Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,259 members, 7,953,994 topics. Date: Friday, 20 September 2024 at 10:28 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures (7466 Views)
He Decided To Teach Them A Lesson By Disturbing Them. Check The Pictures / Atheists Are More "Moral" Than Christians/muslims (the Evidence). Do You Accept? / The Evidence For The Deity Of Christ. (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by turnstoner(m): 8:48pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
So far, no creationist has repudiated the assertion (as they have done previously on this and other threads) that the theory of evolution is a scientific fact |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by turnstoner(m): 9:09pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
davidylan: Even primary school pupils now know that all living things are propagated or reproduced by means of eggs or seeds consisting of genes or chromosomes which are made of DNA (isn't it an irony that an adult who claims to be a biologist doesn't understand the implication of this fact?). In other words all living things whether plants or animals can be reduced to a common chemical formular: the DNA (Deoxyribose nucleic acid). We are all nothing but a collection of chemical compounds, brains and all. The difference between a Rabbit and a human is only a matter of rearrangement or resequencing of DNA! Its as simple as that. Why is it so far-fetched to assume that all living things must have evolved from a common ancestor? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:16pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
turnstoner: I didnt understand your logic here. You seemed to just go on a ramble and ended up saying exactly nothing. How does DNA help you ASSUME that you evolved from a common ancestor? Please lucidly advance that argument. To say that the difference between a rabbit and a human is a mere rearrangement of DNA is evidence that you probably have never gone beyond high school biology. For all your empty bluster, your argument here can be boiled down to this - humans and plants possess DNA, DNA is thus the common unit of life... hence plants and animals must have evolved from the same ancestor! Can you explain how animals and plants could have evolved from the same ancestor considering plant DNA is absolutely nothing close to human DNA? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:17pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
turnstoner: So far, no creationist has repudiated the assertion (as they have done previously on this and other threads) that the theory of evolution is a scientific fact No atheist has logically defended this assertion either beyond throwing empty faith-based claims here and there. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:19pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
davidylan: No one should waste his time with creationist-biologist Davidylan. He has already been destroyed on evolution long ago https://www.nairaland.com/922920/destruction-creationists-olaadegbu-brainpulse-bigd4050 |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:21pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
Logicboy03: You shld just have said you have no answers to the questions we have posed to you for the last 1 yr. About time to give your online empty jingoism a rest. The rest of us have jobs. 1 Like |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:28pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
davidylan: I answered you questions on that thread and debunked you! You and the OP have been caught making ignorant statements on evolution. I have learnt that wasting time with people that argue against hardcore evidence is not worth it. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:31pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
Logicboy03: You've become a standing joke. Besides... crying "debunk" at every one isnt proof that you truly know what you are talking about. Secondly, since when did you realize that arguing in the face of "hardcore evidence" is not worth it? you've been practically living on these pages for over a year its sometimes a wonder that you have time to brush your teeth in the morning. On a side note... i would be very happy to see your "hardcore evidence". It appears your buddy turnstoner has no ideas and is probably ferreting the internet for links to copy/paste as we speak. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by turnstoner(m): 9:38pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Thanks. Indeed I am surprised to see he is posting again. He had agreed previously that where logic is concerned, creationists/religionists have no case. Maybe he has regained his second wind, like the proverbial cuckold that was dealt a near death blow!? 1 Like |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by turnstoner(m): 9:44pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
davidylan: I don't ferret from the internet. All my posts are off the cuff! |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:45pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
turnstoner: As usual, duck when you cannot answer your to your own verbose nonsense. I agree that religion has very little to do with human logic. The bible admits that much. I just asked that you explain your logic that led you to assume that humans AND plants evolved from a common ancestor. Or perhaps your assumption here is based on "faith"? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 9:46pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
turnstoner: Oh ok... you must have no idea what you're talking about then since your "off the cuff" comments make no sense from the perspective of SSCE biology. See above. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by turnstoner(m): 9:58pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
davidylan: Fortunately, besides you there are other readers of our posts. It is they that I address. You, I have learned, are not susceptible to logic |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 10:00pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
turnstoner: and pray what "logic" have you addressed to them? Obviously i have better things to do than engaging ignorant folks who disguise their own ineptitude with feigned disinterest. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by honeychild(f): 11:19pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Who is the ignorant one? You did not even know that there was some uncertainty about your precious KN E R 1813. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 11:25pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
honeychild: Feel free to quote me as supporting evidence |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by honeychild(f): 11:49pm On Dec 27, 2012 |
honeychild: (Quote) (Report) (Like) Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Logicboy03(m): 12:50am On Dec 25 lies |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 4:47pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
turnstoner: Uyi Iredia and honeychild are way way out of their depth in this matter, but don't know it! They think they are making sense because there are respondents ready to indulge them . And you are supposed to be making sense |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 4:57pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
turnstoner: No one has seen it happen, insurmountable pathways, ineffectual evolutionary mechanism etc. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:11pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Uyi Iredia: lolz....yet you are arguing for a god that no one has seen, no logical argument for him exists and the bible is ineffectual. Common descent has enough evidence. You are free to be ignorant. God has none. You cant point to any physical evidence for god. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:13pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: you miss the point. No one is arguing that religion is the bastion of human logic... however the problem is when atheists like yourself try to babble on that your disbelief is somehow anchored on some logical scientific reasoning. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 5:23pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Actually common descent has no evidence. The fossil record lacks one transitional species. In fact a new theory - punctuated equilibrium - was made precisely because of that. I can easily point to the order of things in Nature as a basis for inferring God. You know the funny thing is your reply wasn't germane to my comments. You didn't tackle the points I listed. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:26pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Uyi Iredia: Have you heard of DNA? mtchew |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:35pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: I note that your responses to Uyi's PINPOINT queries are mostly irrelevant one-liners that are so puzzling with regard to how exactly they pertain to the post you are quoting. It really isnt compulsory to respond to EVERY post particularly if you really have nothing to say. Turnstoner raised the "DNA" issue yesterday as well and i remember getting no response back when i asked this simple question - plants have DNA just as man does... should that be "evidence" for common descent too? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 5:44pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Yes I have. So what about it. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:45pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
davidylan: So how does plant having DNA destroy common descent if the theory is that all life came from unicellular organisms? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:45pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Uyi Iredia: Link it with common descent |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:49pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: How does your theory support common descent between animals and plants? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:52pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
davidylan: Why do I have the feeling that once I answer this ignorant question with evidence, the evidence will be overlooked to ask another ignorant question? De ja vu or historical evidence of stupidity from creationists? hmm? |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by Nobody: 5:53pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Yawn. Please provide the evidence already. this delay, punt and feign disinterest tactic is getting old. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 5:56pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
davidylan: Chances are his evidence will be a quote from Wikipedia. |
Re: Evolution: The 'evidence' Behind The Pictures by UyiIredia(m): 5:58pm On Dec 28, 2012 |
Logicboy03: Let him answer. BTW you link it with common descent and I will tell you why you are wrong. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)
Photos: Pastor Ayas Of Ghana Surrenders To Olumba Olumba Obu / What If You Found Out That Fasting Has Nothing To Do With Food ? / Truth, Light And Bread Ministries
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 55 |