this is irresponsible journalism.. not one misconduct committed by the said lawyer is mentioned yet a faceless organisation (probably unregistered) is calling for NBA to investigate him.. for what misconduct exactly no mention is made! it is common knowledge that there is a body called legal practitioners disciplinary committee (LPDC) which receives petitions against lawyers and summons them to defend themselves (failure to successfully defend themselves would attract sanctions). so the question is why hasn't anyone sent a petition against the family of lawyers they should stop making noise on social and print media and petition LPDC if they truly have a case.
p.s. NBA doesn't have a representative in the body called DIL (dignity in labour)! a lawyer being their member doesn't make him NBA representative there. he is a member in his private capacity and not as NBA representative!
MrDrey: Sanction Ojoge Chambers now over alleged frauds, group tells NBA
A professional group, Dignity in Labour (DL) on Friday urged the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) to sanction Bar. Wale Ojoge Daniel, his wife, Bar. Bola Ojoge, his son, Bar. Tommy Ojoge Daniel and his daughter, Bar. Wunmi Babatope Ojoge Daniel who is also a wife to Dr Babatope, a consultant at UCH over recent unpleasant remarks in online newspapers.
DL, which it's members are drawn from all professional organisations in Nigeria said remarks about Ojoge and his family in recent time have brought shame and reproach to NBA as a Nobel Association, adding that such individual should be expelled from the bar.
•Barr. Ojoge and family members
The group in a statement signed by its national president, Adeola Ayinde and the secretary, Abubakar Dogara said Nigeria can only be great if such people are being investigated and brought to book.
"As a professional body, we are monitoring the activities of Ojoge and his family in recent time and we notice they are shame to NBA. If truly the allegations leveled against Ojoge by his clients are true, NBA should as a matter of urgency should investigate and deal with him accordingly."
Quoting some of the recent reports on Ojoge and his family, the group said investigation by its members has exposed more damages Ojoge had done in the name of NBA, and his case has to be investigated.
•Barr. Ojoge and wife
The statement further said during its investigation, the representative of NBA in Dignity in Labour confirmed that the union had at a time suspended Ojoge over his misconduct, urging leadership of the association to suspend him and his family indefinitely for their gross misconduct.
"We are still wondering why Ojoge and his family would continue to disgrace NBA. NBA needs to act now before it is too late. We have more than five family and individual who have condemned their dealings with them. If NBA refuses to act, we shall take a legal action against him," the statement said.
Bruno by the way, hasn't been impressive today and so hasn't been rashford as a "quality" striker. Bruno gave away the ball that led to leicester's goal.. he missed a good header that should've been a goal. Talismans aint working well today.. they are up against "the foxes" Leicester.. they need to bring in cavani otherwise they'll go behind
Angelfrost: Rashford out?!! Are you kidding?!!... He is your 2nd talisman after Bruno!
You may also have cause to regret if he is unable to repay the loan!
Sermwell: Just be wise in this life! My target saving this year was at least #25m. By September I already saved #18m. One useless cousin of mine came to preach MBA forex to me, I just laughed. He pleaded with me to lend him #1m to invest in MBA forex which I did. Now he's regreting. people sha!!
So he should react to every rumour without hard evidence!!! You know how many things that have been said about him over the years without any evidence? You think he is that jobless? Anyone who has hard facts should present it via press briefing / conference! Adefuye said nothing worth responding to! When he comes up with tangible names, facts, witnesses and evidence, then he'll be taken seriously.
deji17: OBJ cannot deny that he has heard of this news before. He has neither come out to deny or accept it. A DNA confirmation will clear the rumour.
1. This allegation of obasanjo being ibo has never been in the public space and no one has ever pointedly accused him of being ibo till now. 2. How then was he supposed to have submitted himself for DNA test when no one ever demanded it? 3. The man you claimed was his father (don't know where you got your information but it should be taken with a pint of salt since it has never been so publicly alleged) never claimed obasanjo as his son in his lifetime and even after his death, no member of the man's family has claimed that obasanjo is their own. 4. I find it difficult to believe that the family of the supposed father of obasanjo would refuse to claim "their own" especially when he has become one of the greatest Nigerians to have ever lived and therefore should be a source of pride and joy to his supposed father's family! 5. Kindly provide the source of your information and further evidence to the effect that obasanjo's father is the man you mentioned 6. He who asserts must prove!
deji17: Joseph Okwudili Onyejekwe . Obi of Onitsha (1962–1970).
Only a DNA test can confirm if this is true or not.
If it is indeed false, I am sure OBJ would have submitted himself to a DNA test.
He who alleges must prove! That is trite law of evidence... Adefuye the June 12 / MKO betrayer-deserter should tell us who exactly the anambra father of obasanjo is instead of making unfounded unproven allegations! Who is the anambra man adefuye oniyeye! (clown)
CULTURE. Nigerian elected into public office in U.S. stands out as he rocks agbada to inauguration
Will Jawando, a Nigerian man elected into the Montgomery County Council in the United States, has proudly displayed a representation of his culture to the world.
The young politician wore a Nigerian attire popularly called agbada to his swearing-in ceremony in a bid to promote the African culture.
He is an attorney, born to a Nigerian father and an American mother from Kansas.
Will, in a video which was shared on Twitter by the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), explained why he wore the African attire to his inauguration.
He said: “We all come from different culture, it’s really important that we respect our differences even if those differences come in ways we don’t anticipate or even understand.”
“So by wearing this agbada, this traditional West African clothing in a public setting to take the public oath of office, it’s part of a bigger and public dialogue that I think it’s needed if we are to understand and respect our differences and move forward.
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rnwv7quIz48 Councilmember, Will Jawando (@willjawando) narrates how he wore Nigerian attire (Agbada) when he was sworn in at-large member of the Montgomery County Council in the US.
Will Jawando is an attorney, born to a Nigerian father and a white Kansan mother.
#ProudlyNigerian
VIDEO: Councilmember, Will Jawando (@willjawando) narrates how he wore Nigerian attire (Agbada) when he was sworn in at-large member of the Montgomery County Council in the US.
Will Jawando is an attorney, born to a Nigerian father and a white Kansan mother.
Advision: Continue reading from the books of lamentation. Your own case is worse, because people on this thread briefed you well before you gave them your money.
There are monikers paid by Maxwell Odum operating on this thread. Their work is to ensure victims do not take any action against MBA forex until it becomes too late. Since I started calling them out, they have become quiet and deliberately avoided that topic ,
If they are not uploading fake alert (one even uploaded 7pm alert by 2pm the same day), they are gathering 70K alert to upload on this thread or telling you MBA Bank a/c has been temporarily frozen by one bank and they will continue paying ROI once the account is unfrozen
Don't say that! If he wants to help a genuinely ill person don't discourage him The lady is allegedly undergoing dialysis.. you know how much that costs? How are you sure she has started receiving her own ROIs? Did she tell you? Are you aware she has announced so? Even if so, are you certain the monthly ROI is enough for her alleged daily dialysis?
SaintUlot: That ain't necessary again, mba forex is now paying.
What do you mean "partner in crime"? Your statement suggests the 19 year old man intentionally set out to dupe people which is not what the story says!
Jammy2012: He was also duped by a partner in crime, his name is Gospel Esekwutem or whatever his name
Why nawu? Year is coming to an end.. settle all beef
VillagePipu: She was scammed by Maxwell and Airsaylong, now she is offering herself to be scammed by an unknown entity. I have never seen someone so foolish and gullible like Trayceey.
"A man who has no rule over his spirit is like a city broken down and without walls" saith the book of proverbs.. Yes, work on anger management but... How long you've been married? Did it just start recently? Does it happen with other people when they get you angry?
Be careful.. this might be a spiritual attack on your marriage.. You need to pray.. like no man's business..
craigkoel1989: Anytime my wife makes me angry I destroy things, the first day she made me angry I destroyed the television remote, another day was the dining table and yesterday I smashed her Android Samsung phone even though I later became remorse and bought her a new one.
I am afraid I might beat her one day.
What is wrong with me and what can i do to stop it?
OlayemiAshraf: Just because you want to reach climax...u don send your self to heaven....rest in pussy ....e be like say na this man teach Johnny sins work ��
Anything done under threat is forced.. it's like saying a rape victim agreed to sex because she did not resist her armed attacker out of fear.. many who take the mark would not wish to take it so they will be forced to take it. That's the truth. Faithful christians would however damn the consequences and refuse to take it while weak christians would.. that is one of the reasons why the Bible says in Revelation that the fearful will have their part in the lake of fire. Anyway, let's leave the issue aside as we both agree that faithful christians will refuse to take the mark though threatened with death. Also, I find it your own private interpretation that the vast majority of those who will rebel against Christ are unbelievers afraid to challenge Christ's millennial reign. The Bible never said so. They will be "deceived" is what the Bible clearly says.. Satan tempts them and they fall.. Hitherto innocent Adam and Eve wanted more than what God offered and so were deceived in Eden.. same would apply to those who Satan will deceive after the millennial reign.. Their own idea of what life on Earth should be would be different from what Christ offers.. that's the crux.. Lastly, it seems you would have me believe that the great apostle Paul was not one of the elect because he clearly stated that it was indeed possible for him to be a cast away! Anyone and everyone who thinketh he standeth but doesn't take heed, will fall and be a castaway.. no immunity for some.. I therefore disagree with your interpretation of Matthew 24:24. God bless for sharing your ideas.
p.s. I must however add that God in his sovereign will, will not permit some souls to be lost. Not because they are more faithful than other christians.. God alone knows the reason. That is why God himself will fight some sinners and make their lives a living hell until they give their lives to Christ.. They may end up getting to God's kingdom the "beggar Lazarus style", but God won't allow their souls to be lost.. some may even not bear any real fruits or do anything of note for Christ but God will not let them be lost.. to however say these ones alone are the elect and those who were mightily used, bore fruits and did great exploits for God yet eventually fell and died almost immediately, were never part of the elect just because they were lost is not correct
Ihedinobi3: I think that you are mixing up English meanings. When we say that anything is done by force, we mean that people don't get a choice. That is not what the Bible teaches. People will certainly take the mark out of fear of consequence if they don't, but no one will take it without making a conscious choice to do so, knowing exactly what they are doing.
So, it would seem that you and I are in agreement. The only problem may be that you are using confusing words to communicate your position. No one will be forced to take the mark. But everyone will be threatened with dire consequences if they don't. Many will take it out of fear, but some will not take it at all. Some of those who don't take it will suffer those consequences, but some will escape them too.
As for some elect taking the mark, you may not have read what I wrote. No member of the elect will take the mark. Some believers will certainly throw away their faith and take the mark. I said that much. The great apostasy is prophesied by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, which is also quoted in my first post on this thread. So it is not my position that no believer will take the mark. Some will, but either after they have ceased to be believers or ceasing to be believers by taking the mark. Since such people did not hold on to their faith until the end, they are not part of the elect. The elect is the group of human beings who believe in God's Messiah until the end of their earthly lives. They are not believers only for a while. So you are mixing up two things when you surmise that I might believe in the "once saved always saved" doctrine if I believe that no member of the elect will take the mark of the Beast. I believe that it is possible to fall away from the faith and I also believe that the elect are those who never fall away until their earthly lives end.
I am aware that Satan will be released after the thousand years of Christ's rule over the world. I know that he will go out and deceive many to rebel against the Lord Jesus. I think that it is reasonable to expect that some of the people who join that rebellion will be people who were believers prior, but the vast majority of those who rebel will be unbelievers who were too afraid to challenge the Lord's rule until Satan came and gave them the push that they needed to erupt into open rebellion. So you may have the wrong idea of what I know and believe.
As for what the mark of the Beast is, as I said, believe what you think is true. I believe and teach the Bible. I see no reason in the Bible to think that the mark of the Beast is other than a tattoo. I won't be changing my views on that any time. You are free to believe anything you like. I am only concerned that believing lies will put you in danger of being captured by Satan. If the Bible does not teach something, at the very least we should be skeptical about it.
Force does not only consist of physical force.. threat of death and denial of means of livelihood is meant.. of course faithful christians will refuse to take the mark! That is trite! However weak believers will take the mark. Some elect will take the mark. If you don't believe this then you are part of those that believe salvation can't be lost and that is heretical doctrine. "Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall". Even after the millennial reign of Christ when Satan will be loosed for a season, he will deceive some to rebel against Christ.. go read revelation! The ones that will be deceived are those who stay faithful to Christ through the millennial reign but will still end up being deceived by Satan! Lastly, it's your choice to hold on dogmatically to the view that the mark of the Antichrist will be a tattoo.. as far as I am concerned, it may or may not be.. God bless you
Ihedinobi3: I am a pastor-teacher. I teach the Bible, not the opinions of people no matter whether these opinions are held by everyone or by a few people. So, I'm afraid I don't share your position that the mark will be forcibly administered. I don't see that in the Bible. What I see in the Bible is that people will be threatened with economic exclusion, imprisonment, perhaps torture, and certainly death if they do not take the mark, but no one will take it against their will. Those who love the Lord will refuse to take the mark no matter what they might suffer for not doing so. There will even be unbelievers who will refuse to take the mark. These things would be impossible if anyone is forced to take the mark.
As for your speculations about the uncertainty of how the Antichrist will come or operate, I also cannot accept your position. If you want to hold on to that, by all means do so, but the Bible does not teach it at all. There is nothing hidden or secretive about the mark of the Beast, not according to the Bible. The Scriptures are clear that it will be a very obvious thing and that it will be a tattoo. If you are not comfortable with limiting yourself to that, then you must do whatever you want with that knowledge, but I am under no obligation either to agree with you or to endorse what you teach nor do I.
The Lord Jesus never said that the elect shall be deceived.
24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. Matthew 24:24 (NKJV)
As it is, the Scriptures are clear that the elect are impossible to deceive. The reason for that is that they are the elect. The definition of the elect is those who believe in the Lord Jesus until the end (Matthew 24:13). Since Jesus Christ is the Truth, those who believe in Him cannot also believe in a lie. If they do, then they no longer believe in Him and are not part of the elect. What the Lord Jesus said was that Satan is going to put in all the effort he has to try to deceive the elect and cause them to fall away. If it were possible for that to happen, it would, but it is not, so it won't. That is not to say that there will be no apostasy. A full third of all true believers will fall away from the Faith during the Tribulation, but everyone who falls away proves by doing so that they are not part of the elect. Those who are elected by God are those who have elected to believe in God's Messiah no matter what happens until they die or the Lord returns to resurrect them, not those who believe for a while and then stop believing.
Those who are committed to following the Bible's teachings, keeping close to the Lord are being sober and vigilant. It is not those who ignore or dismiss what the Scriptures teach in favor of what everybody "knows" or what they fear that are being sober and vigilant. If one is paying close attention to the teachings of the Bible, they will not be deceived by the enemy and they will not be confused about what the mark of the Beast is and what it is not.