₦airaland Forum

garfield1:
The one pasted on all social media platforms

You see yourself, the ones on social media that ain't verified are more acceptable to you than the ones on inec server.

By the way, social media posting of the results ain't tailored.

garfield1:
Hoe can you prove that buhari lost? Was atiku leading in poling unit results

They will soon get to that the documents ain't dumped on the court they have their purposes.

garfield1:
This is pure ignorance.yakubu is just a staff or a part of inec.with or without him,inec exists.finally,he does not need to testify,those that were at the field will

He is inec not in your usual literary one line understanding.

Saniabuh:
If you read the testimony of the witness you will agree that PDP has nothing to prove. Accreditation is done through card reader but not voting, here he is claiming people vote via card reader which is not possible. Honestly Atiku has been scamed by his lawyer but well that is the result of desparation.

It is comprehension that is your problem

FarahAideed:
Please stop fooling yourself trying to make sense of nonsense!!! We all know Buhari lost the election but was only assisted and rigged in by the most corrupt INEC ever and we also Know Atiku will lose at the tribunal not because he doesn't have a case but because the Nigerian Judiciary has been completely compromised and will do the bidding of Buhari shamelessly..the only reason we are in court is to expose the current judiciary for who they are and for history to document it

God bless you jare

Mynd44:
The legal practice in Nigeria is tiring.

It uses none substantial ground to misplace justice. Reform is needed urgently in the judiciary.

Mynd44:
My take-out is that the Supreme Court ought to have declared a mistrial and ordered them all to return to the tribunal all over again.

But that will be tangential to the Constitution which says it has to be concluded 180 days after the election

You are equally right cos at the end, the substance of the litigation were completely not put into consideration in dismissing the case.

olutop:
I guess the only reason why you are interested in this matter is because you are a supporter of a party or candidate not because you want the truth or because you have the interest of this country at hand.
If INEC mistakenly admit to having a server and they produce the result in the server for just a local govt during that election, You will ask us to kill all the politicians that contested or have interest in that election, might have to be recolonized or go back to military regime, seriously we did not have an election atall, The only person in pity in this case is the witness (PO), is life and career is in jeopardy make he just comot naija straight....1 day we will get it right sha.

On point

garfield1:
We are not talking about yakubu here or technicality but electoral matters and inec itself.if atiku had argued that non use of manual accreditation is illegal,it will be a very strong point.just like in osun,his lawyers are not trying

I don't get you. Prof yakubu is inec. Allow him to argue his case and then let the tribunal decide whichever way with plenty of technicalities.

garfield1:
How did they doctor it when buhari based on live results won majority of polling units?

What live results?

Prof, that is exactly what true seekers of justice wanted to know. The technical justice is anticlimax.

Kudos prof on this.

Neoteny:
Look it up in the news. PDP did announce setting up of a PVT before the election, and claimed later that their PVT results varied from the announced results, while the election monitors said their own PVTs tallied with INEC's announcement.

You are mixing things up. Every genuine party in an election has its own situation room.

garfield1:
When variations are established,one with legal backing will be taken.look at the testimony of that ratech officer,he said that he snapped the polling unit result sheet and then transmitted the result recorded on that sheet.all atiku needed to do is to go get that form ec8a and the pink copies and see if there was any alteration inorder to establish his case.

Ain't you following? The over 26000 documents tendered have those forms. A step at time they will get to that.

Very interesting kudos op.

Officialgarri:
The truth is that "the law is an ass". Also, it has its loopholes. It could be manipulated in whatever way.

The law recognizes only the ec8 form. Why? Because all "accredited party agents" have willfully consented to the outcome of that particular unit.

But as you rightly said, the law should have made the provision for server results as a backup. Unfortunately, there is none.

It the duty of the house to make new laws to suit every situation. That's why they are paid heavily

At least the world Would know results were transmitted electronically.

olutop:
Because they told us they are different and of course we all compared the codes among ourselves in The RAcenter a night b4 the election, and they told us it is going to the INEC server, we even questioned the RAC Tech that why can't they make it live that immediately we post it everyone can see it on INEC site or anywhere safe just for clarity, they said people might hacked it and that the President did not sign it into bill that only a returning officer can announce a result. But we never knew it will cause confusion like this we should have snapped the page of the transmission on the SCR....I pray Nigeria will get better sha, our leaders will do anything to attain power.

INEC used it to doctor the results having seen that the transmitted result didn't favour buhari.

Neoteny:
Nope

Atiku alleged rigging, which is the usual refuge of electoral losers.

Atiku claimed their parallel voting system showed different results, and at one point claimed INEC shut down its server.

The server claims came later when some shadowy website was setup by someone claiming to be a former INEC IT staff with screenshots and claims, something i debunked earlier.

So why didn't Atiku use his parallel voting tabulator as evidence, using instead the server claims of some faceless jobber?

No, no such claim of parallel voting System. E-transmission is not a parallel voting. The voting system is not the issue but, the variations between e-transmitted results and announced results.

garfield1:
That is inec regulations while the constitutiin recognises manual accreditation.

I concede everything on technicality. But like many citizens would, we will simply form our opinion on buhari's mandate after the trial.

So far, I am enjoying it. Prof yakubu is a scam. Shikenan

princeade86:
instead of u to take correction, u are arguing.

What yeye correction go back to grammar school abegi.

Ambrosecares1:
Laughable to say all the voters in your unit voted with the card reader...
My Dear, The card reader was only for accreditation not voting.

That is exactly what he meant.

Neoteny:
I appreciate your response and I won't dare question your integrity, but I've some misgivings, namely:

If the EC8 figures tally with the server submission at the end of the day, why didn't any political party, including PDP, contest the final figures reeled out by INEC in Abuja when announcing the results? One would think all the parties would there and then protest the figures as substantially deviating from the figures they attested to.

One would also expect parties to demand printouts from the server showing the results at INEC's end for their records and references.

This question is even more relevant given Atiku's purported server results recorded little or nothing for the other myriad parties.

The PDP persistently challenged the result announcement at abuja insisting on variation rom back end server. Prof Yakubu responded saying there duty is just collate what was brought in but, will look at it in the course of announcement which inec never did.

At the end, the PDP agent Chidoka refused to sign the result sheets.

You actually didn't follow the result announcement.

The other parties were at liberty to demand for same or not. Anyway, they were just rentt seeking platforms the contest was straight between pdp vs apc.

olutop:
The codes are different for all the Polling Unit and we were told not to disclose the code to anyone, I also transmitted all the results of my PU to the said server and I kept wondering why INEC are saying there is no server, something that My SPO said we won't be paid if we fail to transmit the result.

Before man and God inec knows results were transmitted but refused to act when wide variations occurred with the manually announced results at LGAs. The essence of internal control was defeated via collusion.

olajide8:
You peeps have Forgotten, that some of us actually stay behind to monitor the votes and all activities till the Corp members sent the ec8 to the local coalition centre, and at no point did those within our own area transmit the results electronically, or were they told by inec to transmit results electronically, as they would have told all voters including myself, while we queued that after the results were announced they would transmit same- so if you did please tell us the name of the inec official that told you people to do so, as he has committed an offense under the law, and transmitted information which the process did not approve of, because the president did not sign the bill for electronic transfer of results into law

The e-transmission was actually meant for inec internal control. Therefore there was no need for public announcement.

garfield1:
Atiku is actually losing.seems you are not familiar with court proceedings

Let him lose. I am not an #atikuIscomingGang I am just interested in seeing the harikari that happened.

Shebi we are in an era of technical justice and that buhari has already won.

He can't get 10k votes.

udemzyudex:
If this is how you reason then I'll advise people on this thread not to bother quoting you.

God bless you. Some comments are damn low.

oluwamile:
Kola ologbodiyan is PDP spokesman and not APC,get ur facts right before posting nonsense for us to read

The sentence was right cos there was comma separating the two. The apc spokesperson wasn't mentioned by name but portfolio while Kola of the pdp was mentioned by name not portfolio.

wifeesnatcher:
nothing like technically in politics, if you can't beat them you join them


a man criticising an incumbent president somewhat of coming out to testify against his victory his technically in APC?


anything he like to form R APC, all that doesn't prove he's an APC member.

He is a full blooded APC member.

garfield1:
Atiku is not serious.galadima will end up with conflicting testimonies or compound atiku's situations.is it galadima that will explain those documents dumped on the court

One would think you are with the Atiku team and know what exactly Galadima is to prove.

Officialgarri:
Buba Galadima is not fit. That man speaks without reasoning first. Most times, he shoots himself in the leg.
I remember his debate with Femi Adesina, Galadima was beaten hands down even by his own arguments.


This same buba Galadima standing for PDP claimed he wasn't a PDP member but another faction of APC
.

Too many conflicting arguments from one man

So?

KristaPretty:
What have you done for your own community in your little way? Remember change begins with YOU!

Off point!