₦airaland Forum

airmark:
I have addressed that, and can't be repeating it.

Addressed what? You cheap liar.

Quote where I said our injured players won't rescue us this season.

airmark:
I have backed loaning out Jackson several times here. You even quoted one of the posts.

Tell me where I asked for 4 strikers with Jackson loaned out? Below is your lie.




Where did I state that we need 4 strikers if all you quoted are references?

Dirty liar, I only referred to past squads when you and some people were against loaning out Jackson and getting 2 new strikers.

This has always been my stand and I remember Unlimited tackled me on the LB.

Why were you referring to past squads?

airmark:
Have you agreed that I never wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Who said you wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Maybe you don't know who you are conversing with.... Where did I say you wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

airmark:
Have you agreed that I never wanted us to sign 4 strikers?

Have you agreed that you lied here?

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

airmark:
So, we can all agree that Tim.bros is a liar, that I never asked Chelsea to sign 4 strikers.

Where is the lie here?

airmark:
So we should buy a new LB that will bench an English Vice captain of the team, right?

If Chilwell is not leaving, then no need buying another LB that will struggle to bench our English Vice captain, especially when Cucurella is looking manageable.

Chelsea's 2009/2010 Epl winning squad had Drogba, Shevy, Anelka and Sturrudge as our CFs.

Chelsea's 2016/2017 Epl winning squad had Diego Costa, Loic Remy, Batshuayi and Solanke as CFs.

The standard has really dropped for you to be thinking having 2 solid CFs, is too much of a call.

It's high time you stopped seeing Chelsea as Aston Villa. In fact Jackson is not even near Watkins in finishing.

airmark:
Chai, you are beyond repair.

Because of your busybody, you didn't understand the point I was driving at, before jumping into what didn't concern you.

Chelsea of those years, prepared 4 CFs for the season, so they wouldn't get caught napping with injuries during the season. Why can't we do such when Man City, have 2 solid CFs and over the years they have been the team to beat?.

Must one spoon-feed you before you could understand simple stuff?

Jodera:
Just choke am for neck laidat

Make him dey play

airmark:
Even Lordfalcao with weak memory, can confirm that I always wanted Jackson to go on loan and we get 2 new better strikers. How does that mean we should sign 4 strikers?

Tim.bros, you are disgracing yourself.

Can you show me where I said our injured defenders will not rescue us this season?

airmark:
I have posted numerous times where I mentioned signing 2 strikers. Just post 1, where I asked us to get 4 strikers for next season.

Everyone can see clearly that you are twisting the truth.

Can you set the example here by posting just one place where I said our injured defenders will not rescue us this season?

airmark:
I have posted numerous times where I mentioned signing 2 strikers. Just post 1, where I asked us to get 4 strikers for next season.

Everyone can see clearly that you are twisting the truth.

You are the one twisting the truth.

You wanted us to sign more strikers to complete our squad to 4 strikers.

You posted the "standard" Chelsea had before and said the standard have dropped now... Or have your own standard dropped too?

airmark:
So we should buy a new LB that will bench an English Vice captain of the team, right?

If Chilwell is not leaving, then no need buying another LB that will struggle to bench our English Vice captain, especially when Cucurella is looking manageable.

Chelsea's 2009/2010 Epl winning squad had Drogba, Shevy, Anelka and Sturrudge as our CFs.

Chelsea's 2016/2017 Epl winning squad had Diego Costa, Loic Remy, Batshuayi and Solanke as CFs.

The standard has really dropped for you to be thinking having 2 solid CFs, is too much of a call.

It's high time you stopped seeing Chelsea as Aston Villa. In fact Jackson is not even near Watkins in finishing.

It didn't take me 2 minutes to show you reciept, but how many days now have I being begging you to show me where I said our injured defenders won't rescue us this season? You suddenly turned a blind man to selected posts...

airmark:
Post where I posted that we need 4 strikers or shut up.

My stand is clear.

The Internet never forgets.

You know say too much talk dey make you carry gun, set for for your foot and blast yourself away..

airmark:
So we should buy a new LB that will bench an English Vice captain of the team, right?

If Chilwell is not leaving, then no need buying another LB that will struggle to bench our English Vice captain, especially when Cucurella is looking manageable.

Chelsea's 2009/2010 Epl winning squad had Drogba, Shevy, Anelka and Sturrudge as our CFs.

Chelsea's 2016/2017 Epl winning squad had Diego Costa, Loic Remy, Batshuayi and Solanke as CFs.

The standard has really dropped for you to be thinking having 2 solid CFs, is too much of a call.

It's high time you stopped seeing Chelsea as Aston Villa. In fact Jackson is not even near Watkins in finishing.

How many strikers did you list in these EPL winning squads to butress your point? Even claiming the standards today have dropped

airmark:
Post where I posted that we need 4 strikers or shut up.

My stand is clear.

Yea, your stand is crystal clear...

airmark:
Chai, you are beyond repair.

Because of your busybody, you didn't understand the point I was driving at, before jumping into what didn't concern you.

Chelsea of those years, prepared 4 CFs for the season, so they wouldn't get caught napping with injuries during the season. Why can't we do such when Man City, have 2 solid CFs and over the years they have been the team to beat?.

Must one spoon-feed you before you could understand simple stuff?

airmark:
They are more known for their goals and not for being wasteful and permanent resident in offside position.

Leave my club Timbros.

Were they notoriously offside? Yes or no.

airmark:
Stop disgracing yourself.

I only referred to Chelsea of those years having 4 strikers. Comprehension problem strikes again.

I only suggested that we sign 2 new strikers, stop being irresponsible.

You were making that reference to butress your point that we need 4 strikers.

Stop lying.

airmark:
Morata is notorious for being lazy and always in offside position and not for being a potent scorer. This was the player you hailed and wanted to remain at Chelsea.

You should be chased away from our club. You are beyond repair.

Pipo Inzaghi, Ruud van Nistlerooy must be lazy strikers also because they are notoriously offside.

You get problem.

airmark:
Tim.bros, you see your Morata supporter back then? Both of you are confirmed Chelsea enemies.

What the hell is wrong with you? Is being offside a bad thing in football? Which of your preferred attackers doesn't stray offside?

Which kind small pikin dey worry you?

airmark:
And it's you.

It's actually you...

airmark:
You don't need to lie. I see this as the last kick of a dying horse.

We have only one liar here.

airmark:
Chai, you are beyond repair.

Because of your busybody, you didn't understand the point I was driving at, before jumping into what didn't concern you.

Chelsea of those years, prepared 4 CFs for the season, so they wouldn't get caught napping with injuries during the season. Why can't we do such when Man City, have 2 solid CFs and over the years they have been the team to beat?.

Must one spoon-feed you before you could understand simple stuff?

Just one liar.

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

airmark:
You don't need to lie. I see this as the last kick of a dying horse.

We have only one liar here.

airmark:
Chai, you are beyond repair.

Because of your busybody, you didn't understand the point I was driving at, before jumping into what didn't concern you.

Chelsea of those years, prepared 4 CFs for the season, so they wouldn't get caught napping with injuries during the season. Why can't we do such when Man City, have 2 solid CFs and over the years they have been the team to beat?.

Must one spoon-feed you before you could understand simple stuff?

Just one liar.

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

airmark:
I doubted the loan and not the interest in Osimhen.

That we are linked to additional two strikers, shows those in charge impressively don't think like you do.

Who are we not linked to? Every new day, a new name.

Is that the impressive way you and the board think? 6 GKs for a team? How many players have Chelsea signed this last 3 seasons?

Let's see how, and if, Chelsea will enter this season with 4 strikers as Airmark recommend.

airmark:
Fabrizio already reported yesterday that Napoli would discuss him with Chelsea.

We are bringing another striker to make it 2 as I suggested. Go and face your Okomu oil FC.

So why did you doubt it, oche barber?

airmark:
I doubted it too.

Were you doubting it when you quickly jumped on the rumour to celebrate "I told you so"?

airmark:
I am not the coach.

Meanwhile, when I asked for 2 new natural strikers, what did you and others say against it?

Some of you should be supporting small team like Norwich city. Mediocrity is in you.

airmark:
I am not the coach.

Meanwhile, when I asked for 2 new natural strikers, what did you and others say against it?

Some of you should be supporting small team like Norwich city. Mediocrity is in you.

How many strikers do we have? And you think the board is on the right path to gather 4 strikers in the team? Like the way we have like 4 or 5 GKs even going to six?

That is by the way sef....

So you are no longer sure of Fofana again? Is he not one of the injured players that will come back and strengthen the team again? No you are not the coach, but you are the coach to determine Badashile will NOT start for any sensible coach?

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

I am still waiting for you to show me where I said this. You have rushed and quoted where I called them Doctors, which I never argued. Please and please, show me where I said there is no hope of them rescuing us next season. Cheap liar.

Leyqute:
More like 12-8-6-6

Wetin be this

The way I burst out laugh when I see this post ehhh

airmark:
Apart from comprehension problem, you lack retentive memory.

I posted this more than two months ago. Rest.

How about Fofana? Can he start?

For how many days now, you never show me wetin I ask you?

airmark:
Badiashile will not start in any important match for any sensible coach, so you have no point on the defence.

Meanwhile, we couldn't score without PK as we failed to score from open play against unknown defenders, despite using like 80% of our attackers. Same old story as we remain Palmer fc.

You should explain what you meant by "...stacked with 10 defenders ...." Dr this, Dr that.

So Badiashile suddenly cannot start for any sensible coach? Wow! Okay, can Fofana start for any sensible coach?

Yea, we couldn't score thanks to all the chances Jackson missed during the match.

Dr this Dr that... Is that where I said they can't help us next season? I need a quote please or you apologise for accusing me wrongly.

airmark:
You have everlasting comprehension problem as recounted by Diggz, years ago.

Yea, lack of two CFs as recommended by Airmark made the team concede 4 goals against Celtic. Mr Comprehension.

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

Haven't you dug up where I said the bolded yet, you cheap liar..

airmark:
I wanted us to sign two natural CFs that are better than Jackson. We haven't done that.

Just listen to yourself. Read what you posted again and try to make sense out of it.

Meanwhile, I am still waiting for your response from the bolded I quoted before. Prove it or apologise for accusing me wrongly.

airmark:
This Maresca is even worst defensively, than Fraudiola.

Arsenal with better scorers, are still looking at adding Gyokeres to their attack but we are contented with unreliable attackers in front of goal.

Taking a swipe at Guiu this early? Or are you talking of the numerous chances Jackson missed in the match? Which one exactly?

N.B: The defence was very superb. Fofana hardly put a wrong foot. Our injured defenders are back. We don't have issue there anymore. Period.

airmark:
After you explain this.

Did you see the bolded I asked you to prove?

Or should I quote you again?

airmark:
You referred to injured players as doctors with no hope of rescuing us next season. While I wanted bulk of our transfer funds to go to upgrade our attack, you were against it.

I hope you have been educated and finally delivered from the spirit of arguing blindly.

Can you quote where I said the bolded?

airmark:
I always insisted that attack was the major problem. You have eternal problem of comprehension.

An attack that scored way more goals than the previous season is the major problem. But a defence that conceded much much more goals than the previous season is the minor problem.

Shouldn't the mere fact that majority of defenders are out injured most of the season make defence our major problem?

airmark:
Like I kept on hammering back then, our injured defenders are back, no need of wasting money on defence. This is you confirming my view, which has now been reportedly confirmed by Chalobah's exit.

Good that you have now moved away from having 200m and buy defender and CF. Rest.

So you know our defenders are injured last season but kept on insisting that attack was the problem?