Setaje:
All I no is I have seen ufo's twice. The same kind that people said they have seen. A flying saucer. Here in Nigeria. Twice. Don't care if you don't believe but I no what I saw. I wasn't sleeping or in a truance. It was as real as seeing an airplane. Only that this one was exactly like a flying saucer.

Setaje:
All I no is I have seen ufo's twice. The same kind that people said they have seen. A flying saucer. Here in Nigeria. Twice. Don't care if you don't believe but I no what I saw. I wasn't sleeping or in a truance. It was as real as seeing an airplane. Only that this one was exactly like a flying saucer.

chccho:

your over sabi is too much and thats where u are shooting yourself in the leg...
u seem to have answers to everyones post but the simple question is this.
if the earth has been in existence millions of years ago, and u havent lived more than a 100, then who are u to tell what has been, what is and what will be? when u cant even tell what is next for u ..

erusen:
really, chai as I want take believe this one na

erusen:
all he is saying is that u can not conclude what u saw was an alien

johnydon22:
I wonder why it is so hard to understand bro... they just don't want their claims/theories challenged

johnydon22:
The funny part is bro you keep calling it U.F.O.

For the fact that it is U.F.O which means Unidentified Flying Object means you have not identified what it is so how then can you conclude on what it is when you have not identified exactly what it is.

That you saw something you cannot identify doesn't make it alien, it simply means you are yet to identify it..Once identified we both know it won't be dubbed U.F.O anymore because we now know what it is.

so until we identify and know no need formulating such claims that it is aliens

johnydon22:
Hahahahaha honestly i am not disputing the fact that people may see what they claim to see..

My own position is that once you call it U.F.O means its unidentified, you have no idea what it is..

so why formulate alien visitation theories based on what you have no idea what it is?

johnydon22:
Please sir Gravitons are hypothetical and are predicted to be in quantum levels...

dazzlingd:

I understand ur argument and it's quite logical.

but some of these flying objects have formations which is very very unlikely to be any human invention yet very very certain that it's being controlled by some intelligent beings

dazzlingd:

I understand ur argument and it's quite logical.

but some of these flying objects have formations which is very very unlikely to be any human invention yet very very certain that it's being controlled by some intelligent beings

Joshthefirst:
That long post you put up before this one was mostly hypothetical too. Just pointing it out.

johnydon22:
The funny part is bro you keep calling it U.F.O.

For the fact that it is U.F.O which means Unidentified Flying Object means you have not identified what it is so how then can you conclude on what it is when you have not identified exactly what it is.

That you saw something you cannot identify doesn't make it alien, it simply means you are yet to identify it..Once identified we both know it won't be dubbed U.F.O anymore because we now know what it is.

so until we identify and know no need formulating such claims that it is aliens

dazzlingd:

no one wud believe, they will say u saw somtin else, they will say it was jst ur mind, u watch too much movies or they simply laugh....
my curiosity in ufo started after what I experienced sometimes back. But I cared not sharing with anyone cus no one wud believe anyway

malvisguy212:
sorry Johnny for quoting you ( I know you hate that) . If you identified it as U.F.O ,is it wrong to conclude , what you saw was an alien (u.f.o) ? Because it is an unidentified object prior to it discovery mean you cannot conclude is an alien ? Going by your explanation, does it mean we can never identified UFO because its unidentified ? Thank you.

johnydon22:
LoJ this is an image taken with a telescope owned by SonOfLucifer's neighbour... Check it out.. breathe taking isn't it?

johnydon22:
[b] Am happy you quote for me for something good sir.

I mean.. If you see an object now very far from where you are probably seating right now, and you do not have a closer look so cannot say exactly what that thing is..

It is will be very wrong of you to conclude that thing is a cat when you do not really know what exactly it is..

what if it is a dog or a goat.... so it is better you first of all have a closer look to observe and find out exactly what that thing is whether it is actually a goat, dog, cat etc..

so you see thats the thing with U.F.Os .. it is called U.F.O because the observer haven't identified what they are exactly assuming they are aliens is just exactly like assuming the thing you saw from a far is a cat in the example above.

If we identify these objects we won't call them U.F.Os anymore but we will regard them to be exactly what it is ... Space/ship, cloud or others.

I have shown that we have cloud formations that look like saucers often mistaken as U.F.O sightings.

So my position is let us not assume until we know
[/b]

erusen:
is that the moon

johnydon22:
Yes... it is outstanding what a small Galilean telescope can achieve... Am dying to get mine..

If i do i will be posting pictures of celestial bodies i encounter in my night gazing which i know will always stretch pass 2am .. Astronomy is my love bro it is both fascinating and humbling

johnydon22:
Yes... it is outstanding what a small Galilean telescope can achieve... Am dying to get mine..

If i do i will be posting pictures of celestial bodies i encounter in my night gazing which i know will always stretch pass 2am .. Astronomy is my love bro it is both fascinating and humbling

erusen:
all he is saying is that u can not conclude what u saw was an alien

chccho:
pls where did i conclude or say i saw an alien?

LoJ:

Waouhh. The picture is super. Is the guy living in Nigeria? If so maybe you should ask him where he got his.

erusen:
that was what brought me to deism oh,every form of life especially outer space is just inspiring and calling for systematic enquiry,if I have my way I would make all my kids scientist,but people chose life for themselves, anyway I have one microscope with me,though am not a fan of biology I just dey observe some small stuff wake dem dey earth here,do u know to get a telescope,that microscope nor be even my own seft.am currently fascinated by two things na,one is astronomy and the other is archaeology.

johnydon22:
I love archeology too bro because it reveals for us the actuality of history other than what history books or stories say..

E.G.. am trying to see where i can get a telescope here bro..

johnydon22:
Naaaah he lives abroad but they gave me an idea ebay.com..

will check local stores though am not hoping to find it

leksyib14:
“UFOs” In the Bible?
We find in the first chapter of the book of
Ezekiel a description of four living creatures called
cherubim. Cherubim are the highest order of angels.
From Ezekiel’s description of them, they appear to
have been compound figures, unlike any other
object in nature; they actually possessed the
features of several animals ( Ezekiel 1:10 ; 41:18–
19 ). But notice how they moved: “Their wings were
joined one to another; they turned not when they
went; they went every one straight forward .… And
they went every one straight forward: whither the
spirit was to go, they went; and they turned
not when they went” ( Ezekiel 1:9 , 12 ). In other
words, the cherubim, having four faces, each facing
a different direction, moved at right angles. They did
not have to bank a curve. Verse 14 speaks of their
coming and going as being lightning fast. Ezekiel
1:15–21 and 10:9 , 17 speak of the cherubim in
connection with “ a wheel in the middle of a wheel ,”
as though it were some kind of gyroscope.