₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
When they do, we don’t vote them into office and tell ourselves we don’t care about their morality as long as they know how to be a politician.

That’s specifically a MAGA thing. Ask your fellow maga men on this thread. This is exactly what they’ve said

Of the Top 10 Most Porn-Engaged States (2025–2026)
Six are liberal states, two are swing states and 2 are conservative states.
I am sure you never knew this.

Of the next ten, six are leftist states and four are swing states.

DeepSight:
I am very sorry to say but the sad reality is that a good number of them may actually have what you suspect there, such as child porn.

In just 2 days, one leftist female was remarkable racist against Kyle Rittenhouse by the standards of the left.
Now another one, a man I guess is all about porn.
But somehow, we conservatives are the evil ones.
This your boy making noise about porn, if he were in an office, the HR would have invited him and other staff would start avoiding him but you encourage his stupidity. What does that make you?

Obrigardo:
I don't care about those thousands, you are in my line of sight. You displaying all the attributes of those who were later caught in a sex sting or found chasing 12 yr old girls.
You guys always have a disposition to come lecture Liberals on how to live a pious life.
Meanwhile you are the worst of the worst.

Deepsight, your boy came here to discuss watching of porn. Do you see the kind of creatures you keep as friends.
This is the typical left. Very creepy

DeepSight:
I am very sorry to say but the sad reality is that a good number of them may actually have what you suspect there, such as child porn.

It's just funny the kind of sick discussions you leftist have amongst yourselves.
Imagine to men who should be old enough to have sense discussing if people on the opposite political side watch porn or not.
Maybe I should start discussing if APC supporters watch porn.
Leftist are just something else

Obrigardo:
How many maga criminals must I show you to know it's an epidemic in your world? Even you trying to act clean might be the dirtiest of all.

You 'need to use you head sometimes. There are over 50 million Trump supporters, it shouldn't be hard to find a thousand of them who have broken the law.

Obrigardo:
I'm 200% sure if I get to see tctrills computer drives I must find something in the same line if not csam or tranny or gay porn, maybe just ordinary porn. None of them who worship the tyrant trump is clean, None.

Ok so is it illegal to watch porn?
You are really crappy and creepy. Why are you so excited about getting into my computer?
You have a sick mind.
I advise you to forget about my private life. Be a decent human being abeg

Obrigardo:
Trying to play smart but you sound hideous.
Just see the filth on Twitter, let's say you don't want to look into the Epstein files maybe you have malignant cognitive dissonance.
But what about the second most basic lie, like barefaced lie?

Coz it was on his golf course they rushed him out for a medical dental surgery on his tooth. You asked me what happened right?

And you still don't have tds yet?

Stop acting like you know anything.

Let's play a very simple game.
From the Epstein file, tell me the biggest evidence that points to Trump being a child molester.
Just point to one, your strongest evidence against Trump.
And if you don't have any, I advise you never speak on this matter anymore.
I am waiting.

DeepSight:
I am very sorry to say but the sad reality is that a good number of them may actually have what you suspect there, such as child porn.

Yes, no one on the left watches child porn. It's a MAGA thing.
The kind of things you leftist tell yourselves is just crazy.

DeepSight:
I have to admit this really cracked me up./

Yes That very funny and I don't think we should decide humanity by the number of kicks a mother declares.
That can't be a standard.

DeepSight:
Read my words carefully you may see that I interject the word "may" in some places.

That's not the point. I never injected religion into this matter so let's not divert. Let's not make killing of humans a religious matter.

You don't need to be religious to agree that the genocide of babies is evil.

DeepSight:
We are talking about the first signs of consciousness for heavens sake, What would you rely on?
Oh I forgot. Your religion.
Is that science?

I have never mentioned religion so why do decide for me?
In this entire abortion discussion, have I mentioned religion.
Please do not distract.
In fact your replies have been far more religious than anything I have said on the subject.
Also, if you must depend on the kicks the mother receives, then you will be completely wrong to claim that third trimester abortion is Barbaric since only the mother can and should tell.

DeepSight:
The mother is best positioned to be most sensitive to its development. In many ways, she alone will feel its movements, jerks, kicks. Aside from this there is a certain mystical aspect to the whole experience which involves her intuition and spiritual perception and no one else can know like she can.

So, feeling movements, jerks and kicks is how to tell what is human?
This is sounding more like voodoo than science

Maybe 5 kicks show you are human, 2 kicks and you can be killed

GracieX3:
Even with all my explanations, you are still repeating the same lies.

At this point either you are paid shills with no conscience or you are cult zombie.

Your explanation only put you in hotter water and points to more racism.
Part of your explanation was accusing Kyle of the very serious crime of carrying a gun with the intent to kill

DeepSight:
It is obviously a complicated matter and I dont have all the answers. All I can say is that once it has taken on human form and consciousness is detected, I would be queasy. The mother is in the best position to take the decisions, together with the father where possible, and also with medical advice. In no event do I really think the government should come into it.

This is actually serious. You claim that the mother is in the best position to decide when her baby becomes human?

My question is, what puts her in this position?
Does having a baby in your womb automatically give you the science and knowledge to tell when it becomes human?

DeepSight:
It is obviously a complicated matter and I dont have all the answers. All I can say is that once it has taken on human form and consciousness is detected, I would be queasy. The mother is in the best position to take the decisions, together with the father where possible, and also with medical advice. In no event do I really think the government should come into it.

What makes the mother or the father in the best position to take the decision?
Does the mother or father have a special way of telling if it is human or not?
You said in no events you the government coming on it so you're saying that the government should not have the right to decide when a fetus becomes human you're saying that the parents somehow have greater knowledge or they know something that the rest of us don't know and so only the parents can make such decision.
For a baby that has been given birth to, the government can decide but you are saying government should have no power to legislate killing of humans before birth?
Don't you think it is a failure on government if they can't defend human life before birth.
Why should government only be able to protect you after you are born?

[quote author=DeepSight post=139294493]I never said this.[/quote so the most important question to you should be when does conception become human?
If you can't answer that question which it seems you can't, then the only safe and responsible thing to do is to abolish abortion.
We don't want to mistakenly or ignorantly be killing millions of people or millions of humans just because we couldn't tell they are humans.

It is Carlos and genocidal to continue practicing abortion even when we can't tell if we are killing a human being.

Do you agree with this?
It is too big a risk to continue abortions when we can't tell with complete accuracy if humans are being killed. This is child sacrifice.

DeepSight:
I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It may border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

I think that those who support termination of the pregnancy even up to the 9th month have a more intelligent and compelling arguments than you at least they have a standard that is measurable, you don't.
So so someone like you would be okay to abort a baby a week or two before the third trimester. What changed in 7 days?

O

DeepSight:
I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It ay border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

I understand your personal opinion but I am talking of the standard not just your opinion.
For example why is it acceptable to kill a baby in the second trimester.
When do we decide that this is killing it human being.
If you insist that it is up to the mother to decide how does the mother truly know when what she is carrying is now human.
It takes 6 weeks to get a heartbeat but you still think it isn't Barbaric to kill a 6 weeks unborn?
Also do you agree with the law that killing a pregnant woman should be counted as a double homicide, if you do then clearly it is hypocrisy to say that the baby within her is not human

GracieX3:
For what reason are you calling me a racist, Uncle Ruckus?

My dear, I am only using your rules.
You just accused an innocent white kid of a crime years after he was found innocent.
Sorry, not one crime, but two.
He was exonerated of manslaughter yet you claim he could have been guilty of it. How can an innocent man be guilty of manslaughter.
And then you said he carried a gun with the intent to kill.
By the standards set by you, why are you not a racist?
Secondly,
Did Kyle Rittenhouse commit manslaughter or carry a gun with the intent to kill?

Obrigardo:
Guys look at those plates, huge plates at at pedo-lar-go.
basilico will be using all his baby oils when he sees this one
This is gonna thrill tctrills down there

These maga cultists come here and start lecturing us on piety and other gobnobby stuffs when we should be checking their hard drives and browser history.

I am sure someone out there understands you.

Obrigardo:
Guys, is it today?
The tyrant is close to the kaput, but I have a feeling it might just be today.
He's living on borrowed time

Don't you think so tctrills

Explain better please

Obrigardo:
I wonder how you gonna survive here when the tyrant child sexual predator passes away. We may never see you again.

This was short but still I didn't have time for it.

Obrigardo:
Show us the data that you called him out, even with all the crypto scams and financial dealings by his family, insider trading etc.
That should be easy for you right?


Or you need to see the data on that?

Please go back, read and be updated. The entire discussion is here.

DeepSight:
I have answered these questions already in a post to basilico.

This is not the answer to my question in any sense. What you did here is give me your spiritual opinion. I respect it but the question is, since we all don't want to kill a human being, how do we decide what is human?
You already explained your method which is not very accurate.
Is it only the person carrying the baby that can tell when her baby becomes human?
So if for example, a woman tells you that her 8 months old pregnancy is not human, would you accept that?

DeepSight:
Enjoy.

Guy, why are you refusing to call out a racist here. Is it because she is on the left?
@ GracieX3.

You accuse me of not being able to call out Trump. Now it's up to you to lead by example.

IjeBos:
1.) US juries don't find people innocent, they find them Not Guilty, or Guilty. Not understanding that key distinction means you really have 0 clue about US jury trials or the US legal system which clearly doesn't stop you run from running your mouth.

2.) Kyle was found Non Guilty because of how 1.) The judge ran the trial (limited information, showed preference) and 2.) The way the self defense law was interpreted at that trial. (basically, whoever is alive can claim self-defense). Even more, whomever he pointed the gun at could have shot Rittenhouse and claimed self-defense as well.

3.) Ryteenhouse was a POS. He illegally carried a gun to a place he had no business being. He even spoke about shooting people 15 days before the trial. You have a thing where you like to defend POSs like Trump.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kyle-rittenhouse-hit-call-arrest-100041992.html

4.) There are too many people in this thread who post about things they have 0 idea about maybe because they think they sound smart doing so. This thread is filled with so much basic misinformation.

Sorry, I don't read from you, take heart ❤️

GracieX3:
What rubbish are you saying? You are comparing two different cases.

1. Kyle Rittenhouse brought a gun to a charged protest. That alone suggests intent to kill. Kyle eventually killed two people. The court deemed it as self defence. It could have been manslaughter.

2. As for the central park 5, NOTHING LINKED THEM TO THE CRIME. NOTHING. Trump is a racist for claiming their guilt without any evidence

My dear friend DeepSight, are you prepared to apply your rule and call this beautiful lady a racist for accusing Kyle Rittenhouse of the intent to kill even after the jury found him completely innocent?

Are you brave enough to tell a fellow leftist on this platform that she is a racist or would you accept everything that comes from the left.

Do you worship the left and blindly follow everyone and everything from the left?

What use is it criticizing Trump who would never hear what you say when you could correct and help a sister on this platform recover from racism.

This is where you are needed the most.

DeepSight:
Why are you like this, why are you trying to mangle what I said

And while you are bringing up new issues, remember you have refused to answer my question on abortion. Please do well to respond.

Here it is in case you forgot.

Back to the abortion issue.
Am I right to summarise your take like this,
It's up to the individual to decide when abortion becomes killing a human being.
It is only when the mother decides that it is a human being in her womb that it becomes a human being. Until she decides, it is whatever she says it is.

DeepSight:
Not when you insist on framing the alternative as murder when it is not.

Look at this irony.
In 38 of the 50 states in the US, if you kill a pregnant woman, you will be charged with double homicide for the death of mother and baby and rightly so.
But when the mother kills her own child, it's no longer a murder case.
Laws can be so funny.
That's why I concede, let's not call it murder, let's call it killing your child.

DeepSight:
Not when you insist on framing the alternative as murder when it is not.

Oga, let's not argue about that, let's call it what it is, killing a human being. Or killing your child.
I concede the murder charge.

DeepSight:
I was telling you just the other day that some people rightly fear giving out their children to strangers. On the abortion discussion.
Yes, this is not the US, but it is still telling on the question as to how strangers can treat an adopted or foster child.

There have actually even been criminal cases in the US where a family deliberately signs up to foster children only for the purpose of the payments that come with it and abuse those children thoroughly.

This is no point.
Every day we hand our kids over to strangers in the name of teachers at school. There have been cases of teachers doing very bad things to kids but we do not kill our kids because we fear to hand them over to strangers.

There are irresponsible biological parents, there are irresponsible foster parents and there are irresponsible adopted parents but saying that the solution is to kill the unborn, that's crazy.

I would not want my child to be with a stranger but you are telling me that the alternative is to murder my unborn, I will choose the stranger everytime over killing a human being.

Have I answered your question ❓

NothingDoMe:
Lol. It reminds me of our joint venture in Nigeria where Chevron brings 35% while NNPC brings 65%.

​The major concern should be why a government refuses to contribute to a joint venture to save its citizens' lives, but instead wants the foreign party to put in 100% of the funds.

​You don't have $340m to put into the JV, and you don't want to agree to more concessions for the US mining firms.

​Meanwhile, this same Zambia dey owe China $5b.

​If Zambia cannot run her economy, then she should become a vassal state to America or China—who see the money to be made—while the Zambians continue to build bambiala mentality."

Just watch, one angry uninformed nairalander is about to insult you