₦airaland Forum

OYOGREAT:
Rejoinder to the Holy Prophet Mohammed Is a Terrorist by Annunaki

Don’t underestimate me because I’m quiet. I know more than I say, think more than I speak, and observe more than you know. My patience is not the ability to wait but the ability to keep a good attitude while waiting.
I don’t know what is really wrong with you by saying that the Holy Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) is the first terrorist in the world. But I understand that you know nothing about the Holy Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) that was why you tag him unlawful name.
George Bernard Show, a Non-Muslim said and I quote “Mohammad must be call the saviour of the humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it much-needed peace and happiness”. (The Genuine Islam, Singapore, Vol. 1, No. 8, 1938)
I’ve checked most of your posts they’re basically on religious antagonism. In the first instance, is it necessary for you to make comment on another person’s post at all, not to talk of bad comments? Instead of posting valuable articles that can benefit Nairalanders, you’re wasting your time posting and making abusive comments all over the forum.
You should never look down on anybody unless you’re helping them up. Notwithstanding, “If you can’t be a good pencil to write someone’s happiness, then try to be a nice eraser to remove their sadness.” Solving someone else problems make you happy as you’re succeeded in solving it.
I know that you could never do this because you lack some attributes and qualities which money can’t buy such as manners, morals, respect, character, common sense, trust, patience, class, integrity, and love that can make you help others.
I’m glad I met everyone in my life even you. The good and the bad, the good make me thankful but the bad make me learn my lesson. The way you behave seems as you don’t understand life you’re just walking blindly in it. You don’t understand faith you’re just hiding under the pretext of religion. You don’t understand yourself you’re just living aimlessly.
I don’t feel bad if someone rejects me or ignore me. People usually reject and ignore expensive things because they can’t afford them. That was why I wasn’t surprised when I saw in your post that you left Islam for Christianity.
You really knew that Islam is a gold and you can’t afford gold, so you are not worthy of being a Muslim, that was why you’re trying to find alternative. I say alternative because I know that you can never be contented therefore, you will soon leave Christianity for another religion.
I would have remained silent but I know that you’re not alone in this senseless and sinful acts. All around the world a quiet rage is building against the assault on our basic human and religious values. More so ever than in the history of mankind the concern and patience of all the world Muslims are being tested, tried and attacked by the group of Christianity that are hell bent on world domination and destruction of freedom for humanity.
They claim to be the saviour of the world but they can never be. Because they only shout the whole world for Christ, even Muslims believe Jesus more than them. Their behaviours refute their action that is why I refuse to remain silent.

Winston Churchill on Islam:

“ How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.

The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

oaroloye:
SHALOM!

The greatest experts in creating "Islamic" Terrorist Groups is the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

Their first attempt at this was in IRAN, in 1951, when the Democratically-elected Mohammed Mossadegh attempted to negotiate with the British for 50-50 sharing of their Oil Revenues- just as they were giving SAUDI ARABIA at the time.

The British refused.

So Mohammad Mossadegh told them to go back to THEIR country!

The British Oil Company was enraged, but couldn't do anything.

They demanded that the British Government- under Winston Churchill, at the time- retake the oilfields with military force.

He refused, on the grounds that, should the SOVIET UNION step in, they could have World War III.

So they went to America, and asked the support of President Eisenhower. He said the same thing Churchhill said.

The head of the newly-created CIA stepped in: "Leave it to US," he said, "we know what to do."

Instead of sending jets, ships, or missiles, they sent just ONE MAN.

This was KERMIT ROOSEVELT, the grandson of former President THEODORE ROOSEVELT.

He postponed his own upcoming Kidney Surgery: "My country is more important!"

He took office as the Regional Director for the CIA in the Middle East.

He used Bribery, Blackmail, Prostitution, Intimidation to get the Iranian people to hold huge street protests against the prime minister, and spread false Propaganda that he was not doing a good job. Finally, they launched Terrorist Attacks, salting the scenes with leaflets praising Mohammad Mossadegh- until the people finally believed that HE had been behind these attacks.

He was deposed, and placed under House Arrest, to later die in exile- all the while protesting his innocence.

Before he died by 2000, Kermit Roosevelt openly confessed- even boasted- what he had done to secure the interests of his country.

This was called "OPERATION AJAX."

I cannot understand how we never heard of it, before JOHN PERKINS brought it up in his first book exposing his own people's wrongdoings.

I won't be surprised if Muslims one day wake and say the CIA trained and equipped Islamic prophet Mohammed. I won't be surprised if Muslims one day accused the CIA of creating the shia-sunni wars and crisis. I won't be surprised if one day Muslims tell we kafirs the CIA published the stupid and superstitious ha-death.

Muslims can believe anything without verification, as long as it comes from an illiterate imam. If the CIA can actually bring out the terror in Muslims, using Islamic materials as brainwashing tools, then Islam is a stupid religion for dummies.

The last time I checked, Mohammed in his own words said he had been made victorious by means of terror (sahih bukhari 4:52:256). So every good Muslim who follow the sunnah must be a terrorist.

parisbookaddict:
[b]

1. Where was this discovery "announced?"

There is no mention of a publication, a peer reviewed journal, an academic publication... nothing to indicate where someone would go to actually find this "announcement." This is (of course) because no such announcement really exists.

2. Where did this "research" take place?

There is no mention of a University or similar institution where such research could have possibly taken place. The researcher is identified as a “Dutch professor” hinting that he teaches at a University, but the University is never named. This is (of course) because no such research ever really took place.

3. What do “psychological diseases” have to do with the “contact of heart and lungs?”

Nothing at all, actually. The funniest part of this fraudulent little article is the very weird pseudoscience about individual letters and certain PHYSIOLOGICAL (not PSYCHOLOGICAL) effects. Funniest was the claim that “pronouncing the… letter (H) makes a contact between the lungs and the heart and in turn this contact controls the heart beat.” The lungs and the heart are always “in contact,” even among people who are not speaking at all.

One would expect a real scientist to actually know the science he is supposedly discussing. The disconnect is (of course) because the writer of this fake article is a scientific illiterate.

4. Who is this mysterious Dutch professor?

Vander Hoven is not the name of any identifiable person in the Netherlands, let alone a published research psychologist. Now “Vanderhoven” is a real Dutch LAST name, but there is no one with that name who holds a position in psychology, physiology or science at any Dutch university. If Vanderhoven is this guy’s last name, why doesn’t the article give us his first name as well?

This is (of course) because the “Dutch professor” is a figment of the fabricator’s imagination.

It is a sign of the pathetic status of Islamic science, that even when faking bogus research reports such as this one, they try to give their report credibility by inventing fake Western scientists as their sources.

Anybody who believes this article is true deserves the blighted, benighted circumstances that they find themselves in.
[/b]

Islam is not a religion but an arabian political party with a prophet which has its head office in Saudi Arabia. Once people start to realize this simple fact the better.

Islam is the only religion that is spending millions of dollars, yearly, on lies and propaganda. No other religion does that. I won't be surprised if this bogus 'article' is sponsored by Saudi Arabia. They gat to protect their highest investment and treasure, that is Islam, at all cost.

Certifiedbillio:
Guy, see ehn, first of all, Islam is not an internet religion, we do things the initial wey, we don't pray online, wrong read Qur'an online, we don't receive any form of knowledge online.
Secondly Allah is an English word, I don't see any link in its pronunciation and Arabic , the syllables count different.
Thirdly, internet is free, anyone posts anything they like just like u r posting stuffs here from your own imagination, why will u just wake up and say that's the way it is coz it's on ur side, (that's the same thing that made people bath with salt during ebola virus epidemic)
Let me give u the knowledge u don't know, and the truth you'll never be told, Qur'an was in Arabic, but of all the Muslim population in the world, Arabs are the minority, so there was need to translate the Qur'an to various languages, then some set of people called Orientalist, (just like the sophist in the time of the Athene then before Christ socrate Plato ) they were non Muslims, but their aim was to bring Islam down (if u can't beat them u join them) so in the process of translating Qur'an some things were changed, Arabic is a very rich language, so wrong meaning were giving to some statement to make it sound awful, then this Orientalist spread round the world since the go around educating and spread this wrong version of the book, some Muslims learn from this version, coz not everyone know the truth, those are the Muslim who involve in terrorism and co coz of the way things were transferred to then, this Orientalist are among the Arabs also. That's just a brief. In Nigeria Islam existed 300 years b4 Christianity, (pls prove me wrong) but the first version of Qur'an in Nigerian language is translated by a Christian rev. Coz they were literates now tell me how that kind of translating will be 100% of course he will make it look awful, that version goes around like that and u see Muslims who believe those words misbehaving, all is aimed at making Islam look awful. That why real Muslims do our religion the way it was reviled, and not this 21st century internet religion. Pls if u need to know and thing bout the religion of peace, stop all this copy and paste, go and learn Arabic, translate the Qur'an and Hadith with your own knowledge of language , then you can have a valid point

Do you read what you typed before submitting it. It makes no sense at all.

Presbulg:
So why are the rest of us(1 billion+ muslims) not following it ?

Because Muslims are hypocrites who hardly follow the sunnah of the Islamic prophet. What are the sunnah of the prophet:


1) Terror: Mohammed said, '....I have been made victorious through terror. (sahih bukhari 4:52:256)

2) Child marriage: Quran 65:4.

3) Incitement to violence against the Christians and the Jews. Quran 9:29.

4) Extortion of Jews and Christians. Qur'an 9:29.

5) Widening enmity between the Jews and the Christians. Qur'an 5:51.

6) Cursing the Jews and the Christians because they rejected him as a fake prophet . Quran 98:6.

7) Calling for the destruction of non Muslims by Muslim jihadists. Quran 8:60. And many more.

The above are the sunnah of the prophet of Islam which most Muslims do not follow, especially non-Arab Muslims.

Islam is no religion but a political party with a prophet. The political party party is controlled by the ummah hence Muslim's allegiance is not to any non-muslim country but to the ummahh. This is what makes Islam an illegal religion in a sane world.

This is a good development. In no time the religion of peace™ will be banned altogether in the civilized world. People are waking up to the treat of this Arab biggest political party with global appeal.

parisbookaddict:
he didnt lie. what was the lie. that he said, "I don’t like to speak of Islamic violence, because every day, when I browse the newspapers, I see violence, here in Italy"
do u want him to criticize Islam and put not only catholic lives but other Christians at risk in Muslim majority countries. we all know what islam is, more and more everyday without the help of the a popes comments. pope benedict was more vocal and criticized islam, did you defend him when the world press condemned and ridiculed him. has adeboye or oyedepo criticized islam?? be fair man.


yes i agree, but its not a lie that alot of italian mafia members are catholics, like its written in the bible, remove the log from your own eyes first.



wow true2god, i didnt expect this from you. we must be honest at all times. you are not catholic, talk-less of having secret Vatican info, so how do u now claim he was removed. Pope benedict was an old man at the time and ill health forced him to resign. Pope francis has said that he does not have much time remaining as his own heath declines. he fell during mass in poland last week(i actually read comments of nairaland "christians" here laughing at him, an old man!!), lets not forget that ill health and old age comes to us all who live long enough.



i am a catholic and very open minded since i oppose questionable dogmas in all areas of life. the catholic church has defended Christianity for centuries. from preserving christian texts and compiling the bible to forming the very controversial crusades to combat jihadists. today even ignorant protestants condemn the Christians who fought in the crusades. the catholic church has been ridiculed because of the crusades.

the catholic church has become soft when it comes to islam, yes i know. what is ur own alternative. violence? more crusades ?

Yes, I admire the Catholic faith for their contributions to Christianity and their defense of the Christian faith when the Islamic hordes attempted to overrun Europe. I have many Catholics in my family who are very nice. However you need to understand that pacifism does not work when dealing with Islam. Many culture that did that had been destroyed. We should learn from turkey experience.

On the Italian mafia, it has no justification in Christian theology nor do they do that in obedience to Christ

I admire that last two popes, Pope John paul and Pope Benedict, they did not function in the era of political correctness. However this current Pope seem to be part and parcel of current world order. I would have love to itemize my reasons but so busy right now. I have nothing against the Catholic faith, but the current policy of appeasement by the current Pope is very dangerous, he should, even once, condemn current aggression against Christians worldwide in the hands of Muslim fanatics.

wirinet:
Until I see names like pastor Chukwuma, pastor Omoregbe, pastor Abba, etc. appointed as special assistants or assistant general overseers, then I would believe tribalism has not been introduced to RCCG.

Pls take 2 bottles of Heineken and 1 plate of catfish pepper soup. I will pay mama nkechi on your behalf.

parisbookaddict:
He does not defend islam. Can u imagine the backlash if he criticised islam.. he will be causing more divisions, he will also put catholics in muslim majority countries at risk.
He is right by saying that catholics in italy do some violent things as well. Infact he excommunicated all catholics involved in mafia related activities a few years ago..

By the way, catholic teachings on mohammed describe him as an heretical false prophet.

The pope don't need to lie to make the Arabs/Muslims happy, he must always tell the truth. Islam is evil, violent, imperialistic, and anti-kafir to the core.

Catholics in Italy are not making a daily headlines of killing, raping, bombing and enslaving non-catholics, but Muslims/Arabs are. This pope is nothing but a fake, no wonder they technically remove the former pope Benedict. Pope Benedict told 100% truth about Islam and Muslims worldwide went on a global call for his head.

You can't continue to feed a crocodile hoping to tame his bestial instinct. Political correctness and lies is what will destroy the west and the Catholic church with respect to current Islamic menace.

Plappvillemoi:
20 more Mosques to be shut down definitely. Islam is deadly. Defending such religion make you one of them.

It is only a Muslim, a blind and a deaf and dumb man that will tell you that Islam is not deadly. The foundation of is Islam is fraught with wars, genocide and discriminations against non-Muslims and will forever remain so because allahh commanded it (Quran 9:29-30, Quran 8:39, Quran 8:60, Quran 2:191-2, Quran 5:51, Quran 98:6, sahib Bukhari 4:52:256, etc) until the civilized world is determined to destroy Islam and put it in a right classification as a political religion with the aim of global conquest and annihilation of other religions and culture.

In Belgium another priest was attacked in a church by another Muslim. This trend will continue until a real rage will emerge in Europe which will lead to civil wars in Europe and mass deportation of Muslims of Arab/African descent and the complete destruction of all mosques. This incident had happen in Spain and France before, mass deportation of Muslims and destruction of all mosques, and I can see history repeating itself in a much larger scale.

The mistake is with the European politicians who open their doors to mass Arab migration. Arabs/Muslims are never raised to be loyal to the kafirs nor to accept their culture and constitution which is diametrically opposite to Shari'a and a judeo-christian values. It won't end well, you don't put a cat and dog in the same barn. Providence had already separated the Europeans from the Arabs, the European have no business allowing a hostile people and culture in their countries in such a large scale.

Empiree:
Amen

Mass deportations awaits Muslim destitutes in Europe.

parisbookaddict:
Demmzy15 has no understanding of common sense arguments.. he is a perfect example of an imam controlled muslim.. just cant stop regurgitating what his imams and shieks tell him..

He reasons like a toddler, sorry he is a Muslim.

The Islamic concept of Christian-muslim marriage is that a Muslim man can marry a Christian/Jewish woman but a Christian man must never marry Muslim woman. In Egypt, Pakistan, Sudan, Afghanistan, etc, it is illegal for a Christian man to marry a Muslim woman.

People need have a better understanding of Islam by now. Yoruba Muslims are fake, they do not follow the sunnah or the Islamic prophet in all they do. I don't want Yoruba Muslim to start giving us Yoruba example of their Islamic version of interreligious marriage.

annunaki2:
Your hadiths clearly doccument that in his younger days whilst working for his sugar mummy, he travelled as far as to Syria on trading expeditions.

Muslims are set of confused. We kafirs are not meant to be teaching Muslims their religious history for free.

Mohammed also asked his people to migrate to Ethiopia (first hijra before the yathrib or Medina hijra), when the Meccans were fighting back, and they crossed seas and rivers before getting to Ethiopia. And most of them would have told Mohammed their travel experience, the geographical features and vegetations of the land the passed through. So for Mohammed to write few of these in the Qur'an, he is now a prophet. See Islamic educational systems with a constant warp reasoning.

The current Islamic hijra is now Europe, I am very sure Europe will end up like Mecca and Medina and turkey except something drastic is done to stop the modern Islamic hijra.

Farmerforlife:
The sum total of Islamic teachings are not all summarized in Quran 9:5, 29-30 as you want us to believe. Nor do I believe that you have not been previously told the context on many previous occasions. If you did not comprehend it then, you will not do so now.

Your submission is also way off the topic of the op. The discussion concerns conducting the funeral rites for the dead criminal Muslim. Whatever his misdeeds were, he was a Muslim (I am sure you vehemently agree with this), and therefore entitled to a Muslim burial. Furthermore, he has been punished for his crime and that is that. Islamic stipulations are clear and are not reliant on the personal preferences of non Muslims or the emotional knee-jerk reactions of ignorant Muslim apologists.

The French Muslims' reaction was wrong from an Islamic point of view.

You mean we should scrub Quran 9:5, 29-30 from the Quran?

FYI, the Saudi govt also rejected the body of Osama bin laden hence was thrown into the ocean. Why are Muslims always creating new records?

masseratti:
no records of any companion writing it down, it was recited orally and written down by the 3rd caliph, why would anyone one want to standardise a perfect book? kindly explain what standardized means please.

If the Koran was standardized and yet poorly written and arranged (the worst book ever written in terms of taught arrangements and grammatical structuring), only God knows how it looked like prior the alleged 'standardization'.

MRBrownJ:
we have to be mentally stronger than these terrorists, and dont let their evil campaign of hate and chaos get to us all (pointing fingers at the wrong culprits). the mass deportation has already somehow begun as the door on refugees (who not long ago were welcomed with open arms) has been shut down.

But 99% of these refugees are Muslims. For the fact that most Muslims in Europe are not violent against the kafirs does not mean it is no longer in Islamic theology for them to do so (Quran 9:29-30, 5:51, Quran 98:6, Qur'an 48:29, Quran 8:60, Qur'an 2:191-192) and sahih bukhari 4:52:256.

The only way you can objectively appraise Muslims/Islam is to consider the status of non-muslims in countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, Pakistan, etc. You cant say Muslims are tolerant in a country where they are minority because they stand no chance dislodging the majority easily, but as Muslim population grow, their threat, violence and special demands grow. There is no other religious demographic that is as troublesome as the Muslims'.

All I can say is that is you are not honest in addressing Islamic problems on the host society, you are among the people that claim your religion has been hijacked by the minority terrorist without even looking at the core teachings of Mohammed with respect to Muslims and non-muslims relationship.

They sense that the civilized will no more tolerate their barbaric behaviours. I sense damage control and mass deportations soon. The jihadist seemed to have crossed the red line.

Farmerforlife:
We are not at all interested in what you unbelievers think, or in sending you any messages of appeasement. We Muslims are answerable only to our Lord and Creator; the Almighty. When will you finally manage to get that into your head?

And you can misquote the Quran all you like. Not interested in what you believe there either. I think that most Muslims are informed enough about Islam nowadays to know when you are lying and inserting your brand of falsehood into brackets while quoting the Quran, so your addendums no longer even merit a passing glance.

Take care of your blood pressure before you blow a pipe while monitoring Muslims.

Please explain the proper context of Quran 9:5, 29-30 with respect to what your Islamic terrorist did. Is he following the sunnah or not?

MRBrownJ:
this is exactly the clueless comments that have this discussion go NOWHERE! go back and check all the terror attacks that have happened in Angola, then check the culprits, and see if the "religion" of any of these separatist groups have ever been in question. if that is the case the EVERY church in Angola and Xtians should be banned then?! again, you CANT compare apples and oranges, but if you beiieve that there can NEVER be these same terror attacks in Angola, because they've banned Mosques and Muslims there, then i suggest you wake up from your dream.

The last time I checked we dont have anyone shoutind hallelujah before an attack is made. All Muslim terrorist shout 'allahhu Akbar'

The issue has to be Muslims because no other religious group or culture always attempt to challenge the local culture to conform to Arab or Islamic requirements. Any country Muslims migrate to, they will want to change the constitution to conform to sharia laws, thats treason in a sane world. I have never seen any Christian worker in Saudi Arabia asking the Saudi, Iran or Pakistani authorities to observe Christmas or easther festivals but I have seen many Arabs forcing the Americans and the Europeans to declare Islamic public holidays as part of the national holidays.

France and Europe were not there when Islam/muslims started their global war of Islamic conquest. The first religion and culture that started global conquest is Islam and the Arabs. Islam did not come to Pakistan and southeast Asia peacefully, millions of Hindus were killed by Islamic invaders.

You identity here is insignificant. We are not blaming all Muslims but Islam which produced so many terrorist. The Muslim community will quickly deny their own anytime an act of terror is committed but will refuse to report any of their member whom they suspect might he planning an act of terror.

MRBrownJ:
NO, thats not what i am saying.... my point is: focussing on muslim citizens of France is NOT the way to solve this issue, far from it. it will simply create MORE discrimination towards muslims in France (as it has already started), and therefore play in the hands of these terrorists whose aim is exactly that.... how easy do you think it would therefore be for them to brainwash these discriminated muslims?

I'm sorry, I won't buy into this well crafted Obama narrative, it is has gotten stale. This is the same narrative/excuse/reasons Muslims and Muslim-sympathatizers give in order to make Muslims victims of Islamic terror against the kafirs. We are living in a strange world in this strange time.

The last time I checked Christians/Jews/Hindus are persecuted in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan, and almost all Islamic countries and yet I have never heard of Christians/Jews/Hindus committing act of terror in order to air their grievances. Christians are killed in Egypt, persecuted in Sudan, massacred in Pakistan and yet I have never seen any act of terror by the local Christian community against those countries.

Look, the issue is the Quran, the hadith and the sunnah which mandates compulsory violence against the kafirs and as long as these evil books are continually being used to brainwash the feeble minds of young Muslims, the act of terror will always be associated with Islam. You have to understand the foundation of Islamic terrorism which is more that 1300 years old.

Don't ask kafirs to stop blaming Muslims and Islam for the act of terror, it is an integral part of old and modern Islamic theology.

Farmerforlife:
This is wrong. A sinful Muslim is entitled to a Muslim burial regardless of the enormity of his sin. This is a collective responsibility on French Muslims. It is not their right to judge him.

What message will the Muslim ummah be sending to us kafirs if they give this Muslim terrorist an Islamic burial? Anyway he is following following the instructions of Mohammed to 'behead the infidels wherever you find them (even inside church or synagogue)'...Quran 9:5.

Demmzy15:
O Muslims!!!! I'll advice all of you, especially those who are new here, please ignore this Yeebhoe drug peddler. He's time would soon be up(Indonesia tins), this issue he's presently as been refuted long ago.

A word is enough for the wise, when you ignore them, it burns down to their heart. Even if you want to post, just laugh out loud!

It seems you are getting tired defending the criminal activities of your prophet. Keep defending your criminal prophet while your Quran, hadith and the sunnah keep exposing him as a slave owner, slave trader, war criminal and a petty thief.

Safiyyah: Muhammad’s War Booty
An example of Muhammad’s questionable ethics is his marriage to a seventeen-year-old Jewish girl named Safiyyah whom he took from the plunder of Khaibar:

Narrated Abdul Aziz:
Anas said, "When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there (early in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet. He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, ‘Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned.’ He repeated this thrice.
The people came out for their jobs and some of them said, ‘Muhammad (has come).’ (Some of our companions added, ‘With his army.’) We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, ‘O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.’ The Prophet said, ‘Go and take any slave girl.’ He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, ‘O Allah's Apostle! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.’ So the Prophet said, ‘Bring him along with her.’ So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, ‘Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.’ " Anas added: "The Prophet then manumitted her and married her."
Thabit asked Anas, "O Abu Hamza! What did the Prophet pay her (as Mahr)?" He said, "Her self was her Mahr for he manumitted her and then married her." Anas added, "While on the way, Um Sulaim dressed her for marriage (ceremony) and at night she sent her as a bride to the Prophet. So the Prophet was a bridegroom and he said, ‘Whoever has anything (food) should bring it.’ He spread out a leather sheet (for the food) and some brought dates and others cooking butter. (I think he (Anas) mentioned As-Sawaq). So they prepared a dish of Hais (a kind of meal). And that was Walima (the marriage banquet) of Allah's Apostle." ( Sahih al-Bukhari , Volume 1, Book 8, Number 367 ).


The hadith above was the prelude to Mohammed buying of safiya from Dhiya (not a Yoruba man, an Arab criminal) at the cost of seven slaves to one. It must have been a good slave trade business for Dhiya while the prophet of allah must have also enjoyed a nice moment of non-symbiotic sex with safiya. Mohammed is supposed to be charged as a war criminal, in absentia, at the Hague.

true2god:
Sunnah ibn majah volume 3, hadith number 2272. This is an authentic (sahih) hadith, on the cost of safiyya, a 17-year old girl captured by Mohammad's at khaibar who mohammed later raped and 'married'.

This is to say the the prophet of allahh was fully engaged in slave trade business and sleeping with female war captives. This the Islamic most perfect man worldwide whose lifestyle and conducts pious Muslims must emulate.

Damage control strategy.

Sunnah ibn majah volume 3, hadith number 2272. This is an authentic (sahih) hadith, on the cost of safiyya, a 17-year old girl captured by Mohammad's at khaibar who mohammed later raped and 'married'.

Bnladan:
Dis is 1 of several reasons we dnt call "Shi'a" Muslims. Dia doctrines are unislamic. Dats y we as Sunni are neutral on wat happened in Zaria recently. They (shiites) will never have our support. Dis is prostitution, dis is fornication. No religion except dias think one will be rewarded for sleeping with anoda persons wife.

You Sunnis are the world's greatest terrorist and terror financier. Ask the Saudi wahabi government.

MDsambo:
I have a dream that one day you will understand that ISIS and all other Terrorist groups are not Islam and Islam has nothing to do with terrorism

Mohammed said: 'I have been given the shortest expression with widest meaning and I have been made victorious by means of terror' (sahih bukhari 4:52:256).

This is the statement made by the founder of Islam and the best example that all Muslims are meant to emulate, Mohammed ibn abdullah.

MRBrownJ:
focussing on a particular religion hasnt solved anything in the past, and sure wont solve anything now. did the last terrorist attend any of these mosques? pointing fingers at a certain religious group is exactly what these bastard terrorists wants us to do... and the more France does it, the more these terrorists get new recruits in their ranks.

Do you mean that any attempt to forestall future Islamic terror attacks will only lead to a greater Islamic terror? Lemme get your point right.

true2god:
Ibn ishaq, the history of Mohammed, page 155.

Empire, you can see how terrible your prophet can be, even asking a man be tortured because he refused to disclose where a treasure, which Mohammed want to take as war booty, was. Remember, he had already taken safiya as war booty, in obedience to allahh, and now he needed gold and treasures to sell at black market.

Your prophet is simply an armed robber.

Ibn ishaq, the history of Mohammed, page 155.