₦airaland Forum

AlfaSeltzer:
Now your life looks a lot better

KingEbukaNaija:
This should be fun .

AlfaSeltzer:
This is how is hurts me : Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God

I Alfa, servant of the Most Exalted Satan, I prophesy that Jesus Christ is the Son of the Living God

Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God
Jesus Christ the Son of the Living God

I am hurting!!!! Hahahahahahaha!

Hohohohohohoho!!!!!!!!!

Hihihihihihiikikikikiki!

AlfaSeltzer:
does your doG know that it is actually a sign of very bad ill fortune for a father to bury his son.

Syncan:
Shameful I must say. However, Christ our Lord bore more for us without retaliation 1Pet.2:23, that's why we keep coming back.


Peace be with you.

Ichiato:
No where on this thread have I claimed Mary was sinless.

You brought it up and I told you to drop that for now and focus on her perpetual virginity.

deviation from the norm? I believe the blow was bro syncan's quote of what you protestants held to be the norm Even you have deviated from those who deviated.

Isn't this funny? You're the one claiming your claims are simple. I have been quoting bible passages to support my claim and you have quoted none to support your claim. Yet somehow it is mine that is baseless and unscriptural.

ValentineMary:
The way all these theist argue is funny. That is why I decide to ignore vooks and some other people.

Anyways wait and observe. Maybe one day u might evolve into iceman.

Ichiato:
She is highly favoured for what? To carry a new covenant? Is this new covenant holy? Can an unholy vessel carry within it that which is unholy? Was the old covenant considered holy in the bible? The ark which carried the old covenant, was it also considered holy? Why is Mary different from the ark of the old covenant?

The only idiot here is you. Does been espoused translate to been pregnant?
Why did she keep her virginity till was pregnant. Why would a girl who was already betrothed be surprised she was to conceive in future?
where or when was any child besides Jesus called Mary's?

Ubenedictus:
what one gets when he discusses with the protestants: insults.

Ichiato:
what else can a blind man see? Nothing.

I'm surprised this is all you have to say about the post you quoted. You dodged the question. She has always been the temple. You were too blind to see.

I would like to think you meant Jeremiah and John the Baptist were sanctified after they were born and not before. That infact is besides the point. I wasn't pointing to Luke1:28 as proof of Mary's sinlessness. But to the fact that she was sanctified to carry our Lord who is the new covenant. And as with past covenant that with houses the covenant are not used for any other purpose other than housing the covenant. I gave an example of Uzzah in my past post. Am not talking of Mary's immaculate conception, at least not yet. You're trying to drag this discussion somewhere else without concluding the one at hand.

If one who is married is expected to have kids, why would they wait after the birth of Christ to even try?

aren't you also making a claim that Mary did give birth to other children besides Jesus? Just like me are you not expected to prove this?

Ichiato:
Wow classic. But disproving the catholic claim helps with your own claims?? Nice try.

Ichiato:
Any proof Of number 2? If yes, please show me

Ichiato:
He isn't making sense to you cos you have choosen to shut your eyes.

Who gave you this answer? Let me state that mary does not just represent the gate but that which the gate leads into. The temple we know is the dwelling place of the Lord as stated in the bible. Tje bible also stated that the Lord dwelled in Mary.

Luke 1:28 tells us of Mary's sanctity even before she conceived Jesus. The fact that you need proof of Mary's sanctity is quite telling on the god you claim to worship. Can your God dwell in a place which is not sanctified? Or maybe you need to check what it means to be sanct.

can you desist from the name calling? It only shows how shallow you are. Forcus on the discuss and not my person.

Why not lets discuss Mary's perpetual virginity first before moving to her immaculate conception. Let's not jump the gun here. May I ask why you are so sure Mary indeed had children after Jesus Christ?

AlfaSeltzer:

KingEbukaNaija:
Sir ,

Luke 1:28
28 And he came to her and said, “Greetings, O favored one, the Lord is with you!

I strongly believe that Mary was predestined to give birth to Jesus and everything about her aligns with the prophecies of the Old Testament prophecies - birthplace , native land - as she was betrothed to Joseph

"O Favored One " - that sounds that fore chosen one to me .

Mary was with sin according to

Ecclesiastes 7:20
20 Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.

If Mary was sanctified spiritually then there was no need for Jesus to die since she has undergone an anomaly and that should be done for anyone who is of good nature .

Jesus died for every one's sin INCLUDING his mum's and his dad's . Being a mother of Jesus is not an automatic qualification for heaven because Jesus died and resurrected before her very eyes . She had to go through the process as everyone of us - accepting Jesus as her Lord an Saviour - in order to qualify for Heaven .

Ichiato:
Why the back and fort sef.

I thought he mentioned earlier that this gate represents Mary.

In Jewish tradition, any sanctified object may not be used for any other purpose other than the purpose for which it was sanctified. There are a number of physical objects that would certainly fall under this tradition. The Ark of the Covenant is a good example. In fact, the solemnity of this tradition is witnessed to when Uzzah accidentally touched the Ark of the Covenant. He was struck dead by God(2 Samuel 6:6-7)

If it is inconceivable to even suggest that the Ark would be used for something other than carrying Gods covenant, then why does not the same logic not also apply to Mary the Mother of the New Covenant?

Why do you reject such a clear biblical analogy as what would regard as more holy that which carried elements which God had sanctified or that which had carried God himself (the source of all holiness)?

ValentineMary:
The fossil
record, far from the tenuous succession of gaps
described by creationists, provides an admittedly
incomplete but beautiful and coherent set of
clues to life in the distant past. That any traces
at all remain from so long ago is astounding,
and anyway it is not the completeness of the
fossil record but its consistency that matters.
When asked what observation would disprove
the theory of evolution, J.B.S. Haldane, a
pioneering British geneticist, replied: “Fossil
rabbits in the Precambrian era.” But such
anachronisms have never been found.
Then there is the evidence written on the bodies
of all living things. The mammalian skeleton is
consistently recognisable in creatures as various
as bats, monkeys, horses and humans. Vestiges
such as the stumpy wings of flightless birds, and
the hairs that prickle on human skin just like the
rising hackles on furry mammals, are further
testimony to our shared origins. Glitches, like
the laryngeal nerves that are so neatly laid out
in fish but that must detour in animals with
necks—by a crazy 15 feet (4.6m) in the case of
giraffes—demonstrate the incremental,
undirected business of evolution in touching
detail. At the microscopic scale, molecular
genetics connects the various parts of the grand
family tree with fantastic detail and accuracy.
The evidence that Mr Dawkins sets out so
persuasively here is already widely known. Yet
two-fifths of Americans still refuse to accept
that human beings share a common ancestry
with animals, preferring to believe that they
were created in their present form in the past
10,000 years.

And u said there are no archeological proof.

ValentineMary:
It seems u can't read. So you are not worth my time.

PastorAIO:
16 And the scribes of[a] the Pharisees, when they saw that he was eating with sinners and tax collectors, said to his disciples, “Why does he eat[b] with tax collectors and sinners?”

Mark 2.

ValentineMary:
Evolution has to do with adaptation of a specie due to environmental factors. Thus it is the gradual modification of organisms.

I used mostly primitive life to explain it because they are the easiest to observe when evolving because some take just decades compared to advanced life like humans that take millions of years. And for my proof, read my prev post on the topic.

dmandy:
All of a sudden, you have abandoned the 'morphing search'

No sir, there are no exceptions... The lord said it shall never be opened. God has spoken... the vooks cannot reverse.

dmandy:
Have you found how she morphed into a gate? Search a little bit. You will surely get it ok.

dmandy:
You want to know how Mary morphed into a gate?

Hahahahhahahahahaahhahahaha

gabriellaleo:
Catholics or born again...both are created by God. Have not seen or heard muslims arguing about who follow the doctrines in the bible. You should ask yourselves who wrote the bible, why did the bible have different writers, why do we have different denominations in the world (pentecostal, orthodox,anglican and the likes). My people perish because they lack knowledge, if you believe in God, let God tell you what you ought to know, ask him questions and am sure he is ever and very ready to answer all questions. Mind you catholic dont pray or bow to mary, we pray in jesus name npt in mary's name. If mary wasny important in jesus life catholic would have abandoned her, but our bible recorded that when the angel came to visit mary he said hail full of grace the lord is with you and when mary visited elizabeth, she said blessed are you amongs women and blessed is the fruit of your womb, and d wedding at canaan, mary told the servant to fill the pot with water and do watever jesus ask dem to do, jesus said woman my time has not come but he still turn the water to wine, we believe mary can interceed for us as you people ask pastors to pray for you(the pastor is indirectly interceeding on your behalf to God).please we shouldnt allow d devil to use this medium to make us sin against God. Judgment will not be passed based on church. It will be passed based on individual and the works of our hands. The lord be with us always. Will be back on why catholics pray the rosary and back it up with the scriptures.

dmandy:
Tell me about it. Your question have I have answered and you have it colored in blue.

dmandy:
Mary is the east gate, Yes. The Lord will sit in the gate and eat bread, why not? He indeed sat in the gate and get nourished. If you were patient enough to read the post you quoted before rushing to ask questions, you should have noticed where I answered why it was outer to the prophet of God. Now, you will have to agree first that that is the arrangement of the temple, before I walk you through the old testaments and show you how the temple is laid out. Sop now, do you agree that the sanctuary is the inner part of the temple?

dmandy:
The gate of the sanctuary sir remains shut... This indeed is the inner eastern gate and no one enters it so the prophet could only see the outer part this gate. I hope you know that this temple we are talking about here is a visionary one. The people only come into the courts and cannot go beyond.

I am yet to see my dishonesty about the gate, [size=18pt]the gate through which the lord entered this earth is Mary [/size] and that gate is shut (virgin birth). No other person will pass through her into this world simply because the lord has said so.

dmandy:
Lolx


I have answered you, the court and the sanctuary is not the same. The sanctuary is the inner and the courts outer.

AlfaSeltzer:
Anger, insults, irritability, rascality. All the attributes of a good xtian. Just like the violent nazarene destroying people's business in galilee.

dmandy:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

brocab:
If you have an argument with dmandy why write my name on the bottom of the page, believe me brother, I am not Catholic.
I would be the one to back you in the word of God, not go against you. so leave my name out of from the Catholic list.

Syncan:
Pay no heed to his rants, I have taught people far worse than him. He's been learning without appreciation and that's a problem ""It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to the dogs." Matt.15:26. When he is ready to purge himself of his perverse disposition, I will be here to teach him in a very explicit way. I'm sure all my brothers he's mentioned can enlighten him as well. However for now, Just note what St. Paul says about his kind.

1Tim.6:4 "He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself".