STRI1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › STRI1's Profile › STRI1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 25 pages)
I need public guidance from those who have used iphone 6s on it's pros and cons of using it. |
SatanKeepOff:Yes, it is. But some Muslims are largely unnecessary in their behavior. |
a4cube:It's obvious you don't know me, because I know I haven't ever don't the accusations you made against me. And to say I'm not a Muslim further shows you have no idea of whom I am.. |
a4cube:Haa Subhanallah. Where do you get that from please oo اتقي الله |
I am a Muslim, but this is excessiveness, joblessness, extremism and largely unnecessary. Most especially after the person in question has deleted the video. Which he didn't make and the one who shared wasn't a Muslim to know what it means. Our northern brothers are making this very unnecessary What else do they want from him? Though, I support mutual respect which isn't fighting for God but resoect for individual belief and culture. However, that can only be achieved with careful explanation not by fighting each other mindlessly. Islam is a religion of peace and Allah commanded peaceful settlement of misunderstanding. Not destruction. |
If true then its nonsense coz, that's an internal issue faced even in s.africa and Kenya recently. |
I hope Russia, china will help build Africa as a leverage like America build Europe and united them after ww2. That'll be the greatest win for multipolarity. |
pansophist:USA has over 700 military bases around the world. There's barely anything anyone can do, they're the world police of our time. |
pansophist:Yes, there might not be significant importance in the call, I know it's definitely about the recent coup in Niger, but if it's to protect democracy coz I know there's a USA military base in Niger it's a nice thing. |
Mrkindness:The difference is; Muslims don't declare curfew Muslims didn't beat passerby Muslims dont do human sacrifice or human ritual Muslims don't pollute community water for sacrifice |
Even is isreal wipe off all christians on earth. They will keep licking their ass. I winder if those guta think with their brain. Same isreal that lauvhed civil war in southern Lebanon christians in 2006, Killing Palestinian christians daily. Calling christians idol worshippers Yet, you can't help but lick their ass |
That's great and amazing. But what can really be done to the coups in Africa. Or do we just allow people to live anyhow they like. And I think most of the coups are as a result of greed not because of the masses |
I personally do not support any persecution of any religion. How about we look at it this way, you know a society is made of people and what those people accept and stand for. Ilorin for long is known for being Muslim and not accepting idolatry that's what took them out of Yoruba powers of old Oyo empire. Ilorin however isn't saying they shouldn't practise their beliefs but not to the community. No one takes Oro curfew to Hausa or Igbo land, if a community just like any other says, they don't want something, so be it. You can kill as much beef in Nigeria but you didn't try it in India or else you get lynched. That's society and what's acceptable. Muslims pray in mosque, christians in church. Why should traditionalist declare lockdown upon other religions because of Oro. Or why should they use their worship to affect community water. That water feeds that entire community why should you put whatever in it because you want to worship? Or beating passerby for practising your belief. |
Abbasid and ummayad are great Islamic empires. Great with the ottoman empires..... Amazing. |
USA is a bastard blood sucking country. |
CanadaOrBust:They defeated all world powers at their prime days. British, solviet Union and Mr. USA. |
Following a protracted civil war that began in 1816, the Bārakzay clan became the ruling dynasty of Afghanistan, with its most powerful member, Dōst Moḥammad Khan, ascending the throne in 1826. With Great Britain and Russia maneuvering for influence in Afghanistan, Dōst Moḥammad was forced to balance his country between the two great powers. The British, feeling that Dōst Moḥammad was either hostile to them or unable to resist Russian penetration, moved to take a direct role in Afghan affairs. First they negotiated unsatisfactorily with Dōst Moḥammad, and then an invasion of Afghanistan was ordered by the governor-general of India, Lord Auckland, with the object of restoring exiled Afghan ruler Shah Shojāʿ to the throne.In April 1839, after suffering great privations, the British army entered Kandahār, and Shojāʿ was then crowned shah. Ghazna (now Ghaznī) was captured the following July, and in August Shojāʿ was installed at Kabul. The Afghans, however, would tolerate neither a foreign occupation nor a king imposed on them by a foreign power, and insurrections broke out. Dōst Moḥammad—who had escaped first to Balkh and then to Bukhara, where he was arrested—escaped from prison and returned to Afghanistan to lead his partisans against the British. In a battle at Parwan on November 2, 1840, Dōst Moḥammad had the upper hand, but the next day he surrendered to the British in Kabul. He was deported to India with most of his family. First Anglo-Afghan War: Bolān Pass First Anglo-Afghan War: Bolān Pass Outbreaks continued throughout the country, and the British eventually found their position untenable. Terms for their withdrawal were discussed with Akbar Khan, Dōst Moḥammad’s son, but Sir William Hay Macnaghten, the British political agent, was killed during a parley with the Afghans. On January 6, 1842, some 4,500 British and Indian troops, with 12,000 camp followers, marched out of Kabul. Bands of Afghans swarmed around them, and the retreat ended in a bloodbath. Shojāʿ was killed after the British left Kabul. Although in the summer of that same year British forces reoccupied Kabul, the new governor-general of India, Lord Ellenborough, decided on the evacuation of Afghanistan, and in 1843 Dōst Moḥammad returned to Kabul and was restored to the throne. Second Anglo-Afghan War In November 1875 British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli appointed Lord Lytton governor-general of India. Lytton during his service there was concerned primarily with India’s relations with Afghanistan. At the time of his appointment, Russian influence was growing in Afghanistan, and Lytton had orders to counteract it or to secure a strong frontier by force. Soon after Lytton arrived in India, he notified Shīr ʿAlī Khan—the third son of Dōst Moḥammad, who succeeded to the throne upon his father’s death—that he was sending a “mission” to Kabul. When the emir refused Lytton permission to enter Afghanistan, Lytton bellicosely declaimed that Afghanistan was but “an earthen pipkin between two metal pots.” He did not, however, take action against the kingdom until 1878, when Russia’s General Stolyetov was admitted to Kabul while Lytton’s envoy, Sir Neville Chamberlain, was turned back at the border by Afghan troops.Viceroy Lytton decided to crush his neighbouring “pipkin” and launched the Second Anglo-Afghan War on November 21, 1878, with a British invasion. Shīr ʿAlī fled his capital and country, dying in exile early in 1879. The British army occupied Kabul, as it had in the first war, and a treaty signed at Gandamak (Gandomak) on May 26, 1879, recognized Shīr ʿAlī’s son, Yaʿqūb Khan, as emir. He subsequently agreed to receive a permanent British embassy at Kabul. In addition, he agreed to conduct his foreign relations with other states in accordance “with the wishes and advice” of the British government. This British triumph was short-lived, however. On September 3, 1879, the British envoy, Sir Louis Cavagnari, and his escort were murdered in Kabul. British forces were again dispatched, and before the end of October they occupied Kabul. Yaʿqūb abdicated the throne, which remained vacant until July 1880, when ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, nephew of Shīr ʿAlī, became emir. During the reign of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, the boundaries of modern Afghanistan were drawn by the British and the Russians. Third Anglo-Afghan War Amānullāh Khan Amānullāh Khan With the outbreak of World War I (1914–18), there was in Afghanistan widespread support of Ottoman Turkey against the British. However, the ruler of Afghanistan at the time, Ḥabībullāh Khan, was able to maintain a policy of noninvolvement throughout the war. When Ḥabībullāh was assassinated on February 20, 1919, by persons associated with the anti-British movement, his son Amānullāh Khan took possession of the throne. At that time Britain still exercised an important influence on Afghan affairs. In his coronation address Amānullāh declared total independence from Great Britain. This declaration launched the inconclusive Third Anglo-Afghan War in May 1919. Fighting was confined to a series of skirmishes between an ineffective Afghan army and a British Indian army exhausted from the heavy demands of World War I. Nevertheless, the monthlong war gained the Afghans the conduct of their own foreign affairs. A peace treaty recognizing the independence of Afghanistan was signed at Rawalpindi (now in Pakistan) on August 8, 1919, and was amended in 1921. Before signing the final document with the British, the Afghans concluded a treaty of friendship with the new Bolshevik regime in the Soviet Union. Afghanistan thereby became one of the first states to recognize the Soviet government, and a “special relationship” evolved between the two governments that lasted until December 1979, when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan during the Afghan War.
|
When an imam in Nigeria saw hundreds of desperate, frightened families running into his village last Saturday, he decided to risk his life to save theirs. They were fleeing from a neighbouring village - a mainly Christian community. They say they came under attack at about 15:00 (14:00 GMT) from about 300 well-armed men - suspected cattle herders, who are mostly Muslims - who started shooting sporadically and burning down their homes. Some of those who managed to escape ran towards the mainly Muslim neighbourhood nearby where the imam lived, arriving over the next hour. The cleric immediately came to their aid, hiding in total 262 men, women and children in his home and mosque. "I first took the women to my personal house to hide them. Then I took the men to the mosque," the imam told BBC Pidgin. We have blurred the faces of the imam and the villages, for their own safety.This was the latest wave of violence to hit Nigeria's central region where farming communities and nomadic cattle herders often clash - usually over access to land and grazing rights. The region is prone to religious tension - herders are ethnic Fulani and mostly Muslim, while the farmers are mostly Christian from the Berom ethnic group. Hundred of people have been killed in 2018, and the tit-for-tat violence has been ongoing for several years. A report from 2016 suggested Nigeria's pastoral conflict was the cause of more deaths that year than Boko Haram. Had the imam not intervened, the death toll may have been much higher, as the armed men stormed into the mainly Muslim village in pursuit of those who had fled the mainly Christian village nearby.One of the villagers described the panicked scenes, saying: "First they attacked a village before us so we ran to the security post. "But then they started firing towards the security post so we all ran away - even the security personnel." When the attackers heard that the villagers had fled towards the mosque, they demanded that the imam bring out those he was hiding. But the defenceless imam refused to comply - and also refused to allow them entry to the mosque. He began to plead with the herdsmen, who were threatening to burn down the mosque and his house. He then prostrated himself on the floor in front of the armed men. Along with some others in the Muslim community, he began to cry and wail, asking them to leave. And to their amazement the herdsmen did go - but then set two nearby churches on fire.The imam later told the BBC that he wanted to help because more than 40 years ago, the Christians in the area had allowed the Muslims to build the mosque. They had freely given over the land to the Muslim community, he said. "Since we have been living together with the Beroms, we have not experienced an ugly incident like the attack on Saturday," another Muslim leader told the BBC. Those whose lives were saved by the imam expressed their gratitude and relief. "Ever since they took us into the mosque, not once did they ask us to leave, not even for them to pray," said the local chief. "They provided dinner and lunch for us and we are grateful." The villagers stayed with the imam for five days - and have since moved to a camp for displaced people. More than 2,000 people are now living there, and others are living with relatives and friends. Those who fled to the mosque cannot return to their village, as there is no security presence there and their homes have been destroyed. One local Fulani leader told the BBC: "A number of the Fulanis who carried out this attack are foreigners. "When we try to stop them at the mosque, some of them beat up one of the elders." When I visited the village it was completely deserted. I saw a church that had been attacked - all the chairs had been broken and the pastor's house set alight. He died in the fire.The authorities say five rural communities were targeted last Saturday - in an operation that lasted more than five hours. But locals dispute the official figures, saying 11 communities were attacked. "They killed four of my children," a 70-year-old man told the BBC, in tears. "And now I do not have anyone to give me food". The attackers first looted the houses and shops before setting them ablaze. Not even their livestock were spared. Witnesses say the attackers chanted "Allahu Akbar" as they raided the buildings.
|
verifiablefacts:what do you mean by that. bro no one is safe in hindu hand. christians, muslims, sikhs. ask christains where churshes are burnt, reaped etc. muslims are called to be massacred using hitler method by highranking BJP members. sikhs arent safe too ask the khalistani movement. the BJP wants an hindu state against all minorities. i have evidence for all these. |
Not surprised. Same indians killed Muslims for suspecting they ate cow |
Jazaakumullohu Khairan.. May Almighty Allah grant us patience in our endeavours.. |
Jazaakumullohu Khairan.. Alhamdulillah for the mercies in Islam |
Bastard Obama. The blood sucker that destroyed Libya, Syria |
kokorokoman:What do you know about Russia and it's position in this world. Do you know whom Putin is? Where did they see these people sef? |
Good. unclothedness on history most especially for women had always been ground at abd reserved only for slaves, prisoners and criminals. Reason why many art works in middle ages to depict women are always men carrying women features like breast. Banned across civilization like Rome, France and Greece unclothedness throughout history has always been an abomination until now. |
Flamemignon1:If all our fathers change to women, maybe me and you won't be alive. If we want a continued existence as human beings, transgenderism shouldn't be encouraged |
This is nonsense and abomination. Don't just copy everything from the west. If you're not careful this will also be a norm. Switching gender is against rational sense, human nature and rationality. |
Queenttoast01:
|
Queenttoast01:
|