Fhemmmy:


Lol . . .Imagine how much money his 1 pound will be iin cedi

pickabeau1:

Choi...
The girls family in ghana will hunt him down

coogar:


he would be church rat poor by the time he comes out with loads of debt on his head. unless he's got loads of investment back in ghana, he would be begging for cedis.

Fhemmmy:


I guess the prison system in UK is so different from in Canada, cos in Canada, while you there, you could be doing few things to earn income there, and remember free food, and other things without paying for accommodation . . .

coogar:


they can choose to work here as well but they are paid peanuts. the pay doesn't motivate loads of them so they just sleep all day in their cells.

shinejackie:
.

The bold got me laughing, sleeping all day without exercise go make them look like yokozuma...

coogar:


they have gym sessions o....
pool table, 3D football pitches, table football, table tennis, etc. there are TVs in their cells too. if it's a private prison, then it often comes with satellite channels.

coogar:



that's after he hunts the naija neighbour down.

shinejackie:
.

so much luxury to make some of them prefer prison life to freedom......

coogar:


they can choose to work here as well but they are paid peanuts. the pay doesn't motivate loads of them so they just sleep all day in their cells.

coogar:


no bills, no stress, 3 square meals, etc.
the only thing they don't have is freedom. they are locked up 20-23 hrs of the day.

Demainman1:

I will become the next victim.

shinejackie:
.
so much luxury to make some of them prefer prison life to freedom......

carefreewannabe:


The difference is that in one of the scenarios there is a father who is available and in the other not.

The difference is that in one of the scenarios the woman did not decide to take care of the kids all by herself but the the decision has been made by TWO people.

You are slowly losing it, seriously.

carefreewannabe:


The difference is that in one of the scenarios there is a father who is available and in the other not.

The difference is that in one of the scenarios the woman did not decide to take care of the kids all by herself but the the decision has been made by TWO people.

You are slowly losing it, seriously.

donpeey22:
@Carefree, pls if the woman gave up her job and promotion for the period she was birthing children, that means she must have been broke and somebody was responsible for her upkeep throughout that period. That same person must also have taken responsibility for settling healthcare bills and catering for other family needs throughout that period. My question is, if that person is the husband, how should he be compensated for all he spent If the wife should be compensated for giving up her job? Since the children are jointly owned by the two.

coogar:

from colchester eastwards, right?
my last time in colchester was in 2004. it's a very nice place.

carefreewannabe:


We were talking about Western divorce laws here. And in the West a woman who takes maternity leave is not broke and not without insurance.

donpeey22:
I know what the topic is about. I was actually referring to a scenario where the lady never had a job ab initio. Perhaps, if she was working and had to give up her job to birth children, it could be justifiable to compensate her in the event of divorce.

I asked my question because most of the times the ladies that ask to be compensated for times they spent giving birth to children are broke azzs ladies who never had a dime of their own but depended on their hubbies for upkeep.

carefreewannabe:


Honestly, I don't know. Maybe.

There is something called prenuptial agreement, people should make use of it instead of complaining all the time. If you know that the laws are unfair, protect yourself. I have no compassion for people who know how messy a marriage and divorce can turn out to be, especially in the West where divorce rates are between 40 and 50% and still don'T make use of prenuptial agreements.

Chillisauce:


Prenuptial . No!
Use a condom . No!
Don't get married. No!

They just keep screaming in my ears.

carefreewannabe:


Have more compassion. They are the victims.

None of them has shown up on the "wife killed husband thread" yet.

Chillisauce:


Compassion ke.
I was watching an old movie on how these west treat their women . Very precious. They fight wars, kill for them.
Yet our brothers will be the first to take off if small thief knock on his door, leaving wife and kids behind.

Our much value to material gains over human life.

Na dem go church pass oh.

Demainman1:
We are the defenders of bad women? They have gone very quiet lately.

Continue your bad ways. Keep frustrating that that good man you agree to marry because the law here will side with you.
You might just become the next victim.

raumdeuter:


ANy sane man would provide money to take care of his child, WOmen asking to be rewarded for having their own babies is the appearance of insanity here

carefreewannabe:


Honestly, I don't know. Maybe.

There is something called prenuptial agreement, people should make use of it instead of complaining all the time. If you know that the laws are unfair, protect yourself. I have no compassion for people who know how messy a marriage and divorce can turn out to be, especially in the West where divorce rates are between 40 and 50% and still don'T make use of prenuptial agreements.

donpeey22:
dear carefree, if you agreed that a lady who gave up her job to birth children deserves a compensation in the event of divorce, then you should also "know" that a who spent his hard earned money taking care of a jobless wife equally deserves a compensation in the during divorce, unless it is agreed that the children belong to the man and the man alone, in which case the lady can be paid off and made to forfeit everything about the children to the man. That's the fair deal!

I agree with you on the prenuptial agreement tho

SirShymexx:


Colchester is far - I've not really checked the place out.

Places like: Loughton, Debden, and Buckhurst Hill are close by - with top notch quality.

They're not really too far from where I live as well.

THe only way is Essex.

carefreewannabe:


So a woman who takes care of the kids and the home is jobless? Interesting.

donpeey22:
ok , assuming she is employed to birth and take care of the man's children, during divorce, it can be ruled that the lady should be paid a certain amount of money per child MINUS every cent spent for her upkeep during the period, while the man takes total ownership of the child/children.
Hope you agree with that?