Reyginus: Nna! calm down. Lb, just be truthful to yourself. Don't pretend you don't understand my question. Asking your opinion on the right to what they do will be stupid of me, because I know where you stand. What I'm after is the reason you see in this stand you've come to hold unto. Can homosexuality be explained logically?

Logicboy03:


You are a waste of time. ou dont even understand what you are asing

Reyginus: How exactly do you mean?

Logicboy03:

Reyginus: Can homosexuality be explained logically?

ijawkid:

Leave this boy alone ehhhh....like I've said before...it is either Lb is bi-sexual or a homosexual.....the boy defends homosexuality like his life is dependent on it..........

Logicboy03:



I am married to three women one Nairaland........divorce is pending for Ishilove, she is cheating in the romance section

Ishilove:
I deny!

Logicboy03:



lol.......keep bearing false witness.


I am married to three women one Nairaland........divorce is pending for Ishilove, she is cheating in the romance section

ijawkid:

Leave this boy alone ehhhh....like I've said before...it is either Lb is bi-sexual or a homosexual.....the boy defends homosexuality like his life is dependent on it..........

Logicboy03:



lol.......keep bearing false witness.


I am married to three women one Nairaland........divorce is pending for Ishilove, she is cheating in the romance section

Reyginus:
2. Homosexuality. A bit of deviation from what I primarily seek to understand. If testosterone and oestrogen are responsible for the development of male and female characteristics respectively, and thus, the exhibition of affection for the opposite sex. What then is responsible for homosexuality?

ooman: ^^^^something beyond your comprehension. Why can't you just ask your god since it made everything and everyone.

Reyginus: I'm trying to understand why some atheists uphold homosexuality. Let's do it together.

ooman:

am trying to understand why your god created them and then again said they must be killed. isn't that a waste of time for it.

Reyginus: Hmm. You are playing hide and seek. Stop it. Let's discuss the issue at hand.

ooman:

homosexuality is harmless. simple.

Reyginus: Lol. Mind explaining?

ooman:

explaining what? that homosexuality is harmless? if you think otherwise, then you should explain.

Reyginus: Lol. Why are my having the feeling that you are scared of something?

ooman:

whatever!

Reyginus: ehya!!

ooman:

you are not worth my time.

Reyginus: Okay. Good for you if you cannot explain why you hold certain things to be true. I will wait for some other atheist.

ooman:

ok. good riddance

Reyginus:
4. The soul. What does an atheist thinks of the soul?
Everyone is invited.

plaetton: Atheists are not a homogeneous group that share one common viewpoint on everything. Most accept the existence of a soul and most would not.

Personally, You can say that I accept the existence of a soul, but not in a religious or spiritual sense.
I see the soul, both personal and universal, as a form of energy existing outside our 3 dimensional range of perception. Everything exists as a duality, first in its physical 3-dimensional form, and secondly, in its energy form or configuration that animates it.

In the case of humans, our super-conducting brain has the ability, acquired and honed through eons of biological evolution, to aggregate and harmonise all that free energy to flow in a coherent and consistent manner.

That is what may be called the human soul.
Therefore, the human soul most likely evolved in the same manner as human biology, and therefore, is a work in progress.

Reyginus: I like the fact that you pointed out that atheists are not a homogenous group with common viewpoint. I've been doing a lot of thinking on the matter. I tend to wonder why majority of the atheists around, with the aim of antagonising the stance of religion on any matter, accept concepts which from my own understanding betrays the logic they employ to measure up to as standard.
That's by the way.
I don't know if you noticed plaetton.
To consider the soul as an energy beyond our 3D perception and also ascribe our brain the ability for a harmonization of these energies seems to me a contradictory statement. Except, I need some clarifications. I think if the human brain has such ability to 'aggregate and harmonize' whatsoever, it is not possible for the thing in question to be beyond the perception of the organism/thing housing the brain. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Secondly, duality as the nature of everything betrays your explanation of the soul.
Considering the soul in a scale of duality(metaphorically), the likely outcomes following your explanation would be: a three dimensional form and the energy form. I'm sure you know why the explanation fails from this point. You've already posited the soul as an entity existing outside the 3D. That everything exists as a duality, via your explanation does not work for the soul. Correct me if I'm wrong.

plaetton: Atheists are not a homogeneous group that share one common viewpoint on everything. Most accept the existence of a soul and most would not.

Personally, You can say that I accept the existence of a soul, but not in a religious or spiritual sense.
I see the soul, both personal and universal, as a form of energy existing outside our 3 dimensional range of perception. Everything exists as a duality, first in its physical 3-dimensional form, and secondly, in its energy form or configuration that animates it.

In the case of humans, our super-conducting brain has the ability, acquired and honed through eons of biological evolution, to aggregate and harmonise all that free energy to flow in a coherent and consistent manner.

That is what may be called the human soul.
Therefore, the human soul most likely evolved in the same manner as human biology, and therefore, is a work in progress.