I have seen threads on this forum that seem to suggest that a man gains in a relationship as long as he gets sex from a girl he spends his hard earned money on. With humility, I wish to controvert this notion. If I a man has sex with a girl, she is not doing him any favour because she is also deriving as much pleasure as the guy is deriving from the act, probably more. If I spend on my girl, I do it because I love her, not for sex. Mature men don't pay for sex because what they get from sex, she also gets it from it, so why should I pay for helping her to experience cloud nine? If a man is in a relationship where the only thing he gets from the girl is sex, he is not gaining at all. If a girl also has money, what religion or morality prohibits her from spending on her guy. I am not saying she should be the bread winner, but at least, buy some things for your guy once in a while, and he will even spend more on you. Guys, if you are in a relationship where the only thing you get is sex while you expend your savings on the girl, and you think you are gaining, it's an illusion.

Even those advocating feminist movement don't use their own money to but common recharge card they are dependent like Scotland

Á ĞÚŶ ŴĤŐ ĎĔPĔŃĎŚ ŐŃ ĤĨŚ ŚPŐÚŚĔs MŐŃĔŶ ĨŚ ŚŐMĔŤĤĨŃĞ ĔĹŚĔ..
Á MÁŃ ĞÁŤÁ ßĔ Á man

iceberylin: Á ĞÚŶ ŴĤŐ ĎĔPĔŃĎŚ ŐŃ ĤĨŚ ŚPŐÚŚĔs MŐŃĔŶ ĨŚ ŚŐMĔŤĤĨŃĞ ĔĹŚĔ..
Á MÁŃ ĞÁŤÁ ßĔ Á man

I never implied that a man should depend on his partner. But a relationship where the only thing the girl has to offer is sex is risible

jiorhemen: iceberylin: Á ĞÚŶ ŴĤŐ ĎĔPĔŃĎŚ ŐŃ ĤĨŚ ŚPŐÚŚĔs MŐŃĔŶ ĨŚ ŚŐMĔŤĤĨŃĞ ĔĹŚĔ..
Á MÁŃ ĞÁŤÁ ßĔ Á man

I never implied that a man should depend on his partner. But a relationship where the only thing the girl has to offer is sex is risible

#ČŐMPÁŃĨŐŃŚĤĨP ĨŚ ĨŃVŐĹVĔĎ
ĹŐŤŚ more