wiegraf: @f00028

You're making this very hard for me. You've actually made me agree with His Fucktardness. You say wiegraf is abusive then you quote him? You willing to accept your hypocrisy?

When you're being a moro.n and I point out you're being one, that's not abusive (maybe a little, but you're asking for it). If you don't understand at least the basics of an argument, try to stay away from it. Like just now with 'the smoke without fire' thing.

@sagamite, you're still a person


This is what you get when you open threads particularly to flame

Sagamite:

For your sake, I am taking that as a mis-spoke and you meant to say @frosbel?

wiegraf:

You're supposed to be smart, figure it out

Reyginus: We lose our being the moment we begin to take pribe in insulting people.
Sagamite, how do you learn?

Sagamite:

Please stop this "there is no smoke without fire"-educated person's aphorisms that you keep on generating.

Please, abeg you.

It is putting caterpillars in my belle.

I am prostrating. Mo bee. I dey beg.

Reyginus: You still don't get it.
If I claim to be educated and engulfed in wisdom but my character potrays a riff-raff, what would you think of me?

Sagamite:

With all due respect, I don't think you are of the intellectual level to know who is educated or engulfed with wisdom.

Leave that to the clerisy. It is above your tier.

Sagamite:

With all due respect, I don't think you are of the intellectual level to know who is educated or engulfed with wisdom.

Leave that to the clerisy. It is above your tier.

Reyginus: Do you enjoy missing the point?
I did'nt claim anything. You did.
So, tell me.

funkybaby:

Smh !

Mister Intellect.

Sagamite:

I enjoy getting to the point ............quite quickly.

The point is: You are not at the intellectual level to analytically observe and formulate a good opinion on what you are so desperate to discuss. Drop it!

Reyginus: Now I get it.
If I claim not to know but want to know, and you who claim to know keep reminding me that I dont know, even when I made it clear that I dont know, it goes to show that you are not in a capacity to know, because you don't know.
Hope everyone is happy now?

Reyginus: You still don't get it.
If I claim to be educated and engulfed in wisdom but my character potrays a riff-raff, what would you think of me?

Reyginus: @Sagamite.
The truth is, you even need to be taught how to understand.
What is the evidence that you Know?

Sagamite:

Admit it, you lacked the logical thought process to the point you did not know you claimed to know?

Reyginus: lol. The very reason you should learn how to understand.

Sagamite:

Still strawmanning.

Prove my assertion wrong then. Did you not claim you didn't know despite already making an assertion that is a formulated opinion?

Lets loling while you do that for us.

I told you that some things are above your intellectual tier, you refuse to accept. So lets go there.

Logicboy03:

He is arrogant and abusive.

He claims to be intellectual, yet he knows little.

Reyginus: We will go there. But before that, you must give us an evidence that you know or capable of knowing.
Is that too much to ask?

Logicboy03: Reyginius,


Why would you sate time with Sagamite?

He is arrogant and abusive.

He claims to be intellectual, yet he knows little.

Sagamite:

You were right to the T until the last assertion.

If there is anything you feel I don't know, please bring it my way now or in future.

I dare you!

Logicboy03:
Remember when I destroyed you on progressive vs liberalism?


You were running your mouth and I had to shut you up. Good times

Sagamite:

It is not too much to ask you put your strawman tactics away and admit it: you lacked the logical thought process to the point you did not know you claimed to know?

Let me let you into a secret. I am pretty good at judging people's intellectual levels by merely reading a few of their posts.

One of the clues to know people that are not that intelligent are:

- They are very poor at analogies.

- They frequently use and have a lot of faith in their senseless village-schools' aphorisms.

It is just a tool and imperiously intelligent guy like me uses to do quick analysis and make a judgement call.

One can see the former in F00028 easily. I could spot the latter in you instantly.

I knew quickly you will be minced meat if I decide to do it but I do like giving people a window out if they do not come at me aggressively or insultingly. Unfortunately your ego and misplaced perception of your "maturity" will not allow you escape throw the window, you decided to stand. That is like a Hyena standing up to a Lion in its territory.

Hyena = E dead!

Reyginus: Did anyone frustrate you in life?
You sound angry. Why?

Sagamite:

You mean this:

https://www.nairaland.com/1072447/could-atheism-considered-gay-religion/4#12576769

When you did not know conjugal visits are not the norms in prisons?

And your dumb argument that if a prisoner that has no access to woman engages in gay sex, then he is gay?

And you did not know those termed progressives are a form of liberals?

In your dumb world, that is destroying.

Your intellect is below my feet. I will have your for breakfast.

Logicboy03:


Epic fail by sagaminte

1) Strawman- I never said that conjuga visits are the norm in prisons

2) A gay man has gay sex. The only exception is that they man may be bisexual- which is still gay

3) Progressives and liberals are different. Epic fail. What you fail to realise is that they could have overlapping views but they are different. (think of Jew and Christian)


You are too shallow.

Sagamite:

Is this still your strawman tactics?

So you know you are stuck?

I am not angry, I am a person killer.

Urrgh, Gawd!

Bhuhaghh! That feels so amazing to say out loud.

Am not joking, I slaughter fucktards.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvRG03E-GyY&

Reyginus: lol. I know ignorance as a disease but not with this kind of signs. Now I know better.
I will you well Mr intellectual.

Sagamite:

You are dumb!

1) You used an exception/a minority case to defend and be the centre piece of your an argument. That is plainly saying it is the norm. If I said women are physically stronger than men because I know some women are stronger than men, then I have daftly (like you) made useless exceptions the centrepiece of my argument.

2) This just shows how moronic you are. Sexually frustrated people doing desperate things are not gay or bi. I told you you were dumb.

3) Cretin. They are different but under the same umbrella when generically judged: http://thesaurus.com/browse/liberal?s=t That is why your daft arse did not ask me if I was a progressive. https://www.nairaland.com/1072447/could-atheism-considered-gay-religion/4#12575678

You are a person.

Your intellect is below my feet.