a country using tanks especially during the winter. If you must bring in tanks at all do that when you have decimated the enemy using airstrikes. Tanks are the most vulnerable war equipment although they are big.

2. He overestimated what he has in his reserves. He had substantial monies in reserves but they were mostly in foreign banks in UK, Switzerland and Japan. All these funds were quickly confiscated because of the sanctions leaving him with limited resources to fund the war.

3. He also didn't understand this kind of war. It is difficult to invade a country and win the war and occupy someone else's country. Russia tried to invade Afghanistan decades ago and it failed. Georgia was very recent with same results. It is always counter productive.

What is happening now is that Russia cannot even occupy Ukraine even if they take Kyiv because there'll be nothing to occupy if they use the most brutal weapons which is the use of chemical weapons and hypersonic missiles. Putin also doesn't want to back out at this stage otherwise he'll lose credibility with the oligarchs who may force a coup to oust him. Let's see how the war progresses. But one thing is certain, urban warfare is usually to the advantage of the home side. It is a warfare that you can't win even with superior firepower. Russia's invasion of Afghanistan decades ago and the mistake recent one by the YS confirms this. Lastly, there's a difference between fighting for money and fighting to be free. The later is usually the greater motivation!

Just take whag i have told you, there are credible defences for ICBMs. Theyre just proprietary for now . Screenshot this post and in a few months this year, ill remind you of it. MIRVs have both dummy and real missiles that are used to disguise the actual missiles. Like i said again, you need to read up on these things

princeeze1:


If you write papers as you claim, you won’t write these things you wrote here. Firstly MIRV are not dummies but war heads that are independently targetable. Hence the name multiple independent targetable reentry vehicles. It’s different from the decoys or dummies attached to the missiles launched in Ukraine. Again you will understand what an hypothesis is. Laser like you said is still an hypothesis. Or are you the CIA to assume the US developed it and decided to keep it in secrecy lol. The worse case would be to forbid it’s export like the f22 raptor. We are talking facts, not Hollywood fiction, so bring proof. Again, even if laser comes to fruition in later decades, the question will be how many lasers would you need to stop an annihilating attack of over a 100 ICBM incoming at Mach 20+. You suddenly decided to say ICBM speeds are face values, wonderful! And you know better than all the defense corporations and defense experts. Bring contrary proof. Don’t just spill, back up your statement, even with a proven essay. The most important attribute of an ICBM is it’s speed and reentry vehicles my dear. Help yourself na and read first, you will surely discover there are currently no known counter measures. It is on these principles that the doctrine of MAD is founded, because a first and retaliatory strike is assured, and nothing would stop it. The moment a credible defense comes up, then MAD is dead.

Thats why i told you earlier that the US is either already working on or already already owns an interceptor that is based on laser technology which is away from everythong the world ever uses for interception and I explained the concept to you. Laser travels a million times faster than sound and a hundred thousand times faster than the fastest hypersonic missile. All these things are already studied and well documented in the west. I write scientific research papers and I'm very sure of this fact I'm making known to you. The MIRVs that work on disguise are just based on concealing the actual missiles by making visible a lot of dummy ones on the guided vehicle. However, a laser can be used to detect the guided vehicle from the the missile or group of missiles it is carrying at a speed way faster than that which it should use to travel to its target. And again, like I mentioned, these missiles just have a face value of mach numbers of up to 20 but unless the guided vehicle carrying the missile is made of tungsten shields it'll burn up quickly at that speed. The laser technology I pointed up there may not be available for you to read up online just yet because it's a new technology and the only way to stop hypersonic missiles.

princeeze1:
If you must respond, respond with good points. I repeat, ICBM currently has no counter measures. In my initial write up, I clearly pointed out that it uses several factors to beat missile defense including speed which you must have read up by now. It has MIRV some up to 15, this confuses and overwhelms a missile shield. The best interceptor missiles travels at Mach 7 making it no match for an ICBM. Stealth does not hold water because AWACS and ground based sensors would always detect a launch. Again, all this stealth noise, stealth does not make an item invisible on radars please, it only gives it a smaller radar cross section, i.e makes it appear smaller than original size. You can also do yourself some favour by reading this up too. Lastly, building up more missile defenses against a great power has been proven to be inefficient because they will simply overwhelm it with more missiles. That brings us back to the time tested and trusted doctrine called MAD. No assurance of victories, just mutual assured destruction. This is the very reason for NATO’s current humility.

Theres no way to counter missile defense systems with speed alone. Otherwise, a development of defense systems with same speed nullifies the efficacy of such missiles. Stealth technology is usually added to modern missile launching systems. Please go read the entirety of these things before arguing.

princeeze1:

Lol, what has Russian claim got to do with icbm speed? Just because you want to bad mouth Russia, you jumped facts. Is Russia also the owner of minuteman 3 which travels at Mach 23? The US owns minuteman 3 FYI. Again , icbm does not depend on stealth, it is not designed to evade detection, but to counter missile defenses with speed, maneuverability and use of MIRVs. Again you clearly did not study anything in any school because you would have known even the laser you talk about is still an hypothesis, I.e, it’s just a postulated theory. It’s not yet in research, development or practice. Oga, ICBM has no counter measures, that is one of the founding principles of MAD. The ability to initiate a second strike after a preemptive first strike from an adversary is what makes deterrence credible. That is the humility we see. Every other thing you have said is trash. Update your knowledge please and add proofs not fallacies. Read up the following ICBM along side their speed and range, satan 1$2, minuteman 3, trident 2, French m51, Chinese df 41, and come back and tell me they are all lying in claims.

Russia always alleges. They always fall short of all their claims when the time is ripe. Just because wilipedia told you something can travel at 30 mach number doesnt mean it can. If you check the beginning of my post, i mentioned to you that they can make missiles travel at that mach number but then it will be disadvantageous at such high speeds. The heat generated will be so much that it will be detetcted and deflected or it can self- destruct by burning up. An increase in mach number is usually followed by an increase in heat generation if you're a student of physics you'll know this. And like I said earlier, Laser technology can successfully combat ICBMs because they're one million times faster. I studied these things in school and not just talking from some nonsense googled online. Russia also alleged to have developed state-of-the-art T-14 tanks sometome ago but when the time came to use it the tanks transmission were faulty. They always put claims to things they know aren't possible from the laws of Physics. There's no way an ICBM launched at hypersonic speeds of up to 20 mach can go undetected till it hits its target. Itll be detected and the idea is to take it out with a laser before this happens. That's if the missile doesnt burn up

princeeze1:

You would have actually saved yourself some embarrassment by actually using google before quoting me. Minute man 3 travels at Mach 23, satan 2 or rs 28 travels at over Mach 20, pics attached. ICBM are not about stealth but speed, maneuverability and MIRV. While minute man 3 has 3 mirv, satan 2 has 15. I repeat, the reason the US failed to intervene is MAD. Both sides would be destroyed, all for what? Ukraine? As for sanctions, I hope you are reading about protests in European capitals, don’t worry it’s boomerang effect will reach everyone. Europeans are already paying for energy at ten times its price before the war. Inflation is going out of control in the US. Lastly, the Ukraine crisis is not a full blown war. Russia sent about 150 to 200k of its active force of 900k and has been using very old jets like su25. Ukraine has thousands of soldiers sent from all over Europe as volunteers propped up with ammunition, anti air and anti tank from nato countries, yet its gradually been reduced to rubbles. It’s more or less a proxy war between nato and Russia. MAD is still the reason NATO does not want a direct conflict. Imagine if it was a weaker nation involved. NATO says it’s a defensive alliance all of a sudden, but in it’s entirety existence, all it’s conflict, it was the invading force, why the sudden humility, lol MAD.

Digital cureency wont be a threat to the dollar as the value will still be pegged to paper currencies.

nairaman66:
The emergence of digital currency are a threat to the dominance enjoyed by the USA since inception till the 2000s.

But the USA were the ones who pushed for this unknowingly after the WTC bombings. The USA capped transactions at $10k which must be reported to every security agency!

I will provide you facts based on my knowledge of physics and science and based on what i know is happening in the world now. First, there is no ICBM that can travel up to 21 mach number. This is not because they can't make it to travel at such speeds but because the heat generated will be so high that the missiles the ICBM carries will self destruct before it hits the target. Secondly, at such speeds, it can't travel at stealth mode without being detected. Again, because of the red heat the ICBM would have attained at these speeds. The maximum speed that the latest hypersonic missile developed by Russia can travel is 12 mach. Before that, the fastest was the Brahmos II supersonic missile owned by both Russia and India at 8 mach max. Having said all these, modern missile defence systems can't handle these because of the higher reaction times required. However , there is a technology that can handle this and which , I believe ,the US is working on. It is laser technology and works on the principle of physics that light is faster than sound. Its principle is to aim the laser technology at the ICBM launcher thereby dissociating the missile from its carrier before it gets the its destination.
The requirement for this is that the laser technology be close (within tens or hundreds of kilometers) to the ICBM launch location. This is partly what US is usually trying to achieve by having bases in countries close to Russia and China. US is also at a vantage position in terms of first strike advantage because they have military bases close to Russia, north kirea and china while these countries dont have any close to the US. Also, it is more advantageous to impose economic sanctions on a country and save your money for something more useful instead of spending it on a war. US and their allies also have an advantage in this because over 60% of all foreign reserves and international transactions are in US dollar. Another 33% are in Yen, Euro and GBP while the remaining 7% are split across other world currencies. Finally, it is not as if US cannot develop hypersonic missiles at a pace faster than both Russia and China but they slowed this down because they were championing the world denuclearization program. US is light years ahead of both countries with respect to technology and even sells them some of the technology they require at times.

princeeze1:

Nobody, not even the US can win a nuclear exchange. It will be the end of civilization, there maybe survivors in nuclear bunkers, but then they will have to go back to medieval times. There are currently no counter measures for an ICBM. Am ICBM travels at Mach 21+, existing interceptors at their best intercepts incoming at mach 7. Secondly, they come with MIRV. E.g satan 2 has over 15MIRV warheads, meaning for every single one, you need 15 accurate interceptions. If 1000 was launched at you, you would need 15000 accurate interceptions, how is it even possible? Each warhead carries over 1000kN of ordainace. The one that destroyed Hiroshima is just 15kN. So even if your interceptors are able to shoot down some, the ones that scale through would be enough to totally annihilate you. This is the principle of MAD. This is the reason for the American humility. Because there is credible deterrence and a second strike is assured even if you were to launch a devastating preemptive first strike. The US is not after who blames them for what, after all they brushed off the UN and invaded Iraq. What they fear is MAD. Now you know why Kim is very much after nuclear deterrence, that’s the only language the US understands. Even if they do not have a means of delivery to mainland US, they have the capacity to wipe off SK which the US would want to avoid. Everyone calls Kim a dictator or rocketman, but that rocket is the reason the US has not cooked up a reason to invade him. Rather they would use sanctions as we see in Russia.

US, Russia, China, India and France all have hypersonic missiles. What US is working on is a hypersonic missile defence technology and i guess they must have figured this out but are keeping it covert.

07kjb:




What ever Russia has today USA HAVE BUILT IT 20YEARS AGO

The US doesnt want a war because a war with a nuclear powerhouse will just be pointless. It will lead to so much devastation in the world that even if the US wins such war, they'll lose their credibility as a super power as the world will forever blame them for a war that could have been averted. This is what theyre avoiding

I wonder why people here are rejoicing that India is buying Russian oil and cursing the west. Take it or leave it, the US is still the best superpower the world can ever have. It is good that they're involving themselves in issues like this otherwise there would have been no peace in the world. Everything that Putin has done up till today is the exact step Hitler took and when he saw that after annexing Poland the west didn't get involved he now started taking the countries one by one until he took almost half of europe and this led to the second World War. The world can't be watching Putin misbehave otherwise this will set a precedence of neighbours invading their weaker neighbours. And just so you know, Russian oil is selling at 80% discount now and even some countries in the west are still buying it as it is so cheap.

Dont mind them. People think just looking at that data tells you anything. Divide the US GDP by its 300 million population and the chinese GDP by its 1.4 billion population and youll see who the master is.

Goahead:
China is unlikely to catch up with the US in the nearest future, at least not in the next decade. The United States is still far ahead of China in semiconductor technology, medicine, space, military and quantum computing.

Exactly. GDP doesnt show the true picture of wealth. It is when you divide the GDP by population and then consider inflation, unemployment rate , balance of trade and human development index that you get the true picture of the wealth of a coountry and its citizens.

Gamesmart:
It is foolishness to label countries "poorest" or "richest" based merely on GDP.

I feel sorry for Nigerian "yoots" and their low IQ brains.

Grammar and IQ is a challenge for most of you.

There is a reason why US has these debts. Not because they dont have the money to pay or cant pay but because the world economy needs a balance. China and Japan run the two next biggest economies to the US and they both run a budget surplus economy. You need another country with such big economy to run a budget deficit economy and that is what they US is doing. Otherwise, the world economic metrics will be heavily skewed

ArewaNorth:


China is imminently taking over. U.S has more than $26.trillion debt and the Chinese do own a lot of U.S. debt—about $1.1 trillion as of early 2020. Japan and China own about 5.2% and 4.6% of the U.S. debt, respectively. Japanese-owned debt doesn't receive nearly as much negative attention as Chinese-owned debt, ostensibly because Japan is seen as a friendlier nation and the Japanese economy hasn't been growing at a 7% clip year after year. The other countries that hold the most U.S. debt include the U.K., Brazil, and Ireland. So, forget all that debt issues and invest, when it's time to enjoy the debt, enjoy it. Let me help u with the site that can help u see more of U.S heavy debt profile:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp
However, China only has $7trillion debt compared to U.S. So, taking over is already knocking at U.S door.

Add religion to your list

Angelfrost:
Not a single African nation among the top 20.... Sports are no different!

Bring up a list about

Hunger
Crimes
Terrorism
Poor Development
Corruption
Cyber fraud
Etc...

...and you will see Africa bossing the top 10!

So this is because GDP isnt an objective nor qualitative measure of how wealthy a country is. GDP just measures how much economic activity that ocurred within a country in a time frame. The weskth of a coubtry is determined by fhe difference between its assets or reserves and its debts and how much potential the country has in converting resources into value. Based on this definition, Nigeria is a poor country. GDP doesnt measure or take into account the things that make life worthwhile. It doesn't account for leisure, inequality in pay, gap between rich and poor, education and infrastructure, impact of technological advancement, air quality etc. Generally, it doesn't account for the quality of life or standard of living. This is why we have a high GDP but over 70% of our population live below the poverty line. Nigeria is a poor country with very poor citizens. Period!!

Zico5:
Listing Nigeria among the richest country in the world is a pure joke. Average Nigeria are glowing under extreme poverty and suffering. Economy is in comatose, no good roads, no jobs, inflation is skyrocketing on daily basis.
Maybe these people are using Buhari, Obasanjo, Tinubu and co to determine the richness of this country, if not Comoros and Gambia are better country than this yeye nation

Zelensky didnt causr anything. Putin did everything wrong. Diplomatic talks were an option for him to take but he chose to undermine the sovereignty of another nation. If you were Zelensky, what would yoi do? Sit down, fold your arms and watch your country bejng taken over?

Kingpin1000:
Una see wetin Zelensky dey cause.
These days of social media, things can go out proportion.
The youths are the major users of Social media and most times are not yet ripe enough to make good decisions.
The Ukrainian war has been plagued by Propaganda and this boils down to negative emotions.
Imagine young boys going to another country to show valor,without any form of military training.
The reality, is that, they will be used as bodysheild for the more professional soldiers.
These boys might think, it's like video game but,when you start to see people die,you would know the damage you've done to yourself.
Nobody wey don fight war dey remain thesame. Even cultism war go change your life.

Putin just wants to cause devastation to the entire world with this war because there are only two outcomes if he goes to war with NATO(without US involvement). The first outcome is premised on non-use of nuclear weapons. The outcome will be that Russia will lose as they'll be greatly overmatched by NATO both in military technology and military might. The second outcome is premised on the use of nuclear weapons. The outcome of this is that no one wins and there'll be great devastation in the entirety of Europe. This is the option Putin is counting on as he knows he can't win. UK navy is way superior to his own, the French airforce is way superior to Russian airforce and the German army, allied with a handful of other countries have both the numbers and ground military technology to finish Russia.

I wonder how you people analyze things. Do you think Russia has more niclear weapons than all these countries combined? Okay, let'seven agree they have, do you think the most successful country in a nuclear warfare is the country that has the most nuclear weapons? For your information, it is the country that fires first from a range thats in close proximity to its enemy that wins a nuclear war, technically. And just so you know, if they were not going to use nukes then all these countries in combination have the militray arsenal to defeat Russia hands down with US intervention. Germany has the most state-of-the-art war tanks and anti'tank missiles in the whole of Europe, Russia's navy is no match for that of the UK and Norway and then Russian airforce are still using warplanes of the old soviet era-planes that are no match for the sophisutcated ones France has. Tell me how theyll get to defeat these coubtries please. I need to know this new information. The only thing the west is avoiding is a world war thatll take the world sever al civilizations back. Thats all and nothing more.

sangresan:

Which west are you talking about?

How many of them have the stomach for a sustained war like Russia?

France? Germany? UK? Australia? Canada? Austria? Italy?

Many of these countries will call a truce in no time, if NATO were to come into kinetic contact with Russia.