Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,950 members, 7,956,580 topics. Date: Monday, 23 September 2024 at 02:35 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1024952 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (153) (154) (155) (156) (157) (158) (159) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:31pm On Apr 20, 2017 |
kikuyu1: the guys fighting the naxalites r poorly equipped, only some years ago they started getting assault rifle with UBGs u know the usual story human rights of terrorists matters more to some , so shot guns ( pump action ) r not used india is fuuucked up with useless politicians , presstitudes , humanists , libtards etc if they get to see a naxal dead with buck shot , they will raise Cain. anyways if planning to use shot guns in combat IMO the automatic versions would be more useful. eg. USAS-12 automatic shotgun or Saiga-12 (u mentioned it already) or Franchi SPAS-15 (semi automatic) or Vepr-12 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:05pm On Apr 20, 2017 |
M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System (MASS) it is a under-barrel shotgun attachment for the M16/M4 f firearms. It can also be fitted with a pistol grip and collapsible stock to act as a stand-alone weapon. @kikuyu1 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 3:58pm On Apr 20, 2017 |
nemesis2uagain:I can see Indian manufacturers are playing with the big boys! IIRC the leopard 2a7 can be be fitted with with 120mm or 138 mm main gun ,the Chinese type 98 has been testing a 140 mm while the 125 mm armed Armata will soon have a massive 152 mm gun capable of penetrating almost a metre of armour. Any such plans for the Arjun? 2 Likes |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 4:03pm On Apr 20, 2017 |
nemesis2u:The bolded is why Spets uses it as a DAP,Direct Action Penetrator in such situations. Its ofc much heavier armoured than the US version,the MH 60L. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 4:24pm On Apr 20, 2017 |
I've been doing some reading on these Moros and GODDAMMIT,Sikhs,Gurlhas and Fijians COMBINED have nothing on these mofos!! The origin of the word “amok” is actually Malay. The term entered the English language as an idiom when English traders encountered the strange practice of “running amok” among the Muslim peoples of Malaysia, Indonesia, and the southern Philippine Islands.'...... .... Some scholars consider the origin of this strange and deadly practice to lie in the Islamic prohibition against suicide. When “dishonored” a Muslim man could regain his honor (manhood!) by going amok, and dying with sword in hand; forcing others to kill him and thus accomplish his suicide.... ...T he juramentado would prepare for his mission by having his TESTICLES TIED OFF WITH COPPER WIRE! In a state of intense agony, the juramentado would spend the night working himself into a killing frenzy. By the next day, the juramentado would be in such agony; in such an altered state of consciousness, that his mind would no longer register additional external pain. The juramentado would be led to where his target was expected (usually in public places). Just before being unleashed against the victim, his arms and legs were tied with occluding ligatures; reducing blood loss from expected wounds to these extremities.https://deadliestblogpage./2012/03/08/moro-juramentado-suicidal-assassin-of-the-philippines/ No wonder pump actions and the .45 were invented! Baaaad mofos! [img]https://deadliestblogpage.files./2012/03/73056974_s320x240.jpg?w=640&h=480[/img] Blood feuds known as rido are a major cause of death among males. According to the studies, during 2002–2004, 50% (637 cases) of total rido incidences occurred, equaling about 127 new rido cases per year. Out of the total number of rido cases documented, 64% remain unresolvedhttp://www.wikiwand.com/en/Feud In 2007, Carlos H. Conde wrote in the New York Times, “Clan violence has contributed greatly to bloodshed in the southern Philippines, with government forces and Islamic separatists often drawn into the violence unnecessarily, complicating the decade-long search for peace there, a new study shows.http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Philippines/sub5_6c/entry-3874.html#chapter-10 I still remember a Senator in those parts who had media problems. He didn't bribe,threaten them or their organisation heads-HE KILLED THEM ALL,ALL 58 IN 2009!! [img]http://www.asianews.it/files/img/FILIPPINE_-_massacro_maguindanao.jpg[/img] Btw,his clan was typical in that they were suspected of another 200 murders! Moro weapons are artistic but utilitarian allowing their Moro users to run amok in style and hack,cut,slash and thrust at will. Tbh,I find it fascinating! I truly wish we had some forumers from those parts. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:25am On Apr 21, 2017 |
nemesis2u: Okay ma frend and yeah "dimple" is a good word to explain the inward buldge. You're a very resourceful guy... 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 5:49am On Apr 21, 2017 |
Gentlemen let us dedicate page 155 to 155mm howitzers! 1. T-5 truck mounted howitzer! It can be used like the WW2 German 88mm gun in it's direct fire mode. Maximum range is 54km+ with Velocity Enhanced Artillery Projectile (VLAP) rounds. These type of rounds have been said to lack the effectiveness on target of conventional or normal HE rounds as the rocket motor and the base bleed unit take up space for the warhead. But the HE PFF version of the round in the Assegai series negate that as it carries thousands of tungsten pellets. The pellets increase the fragments of the rounds on target making the round's fragmentation more effective than normal HE rounds as proven in the G7 trials. Fuzes again increase the effectiveness of the howitzer's rounds. After shelling some air field wasn't used for a while as shells were still going off hours after the shelling. The towed version of the howitzer(45 calibre) disabled tanks in combat. Imagine a direct hit on a tank from this thing!!!!!!!! 3 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 6:10am On Apr 21, 2017 |
G5-45 towed version. In it's self propelled mode it can reach speeds of around 4k/m and around 16k/m on roads. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzxMmuEGfYc&itct=CBYQpDAYACITCMH-irDhtNMCFQO-VQodaRgP6FIPRzUgaG93aXR6ZXIgQUFE&gl=ZA&hl=en&client=mv-google 2 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:01pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
Pair of J-20s flying in formation
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:09pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
MikeCZA: cargo rounds/sub-munitions ? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:12pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
test fire of land attack version of brahmos cruise missile from ship.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 6:23pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
Archer truck mounted howitzer. The gun it's self similar to the T5-52 is based on an earlier towed version(the FH77 L39). Ofcourse it's 155mm. Able it reach ranges around 60km with certain rounds. After the Pzh-2000 this one of the most good looking weapon system in service. 2 Likes
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:28pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
Jf-17B
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 7:36pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
jakeporeshenko:Any organization trying to design fighter aircraft engines outside France, Russia, UK and the USA will have a tough time. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:37pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
nemesis2u:US official: With eye on North Korea, China puts bombers on 'high alert' What is your take? 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Adminisher: 11:54pm On Apr 21, 2017 |
nemesis2uagain: SU 30MKI has to use a well known targeting pod which has not been upgraded in many years. Super Tucano has three different but very accurate ways to deliver ordnance to ground targets; CCIP, Elbit supplied FLIR and other EO based targeting systems and a new type of ground targeting radar. Everything linked to helmet. With CCIP even tossing a dumb bomb will be very accurate. I hope Nigeria is buying the ground looking radar with their Super Tucanoes Finding small ground targets is an expensive, time consuming chore for SU MKI but routine work for Super Tucano. Big powerful aircraft with heavy weapon loads are useless against insurgents. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 8:12am On Apr 22, 2017 |
The Giant Cannon Is the Bigfoot of Modern Tank Design
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:07am On Apr 22, 2017 |
Adminisher: are you talking about french Thales damocles targetting pod on sukhoi 30 mkm, mka ?? you cant compare sukhoi 30 with turbo pop tucano they dont play in the same league . without talking about radar capacity difference, roles ect ... tucano for COIN yes but if insurgents get some manpads , AAA with its low speed low fly is exposed it to ground fires and will be useless ! + the speed : for close air support to troops in contact the tucano is slowest when The fast jet can move from contact to contact at a high cruise or with after burners reducing reaction times and enabling a large area to be covered with a single aircraft. Because the fast jet is so versatile, it can carry out other missions while still being able to provide reactive CAS + the Su-30M has 12 hardpoints for external payloads up to 8,000kg + can be refueled in the air , super tucano 1500 kg and when he throw his payload he have to return to air base (speed) . + cost for super tucano United States recently paid around $21 million per plane to supply them to the Afghan air force. and its wasnt the last best version with all last modern systems you re talking about , not as cheap that it look , when a sukhoi 30 is around 40 million can do better all what can do a tucano . and do other roles (air supremacy , heavy bombing ect ... ) . + psychological side for insurgent and other armies , when a sukhoi 30 jet pass above insurgent head , its not the same like a turbo prop tucano + nigeria will never get the last modern version , they will give you the same version then other african countries burkina , maritania ect ... and for task you r talking about low slow fly targetting small groups for me attack helicopters mi 28 , appach , mi 24 ect .... are better choice . 4 Likes |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:35pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
Adminisher: i was kind of worried, but now i am not. but i very much appreciate the fact that u replied, many would have not. SU 30MKI uses LITENING G4 which is a potent system. it is a multi-function add on system which can be upgraded to newer versions. each LITENING G4 pod costs more than 3 million dollars which is almost the 1/4th the cost of a SUPER TUCANO(2011 price). there can never be any comparison between the targeting systems of SU30MKI and SUPER TUCANO because of many factors, one major factor being - POWER. let me give u a analogy , u have a 50cc bike i have a 1000cc bike both u and i attach say hypothetically, a 50000 watt bulb to the respective bikes engine. which bike engines do u think will have the juice to light up the bulb ? the more powerful the targeting pod is, it will need the corresponding utilization of more powerful thermal management systems (cooling systems) which in turn necessitates a high power supply from the aircraft engines. so a single turboprop engine aircraft like tucano will not have the juice to operate a powerful targeting pod like those found in jet powered aircraft's. same goes for the data processors etc i hope u know what CCIP stand for, it is constantly computed impact point. CCIP is basically the ballistics calculation done by onboard systems to predict the impact point of a released A to G weapon.( usually dumb bombs/rockets ) nothing extra ordinary about it , most legacy aircrafts have this, forget about 4 gen aircrafts. it is more sophisticated in supersonic fighter/bombers. also CCIP is linked to HUD not HMD/HMS. do u know that SU30MKI is a MINI AWACS by itself. and more over the LITENING G4 pod is capable of doing the same job as being envisaged by the proposed side looking airborne radar in SUPER TUCANO. actually SLAR will help in detection / location of targets only ( with added advantage of the various modes), while LITENING G4 pod will help in detection / location and targeting of targets. "Finding small ground targets is an expensive, time consuming chore for SU MKI" no it is not, provided u play with the right tactics , use helicopters/ FAC (forward air controllers)/UAVs to locate the elusive targets in conjunction with the SU30MKI. i agree with u only with the expensive part. "Big powerful aircraft with heavy weapon loads are useless against insurgents." no it is not , provided u play with the right tactics.tailor ur weapons load to meet the target profile, engage in effects based operations and ur set to bomb the crap out of terrorists. all aside for its intended role SUPER TUCANO is a very capable and well equipped aircraft , no second thoughts on that , at least not from me. this is my opinion , so i leave u to analyze it as u deem fit. danke 4 Likes |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:47pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
MikeCZA: and the quickest to fire its rounds |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:57pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
tdayof: to tell the truth , i have no info, only the open source news which u too r familiar with. just let me add this NK is at logger heads with china last few years. so i have a feeling that the only reason the Chinese r in the game , is to deny the US the foot hold in NK. (same for russia) another very important reason is NK and china both r security states, if one comes tumbling down, the other will follow suit , the CCP is very worried nowadays. and a minor reason is to stop the skeletons will tumbling out of the closet, as NK was always the fall guy for Chinese nuclear/missile proliferation's among others etc |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:31pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
tdayof: actually a high ranking officer told me igirigi suffers from mobility problems in certain terrains due to its weight.sinks into the ground this was told to me 1 and 1/2 years - 2 years ago, dont know the present assessment. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:39pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
nemesis2u: Good. There should be an improvement now. The igirigi is our first. We keep learning everyday. Proforce is doing better as a professional when compared to igirigi manufacturers. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:05pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
kikuyu1: not for arjun it will have 120mm rifled gun or later 125mm smoothbore gun (commonality purpose) , for the future, identification for project definition/requirements has been going on for FMBT (future main battle tank) for sometime lets see , what sort of specs they come up with for the FMBT. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:09pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
chkil0: almost forgot that u guys have the damocles targeting pods for ur SU30 by the way what pods do u use for EW (jamming) ? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:41pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
copy paste In November last year, the Indian government, after years in suspense, concluded a deal with the BAE Systems-Mahindra partnership to build M777 ultra-light guns in India. On Friday, another Indian private sector giant L&T formally entered into a partnership with South Korea’s Hanwha Techwin for India’s second big gun deal. The deal has already created its share of buzz for what is being seen as a record of sorts. A partnership signing ceremony here today between L&T and South Korean Hanwha Techwin for executing the programme set the stage for the inking of the Rs 4,600 crore (710.86m USD) contract with the Ministry of Defence which is expected next week. The Cabinet Committee on Security has already approved this deal. The 155 mm, 52 calibre guns will be supplied by L&T, with Hanwha Techwin as the technology partner. All 100 guns will be supplied in under 42 months from the signing of the contract. The deal envisages 50 per cent indigenous content. “(Of the 100 guns) 90 will be assembled in India. The first lot of 10 will be built in Korea with 80-to-90 per cent Korean content,” disclosed Hanwha Techwin CEO Shin Hyun-Woo at Friday’s signing ceremony with L&T. The final assembly of the first lot will be at L&T’s Strategic Systems Complex at Talegaon near Pune in Maharashtra. India’s largest private sector defence and aerospace company will produce and assemble the remaining 90 at a greenfield manufacturing line at Hazira in Gujarat which will also have a state-of-the-art test track and facilities to test and qualify the K9 VAJRA-T guns. “We hope to deliver the first gun this financial year,” announced Jayant Patil, L&T’s head of Defence and Aerospace. His confidence stems from the “co-development” of a prototype for field trials within 18 months of the RFP being floated.This has set new deadline benchmarks for fielding a prototype with foreign assistance to meet Indian GSQRs, claimed Patil. “This programme shows the way forward. Two years is enough time to develop a weapon system,” he said. “There were 13 Indian systems in this prototype,” said Patil. The VAJRA-T is a variant of the highly successful K9 Thunder modified for Indian conditions. One thousand K9 Thunder guns have already been sold thus far. Significantly, the most critical parts of the gun – the barrel and breach – will be imported. “It’s not viable to produce the barrels in India for an order of just 100 guns. We can make this happen in larger programmes like towed guns,” said Patil, claiming that a capability to produce nuclear-grade steel makes barrel production for artillery guns a distinct possibility for L&T. The L&T-produced indigenous systems on the gun will include the fire control system, hull, turret, electronics, NBC systems, auto loaders, air conditioning and direct fire systems. The VAJRA-T was declared the sole qualified gun after user evaluation trials at Pokhran. The Russian competitor could not meet the requirements. Among the 13 Indian systems on the winning prototype was a fire control system to cater to a huge mix of Indian ammunition.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:42pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
nemesis2u: KNIRTI SAP-518 wingtip jamming pod and also the SAP14 jamming pod 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:47pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
chkil0: thanks and for the KH31P what cueing pod do u guys use ? do u guys also use the KNIRTI SAP 14 jamming pod for centerline fitment.? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:10pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
nemesis2u: yes they get also SAP 14 with it but never seen a pic of it on algerian sukhoi 30 MKA . for KH31P , i dont understand the question , a pod ? from wiki , KH31P with passive seeker head for use as an anti-radiation missile. Stays at high altitude throughout its flight, allowing higher speeds and increasing range to 110 km (60 nmi; 70 mi). The seeker has three interchangeable modules to cover different radar frequency bands 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:33pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
chkil0: yes u need a high accuracy direction finding pod , to detect emitters and localize them. otherwise a KH31P fired from a stand off distance will not be able to get close enough to its EM emitting targets , to allow its nose mounted passive seeker get a positive lock for a kill. the passive seekers range is very limited , anywhere between 10-20 kms without using a cueing pod , KH31P has a good chance of getting lost/missing its targets or get seduced by decoy emitters. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:37pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
@chkil0 Russians use this SAP51A pod |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 10:47pm On Apr 22, 2017 |
nemesis2u: Let us hope India's possible opponents don't in the near future invest in extended range base bleed and base bleed and rocket motor projectiles, newer counter-battery radars and other targeting systems e.g UAVs and datalinks. Cause the India might have to invest heavily in EW and targeting systems. And Oh I'm mad the Pzh-2000 wasn't trailed. 1 Like |
(1) (2) (3) ... (153) (154) (155) (156) (157) (158) (159) ... (668) (Reply)
American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 112 |