Tozara's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Tozara's Profile › Tozara's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 34 pages)
WORDWORLD:All I see is word salad and some semantic playing around with the meaning of the word “civilization” and its alien nature to the sensibilities of ancient people, and at most, if anything of substance at all, a criticism of modern liberal extremism and hilarity that do not in anyway represent the core of Western values and civilization. René Guénon made no arguments that would convince anyone that Western civilization is NOT the greatest civilization in human history. The West invented penicillin. Will African deniers of Western greatness and superiority (and their European panderers) continue their refusal to see reason until the West, this time around, invents the drug for curing senselessness and stupidity? “There are different kinds of civilizations and none is superior” is the most illogical nonsense I’ve read this evening. |
khia:Ancient Egyptians were black? Who told you this? The Afrocentric Senegalese historian and anthropologist, Cheikh Anta Diop? ![]() |
LastProphet: ![]() Black people attach themselves by force to ancient Egypt because no BLACK CIVILIZATION has an equivalent ancient glory. They were all backward and inferior. As backward as the black nations of today, in comparison to other parts of the world. The pathetic nature of black society is a very ancient characteristic. It is a feature, not a bug. There is nothing new about it. That’s why no black African talks about the Oyo Empire, the Benin Empire, the Ashanti Kingdom, Dahomey, the Kanem-Bornu Empire, the Sokoto Caliphate, and so on, when comparing civilizations, because they know deep down that these societies were significantly inferior to the ones in Europe and Asia. They have to replace their own ancestors with NON-BLACK ancient Egyptians. It’s a disgrace. |
khia:Lol. What? Your land? They belong in Europe? Didn’t they conquer the land, populate it, develop it, and transform it into the greatest geographical entity in human history? Have they not earned all the right to call it theirs? Or isn’t it America you’re talking about? White men of mostly Northern European ancestry (predominantly English by both culture and ethnicity) founded the United States of America, built it with their sweat and blood (and with black slaves SOLD TO THEM BY BLACK PEOPLE IN AFRICA—-in an era when the world had different moral sentiments, and when such things were not as reprehensible as they are today—-and these slaves contributed almost nothing to the culture, the science, the technology, and the literature; the fundamental things that form the national character of a people and the aesthetic wealth of a civilization). How is the land not their own? My grandfather’s farm in my home town belongs to my dad, and, by extension, to me as well. Our lineage has cultivated it for five generations. A new comer cannever lay claim to any part of it—-except by expelling us and taking ownership through force of arms. |
khia:Exceptional black individuals who are IN THE MINORITY, excelling in progressive intellectual environments (and not even at the top of the pyramid) does not tell any compelling story. Talk about black people as a group, as a society, as a race, as a civilization, and you’ll be embarassed, disgusted, and ashamed to your very core. Their character and achievements as a collective are worth almost nothing. I do not think I would want such a pathetic people to be the only available representation of the extraordinary potentials of humanity. |
khia:The inventions of black people can be briefly counted. That’s how “numerous” they are, which is hardly something to be proud of. It is, in fact, an embarassment that many of the greatest contributions black people made to civilization are things people of European ancestry did as routine activities. Which glorious civilization did black people create? Which great conceptual leap in human thought were they responsible for—-be it philosophical, scientific, literary, or mathematical? You may refer me to ancient Egypt, but ancient Egyptians were NOT subsaharan Africans. Those were not our ancestors. Our ancestors lived and evolved in territories South of the Sahara. What did they contribute to human civilization? |
JhayJoe:The world WAS hell on earth. Europeans made possible the ethical, technological, and scientific advancements that enabled the creation of near-paradises that backward black people are always eager to run to. Point me to one black nation that qualifies to be the pride of the human race. Whether it is in America or Africa, black communities are renowned for being pathetic shitholes. Don’t you think it is a great thing for planet earth’s reputation that white people actually exist? Their absence would have given us the ugliest possible world in the universe. |
khia:Lmao. Yet Black people remain the most barbaric and least civilized race in the colorful history of the world. ![]() Morally depraved. Intellectually crude. Technologically and scientifically backward. Zero cultural virtues. What a mystery. ![]() |
Martinez39s:What’s up bro! If you don’t mind, would like to connect with you outside this platform. |
It’s very hard to predict, you see. There’s no doubt that the traditional religions of the East and the West will one day become history. If not in the coming century, certainly in the one after it. However, I do think humans will replace them with other forms of “religion”. Anything that allows them to cling onto the sacred and access the transcendent realm of spirituality (whether or not such a thing exists is totally irrelevant to the tendencies of man, as history has proven time and time again). I’m of the opinion that man will always be like this until something BEYOND Homo sapiens biologically evolves (Nietzsche’s Superman?) or is created by upgrading man through artificial means. But one thing that’s for sure is that the world religions of today will one day become history. And it’s definitely not going to take a thousand years for this to happen. |
MhisTahrah:Hey, Tahra. Quite a while indeed! It’s been so long. I’ve been a lot busy for the past few months. How’ve you been? |
Nbote:He “cried out”. That’s a good thing. At least, give him credit for it. |
Many people with heart disease. Only a few know what they’re dealing with. It’s quite unfortunate. Such a pity. |
deleo16:Do you have the book? Can you please share it with me? |
BIXYBABE:Must you quote me? You all giving the thief a free pass but coming at those disgusted by his action. Are you a thief too? |
merahki:Another hypocritical bastard. Why are you moröns so irritatingly retärded? You came to preach to me only to end up contradicting yourself? Aren't you an idiot? |
haladadon:I pray you jam a smart woman who turns your trust into rag, milks you until you become dry and empty, ensuring that the bones of your emotions snap like twigs. |
Ranchhoddas:Of course. A psychopath can justify anything. That doesn't make his "justification" legitimate. Saying that you need a wealthy man for anything repulses me if you carry a feminist placard on your forehead. How do you not see the hypocrisy in this? Why should a feminist give her blessings to a woman who announces that she want a rich husband?Feminism is about freeing women from being caged by society. They should be able to make THEIR OWN CHOICES without any prejudice, not have "choices" IMPOSED on them. Saying that you want a wealthy man does not in anyway contradict feminism. It is not hypocritical in the slightest. If you don't see it there is little I can do.How come you still don't get it? Of course, "I want a rich man" really does MEAN the same thing as "I don't want a poor man". So what? It certainly DOESN'T mean "poor men are shit that are undeserving of any women". That's an entirely different thing. I'm only speaking for myself and saying what I desire. I want a rich man. Is that a crime? "I want a fair woman" automatically means "I don't want a dark woman", but it doesn't translate to "no one should want a dark woman. They're terrible". How can saying "I want a fair woman" offend dark women? Surely, there are other guys out there who love dark skin? So, why would my personal preference offend them? I have not implied that they are pathetic and undesirable. It's really simple. "I want a tall man" does not mean "short men are shįt". If a lady says she doesn't want a broke man, let the broke man look for someone who wants him. If the rich man says he doesn't want the broke lady, surely she will find one who wants a broke lady. There is nothing wrong with wanting something. You say you want a girl with big ass, does that mean you are mocking ladies without it? I felt offended in the past. It does not offend me anymore. I have come to terms with the reality in my usual manner. I just have a problem with people who can't do same when their ideals align with such thought because it does not suit them at the moment.I agree that our society is a depraved one that puts money above virtues and moral values, but that has no particular relevance to this discussion. How did you conclude the values of the said lady based on her desire for a wealthy man? How does that give you enough information to conclude that her philosophy is "only money matters, fück everything else"? That would be a leap where the premise has no connection with the conclusion. The point of the argument is this: desiring for a wealthy man does not mean a lady hates broke guys, mocks them, and has contempt for them. She just doesn't want them, and she DOESN'T have to want them. |
TheManOfTheYear:Get lost. |
Ranchhoddas:Of course, it is evil. When did I ever say it wasn't? I emphasized that in my post, and stated explicitly that you would be justified to condemn her if she had supported that, and she didn't on that thread, since the lady on the said thread was only praying for a wealthy man, not broke-shaming the poor ones. And the guy also stated his personal preferences. Why are we getting worked up. Did you say it harms no one? It's Ego- destroying. It alienates smart, caring, hardworking men who for some reason cannot make a lot of money. The need to meet the financial requirement of the sick society we live in is a consequence of statements like that. Money above all. Why would you want a young man to give you things your father, brothers and all the men in your family could not provide. Well, you put him under pressure and the consequence is yahoo, ritual and the vices we see in the society.The guy wasn't stating his preferences. He was shaming older women. Isn't that detestable? The post you referred to was not supporting broke-shaming. So, I don't know what could be ego-destroying about a young lady saying she wants a rich man, and another praying she gets it. What's wrong with that? Isn't there a difference between "I want a working class woman" and "Men should only go for working class women. The rest are useless and worthless. They deserve no love. Just use and dump them"? Isn't there a difference between "I love women with big boobs" and "Men shouldn't date women with small boobs. They have no value". Isn't there a difference between saying "I prefer younger woman" and "Older women should be married only to be cheated on and treated like trash"? The guy also has the right to decide the age bracket of the women he want to follow. He also has the right to use and dump (whatever that means) as he pleases. Who decides what is right or wrong? You?If this is your philosophy, why do you feel offended by women who treat poor men like trash, use and dump them, lie to them and cheat? If you declare men of a certain financial standing undeserving of your affections without recourse to feelings, men should also be able to say what they want in women. Whoever is offended should get a grip.That's it! People should be able to decide what they want in other people of the opposite sex. That's what the girl she was supporting did. That is NOT what the guy she quoted was doing. |
TheManOfTheYear:What did you just do? Hypocritical bastard. |
gbosaa:Don't mind the cretinous Jesus-wannabe. |
TheManOfTheYear:What did you gain from quoting me to display your stupidity? |
TheManOfTheYear:You must be a mad, useless bastard for faulting me for condemning an idiot who deserves to be condemned, a criminal looking for an escape route. Why shouldn't he face the consequences of his actions? Why should he escape? You're just another fool with similar history, who feels a tendency to go easy on another like himself in order to make himself feel good. Get the fück out. |
TheManOfTheYear:She needs to know the kind of human being she's living with. Why should you deprive her of that right? What if you are in her shoes? Someone who has been robbed of 3 million, has health issues, and he even explicitly admitted that she has little money left, yet none of that deterred him from doing her such evil. Would you want to have someone like that around you? You want her to keep trusting him, ignorant of the crime he has committed, until he eventually kills her and then comes here to tell us how remorseful he is? |
ExposedWicked:You are simply a selfish, wicked fool. How the fück can you even summon the courage to ask for help as if you are in a dilemma? If you are broke and in need of her financial help, you can't ask her to help you at her own convenience? You are a fücking stupid thief. |
Ranchhoddas:Apples and oranges. There's no equivalence here, man, so she cannot be a hypocrite. You're the one making the wrong comparison. It is a different thing for her to support a woman who believes in using a broke guy to satisfy her sexual needs while seeing a wealthy man behind his back. You would be justified in condemning her for supporting a woman scheming such evil. Again, it is a different thing for her to support a woman who tells all women not to date broke guys, saying they should all go for the rich ones instead, while treating the broke ones like trash. I don't think she has ever espoused such view, and that was not the case in the post you dropped the link to. Rather, in that thread, a woman expressed her wish for a wealthy man in the new year, and she supported her with her own prayers, because what the woman asked for HARMS NOBODY. She was just stating her PERSONAL PREFERENCE. She has the right to such wishes, the same way a guy like you has the right to prefering a woman with firm boobs to a woman whose boobs are saggy, as long as he doesn't come out saying men shouldn't date or marry women with saggy boobs, but should only use them for pleasure and dump them for the fun of it, because that would be cruel. In the case of the guy she quoted, he came out to declare women of a certain age undeserving of marriage, love and care, and that all men should treat them like worthless objects. How can you compare it with the case of the lady simply stating her own PERSONAL PREFERENCE? Are you trying to say you're fully in support of such wicked mentality? To consider a menopausal woman a worthless individual deserving of no respect, love, commitment, or care, yet going ahead to marry her for the sole purpose of subjugating her to psychological and emotional torture? Don't let your contempt for feminism make you blind to reason and common sense. You're being intellectually dishonest when you accuse her of hypocrisy for condemning that dude and every other sick fück that thinks like him. |

