Tingotoe's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Tingotoe's Profile › Tingotoe's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 (of 78 pages)
udele1:Please add graphic pictures to your title and how sure are we that it's the man in the picture give that he had his face blown off |
Angelfrost:Get lost go do your sit at home with your brethren in eastern jungles |
theTranscriber:He's chilling in our zoo cage collecting 80 lashes of koboko everyday ![]() |
Angelfrost:IPOB a secessionist group. They reject Nigeria regardless of the government in power. Joining the terrorists to sit at home on our national day sends the message that we are for secession which we are not. For the fact that things have gone so bad in the country today wont make the rest of us align with a terrorist organization to destroy our country. Now get that into your low IQ, terrorist sympathizing brain and get lost |
Angelfrost:We are not interested. Is it by force? Do it on your own. We will not join forces with a terrorist organization for any reason whatsoever |
We no dey join you follow for your madness. So our people should stay at home and starve simply because one terrorist organization said so? Stay in your homes till thy kingdom come but as for the rest of us, we going out to hustle on that day |
Shaolin77:Terrorists usually don't need a reason to kill. That's why they're called terrorists. |
valentineuwakwe:None of them are convicted felons |
Two old crooks dine and wine together ![]() |
meolaniyi:They are terrorists. Simple and plain |
I think our northern governors are missing the point here. It's the turn of the dirty south to prove to us how they bring to the table their 'superior southern leadership. As if that's going to happen ![]() |
loveth360:This ostrich's head is buried in the sand ![]() |
udele1:D nigga na dropout na ![]() |
President Buhari was right in labeling them what they truly are- TERRORISTS |
Shege inyamurin ![]() |
vasel15:The Nigerian state can outspend you ten to one. I's a hopeless cause this your Biafra |
Excellent. Kick those terrorists out |
loveth360:Nansense |
That terrorist will rot in DSS cell ![]() |
This headline is mischevious but will still cause saliva to drip from the lips of some miscreants. Buhari has no power to determine the wages of any public servant not even his own. That is the responsibility of the wages commission |
Conner44:Human lives are sacred in the east but over 100 security agents gunned down in cold blood by your life loving ESN abi? |
What else can you expect from a group of miscreants and touts? |
Elvixbeatz:Not everyone is an IPOB miscreant |
oyatz:Brilliant |
ANALYSIS: Israel’s accreditation to the AU is dividing Africa Many African states are digging their heels in at Israel’s return to the African Union as an observer. by Shewit Woldemichae Israel has long sought to retake its position as an observer state at the African Union (AU). It had this status with the Organisation of African Unity until that continental body became the AU in 2002. AU Commission chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat has now opened the door to Israel again – and not everyone is welcoming his decision. But how important is this issue for Africa and the AU, and does it suggest any significant changes in the continent’s relations with Israel? If its accreditation is not overturned, Israel will join a growing list of more than 90 external partners endorsed by the AU. It will have limited access to AU documents and sit as an observer when invited to meetings. Accredited non-African states and organisations are expected to support the AU’s work in the spirit of its founding principles. Most African governments have been silent on Mr Faki’s July decision. This could indicate Israel’s growing influence on the continent due to changing global dynamics, particularly the normalisation of relations with several Arab countries in 2020. But the move has upset 21 of the AU’s 55 states, some of which are members of the League of Arab States and Southern African Development Community – so much so that the matter will be reassessed when African foreign ministers meet in October. Israel’s request for accreditation follows an improvement in its relations with some League of Arab States members, including Morocco and Sudan. But several southern and north African countries object to what they see as Faki’s unilateral decision to receive credentials from Israel’s ambassador to Ethiopia, Burundi and Chad without adequate consultation with AU member states. Most of the opposition is based on political and procedural concerns. The legal basis for AU accreditation follows criteria for granting observer status, based on a system adopted by the Executive Council in 2005. This system allows non-African states to participate in open sessions of the AU’s Peace and Security Council (PSC) and the opening and closing sessions of AU summits. States also get limited access to AU documents and may be invited by the commission chairperson to participate in meetings and make statements. They cannot vote, however. The criteria allow the chairperson to consider accreditation applications, ‘bearing in mind the supreme interest of the Union and the known views and concerns of member states.’ Only if they are convinced that ‘there are no reasons why such a request should not be acceded to’ shall it be approved. Countries that have criticised Mr Faki’s decision claim that all African member states are unlikely to support Israel’s accreditation, given the AU’s political stance on Palestine. The AU has called for an ‘end to the Israeli occupation that started in 1967, [and] the independence of the state of Palestine on boundaries of 4 June 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital.’ Those opposing Mr Faki on the issue say the AU rejected two previous applications by Israel in 2013 and 2016 for this reason. As the situation in Palestine has not changed, they argue, neither should Israel’s status. They claim the move would be against the AU’s founding principles and vision. However, several of these states, including South Africa and Botswana, have bilateral relations with Israel. This raises questions about their objections to the continent having relations with Israel. In response to the criticism in early August, Mr Faki acknowledged the AU’s continued commitment to a two-state solution for Palestine but argued that accreditation fell within his mandate. He also pointed out that more than 40 AU member states have bilateral relations with Israel and may not oppose its status change. Israel has, in recent years, normalised relations with many African countries as its interest in the continent has grown, and regional and world politics has shifted in its favour. Improved dealings with Sudan and Morocco in 2020 followed a series of cooperation agreements between Israel and Arab states, mediated by the United States. Israel’s supporters in the accreditation debate, including Sudan, Morocco and Somalia, compare the situation to the United Kingdom’s (UK) occupation of Mauritius’s Chagos islands. African leaders have consistently called for the decolonisation of Palestine from Israeli occupation, as they have done in the case of the islands. But since the UK’s accreditation to the AU has never come under scrutiny, neither should Israel’s, they argue.AU rules and procedures require that if even one member state objects to the accreditation of a non-African state, the Executive Council must decide. Given the current lack of consensus, the issue will go to a vote. If members agree that the matter is procedural, a simple majority vote by a quorum of two-thirds will decide Israel’s status. If not, a two-thirds majority is required. In the lead-up to October’s meeting of foreign ministers, Israel’s opponents and supporters are lobbying for support. If states with bilateral relations with Israel openly oppose its status, others may follow suit if the issue is put to a secret ballot. Having waited almost 20 years, AU accreditation would be a foreign policy triumph for Israel. Although African countries will continue to call for a political solution to the Israeli–Palestinian impasse, relations with the continent may strengthen despite the current uncertainties. Beyond discussing whether Israel should be accredited, the AU Executive Council should reflect on how those that receive this status contribute to the continental body’s priorities. The PSC should be tasked with reviewing the role and impact of external partners in Africa’s efforts to achieve peace and security. https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/483929-analysis-israels-accreditation-to-the-au-is-dividing-africa.html |
Why are IPOB miscreants so pained about the president's visit? |
lasthero:Leave yourself behind |
lasthero:Those of us who know just know ![]() |
A man who allegedly posed as 'Salim', and his brother, both Nigerian nationals, were arrested by Chennai city cyber cell officers, from New Delhi on August 30. Two men suspected to be Nigerian brothers have duped a woman to the tune of N2, 253, 952 in a romance scam in the city of Chennai, India. A man who allegedly posed as 'Salim', and his brother, both Nigerian nationals, were arrested by Chennai city cyber cell officers, from New Delhi on August 30. According to New India Express, the swindled woman, whose name was not disclosed, received a message on a matrimonial site that one Mohammed Salim from The Netherlands was interested in marrying her. They began talking and a few days later, Salim told her he had sent her a gift. What followed was an elaborate scheme, at the end of which she was swindled of Rs 4 lakh. The suspects, O. Paulinus Chikeluo (31) and O. Cletus Ikechukwu (23), have been remanded in judicial custody. Paulinus posed as Salim, a doctor from The Netherlands, and Cletus posed as Asif, the groom's brother. Police said the accused persons used stolen identities to cheat wealthy people on matrimonial sites. The fraudsters bought SIM cards and bank accounts from daily wage labourers or random people they would meet at liquor shops for Rs 10,000. After 'Salim' told the woman he had sent the gift, the victim received a call from a woman, who identified herself as a Customs official. "She told her the gift package contained thousands of Euros, and she had to pay Rs 28,000 for clearing the package. She then was eventually asked to pay Rs 77,000 to convert the currencies, Rs 95,000 to upgrade her bank account, Rs 20,000 for payment delay, Rs 50,000 to cancel the overdue and another Rs 1.35 lakh for a flight ticket for the groom’s brother to visit India," the police said. Meanwhile, when the victim grew suspicious and refused to pay the money, she received a message from Asif stating that Salim had attempted suicide because she refused to accept his gift. "The fraudster threatened to file abetment to suicide case against the victim," police sources said. Frightened by the threats, she paid Rs 4.05 lakh to the fraudsters. Police have also seized the cash from the Nigerian duo. http://saharareporters.com/2021/09/06/two-nigerian-brothers-defraud-woman-over-n2-million-romance-scam-india |
LOL ![]() |
I don't take orders from a terrorist |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 (of 78 pages)


Who has the authority to order for the referendum?
