Triplechoice's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Triplechoice's Profile › Triplechoice's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 93 pages)
Workch:Your first comment suggested that most within the scientific community are atheists. Go back and see. As for your data, it captures those in the US alone. I hope you're not ignoring that? What of scientist in other countries. what do you know? See, one doesn't need to be a professor in the sciences to become an atheist. Science doesn't extinguished belief completely and It has never succeeded in doing so. Noah's story is a myth. It is unnecessary and a waste of time to use science to investigate what is obviously a myth. There's is reason you were made to accept it as a real story; it is to stimulate believe in the Christian God. Every religion does the same thing. Yes, it is deception but it is a means to an end and it is what you don't know.. |
LordReed:Yea ,some religious people think science is against their god and religion. Some of them have thought that it is the devil that brought science to challenge their god while denying the fact that science has helped them in several ways. |
Workch:You earlier said most scientist and never specify if they were professors. You don't need to be a scientist or practice more science to become an atheist. When you already believe in a god,( depending what god) an increase in scientific knowledge may result in non belief. That is the pattern. But not in all cases The unintentionally contradiction has helped some of us , me especially, to have a rethink of what we used to believe. But this doesn't mean that science is actively interested in replacing religion. Concerning quantum physics and believing in Noah's ark, not every Christian take the story as literal. So those can still be good in quantum physics and excell in it. But wait. I thought they said that if you think you know quantum physics, then you don't know it. If that is true , then who are those that can excell in it? And please which of the gods are we talking about |
XXXXTENTACION:You didn't fall because you never truly accepted those believes. Those who did were the ones who accepted it as real |
Workch:It is true that the scientific community has more atheists than any other group but it doesn't mean they're the majority within that group. It is 59%--41% Science is neutral. It doesn't support belief or non belief. Anyone can become a scientist. A person's worldview is not an hindrance to becoming a scientist. |
XXXXTENTACION:It is not possible to believe in a god and at the same time not believe (play along) You would need to really believe in a god without any doubt in your mind to have the same sort experience of those that believe. Once you have that experience, then you can better judge for yourself whether it is enough to make you feel special. |
XXXXTENTACION:Then, your op is not sincere but a bait. But of course I know. But let me ask, have you ever believed in a god before? |
XXXXTENTACION:I replied your op. What again? |
XXXXTENTACION:Religious people believe in something while Atheists don't. So, the only way you can really know the difference between you and them is to have, even if for a moment,, the same sort of belief that they have and practiced it. Because as it is now, you have presented yourself as an outsider who is judging things from the outside. Modified: I have not said that their belief makes them special even if they feel that way. |
HardMirror:I have indirectly addressed the op through your friend. Respond to that and quit what you want to start. The op is not convincing enough. I gave my reasons already. Go and see them and react to it Prove your intellectual capacity |
My arguments here is clear to those who can see it I have not made any claim about prayers neither have said that the argument is completely false But only being pointing out that the arguments for prayers being useless is not cogent enough to convince a religious person to abandon the practice. And for god sake, I have given my reasons. Now, instead of countering those, one egocentric nonentity who sees himself for what he is not, is now throwing tantrums everywhere . I have said this before, some persons are not truly themselves here. They are living their lives under a false identity and don't know it. There's a difference between an atheist who was once a religious person and those arheist who never practiced any religion before . This difference is easily identified from their behavior. The marker of an atheist who never practiced any religion before is that of insults, intellectual bullying and an insane lack of understanding that usually metamorphose into narcissistic personality disorder. Atheist who were once religious are usually immuned from all of those and have the huge advantage to come up with very convincing arguments to make the theist start to think. They have been there before and so it is expected that their attitude should be one of concern understanding and not to descend so low as to start using the sad incident of those who unfortunately perish in that building collapse without any regard for the feelings of the families still grieving. All we see mostly on this board is recycled ideas and reworked threads of other atheist before now. No dynamism in thinking at all and yet one of those nitwit thinks he has the licence to insult . Nonsense. Only few are atheist here. The others are confused. Cc, lordreed, budatum, Seun |
hupernikao:You could see I just ignored him. The wrong impression he has of himself is obviously the problem. |
hopefulLandlord:I never dismiss your argument completely. My position is that it is not cogent enough to convince a Christian faithful to abandon prayers, that is, if you're see things from their own perspective. Amongss those that survived, were people who prayed and believed after rescue, that their prayers were answered. So, do you think your arguments is persuasive enough to convince them and their family members that their prayers were not answered even if others did not make it. Have you not heard Christians saying that their God has the prerogative to choose who to save or who not to save? If that's is what they believe, what makes you think your arguments can work. Or is it not directed at them. As for the bible passages you quoted ,one can not fail not to see that they come with certain conditions. How were you able to evaluate the mental state of those who prayed to know if those conditions were met? Please I need an answer to the above and don't skip it. Now, Matt. 17.20 doesn't mean small faith or little faith as you interpret it. Even most Christians don't even know exactly what it means. The mustard seed metaphorically represent a faith that is complete and certain because when you plant a mustard seed you're sure of having a huge an mighty tree later. It is the Certainty of this outcome about the mustard seed when planted that is being referred to in that passage if not the same Jesus would not later accused his disciples of having little faith when they saw him walking on the sea. That would be contradicting himself.. Someone who is praying and at the same time crying ( doubting) is not certain and so can't be said to have the faith of a mustard seed. Let me remind you again, I am not a Christian and not defending the religion. But to let you know that your arguments can't convince any neutral judge ,not to talk of a Christian faithful that prayers are useless. You need to come up with something better. Put yourself in the position of those you're trying to convince |
hopefulLandlord:So you want the ministry to expressly state it before you know? There are not a religious body and so are expected to deal with the public in a formal manner so as to avoid any form of lawsuit Liable is liable I never in anyway suggest definite. I am trying to present your logic to you in another form so you see ,maybe ,more clearly what you did Some preachers may be wrong. We know that Some Doctor give wrong diagnosis sometimes. That should not be enough reason to form an opinion about general medical practice. As for the Bible saying you require a little faith, well I have not forgotten my Bible. There's nothing like that. Please provide the passage in the Bible. |
hopefulLandlord:1, Those who smoke and those who don't smoke are liable to die young. 2, Those who smoke and those who dont are still liable to live long Conclusion: It is useless not to smoke. 1, if you adhere to traffic rules or don't while driving, you still can't avoid accidents. 2, If you obey traffic rules or you don't while driving, ,you still can go on without accidents Conclusion: It is useless to obey traffic rules. With the two above ,I hope you can see that your arguments is not cogent enough to persuade any even though it is not completely false. How can you tell that those who survived was not as a result of their prayers answered? BTW I am not a Christian . But only trying to show that the argument you have presented is not sound enough. If as you said that some who prayed survived through it, then how does it become useless? Or you have another definition for the word useless? |
LordReed:Yes she was weak and sad But to what extent? If that would be enough reason, then nearly every doctor in Nigeria would be hallucinating everyday and we would all know about it. Go to any emergency ward in Nigeria and see what these doctors encounter everyday, is even far worse than that of the op and yet it doesn't results in them seeing things. I have read the report from the link shared and can't find any evidence that patients dying under their care is the cause.. The reason from the report, is personal problems at home added to work stress. Concerning the soul, I doubt if scientist would call it soul if in the future it is discovered that some part of us continue to live on after death But of course it would be better understood by them. |
LordReed:Doctors get traumatized I know. But is there any evidence strong enough in the story to suggest he was traumatized to the extent you claim? Non I can see. There's nothing strong enough in the story that could have triggered that kind of reaction. If there was ,he himself would have let us know. He his a doctor and you keep ignoring this fact . It seems you're focused more on trying to diagonize the mental state of someone who is in a position to know better than you. He made us know he shouldn't be having that kind of experience at all.Nothing warrants it according to him. He couldn't have been doing drugs and as I already mentioned he is already desensitized to that kind of experience.. When he got home ,he was about to sleep off without giving it much thought until his attention was captured by the noise at the window. If he was really disturbed, he would have remained awake after coming home. That is the normal reaction for anyone disturbed by anything. For doctors who commit suicide do you have any proof that it is their personal encounters with their patients that lead to it. It could be anything outside of their practice. BTW Nigerian doctors are not known to commit suicide as their foreign counterparts. I previously mentioned what he did to ensure he was still in the right frame of mind and even corroborate it with Randi's but you just skipped that.That is the major thing to consider in the story. It rules out hallucination. As for scientist being handicapped to investigate due to inadequte data, where would it come from, if the same people who are to investigate it are the same persons making it difficult for others to come out and share their experiences. They are the ones who by their training would label you as insane or hallucinating if you try to speak out. Well , whatever you think, no point in dragging this further because I know your own worldview would not make certain things acceptable to you. That, sorry to say ,is the barrier. But think about this, what can be wrong in it if someday in the future we get to know that there is a part of the human being which is not currently perceptible to the naked average human eye or captured by any known scientific instrumentation that can survive after death. Would that knowledge disturb you in anyway? If it would not ,why can't we keep an open mind and try to investigate ourselves. We all can be scientist especially if we know how to apply the scientific method of inquiry. . I myself from a long time ago, ,have been investigating some of these phenomenon . Honestly, I have gathered enough data myself that has kept me open-minded But I have learnt to ignore anything based on believe.. I don't bother myself with those. |
LordReed: |
LordReed:I don't want to accept that a medical doctor whose training has already desensitized him to those kind of incidents would be so traumatized to the extent you explained. It doesn't follow at all. .I think you're seeing the doctor as every other average person out there and using it to judge his reaction. Doctors have the special training to make them not to overreact to those kind of situation. Go though the story again and see that he wasn't as much disturbed as you want anyone to believe. The incident does not match your interpretation of his reaction. If he was so disturbed as you claim, he wouldn't have had the presence of mind to do other things to ensure he wasn't dreaming .What he did by opening his fridge to get a bottle of coke wasn't instinctive but a deliberate way of ensuring one is still "here" whenever you think you're hallucinating .That is a very significant part of the story which you're not paying much attention to and it is the evidence he was not just "seeing things" It completely removes any idea of hallucination from the story. James Randi does the same by looking at his wristwatch intermittently to be sure that all thats happening around him whenever he is having one of his debunking sessions is still the normal world. Go an check out some of his videos to confirm. The image that stood at window of the doctor said something that matches what transpired at the emergency unit . This shows that the two events are strongly linked. What appears to be an image from hallucinating is strongly connected to a real event that just happened. Just like my friend's, they smell something and the confirmation of why they have the smell , is what happens after. Even though their's doesn't happen exactly in the same sequence as that of the doctor, we can still see a connection . In your own case of hearing your father's voice, theirs no such link to an external event happening before or after. What do you normally observe before and after you hear the voice of your late father? I already asked this question before but you didn't answer. If yours doesn't connect with something that others can verify, then it is all in your head. That is hallucination and it is what I mean by your experience having "no basis in reality" Dogs that can sniff out drugs concealed in traveling bags are able to do so, due to the special ability they have. Not every dog has this ability. And just like those sniffer dog,, I strongly believe, based on some of the things I have personally experienced in the past, some people are gifted with the special ability to see things that others can't perceive. In addition, there is always something that act as triggers for these people to see. If science can identify what triggers this ability, I am sure we would be having a better explanation in the future for some of these things some people are quick to dismiss as hallucination. But the problem now, is that those in the main body of science are just not interested in investigating any of this phenomenon hence most people are confused and not knowing what to make of it all . Some people even deny that they have these experiences due to ridicule or that no one would believe them. Fortunately for me , I have met with people who are willing to share their experiences with me So I am home with them. Nothing surprises me If you're the kind of person who critized this sort of experiences, no body tells you anything. Even if your wife has the ability she won't open up to you once she knows you would never believe her. That is it . one just need to keep an open mind in order to be aware of things happening around you. I am not suggesting supernatural in all of my explanations. Not at all. What some people consider as supernatural are things we are yet to have rational explanation for |
LordReed:May be it is my fault I have not made my self clear enough. But if you don't ignore the instances I used in my explanation, then it would be clear to you. Here is another one. I have a Friend who smells death. Honestly, I don't feel too comfortable knowing this about him. This is what happens. Each time someone is to die within his compound or anywhere he lives, he always not usually, perceive the smell of formaline.And from that day until some days or about a week later, someone dies. Would you describe his experience as hallucination since it connects with something real happening?. It is call olfactory hallucination but is that enough to explain it all? Another one , I had a girlfriend in the past who had the strange ability of smelling me before she meets with me physically . I was in Warri then and she lives in Benin. Anytime I am in Benin, she would call even when I never let her know I am around. Initially, I thought someone was letting her know whenever I came to town. But there was I time I travelled to ghana from Warri. As the vehicle I boarded got to Benin,on my way to ghana, my phone started to ring and it was her. I was in Ghana for some months. After some period of time, I stopped calling her. So for about a month plus no contact. Then , I was returning after that period and didn't call to inform her of my movement. I got to Nigeria late at night and by morning was off to Warri. As I got to Benin by Ring road, she called. Ha . I said to myself something is going on that I need to know. A week later I traveled to Benin. Met with her and finally found out from her, she could smell me whenever I am close just like my friend who smells death. Would you describe her experience as hallucination too? I am not anti science. Science at the moment ,doesn't have explanation for everything. That is not to say that we should just accept any nonsense or story that anyone brings.. But using one explanation (hallucination) for everything becuase science says so would not make it possible to know exactly why some people have these kind of experiences as I have described. There's a difference between your own experience and those I described above. It is not the same. The op experience is alao not the same as yours and I have explained that already. |
LordReed:Hallucination is defined as experiences which appears real. Appears real means it has no basis in reality. Lordreed, what is reality ? |
LordReed:The doctor was in a normal state of mind since he had the presence of mind to open his fridge to pick a bottle of coke to be sure he was not dreaming And by the way a medical doctor should know better. Now, what I actually mean about your experience having no connection to reality is this; If at those times when you usually hear your father calling, you later get to confirm that he has been trying to reach you or was about to call you for something, then your experience is connected to reality. In your case, have you ever experienced that? You get to confirm your dad was about to call you later? Some persons have reported having a late parent appearing after death to inform them about something which they later verify to be true. For instance, your late father appearing to you in what appears to be a dream or trance ,to inform you that one of his friends who owe him some money while he was still alive is coming the next day to payback the money. Then tomorrow comes, the said friend brought the money to you. Would you then describe your experience as hallucination? People have had such experiences and still do. I myself have had such an experience before but it is not something I feel going back to because it brings some uncomfortable memories tied to that period. So there's a difference between what is hallucination and some "real "experiences that lots of people not understanding it mistake for hallucination as in the case of the op. That is certainly not hallucination . It is something science may be able to explain better someday. |
LordReed:I don't think ordinary trauma could have led to that experience if not nearly everyone would be seeing ghost As for the voice of your dad, it is hallucination because it doesn't connect to anything real in your life. That's what separates hallucination from some strange experiences that can't be rationally explained. I |
LordReed:I don't see anything terrifying in the experience the doctor had with the patient when she was battling to stay alive that could have led to PTD Such incidents are not uncommon for a medical doctor to experience Hallucination? Well , hallucinatory experiences have no basis in reality or no connection at all. But in the above story there appears to be a strong connection between what happened in the emergency ward and the dead woman later appearing to him . At the ward, she pleaded not to be allowed to die and later appeared at the window after death, to ask him, why did you allow me to die? This is not how hallucination goes. Or is the story not true? It doesn't appear so. A medical should be in a better position to know if it was hallucination or not. And besides, I dont think PTD would ust disappear without any form of therapy |
duketunde:@ Lordreed, what's your take on the above? |
CanadaOrBust:How was he pulling my leg? Antichristian is Muslim and nearly everyone one this board knows this to be true. You need to go through is profile to confirm |
CanadaOrBust:Not true. He is not an atheist but a Muslim |
I had a discussion recently with a devoted Christian who complained bitterly how his former church deceived the members into contributing both money and time into building a school that most members can now not afford to send their children to. He told me that before the project started, the pastor sweet talked them into it one Sunday morning after service. They where told that most public and private schools have teachers who are not Christians. So it is dangerous to allow such people train their wards as they can corrupt them. Also, the pastor said that most chridren attending these non Christian schools have parents who are cultists and witches So to prevent their children from being initiated, it is very important they have their own school with God fearing teachers and pupils With this ,every member became actively involved in the school project. But after the school was built, the school fees made it practically impossible for most members to enroll their wards. The irony now, is that it is children of non members, " cultists and witches" who can afford the fees that mostly attend the school. Most of the church members who can't afford the school fees continue to have their wards attending those other schools the MOG already condemned. Now, the purpose for which the school was bulit has been defeated. But the pastor no longer cares. So ,at that point, the person narrating this to me ,said he had no choice but to leave not because he could not afford the fees for his own children but for the deceit involved in the whole thing. . This story is the same everywhere. |
AntiChristian:When you don't know what you're advising on? |
AntiChristian:Who are you to tell me ? |
AntiChristian:How does that prevent anyone from enjoying the benefits from practicing the yoga exercises? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 93 pages)



