₦airaland Forum

When the whites where farmers before the ill-implemented land reform was zimbabwe not one of the biggest food producers in Africa?? Where zimbabweans starving??
Now the old fool is living large while his people are dying. You accuse nigerian politicians of feeding fat off state funds while the people are dying of poverty but you love and encourage mugabe because he hates America and britain as much as you do. . .What hypocrisy!

;d

debosky:
Quit gloating and listen for a minute.

An allegation  cannot be regarded as baseless UNLESS it has been investigated and revealed to have no facts backing it up - till that is done, it remains an unproven allegation.

Definition of allegation:

1.  Something alleged; an assertion: allegations of disloyalty.
2. The act of alleging.
3. A statement asserting something without proof: The newspaper's charges of official wrongdoing were mere allegations.
4. Law An assertion made by a party that must be proved or supported with evidence.

So whats the difference between what you're saying and what i said??
I mentioned allegations and facts complimented one another while Afam implied there's a difference

Afam: . . .stating that an allegation is not an established fact is not the same thing as stating it's baseless

heres what you wrote debosky
"An allegation  cannot be regarded as baseless UNLESS it has been investigated and revealed to have no facts backing it up" - In other words An allegation can be regarded as baseless WHEN it has been revealed to have no Facts backing it up. . . .
This is clearly not what Afam the wise one said.

mccloud224:
@Tudor

You shut it and shut it good.The Zimbabweans weren't faring any better when the "colonialists" had most of their land.The only indigenes that profited from them where the ones working on "their" plantations.Mugabe came in with a vision to liberate the country.What is going on there is no different from what happened with Liberia (think with your head not your ass).Under the leadership of Ghadaffi, the country prospered and got a lot of sanctions and bad press to show for it.The great difference between them is the severity in Zimbabwe.

The Western powers have been getting back at him for many years with numerous sanctions and as it is, the country can't trade even if they have valuable resources.For years, the media has demonized him to the extent, people don't remember how it all started.All people (like you) know is the trash that is fed to you about him on CNN.This is a typical repeat story of what happened to Moses in the desert.When the Israelites got thirsty and hungry, they completely forgot that a while back, they were slaves. And even the ones that remembered the slave days protested that they preferred slavery to their current circumstances.Nobody remembers what his goal was and still is.All people know is the crap the western powers are making up about him.Bloody ingrates.

Why all these rantings??
Mugabe this, mugabe that! Stick your head outta your arse and see ZIMBABWEANS ARE DYING OF HUNGER AND POVERTY! Mugabe lives in the presidential mansion enjoying himself, celebrating his birthdays flamboyantly and living large.
28 years in power, is he the only one?? What a miserable old fool!

Zimbabwe was once regarded as the food basket of africa and had the best educational system. Tell me is it CNN that'll plant food for zimbabweans??
Or would america come maintain your educational system??
Your excuse is pathetic! Zimbabwe can't trade but mugabe can import weapons from china prior to elections abi? What did he use to buy the weapons. . . .cowries??
Blessings on the good hearted south african dock workers who refused to unload the evil cargo.
Mugabe would rather buy weapons to kill his people than plant food for them - that you find such a man hero makes you look like a psychopath.

You expect zimbabweans to be grateful for a man starving them to death. Think again!

eduezeyim:
This goes out to everything nairalander that post different kind of stuff against the body of Christ.

Err which body??
Is it the over 30,000 pieces sects present in the world today??
Besides we atheists on NL are the voice of reason. You christian brethren are always on each others throat as to who is right or wrong.
Case in point
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-215905.0.html

it has brought nothing but pain in my heart.

Sorry ooo. . .

let me ask you who are you to say THAT THE BIBLE IS A LIE, who are you to say JESUS IS A LIAR, who are you to JUDGE ANOTHER MAN.

Emmm, we didn't declare the bible a LIAR rather it very much exposes itself. The lies and contradictions in the bible are pretty much there for everyone to see. For some of them lies check here
https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-238664.0.html

well i don't blame you all because YE ARE OF THE DEVIL.

I don't know and have never met this devil. You know him?

let me ask you "Unto whom will you give account of your life if you die".

My lawyer or the executor of my will. . .

i thought this thread is supposed to enhance our spiritual faith. Damn! it's messed up. PLEASE TAKE TIME TO THINK ABOUT YOUR LIFE. WITHOUT GOD YOU CAN DO NOTHING. PLEASE GIVE YOUR LIFE TO CHRIST. THE END IS NEAR!!!!

We have been waiting over 2000 years since they f.ked jesus up and the end time neva come. Haba!

Afam:
The good thing about an open forum like this one is that it offers one ample time to display his or her stupidity.

The quote above though very clear has been shamelessly misunderstood by this waste of orgasm called Tudor.

Now, mr Idiot a bit of education for you.

Stating that an allegation is not an established fact is not the same thing as stating that it is baseless [/b]unless your parents didn't send you to school or that you are inherently incapable of comprehending simple english.

[b]There are indeed more than 2 good reasons for Charles Taylor to make the allegations though I will always treat facts as facts and allegations as allegations regardless of the issue on ground unlike an idiot like you that does not know the difference between baseless, facts and allegations.

You will certainly self destruct on this forum, I have seen clowns and morons like you come and go on this forum.

Don't we all love the naked spectacle when fools trip over themselves all in a bid to hide their latent stupidity? . . . .

Somebody pls tell this slowpoke that here in the real world allegations are made based on FACTS and that a baseless allegation is one made without evidence/FACTS to back it up.
So mumu they are not different rather they compliment one another. . .a baseless allegation is one made without facts. *special needs class dismissed*

No2Atheism:
So melodrama is the best you can do in terms of a response ,
Salvation is not about whther the Messiah was white or black. However the Bible does not permit the propagation of a lie even if it has no bearing on the issue of salvation.

what lie?
What reliable evidence do you have to show that a lie is being propagated??

Propagating the lie that the Messiah was White just shows a level of inferiority complex that you obviously are still dealing with, even though u claim to be an atheist who does not believe in the bible.

For me to be proud and confident of my race doesn't require i steal the white man's messiah and convert him to my skin colour. . .like you're desperately trying to do.

Moreover if u do not believe in the bible how then do you know the Messiah is white or is that not a confusing and contradictory stand to make (infact it makes you sound like the muslims who also claim the bible is corrupt but at the same time use it as a basis of argument).

I don't belive the bible,

don't know the bloody messiah, neither have i met him. The people who brought the fable /myth to us claim he was white. If you have reliable evidence to the contrary present it. Till then, the messiah remains white like we're told!

It is not my duty to convince you (although i have tried doing that  to my chagrin), infact i am no longer going to try to convince you, that you choose to be lost is your choice  . My rebuttals to your outlandish statements is now going to be for public consumption, considering that you sound quite equivocal.

you're the one who's lost, trying to take the white mans god and convert him to a negro - how sad!

My duty is reveal the truth to those that have an ear so that self-loathing individuals like you do not get the opportunity to on one hand propagate a lie about the race of the Messiah and then on the other hand also claim not to believe the bible.

The messiah is not black. Don't let your confidence in your race be determined by the supposed race of a bloody carpenter who was in the middle east. I'm sure if you were chinese you'd be arguing the messiah was a china man.- it shows your pathetic insecurities and lack of self confidence in your own race .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way once again please focus on the topic and stop trying to redirect the topic to something irrelevant, otherwise i would no longer respond

i have no concern with the $4bn oil or alleged oppression of Gaza, my main issue with this thread was with the way you categorically dismissed the present day isrealites as europeans with no link whatsoever to ancient jews - how ridiculous!

. . to your posts considering that i have already answered ur questions here and even in other previous threads apart from this one (where my answers where even more detailed than i have tried to provide here).

You've not and have never answered anything. All you keep bringing is "the romans called paul an egyptian" and "the creator said this" - did any creator tell you anything??
Or you decided to base your claim on the unreliable and full-of-lies bible. . . .not forgetting that ridiculous unreviewed book you keep bringing.

debosky:
That username shall remain perpetually banned, one idiotic atheist is enough, but two? Sorry that would mean pigs in addition to the already threatened goats are in danger. 

degoatsky i didn't realise there was a depigsky around. . .
Either way, i'm no threat to both y'all. . .

No2Atheism:
pls cleane up ur post to allow for proper referencing during reply (Edit: Good to see that u have done that).

An d by the way i do not intend to be going round and round in circles, cus the tanning of the romans is not the issue here, i just used it as an example to show how ridiculous the basis of your tanning argument really sounds.

Paul being called an Egyptian is not the only basis of my argument, the other basis is given below.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is not baseless if u choose to at least try to increase your knowledge of history and events and stop being dogmatic in your ways.

ANSWER

From the Bible:
-------------------
1 - The bible (Paul who was a real person in real history was confirmed to be non-white and essentially black because he was mistaken by the white people (roman city) for an African i.e. an Egyptian, also logic tells us that Egyptians where yet to be invaded by the Arabs and thus were essentially people that we would call black people today by the way the present day Egyptians are most invaders and Arabs who themselves are not black)

2. - The Creator Himself told us the Ancient Isrealites were black (chk your bible for where the Creator used the Ethiopians (who are black) to describe the Isrealites to us).

3. The bible tells us that Cush, Mizraim (Egypt) descended from the same Black Father (Ham) hence biblical history shows us that Egyptians were black.


From a Present Day Jew Himself
----------------------------------------
Arthur Kestler [b]who himself was a present day Jew, [/b] shows us in the book[b] The Thirteenth tribe[/b]  that most of the present day people who call themselves jews are actually Khazarians (please note that i have already recommended the same book to your on another thread, so please try and get it and go through it this time aroundso that you would at least increase your knowledge and stop asking the same annoying questions over and over again .)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Moreover i remember that i have ironed out this issue of the real isrealites with you on another thread not so long time ago, however if i can remember well u more or less just waved it away with the hand instead of facing up to the historical and biblical implications of my defense them. Hence i would not waste my time discussion the issue with u again, since it seems ur r dogmatic and not really versed enough to offer proper rebuttals otherwise we would just be going round and round in circles with nothing achieved.

---------------------------------------------------------------

So can u please focus on the thread and offer a constructive response to the topic of the thread instead of redirecting the thread on an unrelated tangent.

All you're presenting is the bible which has been shown to be sometimes inaccurate and the words of[b] "the creator" [/b]- do you think we're imbeciles??
Not to forget an unreviewed and unaccepted book written by some self appointed historian.
Bring better reliable stuffs to back up your claim than the fake words of "the creator".

No2Atheism:
This is where ur rants are starting to get ridiculous:
1. Roman know what the egyptians looked like, cause they also conquered them stop trying to play ignorance off as intelligence. Romans knew wat the Britons were, they knew what the barbarians were and they also knew was the Egyptians were.
2. Romans themselves could have been tanned (they were not as pasty white as the barbarians aka. scandanavians and united kingdom people whom they also more colonised), hence you theory about tanning is quite ridiculous to say the least if one considers that the region roman capital was in a region more or less mediterrenian in context. Even present day Italians are naturally tanned compared to the Irish or Brits or Scandanavians, hence showing just how ridiculous your tanning theory sounds.

You admitted youself the romans "could" be tanned. . .what if they're not??
Your entire theory is based mainly on the claim the romans referred to paul as egyptian. I'm trying to tell you he could have been mistaken for an egyptian maybe he had a tan. Never did i claim the entire tribe of isreal where tanned

3. Your diatribe all stems from the fact that you an atheist and thus u do not believe in the bible which is understandle hence why i provided you with a publication independent of the bible.

The so called independent publication WHERE ARE THE REVIES OF THE BOOK BY NOTABLE HISTORIANS??
Is the book is widely accepted by majority of historians?? Clear answer NO!
You can't just bring the private ramblings of an author and present it as fact without reliable peer review

4. Historians do not deny the fact that Ham is the father of cush, nubia, ethiopia.

Which historians??
Bible historians or what??
The bible is not a reliable source for the origin of races. Moses made up the noah and his sons story!

5. You are obviously not a student of history otherwise you would have known that black people also migrated to asia and mixed with the races in asia hence the reason why you have people in asia who have both asian and black features (a present day example of this kind of person is Tiger Woods).

You're obviously not a student of history coz you would have known the ancient isrealites were scattered over europe and inter married with the europeans hence you have european looking jews like we have today.

6. And finally Yes Arthur Kestler is a Jew who was bold enough the officially reveal the secret that the European Jews have been keeping as regards their origins and why they do not have a claim to the Land of Isreal.

baseless conspiracy theories!

7. You obviously do not have any sense of right or wrong othewise your atheist tendecies would tell you that it is wrong for people to claim what does not belong to them, unless off course u are also someone who seeks and hopes to benefit from ill gotten wealth or resources.

You're the only one with wisdom to determine who's the rightful owner, abi?

8. If u are so concerned as an atheist why are u so bothered that the people you think are Jews are not actually Jews, at least from your principle of evolution you all descended from Apes, hence it should make no difference to you whether or not you are Jews or whether or not White people call you monkey for being black.

It makes no difference to me, don't care who owns the tribe. You keep bringing up the issue with your so called prophecies and sh*t.

9. Learn to hear twice and speak once, you expose your level of intellect the more u continue to speak and oppose everything without actually offering and academic and researched rebutall.

Which have you provided?? Apart from unreliable scriptures and an unverified book.

10. Yes i agree that there are those who are not jews but who claim to be so, hence i am not here defending them, simply because[b] i have no proof. However the one i have proof [/b]is that fact that Europeans are not Jews they are descended from Japheth, infact the Khazarians who call themselves Jews have more in common with the Turks than most europeans. Because everybody is claiming to be jews does not mean the truth should be covered up out of fear of over exposure. The truth still remains that European Jews have no biological or historical connection to the Ancient Isrealites of the bible.

You've not given proof rather you speculated
based on unreliable accounts of mans origin by the bible

11. The issue of who the real isrealites are is an important topic, because the identity issue has been used to brainwash Africans and almost all black people into thinking they are inferior to anyone white.
12. Hence setting the record straight is an avenue to combat racism.
13. I am not discussion the issue of being jews as in regards to being a jew by religion, no one can be a jew by religion it is by blood as a descendant of the Tribe of Judah which itself is just one of the 12 original tribes of the children of Isreal. Hence common sense tells every reader that in as much as being a Buddist does not make me Chinese, likewise being a judaism faith person does not make anyone a Jew.

it's not a must that jesus must be non white. If you're so against imperialism you should have stuck with your local amadioha or ifa because JESUS WAS WHITE! Whether you like it or not.

banom:
@ topic

[s]TUDOR is a Nigerian based in Sychelles, a gradute of convenant university , from a  christian family,formerly a christian, presently an atheist, a member of nairaland, male, cool,nice, intelligent,hot,bad, fine and ugly. HE HAS A CAMARA AND A PHONE, making it a camara phone( check his profile to see things for yourself). [/s]

banom you have finished me!

No2Atheism:
It is not baseless if u choose to at least try to increase your knowledge of history and events and stop being dogmatic in your ways.

ANSWER

From the Bible:
-------------------
1 - The bible (Paul who was a real person in real history was confirmed to be non-white and essentially black because he was mistaken by the white people (roman city) for an African i.e. an Egyptian, also logic tells us that Egyptians where yet to be invaded by the Arabs and thus were essentially people that we would call black people today by the way the present day Egyptians are most invaders and Arabs who themselves are not black)

From one baseless claim to another!
What evidence have you got to prove ancient eygyptians where black??
They might have darker or a much tanned skin than the roman but they definately weren't NEGRO neither was paul. It could be argued he just had a darker skin much like the tanned look of some arabs therefore he was mistaken for an egyptian.

2. - The Creator Himself told us the Ancient Isrealites were black (chk your bible for where the Creator used the Ethiopians (who are black) to describe the Isrealites to us).

3. The bible tells us that Cush, Mizraim (Egypt) descended from the same Black Father (Ham) hence biblical history shows us that Egyptians were black.

[/quote]The creator told you this, the bible shows that. . .this is by no means a reliable base for your claims??
BTW out of the 3 sons of noah who is the father of the mongols??
Have you seen a mongol from china, japan, north korea and compare them with the ones from cambodia, vietnam and burma??
The latter group are much darker than the former, does it mean they're black??
That they supposedly descended from the same father does it mean they must have the same skin colour??

jeez!

From a Present Day Jew Himself
----------------------------------------
Arthur Kestler shows us in the book[b] The Thirteenth tribe[/b] that most of the present day people who call themselves jews are actually Khazarians (please note that i have already recommended the same book to your on another thread, so please try and get it and go through it this time aroundso that you would at least increase your knowledge and stop asking the same annoying questions over and over again .)

Who the hell is this  Arthur kesler guy??
People can write books relating something to nothing so ridiculously that gullible people are bound to take it as actual fact.
Go ask those igbo scholars who believe the igbo tribe are descended from the Jews. . .they too supposedly have extensively researched and have "evidence".

Why is everyone just claiming to be the real jews?? Is it because of the fairy tale promises made by the phantom jehovah??
I wouldn't be suprised if tommorow chinese people claim to be the real isrealites and jesus spoke mandarin.[quote]

Afam:
Of course, a mind reader and a fool would tell the world why someone did something, interesting.

Yeah and you don't expect a slowpoke to understand it either. . .

The content in bold refers, I never acknowledged Charles Taylor's statement was baseless, this is another shameless lie by a cursed idiot.

The lenghts you're willing to go in order to LIE is SHAMEFUL.

Have a look at your stupidity below. . .

Afam:
I have not claimed Charles Taylor is 100% right and I went further to interpret it as allegation because it is not an established fact.

Why are you contradicting and embarassing yourself??

I need not debate about hating America because I do not but will always point out atrocities and wrong doings by countries especially the West because it is the West that goes around with this "holier than thou" attitude and I object to it.

Obama visited Ghana and talked about democracy and African leaders but the first stop on African soil was in Egypt, a country that practices a type of democracy the US would object to if the president of that country was not doing their bidding. Even Saudi Arabia does not practice democracy and yet the US does not openly condemn the country even in spite of the human right issues there.

So, while you may have sold your soul to the US and you are ever ready to insult anyone that does not share your stupid commendation you must understand that there are people that think with their brains and not just allow some people to force them to accept all forms of propaganda, lies and misinformation.

My initial response was to texxazzpete and even while objecting to his name calling I never insulted him but an idiot and cursed fool like you who probably insults and slaps his father anytime he feels like thinks other people would tolerate his excesses.

You are a complete and total slowpoke.

How does all these rubbish you've written relate to charles taylor and the CIA springing him from jail??
What a dolt!

Beaf:
He called everyone who had contributed before him "dolts", because he was to lazy to read the OP. The OP consists of allegations and quotations from Charles Taylor as quoted from press rooms external to NL.
Until texazzPete posted, the posts remained neutral. Its just an attempt at bullying. Fail!
The OP itself draws no conclusions, so were did people take "charles taylors word for it"? You and texazzPete seem to be carrying some sort of bitterness? Please allow others discuss.

It's either you're an illiterate or a bloody lair!
Is this how you define neutral??

Beaf:
sharap!
It is confirmation from the horses mouth.

This was the SECOND reply to the thread and it was from YOU.
Far from neutral don't you think?? HYPOCRITE!!

Tell that to Afam. I only said "to assume such is daft" not he's personally daft.
But being the ignorant slowpoke he is, he took it personally and started insulting me. How daft is that?

Well it should be the ministry of mis appropriation of funds {if it exists}

For you to execute the militants you've to first arrest them. . .therein lies the problem.
They wage a kind of guerrilla warfare which makes it difficult for them to be captured.

To the politicians the ministry of finance works perfectly!
As long as their allowances and constituency developement funds are paid, no wahala.

Afam:
I have not claimed Charles Taylor is 100% right and I went further to interpret it as allegation because it is not an established fact.

However, I queried the rationale behind someone calling people dolts and dumbos simply because those people do not share in his beliefs or convictions.

He called them dolts because they took charles taylors word for it without any form of evidence whatsoever. Learn to read and understand!

On Charles Taylor and jail break[b] it is not hard for any intelligent mind to understand that such high profile prisoner cannot just escape from a high security jail in the US and return to his country to become president.[/b]

Err why not??

I knew it!

You can never been sincere. First you acknowledge it's a baseless allegation now you're trying to bring out reasons to indict the CIA.
What a slowpoke you are! If you gonna hate America, hate them with all honesty. Don't come here pretending you've got any form of objectivity.
You can deceive others, but WE KNOW YOU!

Now, as to your insult which you know by now that I will always respond to in kind here is my response - I may be daft but judging from your reckless and stupid posts on this forum it is obvious you lack basic home training and never have I seen a human being that is not only unintelligent but ignorant and plain stupid. That you insult your parents at home and they ignore you don't mean others will tolerate your excesses.

However, I know for sure that people like you when faced with statements they cannot counter easily resort to insults just to divert attention from the core issues. Pigs like you will remain pigs, that's a promise that you will live and die with, silly thing.

Oh cry cry baby
did i hurt your feelings again??. . . . You're still daft you know. . . .

Churches are now over desperate for members, jeez!
Y'all remember god told noah "Build the ark and i shall fill it" - if god did indeed send you, you shouldn't be advertising your church like a cheap prostitute. God should fill it himself!

noetic2:
I cant see that listed anywhere in the bible 

. . .but you see spirit filled christians demonstrating it. . .must be an added bonus

No2Atheism where is your evidence to prove the present day isrealites are impersonators??
Have you got the geneology of every isreali to know they're not original jews??
From where did you get this baseless claim??

The earlier i give my life to christ the better for my bank account!
See the way thes men of dog dey enjoy brekete. . .

noetic2:
lying is allowed in atheism. . . . .just e-terrorism is allowed in islam

Yeah. . .same way hypocrisy is a fruit of the spirit in christianity.

debosky:
Stories! We've heard more interesting stories from other multiple ID users. Cousin my foot - giving you his profile to post is tantamount to you having a double ID and is deserving of a ban

Oh shut up!
Go and unban JATADOR.

Afam:
You call people dolts and dumbos for choosing to believe what Charles Taylor said? Wonderful.

What if what Charles Taylor said is 100% correct? What will that make you?

It is well known that CIA has been involved in things like what Charles Taylor is alleging, so why the name calling?

@topic,

Foreign influence in Africa is not a secret. Charles Taylor could not have escaped from a high security prison in the US and ended up being the president of Liberia if he did not have support right from the prison escape.

However, in spite of what CIA may have done he should be bold enough to accept full responsibilities of his actions and based on his actions he deserves the death sentence even though killing him would not be enough to right the wrongs he did while in power.

Unfortunately, he is being tried by foreigners in a foreign country, it would have been nice if Africans can dish out their own style of trials and execution for crimes like these on their leaders.

Why am i not suprised this is coming from Afam the anti-american campaigner. . .
What if charles taylor is 100% wrong?
You decide to believe whatever fuels your hate for America.
Do you have evidence that the CIA sprung mr taylor from jail??
That they've done it before doesn't necessarily mean they were involved with charles taylor. To assume such is daft at best.

texazzpete:
YaY!! Charles Taylor said the CIA helped him escape. So it must be true.
SO now that we know that Charles Taylor is a reliable person whose testimony must be believed, that means he must be innocent of all the charges levied against him as he has claimed. Afterall, we now know he's an honest man, right?

You dolts will believe anything anyone tells you as long as it fits in with your crazy conspiracy theories.  Since when did a drowning man like Charles Taylor become a credible witness?
As long as dumbos like you keep blaming everything on the CIA, Africa will never progress. You're no better than Mugabe, starving his people to insanity while blaming his errors on the 'Western imperialists'.

I'm not surprised. there's always a historical precedence for this blame shifting. In the 1930s we saw Hitler convince millions of Germans that the Jews were the source of the problems of the world. we know what happened next.

Tell them please!
They keep believing EVERYTHING as long as it oozes conspiracy from the CIA.
Soon Yara'mumu would claim its the CIA that damaged his kidneys and you'll see all of them drooling. . .

Abuzola:
@tudor, Did i ? Pls  Remind me

You've threatened almost everyone you can't even remember.

Krayola:
haha. . I got banned too. I thought it was because of what i posted. .

They had better fix that problem fast!
It's becoming a bloody nuisance.

Abuzola:
For me i like Tudor, he disgust me when he start his unfounded insult, but the guy is cool.

I was not so cool when you threatned to jihad me though. . .

Krayola:
haha. . .Tudor na correct guy!! True prophet bringin u the truth that will set u free!! 

Krayola how far na??
Where you also banned?
I got  banned by the spam bot earlier today for spam when i tried to quote your "numerology of the holy qu'ran" post.
I was worried they banned you too.

goodguy100:
Anti-Christ, is one of this guy called TUDOR here, people must be careful of him.

Now mr goodguy what the hell is your problem??
It seems you're the only one who's got issues with the good hearted and peaceful TUDOR.

Thanks to y'all who spoke up and helped defend my character from this libelous entity called goodguy. He obviously can't stand others with  different views from his. Thats the sign of a FANATIC.
Abuzola take note.