Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.

U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.

The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow. It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to its website.

These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.

But, that’s not all.

Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “The Vulva Paper.”

If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here.

The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).

The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the Instruments were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper. They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.



Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”

These nothing one can't compete and win again in this world of ours

Pinsure or idntbelieveit

Mmmmm....nice

The beauty of vagina is in the eyes of the beholder. Na black woman suppose win na mm.

Whr d picture na

Where's d pictures naw? I want to study d stuff too

post pics na n lets c d one which is beauTIFULLL

Hoes

Jizoz ooo.
What is this.
I'll be hosting a smelliest mouth contest next month.
Or maybe I'll just host a most whitish eyes contest.

I would like to see what the judges saw before making my decision..

Stupid contest

NONSENSE

morbeta:
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.

U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.

The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow. It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to its website.

These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.

But, that’s not all.

Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “The Vulva Paper.”

If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here.

The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).

The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the Instruments were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper. They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.



Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”

all this white people self nothing u won't see
4kfreedom..com

SEE IS BELIEVEiNG,..could she have inorganic to clean that lead her to the top,.

Priority gloriously misplaced.

Indirectly Everything one(part of ourbody) is a plus/unique

No Pix

Did ALMIGHTY GOD make MISTAKE creating WOMEN.?

*faints* wakes up *faints*

lobatan * Ah viginal competition ke waiting person no go see

Wollop!! Wollop!!
Gerrarrahia men!

Mrbigman1:
Pinsure or idntbelieveit

Lol.. I'm telling you bro..

Cutehector:
Whr d picture na

What do you want to see?

But op, this post is useless without pictures.

Adaeze003:


What do you want to see?

But op, this post is useless without pictures.

ajuju.. Wat else wouldn't u want me to see if not faces...

daughters of eve and Jezebel.

Pissure or I

They ll start the most beautiful Penis very soon. Iranu

jedyjedy:
They ll start the most beautiful Penis very soon. Iranu

hahahahaha