BossTtdiamonds:


Jump to business... when the original premise is unjust...

How? I quoted the bible, he said what I quoted was meant for the jews, I asked if the god of the jews in question was different from the god of christians, if the god of moses different from the god of christ? The same question I'm directing at you now.

EzioAuditore:


Your idi*ot friend was trying to be a troll when he used it, but apparently this knob head actually believes it? Lmao!

True + True + True = True... That's the interpretation of the boolean summation.. 1 = True, 0 = False..
It 'lld have done you some good if you had passed through the walls of a sound university system... But na Poly una go dey go...

EzioAuditore:


How? I quoted the bible, he said what I quoted was meant for the jews, I asked if the god of the jews in question was different from the god of christians, if the god of moses different from the god of christ? The same question I'm directing at you now.

Rephrase the question will you...removing the false entities that has polluted it validity.... Then you have me to debate

BossTtdiamonds:

True + True + True = True... That's the interpretation of the boolean summation.. 1 = True, 0 = False..
It 'lld have done you some good if you had passed through the walls of a sound university system... But na Poly una go dey go...

So what is 1+0+1?

BossTtdiamonds:


Rephrase the question will you...removing the false entities that has polluted it validity.... Then you have me to debate

The false entity being?

EzioAuditore:


Your idi*ot friend was trying to be a troll when he used it, but apparently this knob head actually believes it? Lmao!

but you asked

EzioAuditore:

So what is 1+0+1?

True + False + True = False...

BossTtdiamonds:


True + False + True = False...

And what is 1+1+0+1?

EzioAuditore:


The false entity being?

Are you really asking??....
Well I'll build..

First Throw off: "According to the monks tradition"
Please where the f*ck is your source...Any Tom,d.ick or Harry could have said this.. You can't just conjure up text from nowhere and expect us to believe it... At lease quote something relevant.. e.g. (Quran, Bible)...
Can we start off from here..
I leave you to figure the rest..

EzioAuditore:

And what is 1+1+0+1?

Grab a book on " Regular Expressions "... I'm done tutoring you on this subject matter... We all paid to be educated...

BossTtdiamonds:


Grab a book on " Regular Expressions "...
I'm done tutoring you on this subject matter...
We all paid to be educated...

Lmao! Just answer the question mate, I'm just a lowly polytechnic student, please do not deny me this opportunity to learn.

EzioAuditore:


Lmao! Just answer the question mate, I'm just a lowly polytechnic student, please do not deny me this opportunity to learn.

How touching your statement...
Grab a book read... Thay's hoe to learn...
I've gone through the stress of pulling a site for you (http://wiki.tcl.tk/461)... Its up to you Waheed....

BossTtdiamonds:


Are you really asking??....
Well I'll build..

First Throw off: "According to the monks tradition"
Please where the f*ck is your source...Any Tom,d.ick or Harry could have said this.. You can't just conjure up text from nowhere and expect us to believe it... At lease quote something relevant.. e.g. (Quran, Bible)...
Can we start off from here..
I leave you to figure the rest..

Lol! So the university graduate jumped into an argument without knowing what its about? Yet somehow he arrived at the conclusion that I'm confused? The fact that that document exists is not enough proof for you? Okay. Lol! Your holiness, please go back and read how this all started, it was all about verses from the Quran and hadith. Thank you for gracing us with your presence oh most educated one.

BossTtdiamonds:


Are you really asking??....
Well I'll build..

First Throw off: "According to the monks tradition"
Please where the f*ck is your source...Any Tom,d.ick or Harry could have said this.. You can't just conjure up text from nowhere and expect us to believe it... At lease quote something relevant.. e.g. (Quran, Bible)...
Can we start off from here..
I leave you to figure the rest..

Lol! So the university graduate jumped into an argument without knowing what its about? Yet somehow he arrived at the conclusion that I'm confused? The fact that that document exists is not enough proof for you? Okay. Lol! Your holiness, please go back and read how this all started, it was all about verses from the Quran and bible. Thank you for gracing us with your presence oh most educated one.

BossTtdiamonds:


How touching your statement...
Grab a book read... Thay's hoe to learn...
I've gone through the stress of pulling a site for you (http://wiki.tcl.tk/461)... Its up to you Waheed....

Thanks for the hardwork, I'll try to read the contents, but for now, please help me, 1+1+0+1=?

EzioAuditore:


Lol! So the university graduate jumped into an argument without knowing what its about? Yet somehow he arrived at the conclusion that I'm confused? The fact that that document exists is not enough proof for you? Okay. Lol! Your holiness, please go back and read how this all started, it was all about verses from the Quran and bible. Thank you for gracing us with your presence oh most educated one.

Your Dumbness, I see you've failed to understand my assertion... please your dumbness if you need us break it down, we'll gladly break it down.. Just by saying the mahic word.....

BossTtdiamonds:


Your Dumbness, I see you've failed to understand my assertion... please your dumbness if you need us break it down, we'll gladly break it down.. Just by saying the mahic word.....

Oooh please your holiness, please break it down.

EzioAuditore:


Thanks for the hardwork, I'll try to read the contents, but for now, please help me, 1+1+0+1=?

Your dumb self would probably try to equate
1+1+0+1 to be 1+1+1+0,
Forgetting this is not a mathematical statement but a boolean statement where the placement of every data set matters..
You'd probably take 0 and wind it up into the error term thinking it has no value, forgetting that the actual value of 0 is False. Thus 0 is not an integer but a boolean value that contains in it the value False. I'd suggest you read up on " Logical Operators " so you catch a glimpe of what I'm really trying to assert. i.e. 0 is a Variable that contains the object False in contrast to a mathematical statement where 0 equals null...

BossTtdiamonds:

Your dumb self would probably try to equate
1+1+0+1 to be 1+1+1+0,
Forgetting this is not a mathematical statement but a boolean statement where the placement of every data set matters..
You'd probably take 0 and wind it up into the error term thinking it has no value, forgetting that the actual value of 0 is False. Thus 0 is not an integer but a boolean value that contains in it the value False. I'd suggest you read up on " Logical Operators " so you catch a glimpe of what I'm really trying to assert. i.e. 0 is a Variable that contains the object False in contrast to a mathematical statement where 0 equals null...

Still no answer sir?

EzioAuditore:


Oooh please your holiness, please break it down.

"According to the monks tradition"




Note the bolded, Notice I started and ended with this... I jope you het the logic now as I have isolated other factors to unincumber your reasoning...

EzioAuditore:


Still no answer sir?

After all the explanation Oya class work.. Submit your answer and I'll tell ypu if you're correct or not..
Use the template of ny previous examples...

BossTtdiamonds:


"According to the monks tradition"




Note the bolded, Notice I started and ended with this... I jope you het the logic now as I have isolated other factors to unincumber your reasoning...

There are many ways to spot a foool, but for me, the best way is when he presents winnits as his best work. What you fail to understand is, the document still exists, the monastery still exists, they still have it on display, so why would you think that part you foolishly isolated is false?

BossTtdiamonds:

After all the explanation Oya class work.. Submit your answer and I'll tell ypu if you're correct or not..
Use the template of ny previous examples...

Lmao! Seriously? Are you this shameless? Lmfao! C'mon, I don't know sir, please give me the answer, think of it as correction. I accept that I have failed.

Sai Mo.




The king of Terror!

MightySparrow:
Sai Mo.




The king of Terror!

And by Mo you mean the biblical MOses? I agree!

EzioAuditore:


There are many ways to spot a foool, but for me, the best way is when he presents winnits as his best work. What you fail to understand is, the document still exists, the monastery still exists, they still have it on display, so why would you think that part you foolishly isolated is false?

Geez..... what planet did you spring up from.. You probably have no idea how dumb you sound..
Seeing you're so dumb without even realizing it, for your every act of inanity, you'd have to be spoon fed.

According to the monks' tradition,Muhammad frequented the monastery and had great relationships and discussions with the Sinai fathers.[3]

In research, the integer 3 in square brackets " [3] " tells the reader you're citing a source. After reading the entire Jargon, I looked to the end to see if you'd list the source, or at least quote where you copied the entire Jibberish from for proper verification, but none was found..
Ever heard of Plaigiarism? This single act prooves either of the following;
1. You're hiding vital information as there's no way we can verify if your OP had not been corrupted..(Same way ya'll removed the satanic verses from your unholy book). i.e. You copied, edited - by adding part that would justify your deceptive act and posted the Jargon for us to digest.
2. You're so dumb, you never realized the above meant anything important...

Now that I have spoon fed you, can you please make the necessary changes to the obvious, and reduce being thought a fool...

EzioAuditore:


Lmao! Seriously? Are you this shameless? Lmfao! C'mon, I don't know sir, please give me the answer, think of it as correction. I accept that I have failed.

How Pathetic you are; admitting to being a complete failure... The s.h!t probably runs on your veins.. Mohammed probably thought you that...

BossTtdiamonds:


Geez..... what planet did you spring up from.. You probably have no idea how dumb you sound..
Seeing you're so dumb without even realizing it, for your every act of inanity, you'd have to be spoon fed.


In research, the integer 3 in square brackets " [3] " tells the reader you're citing a source. After reading the entire Jargon, I looked to the end to see if you list the source, or at least quote where you copied the entire Jibberish from, but none was found..
Ever heard of Plaigiarism? This single act prooves either of the following;
1. You're hiding vital information as there's no way we can verify if your OP had not been corrupted..(Same way ya'll removed the satanic verses from your unholy book). i.e. You copied, edited - by adding part that would justify your deceptive act and posted the Jargon for us to digest.
2. You're so dumb, you never realized the above meant anything important...

Now that I have spoon fed you, can you please make the necessary changes to the obvious, and reduce being thought a fool...

I'm so dumb this, I'm so dumb that... Alright! Are you now accusing me of writing the achtiname? Or are youy saying the monks did not hold this belief? Of course I copied the achtiname and the introduction about what its about, I thought that was obvious enough but apparently I did not account for extra ordinary knob heads like yourself. Now, if they did not believe this why would they still display it at the monastery, which I'm sure this bellend doesn't know still exists. Now what did I twist? Does the document not exist? What act am I justifying here? So the prophet promising mercy to christians is such a despicable act? Am I missing something here? Okay, let's play it this way then, every fact that can't be verified can be falsified, now the achtiname is nothing new, if you have anything to prove anything I have posted here is false, go and bring it. This sprag has completely lost the plot, he doesn't even know what he's against, all he knows is that it can't be true. You christians and your constant need to antagonize anything islamic even when facts are presented before you is becoming tiring. I'm not surprised though, it is afterall what makes you christians, illogical reasoning and fighting facts. Anyways, I'm waiting for you to go and bring anything that proves anything I posted here is invalid.

BossTtdiamonds:


How Pathetic you are; admitting to being a complete failure... The s.h!t probably runs on your veins.. Mohammed probably thought you that...

No need to bring Muhammad into this, just answer the friggin question, your holiness.

EzioAuditore:


I'm so dumb this, I'm so dumb that... Alright! Are you now accusing me of writing the achtiname? Or are youy saying the monks did not hold this belief? Of course I copied the achtiname and the introduction about what its about, I thought that was obvious enough but apparently I did not account for extra ordinary knob heads like yourself. Now, if they did not believe this why would they still display it at the monastery, which I'm sure this bellend doesn't know still exists. Now what did I twist? Does the document not exist? What act am I justifying here? So the prophet promising mercy to christians is such a despicable act? Am I missing something here? Okay, let's play it this way then, every fact that can't be verified can be falsified, now the achtiname is nothing new, if you have anything to prove anything I have posted here is false, go and bring it. This sprag has completely lost the plot, he doesn't even know what he's against, all he knows is that it can't be true. You christians and your constant need to antagonize anything islamic even when facts are presented before you is becoming tiring. I'm not surprised though, it is afterall what makes you christians, illogical reasoning and fighting facts. Anyways, I'm waiting for you to go and bring anything that proves anything I posted here is invalid.

Oh! God... How far apart you are from comprehension..
Just list the source of the damn article that's all I've been talking about... If it has no source, tell us about how you came into conclusions... Easy as abc..
You're jibberish posting is quite annoying..

EzioAuditore:


No need to bring Muhammad into this, just answer the friggin question, your holiness.

I gave your dumbness a simple question to answer in your free time, but your dumbness already admitted to failing....

1 + 1 + 0 + 1 = ?
i.e. True + True + False + True = False
There you have it..

EzioAuditore:

So what is 1+0+1?

1+0+1=0 which denotes one cannot work without the rest it affirms Trinity