Truckpusher:
Yeah, but sometimes your life becomes a living nightmare

sukkot:
brah, masonic lodges are a black thing. its all egyptian esoteric knowledge which the greeks copied from egypt and if you read about the history of freemasonry they tell you all their knowledge is from egyptian mystic schools. dayumm brah you give the white man too much credit and then give the black man no credit at all. this is a theme of yours i have noticed. what you got against black people ? you are black right ?

Shymm3x:

It's not just naij - black people in general have no power. So I'm not under-estimating anyone, just stating facts. All those masonic lodges are just ceremonial junk for personal networking by elites who're inconsequential outside naij and don't even control the real power in naij - nothing serious. Most of those naij pastors should be members of those lodges.
There's nothing dynamic about naij. It's a stagnated country, with the North controlling over 70% of the landmass and population, while the South is just the South. The country is divided along deep ethnic fault-lines and tribalism is the bread and butter of the country, just like every other indigenous country. And the interests across the divides clash all the time. That's the reality.

sukkot:
dayumm brah you give the white man too much credit and then give the black man no credit at all. this is a theme of yours i have noticed. what you got against black people ? you are black right ?

sukkot:
true indeed but in the midst of that nightmare-at the end of the tunnel is always a silver lining. it gets darkest before it becomes light. a wise man once said-life is a series of moments and happiness is not a destination but a bus-stop. so nobody has happiness all the time. not even dangote.

Shymm3x:


Yes, freemasonry was a black thing in Egypt - but white folks hijacked it time ago. There's nothing black about it anymore. It's akin to calling today's Egypt the black land, which's the real meaning of the ancient name for Egypt (Kemet).

Don't mess about with the York and Scottish rites in Freemasonry. Go to the City of London and see what real masonic lodges look like.

sukkot:
so you admit it is a black thing. so they are taking back what is theirs. so how are they coons for taking back what is theirs ?

Shymm3x:


It's not a black thing anymore. Heck, the two umbrella rites in freemasonry are York and Scottish rites. What's Egyptian about the two names?

Brev, ask the Knights Templar - the Empire took it time ago.

So they're coons cos they're just slaves to something white folks and is selling back to them to do their bid, without the power that comes with it.
Anyway, I need to stop talking about Freemasonry...I've got things to do.

AreaFada2:
You dey mind that hypocrite called OBJ? He scammed Awo, vilified MKO, only just supported GEJ hoping to make him a stooge. When that failed, he developed both mouth and pen diarrhoea.

sukkot:
you do know when freemasonry was formed in scotland it was when black people ruled scotland right ? scot means black. so scotland means black-land. the last black king of scotland was king james who commisioned the king james bible hence the movie the last king of scotland with a black man forest whittaker as the black king. you need to understand these things bro. the scottish rites and the knights templar are all black organizations.

Shymm3x:


Lol. The Last King of Scotland was about Idi Amin and King James wasn't a black man.

Scotland has always been the Celt land from time immemorial, only England had black folks, during prehistoric times - till medieval times. I think the farthest black folks went was York, hence the great history attached to the place. And I believe the Stonehenge was built by those ancient black men. Story for another day.

Freemasonry started in the UK in the 18th, and the European conquest of the world had already started by then. So you can't call their version the black version. They took it from the sacred temples of Egypt and made it their own. And when the British Empire conquered Egypt in the 19th century - they expanded on it, with the unrestricted access they had to secrets of ancient Egyptians.

Shymm3x:


Lol. The Last King of Scotland was about Idi Amin and King James wasn't a black man.

Scotland has always been the Celt land from time immemorial, only England had black folks, during prehistoric times - till medieval times. I think the farthest black folks went was York, hence the great history attached to the place. And I believe the Stonehenge was built by those ancient black men. Story for another day.

Freemasonry started in the UK in the 18th, and the European conquest of the world had already started by then. So you can't call their version the black version. They took it from the sacred temples of Egypt and made it their own. And when the British Empire conquered Egypt in the 19th century - they expanded on it, with the unrestricted access they had to secrets of ancient Egyptians.

drss:

How will this ranting change the fact that the article is true Open ur eyes, you have been scammed by the north. Even Ameachi eye don open to the grand deception by the A.b.o.k.i.s

Shymm3x:


Lol. The Last King of Scotland was about Idi Amin and King James wasn't a black man.

Scotland has always been the Celt land from time immemorial, only England had black folks, during prehistoric times - till medieval times. I think the farthest black folks went was York, hence the great history attached to the place. And I believe the Stonehenge was built by those ancient black men. Story for another day.

Freemasonry started in the UK in the 18th, and the European conquest of the world had already started by then. So you can't call their version the black version. They took it from the sacred temples of Egypt and made it their own. And when the British Empire conquered Egypt in the 19th century - they expanded on it, with the unrestricted access they had to secrets of ancient Egyptians.

sukkot:


king james

Shymm3x:


That's not a black man.

And I don't even believe they would have allowed a black man to become King during that period cos that was when they were chasing the moors out of Europe. I'm sure you know that's James VI of Scotland (King James 1 of England) and the first king to ever rule both the Scottish/Irish, and English thrones at once and he also founded Virginia (Jamestown) in America where black slaves were later transferred to?

Not buying this black claim. The timeline isn't right - that was when black were being persecuted in Europe and the beginning of slavery.

sukkot:
nah you got it wrong. the last vestiges of black stronghold was in england in the 1600s before the black plague came and decimated them and they lost power. do your research. the european has only been in power for 500 years or so

Shymm3x:


Nah, you got it - ya timeline is so wrong.

The black death/plague happened in the 14th century and James VI of Scotland didn't even become King James 1, till late 16th century.

And that was the period when the black moors were being persecuted and chased out of Europe.

Heck, slavery started in 1619 and the first black slaves ever shipped to the Americas (new world) were sent by King James 1 to Jamestown, Virginia (a place he founded in America), by his Virginia company. So how would a black king enslave his own people, when it would have been easier for him to use white folks?

sukkot:

[b]KING CHARLES STUART II: THE BLACK BOY KING OF ENGLAND 1630 – 1685
Merry King Charles Stuart II: The Black King of England

The word Stuart comes from the old nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English.

There was once a Stuart line of Kings in England. The name of the founding ancestor was Stuart which means Black man.

In this post, we feature the original painting of one of the Stuart Kings of England and Scotland, King Charles II, also lovingly known as the “black boy” of England by his subjects.

He is commemorated in the celebrated name of the Black Boy Inn, found all over the British Isle.

King Charles II was a black man. Many of his surviving paintings falsely depict him as a so-called white man in clear contradiction to the famous description of the jolly King.

However, in the picture posted immediately below, one can see one of the contemporary paintings of King Charles Stuart II, Merry Black Boy of England. This picture invites all to decide why King Charles Stuart II, would have been called the black boy.[/b]

Shymm3x:


Nah, you got it - ya timeline is so wrong.

The black death/plague happened in the 14th century and James VI of Scotland didn't even become King James 1, till late 16th century.

And that was the period when the black moors were being persecuted and chased out of Europe.

Heck, slavery started in 1619 and the first black slaves ever shipped to the Americas (new world) were sent by King James 1 to Jamestown, Virginia (a place he founded in America), by his Virginia company. So how would a black king enslave his own people, when it would have been easier for him to use white folks?

Shymm3x:


Not saying there were no black kings and noblemen in medieval Britain - there were a lot of them. However, muthaphucking King James the racist King was not a black man. The catholic church ordered the slavery of black people but he was the first to ship black slaves to the new world to work on plantations. That man was a white man - a freaking Scot!

sukkot:
you dont know how this works. its all spiritual. when one empire loses its power the empire taking over comes in with so much violence and it started the black persecution. so while a huge section of blacks had fallen and were being enslaved, at the same exact time there were still black strongholds in britain which would eventually all fall. but yes it is an amazing fact that when the slavery was going on there was black nobility all over england. verifiable fact. the black enclaves didnt all fall at once but they fell one after another and while some were enslaved some still had their strongholds. kinda like in america where there was slavery of blacks but many blacks were free in the north running successful business and some blacks even owned black slaves in america etc. see, history is not what you have been told. you have been lied to

DedeNkem:
[s]It's funny seeing yorubas complaining?
They don't learn from history. Ab*okis are using you guys like m*orons.[/s]

Shymm3x:


This has nothing to do with anything spiritual. Once you miss the timeline in history, that shows you're wrong. Black plague/death happened two centuries before King James I.

And a freaking King who was the first to ship black slaves to work on a plantation could never have been black since the first crop of black slaves were shipped directly from Europe and they were moors. So there's absolutely no way he would've enslaved his own people.

Yes, there were black people in America before slavery. But that's another topic entirely.

sukkot:
you are the slave. you are a slave to tribal allegiance. i am a free man. no allegiance to archaic tribal traditions or peoples. notice how you tribal slaves cannot think straight ? you make choices to your own detriment just to appease your primitive tribal instinct

speaking of ghaddafi, when he was ruling libya was very rich. libyans got free housing and education and monthly stipends. now that he has been kicked out the people are suffering. i see you are also a slave to western propaganda. making you a double slave. a slave to tribal and western propaganda

Shymm3x:


This has nothing to do with anything spiritual. Once you miss the timeline in history, that shows you're wrong. Black plague/death happened two centuries before King James I.

And a freaking King who was the first to ship black slaves to work on a plantation could never have been black since the first crop of black slaves were shipped directly from Europe and they were moors. So there's absolutely no way he would've enslaved his own people.

Yes, there were black people in America before slavery. But that's another topic entirely.

Ola17:
Nice article.

Every genuine PMB supporter who isn't disappointed with his skewed appointments, promise denials and lack of policy direction is living in denial. This article can't be faulted. PMB has successfully lost lots of goodwill he enjoyed barely 3 months into his administration. That's bad.

The most disappointing is his failure to declare his assets publicly, come on, that doesn't take much to achieve na. This is definitely not the change lots of us expected.

sukkot:
well not many will have the balls of steel to steal under buhari but you reduce the chance even further by hiring righteous people from the start

sukkot:
and you are wrong. the black plague in england was 1665. so you are the one who got the dates mixed up. in this picture of the black plague see if you can see that mixed race black king. and it has the date. 1665. dunno where you got the 1300 stuff you talking about

http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/The-Great-Plague/

click that link. here is a mixed race king charles in 1665