₦airaland Forum

djon78:
Virgins are bore
If you have been in the game and see all there is

There is a place for experience


Most guys that married virgins

Still keep side chicks that are highly experienced

Experience is obviously not the thought I had when I was making my explanation.

Have a good day!

I'll be least surprised if I hear he committed suicide.

Dollywood:
Ain't a simp, but why do yall lay emphasis on the virginity part? Like marrying a virgin ≠ a submissive, and non-feminist wife.
The virgins are the ones getting deflowered by most redpillers up-ing their games to get girls laid. So, I need more clarity on this part if you don't mind.

Mr. Dollywood,
A man feels powerful when he has what other men wish they have. You must have seen kids when they get to the field to play football, the one who owns the football doesn't beg to be selected because he is sure to play. In fact, other kids try not to offend him so that he doesn't leave with his football. You see it when a young boy becomes the first to become rich among his peers or when he buys a gadget before the rest, he is treated with respect. Man feels powerful and fulfilled when that ego grows fatter.

Commiting to a virgin is getting that pussy that no other guy has had. It makes it valuable. To his ego, it is the same as gold. If everyone has access to it, it is common and that can't make man's ego get any fatter. It is his nature. It is the effect of the testosterone... Conquests, being the first to have it, power!

Biologically, it means she can easily bond to him (which means she can easily submit to his authority). It means there are less chances of being a victim of paternity fraud. It means a clean and by extension, a healthy vessel to carry his seeds.

A woman's virginity is the same as a man's commitment, it is leverage. "I'll carry your descendants in my untouched womb if I'm assured of your protection and provision"

This is why we emphasize on virginity.
Thank you.

heartofcity12:
Well said bro.. There is a lot to learn from here. However there has to be a way to make ladies invest into relationship or marriage because ppl always tend to value what they have invested on and protect it by all means, in all honesty you can not get submission with a 50/50 marriage but I think 70% contribution from a man’s end and 30% contribution from a woman’s end is fair enough, or better still have a business and make her one of your employees.

You want a lady to invest, good. It is why we should be chosen. You chase, you lose. You're desperate, you lose.

Making her work for me is not for the sake of contribution but so that she doesn't stay idle chatting with other women about nonsense. If she's working for me, it is more profit for my business, more time to focus on new business and the family gets to have more provided for them.

If she chooses you, she sacrifices her virginity(which is too precious) ( PS: I'm talking from the standpoint of committing to virgins exclusively), then it is up to us to apply everything we have read from page 1 till now, Ubunj@'s miseducations, Rollo's books, etc ... Everything! to keep the power tilted in our favour.

For if the power remains with you,you wouldn't hesitate to cut off the relationship in the event that she decides to let all her sacrifice go to waste (Yes, I mean when she lets her hypergamy make her take stupid decisions to jeopardize the relationship).

Thanks.

heartofcity12:
Apt!
Thanks for the input! Coz I could see some redpillers thinking they can eat their cakes and have it by thinking being in a relationship with a rich or independent lady is “standard” forgetting the qualities this kind of ladies possess, they better thread with caution.

It is for the same reason I am encouraging all of us to understand how the masculine works. You're either in or you're out.

These days I hear a lot of "men don't know what they want" and it's quite shameful to me. You want a woman who brings money to the table and you also want her submission? Lool.

Man is to provide and protect and woman is to nurture the kids and make sure everyone in the unit is in good health so that they (men,of course) can continue to protect and provide. So simple, the division of labour.

Man is to teach the boys to be good at being men and to be good men and woman is to also teach them to be calculative of risks... All that testosterone cares about only risks (watch young males play and you'll see how risky the plays get and they don't even care ).

Man is more brawn and less brain, woman is more brain and less brawn.

I could go on and on. It's a beautiful thing

heartofcity12:
Redpillers; question to you.
(A) A submissive, not entitled, feminine, virgin young lady who has a small job or ready to work for you.
vs
(B) A rich independent young lady, not as submissive as girl A, virgin from a rich background.
Which will you choose for a long term thing..?
Kindly give your reasons.

I don't care if she makes billions. The moment I understand she's not submissive or a virgin, then she's for fun.

For the fact that she works her ass out to make money and climb the ladders of power, she's driven by testosterone (and definitely can't submit) and ain't nothing feminine about that.

If she's from a rich background,all that excess tends to make them become extremely narcissistic and grandiose (absolutely no room for submission).

Come to think of it, if she has all that money, what then is my role in the relationship? I can't possibly call myself a provider and there's nothing like "co-leadership" in a relationship.... you either call the shots or you don't. And hell, I'm not taking no orders from a woman living under my roof.

I will choose A even in my sleep.

This community has grown progressively to teach men how the feminine mind works but I have come to observe that we may be missing out on how the masculine works.

The difference between a "simp" male and a redpill aware male is simple;
✓ The "simp" male runs purely on male instinct (protector and provider). He does not understand how the female mind operates. An untamed masculine is prone to pick up fights unnecessarily, provide for an unworthy female and may also have a distorted idea of honour. He is like an individual given a gun but has no idea where to point at to take a shot.

✓ The redpill aware male understands his nature (male nature) and also has an excellent understanding of the feminine mind. He understands the rules of the game and plays to always win the game. He is a tamed masculine who understands the good and bad of masculinity. He knows where to point his gun.
The redpill aware man is the same as a woman who understands her hypergamy.

Debates have been had here about things that shouldn't even be worthy of debates if there is a clear understanding of our different nature.

I am not a fine writer as ubunj@ or c@vêAdullam or M@rtinez. I can only refer us to books (as I read) or videos that describes some of these concepts.
One thing is being a good man and another is being good at being a man.

I think we can both be good men and be good at being men.
Let's understand male nature.
Join me as I read jack Donovan's "the way of men"

We are men not women, not children.

Understand the way of men.

heartofcity12:
She said it all just like the redpill has always said; Men aren’t loved, they’re only loved conditionally based on what they can provide, only women and children are loved unconditionally. It’s the harsh reality..

And it's quite funny when you try to let some of these men know what's going on, they just sigh, let out a silly grin and give one of the usual silly comments "women eh", "women get power o", "women strong" and what have you..... And continue being foolish


To give the final blow to put you away, they'll take a swing at your ego by saying "marriage is not for small boys"

Today's episode on facts about married life

I have always known myself to be rebellious hence whenever any idea becomes generally accepted, it's a signal to me something may be wrong. I stay cautious of what herd mentality (group bias) can do to my thinking abilities.

As the redpill is gradually gaining attention,I look out for when it begins to get diluted or when adaptation occurs as females are fluid.

Stay sharp!
Think for yourselves!
Beware the group bias!

ToyBoyAaron:
The most powerful thing I have encountered today. What's the full article

It's Robert Greene's laws of human nature.

JESHAL:
The issue is that this the first time in the history of the world that high valued men with socio-economic status like will Smith won't recognize their worth, I recognize monogamy as always been a norm in Western Civilization compared to Africa and Arab societies but yet noble men, Kings, Earls,Lords had concubines with bastard sons and their wives knew their role and accepted it, seeing Jada humiliate Will as an average career actress who didn't even reach limelight if not for her association with will really proves how ungrateful women are when you elevate them but their Hypergamous heart is for someone else, see as she's ruthlessly disgracing him because she knows he doesn't have any leverage over her,she is even being pampered and treated like a princess, a shameless slut that's meant to be thrown into the streets, I remember Tega of big brother that commited adultery on live TV and her cuckold husband didn't seem to be offended, what is happening to men if this generation, the standards of what we accept from women diminishes every progressing year, men are more tolerable of toxic behaviors, deplorable past history of women, I want to ask you why? , why this phenomenon, why are men whether rich or poor conceding to the Feminine debauchery?

I guess you missed my previous post.

It's the 1920s all over again . You can't change the zeitgeist. Just protect yourself and your interests.
These women be wildin' but just like @capsl0cked said "may be a task to score one but it's better than settling for garbage"

In the images below are elements of truth that are undeniable.

I have every reason to believe we are in the fourth generation. The "weak men create hard times" part of the cycle we know. This community sees a reflection of itself in the second image and the truth is we cannot change the zeitgeist. We can only make sure we are not carried away by the tides.

If anyone thinks history (as recorded) does not repeat itself, we may want to do a little reading about the 1920s; The period of the flappers and see if there's anything familiar between today and 100 years ago and we may be able to forecast what may happen next.

Cheers!

CAPSLOCKED:
I USED TO THINK THAT IT WAS WRONG FOR MARTINEZ39S AND UBUNJA TO DISCOURAGE ESTABLISHED MEN FROM MARRYING AGING WOMEN AND SINGLE MOTHERS, NON-VIRGINS, RAZZ WOMEN, SOCIAL MEDIA NUDISTS, ETC. I STILL MAINTAIN A DIFFERENT POSITION FROM MANY HERE CONCERNING THE TOPIC THOUGH.

BUT THINKING ABOUT IT, IF YOU ATTEMPT TO TELL AN EDUCATED, BEAUTIFUL, OR ACCOMPLISHED WOMAN TO DATE OR MARRY COBBLERS, NEWSPAPER HAWKERS, VILLAGE TOWN CRIERS, GALA SELLERS, ETC, YOU'RE MOST-LIKELY GOING TO BE CONSIDERED A BAD PERSON OR ENEMY OF PROGRESS.

WOMEN SET THE BARS VERY HIGH AND THEN MEN HELP THEM ENFORCE IT AND COMPETE FOR PLACES IN THEIR RIDICULOUS ENDEAVOURS, WHILE THE SAME MEN CONTINUE TO SETTLE FOR LESS. SUCH PITY.
AS A FINE HARDWORKING MAN YOU REALLY SHOULD HAVE STANDARDS. YOU WILL NOT DIE IF YOU DO.

The bolded is true but it has already been established here that women pair to higher males (hypergamy) and men pair to lower females. This ensures clean display of dominance and submission, leader and follower.

The class of women you highlighted are so low value in SMV, hence worthless. No right thinking male will settle for those. The class of women you highlighted are equivalent to the class of men you equally highlighted. One is through the lens of a male and the other is through the lens of a female.

Both classes are low value in the sexual marketplace.
Thank you.

I'm glad to know this post aged well.

Jada is an exhibit of what today's women want. Freedom to ride as much c0cks as their strength can manage and still wish to have a man who would "fight for them" and lavish them with his TEARS as a traditional man would his virgin.

Don't be like Ms. Will pinkett
Don't be a willy
Don't be a pvssy
For the love of masculinity.

I have zero respect for a man who would take a swing at another man because of a loose woman.

It's like trying to fight for leftovers from the community.
It's belittling of a man.


Please don't be a b!tch

Chris gained respect for maintaining composure as a professional and Ms. Will pinkett gave us something to laugh about for the week


And Twitter's not holding anything back

Someone said; Chris did not rub his face because the punch was too girly, it passed for a pat on the cheek

Once I recommended a movie for us to see with the intention that we paid attention to the male character, Antonio and the three women; Vicky, Christina and Elena and Judy, Vicky's aunt.

We see in detail what we read in the books and what happens in reality.

We've talked about Niklaus from The Originals, Thomas Shelby of peaky fvcking blinders ( lol... I couldn't help it),Ragnar lothbrok of vikings.

I think we should also look at Harvey specter from Suits.

What I find interesting apart from the power play is the expression of these characters and how they relate with what the community preaches.

Study; Harvey, Louis and Jessica and see what masculine man, effeminate man and masculine woman looks like.

All these male characters I have pointed out all acted the same way...... We can emulate.

Have a good week!
For the love of the pills.
For the love of human nature.

heartofcity12:
What a thread
I’m glad to see men having standards these days.
https://www.nairaland.com/7045951/told-girlfriend-getting-married-she

You have zero idea how "overjoyed" I am after reading that.




A traditional man in the making .

I've seen too many "what do men want?" and "what do women want?" on the cyberspace.

Understand masculinity, understand femininity, understand human nature, understand the redpill and be wise.

Traditional men get traditional women.
Modern men get modern women.

You can't get both!

AntichristXXX:
No guy who comments on her picture sleeps with her.

And if he does, it’s fast fading.

Understand

Instagram is a validation machine for women.

It’s for the herd of simps

Any guy who comments or even likes her pictures?

She mentally puts him in the “simp zone”

DMs are also not the greatest strategy but still better than commenting.

The key is to REEL her in

Your Instagram should be optimized to be a chick magnet.

Don’t have selfies on there- Have fun party, social, travel pictures of you with your badass boys and beautiful girlfriends with you being the center of attention.

Stand out, don’t be a “reply guy”

It won't cost you anything to cite the source of your message, you know.

Better still post the screenshot other than pasting it like it's yours.

Do it for honour.

Lightway:
Name of book ple

The laws of human nature by Robert Greene.

Read, understand, observe, practice...

That is only how you know you've learned.

Calibrator:
You are not obligated to defend the sovereignty of your fatherland?
So if someone shows up tomorrow at your ancestral home, you will willingly sign over the ownership of the land to him?




Cowards and empty barrels abound!
And you lots are always quick to point to the great men of times past as true patriarchs when you can't even meet up to the barest minimum of what patriarchy entails.



Redpill dictates that men embrace masculinity and female act their part by staying feminine.
What is masculine about cowardice?


Continue focusing on only sex and don't broaden your understanding of what masculinity is really is.

Even if the opening theme of the thread was about getting sex or whatever, anybody who has ever seen the four walls of a learning institution knows that the introductory lessons of every course are the easiest to grasp so as to lay ground work for the more difficult lessons to come.




Nonsense!

It is not wise nor masculine to become a pawn in someone else's game. If my tribal chief refuses to be reasonable and bring war to the community, I'd leave him to his fate and protect my family by fleeing with them because I AM NOT TRAINED FOR WAR.

The society is divided into segments and the ones who wear the military uniform have chosen to be part of the military and have been trained for combat. Why will I who knows nothing or too little about wars take up arms? Who protects my family? When I die, how long till I'm forgotten? And my wife? Lol, someone else will continue from where I stopped. What about my sons? Which father figure will stand for them? So what is the point of being foolish, eh?

The 18-year olds are just starting their lives and the 60-year olds are hoping to relax and enjoy the fruit of their toils. The 30-year olds may just be starting their families and what do they get for it? A catalyst to speed up their deaths because of what?

When the world was attacked scientifically, did you join a laboratory to look for a cure? Because all of our families were in danger. I'm pretty sure you did not (if that is not your area of expertise) rather you let the "professionals" handle it.

Having to protect my own family is quite different from trying to fight for my country (if it's not worth it).

Remember: only fight when there is something bigger to gain

You know what they say about logic and emotions.
Peace!

ubunja:
very clearly explained.

Now, let's say a woman chooses you who has more money than you. What's the way forward. This is in light of the Rihanna/A$AP thing. And I'm in no way saying A$AP was chosen,, but I'm more focused on the Richer Woman/Poorer Man dynamic.

Personally I don't mind gold digging the women. Using women for money. I actually encourage it. But sustaining a long term relationship under this dynamic is clearly emasculating.
I think I have heard of situations where richer women gave control of a business over to the husband so the wife can rest in her femininity and the man shine in his masculinity. How common is this.

I understand nature has a way of ensuring balance. If a richer woman chooses me, how about the other specs? If she doesn't fit, I may have to explore other options.

Being a traditional male means one must be high value so one does not compromise his standards.

How common is it to find a "powerful feminine woman"? Hardly.

Between the richer woman and poorer man dynamic, the man automatically wears the skirt (in the long run).

ubunja:
Redpillers are loathe to spend on a woman and to support her financially, yet detest a self- supporting financially Independent woman because she's carrying a lot of masculine energy. If I was a woman in today's world I wouldn't even know how to deal with manosphere men. Cause, be dependent it's a crime. Be independent it's a crime. Damned if you do, damned of you don't.

If a woman has to pay her part cause you don't want to, then expect her to come standard with masculine energy. That's the nature of money and financial independence.

Now where exactly is the disconnect in the redpill? It has to be found and fixed.

Cause at this point there's merit in what these women are complaining about...

Took us long enough to talk about this. Since I began to learn about these things, I have loved the traditional way of things. I am no fan of career women because there are too many cons.

My submission is to be chosen and the said lady will have to fit the traditional spec. of women(virgins, submission......, etc). This way, the power remains with the man as he's not so much invested.

As for being a provider, that will happen after these criteria have been met.


My thoughts

Choice can only give birth to two; rewards and consequences (punishments)

In whatever choice we make, we tend to meet one of these two. We must accept the product of our choices.

That, I believe is the difference between a man and a sad b!tch.
A man does not reserve the right to apportion blames.

When the subject of "marriage and old age" was discussed here, some of us had the pain of going several pages seeing the same mischief displayed by same person and it's happening all over again and we still can't see it.

Too bad, really sad
SMH

The weekend is already spent but if you find free time, I recommend a movie I think we should see.

I saw this movie upon recommendation too.

Vicky Christina Barcelona
At least one lesson could be picked from it.

chikasnight:
I never thought staying cold and emotionally detached was tough until recently tho I didn’t show the emotions...
I want to ask Staying cold does it mean
hiding your emotions or
Having no emotions at al ??

You want to renounce being human?

The idea is to be able to control these neurochemicals.
You hear a loud bang somewhere in the neighborhood, your heart skipped a bit and there was a rush of adrenaline (The fight or flight hormone) in a split second but guess what? You don't run nor fight, you chose instead to hold your ground and assess the situation. That is choice

Same principle can be given to any hormone(s) that make up our emotions.
Take a step back and assess the situation.

As per emotional detachment; here's a little quote "expectation is the root of all heartaches"

Always expect less from people. If they do more, it's bonus.

Be human

Law of vibration (a law of the universe):

The frequency of vibration you give out to the universe is a signal as to what you want and she gives you exactly what you want.

Hate is an energy so negative. If you send it as a signal, you only get what amplifies it from the universe.

Be free, learn the truth, be angry then understand the game. Only then do you get peace of mind.

To better men!

A little lesson from PB

Arthur lost frame when he got addicted to this process.
Its how they have their way, it's how red men lose in the long run in the institution.

Stay sharp!