Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,195,353 members, 7,957,945 topics. Date: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 04:59 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1025262 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (107) (108) (109) (110) (111) (112) (113) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 10:57pm On Jan 10, 2017 |
nemesis2u:Mi-171sh |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:02pm On Jan 10, 2017 |
x |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:02pm On Jan 10, 2017 |
Odunayaw: i am willing to negotiate |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:23pm On Jan 10, 2017 |
Meanwhile somewhere in a ordinary Russian village if me was nearby to that topol ICBM i would be making my way to it armed with a screwdriver as fast as i can 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 4:46am On Jan 11, 2017 |
Odunayaw:Hermes-k is carried by KA-52k. Line of sight! I don't see you proving the Hermes-l is intergrated on the Hind e-warrior. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 4:57am On Jan 11, 2017 |
iblawi:Strafing runs! What does this video prove tell me? 2 Likes |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 3:36pm On Jan 11, 2017 |
MikeCZA:bartimaeus..did u see hermes-k in my post u quoted? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 5:15pm On Jan 11, 2017 |
Odunayaw:I see Hermes-K right here! 2 Likes |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 10:03pm On Jan 11, 2017 |
MikeCZA:Mike..d last of my post u quoted..did u see the Hermes-K why do u like dodging questions? also,except u don't read with understanding u'd know I mentioned the Hermes-k cuz Jock was about to talk bad about Russian missiles 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 3:30pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
who is ready for some football match? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:23pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
ccccc |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:23pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
PINAKA-MK2 rockets which r the upgraded longer range (65km) and guided version (GPS/INS )of PINAKA MK1 rockets (40km) was tested successfully recently.The Mark II version is equipped with a navigation, guidance, control kit . PINAKA ER or MK3 rockets with range of 120 km and with pin point terminal guidance is under development
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:25pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
PINAKA guidance kit
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:45pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
2nd scorpene sub launched
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:49pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
in this pic we can see the vishakaptanam P15B destroyers successor to the kolkata class P15A destroyers coming up
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:46pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
one bear to another bear "lets piss on it" nuclear sub commander peering through periscope remarks "mates somebody just pissed on us " 2 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:52pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
2 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by BlackBaron: 9:15pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
PAC is actually a corporation set up by the Pakistani Airforce. 'On its own',... I meant an actual airforce that set up its own corp. and then actively went out to produce a fighter jet of its own in collaboration with China of course. No other country's airforce, correct me if wrong went on to establish a company that went on to produce an aircraft. nemesis2u: |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:35pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
nemesis2u: |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by realnas(m): 9:38pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
nemesis2u:when will the Indian government make this system available to buyers in the intl market? If I'm not mistaken it cost a fraction of what other modern mblrs like the smerch and m 270 |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:03pm On Jan 12, 2017 |
realnas: if this present government comes to power again , u will see it within 2 years or so being available for export , the defence PSUs r struggling to meet the current domestic order the lazy jackasses . first priority will be domestic market , india is short of fire power presently. anyways i can confirm India was in talks with some African countries for LCH , they want it in the simple form with surface effect weapons only , with high operational availability plus with the option to upgrade / refit /tweak as deemed fit by them later on in the future with india providing necessary consultancy etc . 1-2 teams held closed room talks but rest i dont know. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:15pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
3 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:18pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
pic 4 Scorpene SSK's SUBTICS CMS & IPMS
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:37pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
Delhi Wants to Ascertain Production, Export Right of Russia-India FGFA Project ASIA & PACIFIC 12:53 04.01.2017 (updated 14:15 04.01.2017) Get short URL 395944 The Indian government has been hanging back from making a firm commitment on the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) project because it first wants to confirm whether the agreement will allow commercial production and exports. © FLICKR/ MATT MORGAN Russia, India Discuss FGFA Advanced Fighter, Su-30MKI Upgrade New Delhi (Sputnik) — India and Russia are expected to sign the detailed design and development contract of Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) in the next two to three months. This will enable Moscow to retain its position as the prime supplier of Indian Air Force's fighting strength. India has signaled that negotiations on R& are almost final except for some issues related to rights over export to third countries. "Secondary round i.e. R & D round is almost finalized except some issues related to the future of the aircraft. Because, when R& phase will get over and you are not able to produce and sell, what is the point in developing? Whether we will have right to produce because there will be some IPRs over which Russia will have claimed. All these important aspects are being clarified properly," says Manohar Parrikar, India's Defense Minister in New Delhi. Sources told Sputnik that a Russian delegation is arriving in New Delhi in the next few weeks to discuss all these aspects. The Indian government feels that before embarking on commercial production, every issue needs to be sorted out such as the aircraft's stealth capabilities or the right to export right. Parrikar said two to three months does not hold much importance for the project with a time frame of 10-15 years. Currently, both the countries are not discussing the number of aircraft to be produced under the project. "We are trying to ascertain quantum of stealth, transfer of technology and whether we will be able to manufacture and sell jointly. All these aspects are being discussed because when we invest huge money ($5-6 billion) you are commercially not only producing for ourselves but considering exports as well. Secondly, stealth aspects should also be in conformity. So all these technical aspects are being looked into before going forward," Parrikar said. © AFP 2016/ ALEXANDER KLEIN India Announces New Fighter Jets to Be Produced Domestically The Russian-Indian FGFA has stealth capabilities and is based on the Russian T-50 prototype jet. The FGFA project came about following the signing of a Russian-Indian cooperation agreement on October 18, 2007. Both the countries signed the primary contract in December 2010. India has spent $242 million on the primary contract. The Indian Air Force has proposed building an indigenous FGFA called the Advanced Medium Combat Stealth Aircraft (AMCSA), but it still remains at the conceptual stage. Sweden's SAAB has offered to help in the development of AMCSA but the Indian establishment is yet to respond. Meanwhile, China exhibited its fifth generation stealth fighter aircraft J-20 in November this year. The J-20 is expected to provide long range, hard-to-detect strike capacity to the PLA Air Force from 2018 onwards. Read more: https://sputniknews.com/asia/201701041049247669-india-russia-fgfa-project/ 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:00pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
As Boeing Defense revives its campaign for the F/A-18 Super Hornet in India, a slide in its presentation today on the pitch stands out significant and adds telling detail to an aspect of the effort that has remained relatively unknown — how India’s proposed Make In India Fighter programme ties in with the country’s concept fifth generation development AMCA platform. We now know that Boeing has a very specific plan, with three major thrusts: First, as the slide most visibly suggests, Boeing proposes that the manufacturing facility and supply eco-system that it builds up for the F/A-18 in India in the event it is chosen, could be used to produce the AMCA. The existing facility could be leveraged, precluding the need for a greenfield setup elsewhere.Finally, there is the suggestion that Boeing could be available to help along the AMCA programme directly as a partner or consultant in such a way that it makes the Block 2 Super Hornet -> Advanced Super Hornet -> AMCA flow more seamlessly from a development-to-manufacturing perspective.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:34pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
MSMC sub machine carbine is almost confirmed to be inducted for CT, CQB roles for the army , paramilitary , police forces it uses a custom design ammo 5.56x30mm with steel insert for better armor penetration it seems s.africa took more than a passing interest in it in 2008 (cant confirm personally though, consider it my paparazzi moment ) 3rd pic is the latest version
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:36pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:15pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
This thread makes India look like a country preparing for war. Damn alot of military assets in development. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:40pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
tdayof: many people dont realize this fact that military industrial complex of a country is a reflection of its civilian industrial complex , any country whose civilian industrial capabilities is on the rise will have a positive effect on the military industrial capability look at china , its defense products r cheap because its civilian industrial complex is tied to its military industrial complex (one of the factors though in relation to china other factors r there such as china being a security state etc etc ). it is prohibitively costly to set up infrastructure for producing weapons only, however if the said infrastructure is geared towards manufacturing both civilian and military products then economics of scale comes into play and reduces cost by a very big margin. this can be achieved by the private industry per se with government industries involved in R & D and hand holding role only. the moment government gets involved in arms manufacturing though govt. established industries , the end users becomes a captive player unable to have any say in the quality and requirements etc etc (most of the times) India has the privilege of 2 nuclear armed adversaries....... one very unpredictable a loose cannonball of sorts who threatens nuclear war every month , and another one which eclipses India in almost every sphere. so u got to be prepared and there is the matter of generating jobs and revenue also with exports as the icing , infact defence exports have quadrupled in the last 2 years while the aim is to increase it to 2 billion dollars per annum in the next 2-3 years. Indian civilian industries capabilities r on the rise and therefor in recent years we see the results and present govt policy of ending undue preferring to public sector arms companies has led to increase in competition and rise of Indian private sector defence companies. simply stated common people of india r not aware that there is something called defence sector in india and that money can be made out of it . and most importantly where there is money to be made........... there are Indians present govt has changed the mindset and cleaned up a lot of the rubbish red tape plus handled corruption very harshly . kudos to them for this . previous govt. were shit and corrupt to the core. infact a few months ago a 14 years or so old boys design for a mine hunting UAV was acquired by the government for production. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:50pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
T-Rex Long Range Reconnaissance and Observation System from TONBO IMAGING INDIA. T-Rex is an advanced long range reconnaissance and observation system. It includes a very long range day optical imager and a cooled area scan thermal imager integrated with a 20km eye safe laser range finder, GPS and magnetic compass all in one compact and modular system It is also equipped with advanced algorithms to perform intrusion detection and can also act as a long range passive IR search and track system. T-Rex images simultaneously in the visible and mid wave IR spectrum providing fused imagery that gives greater situational awareness and panoramic views can be generated from IR, Visible or FUSED imagery. The system can detect threats in day, night, obscurant conditions, range to the target at an eyesafe wavelength, and calculate grid coordinates with its own GPS, Elevation, Azimuth capability. pic : somewhere along the international border with pa***** 1 Like 2 Shares
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 9:50pm On Jan 13, 2017 |
nemesis2u:and another russian technology goes into American hands |
(1) (2) (3) ... (107) (108) (109) (110) (111) (112) (113) ... (668) (Reply)
American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 55 |