henryobinna: oh really? maybd I should have used 'theory' or you give me the right word to use, but then try look up the meaning of hypothesis

Billyonaire: Electromagnetic cosmic pulse can do that.

ElNur1: Anybody dat believe everytin dat those stupid white American scientists tell him, is a biig fool...

D first lie NASA told was landin on d moon...
how can d American flag fly wen thier is no air on d moon...


stupid American scientists

Billyonaire: I know the meaning of hypothesis, theory, postulate and laws. I think you need to get back to the ABC sincerely speaking because you use wrong terms in scientific cook-books.

Apatheist:
Source : www.mnn.com/earth-matters/space/stories/black-holes-are-portals-to-other-universes-according-to-new-quantum

Olazy239: abeg who know were black hole dey make i jump inside cumot 4 dis fuckin freakin earth rock jor

all4naija: The fact that nothing that goes into black-hole comes back as it passes into the even horizon it is squeezed into nothing and that makes it more difficult to understand in space. Even light cannot escape the powerful force of the black-hole.

For you jumping into black-hole is a waste of your time and imagination because you would experience nothing before you are sucked into the event horizon.

kcool2: hehe.....the black hole is an interesting phenomenom since you have to be travelling faster than light to escape it.....i got a question though if i was travelling in a vessel moving at the speed of light,then walked forward still inside the vessel,i would be travelling faster than the speed of light right atleast based on classical physics

kcool2: hehe.....the black hole is an interesting phenomenom since you have to be travelling faster than light to escape it.....i got a question though if i was travelling in a vessel moving at the speed of light,then walked forward still inside the vessel,i would be travelling faster than the speed of light right atleast based on classical physics

TopsyKrete:

To burst your bubble, you are still travelling at the speed of light, that is if u manage to survive the sensation of every cell in your body passing through the pores of your skin and splat on the vessel...

U got that

Oahray: They still hold on the big bang theory .

There are more technological than scientific breakthroughs these days. Assumptions and daring speculations get to be used to explain mysteries while ignorant onlookers agree just to sound smart.

wisemen045: Disclaimer: I am not an astrophysicist or the likes. Just a person that watches discovery science once in a while.

@OP black holes may be portals to other universes if you look at it from two angles. One, the fact that black holes are not really holes and two, the fact that black holes holes have a limit to the amount of matter it can absorb. According to a show I watched recently on discovery science, a block hole acts like a Pulsar once it has reached maximum capacity and shoots out huge jets of materials (matter, energy etc) up and down its poles. The matter ejected then forms the building blocks of other galaxies/universes. Just picture a black hole with a galaxy at its top and bottom. So there is a white hole (burst of matter energy creating new universes) at the opposite end of every black hole. This may also help to explain what was before the big bang since energy can neither be created or destroyed. Just in this order:

A super star dies - a black hole - singularity - big bang (white hole) - a new universe.

N.B The show was titled ''how the universe was made''.

Apatheist:
Technology is not scientific?

Oahray: technology is APPLICATION of scientific knowledge. They are related, but not the same. I thought everyone knew that.

Science - knowledge
Technology - application.
My point is, technology or application of such knowledge from past decades/centuries is advancing faster than we are truly learning new things. It could be because we have learnt alot already about our earth, and the universe isn't the easiest thing to study.

All we get now are speculative theories as against well-tested scientific fact or laws.

Apatheist:
Who says we aren't learning new things?
You should read sites like Scientific American, and not Linda Ikeji 's blog.

Oahray: smh... I talked about the RATE of learning, not just learning. How did you miss the "faster than" I wrote?

What's more, a scientific breakthrough is not the same as regular small improvements on existing knowledge. Don't be in a hurry to argue.

Akalia: None of the above speculation is a fact, reason been that today's science and technology is yet to advance to a stage where space exploration and findings will base on facts but not speculations and theories.

Oahray: technology is APPLICATION of scientific knowledge. They are related, but not the same. I thought everyone knew that.

Science - knowledge
Technology - application.
My point is, technology or application of such knowledge from past decades/centuries is advancing faster than we are truly learning new things. It could be because we have learnt alot already about our earth, and the universe isn't the easiest thing to study.

All we get now are speculative theories as against well-tested scientific fact or laws.