gwmlogistic:
. Tolu mind ur biz.
In other news. Urgent sales. Fairly used AC @ very reasonable price 08039619808

what's the specification and the price

hobermener:
I understand where the dude is coming from!!

If the president of the most populous black nation on earth can attain to that position without a common secondary school leaving certificate, and still has a prof as his assistant, then what is there to celebrate about a girl bagging a phd at the age of thirteen?



Who's the bastard that laid an eternal curse on this country

Who we offend?

My brother, The curse is very dangerous!!!!Deadly union. This is not a country sha. Never was meant to be. It's a corporation

delishpot:


This girl progress just dey pain you. But.......why?

Such a typical African answer to an educational issue.

"Progress" paining somebody?

You must live in a hovel.

DeepSight:


Such a typical African answer to an educational issue.

"Progress" paining somebody?

You must live in a hovel.

No cry again. E too pain you. The girl is living her life, you are here crying blood. Call me a village person but the WHITE man's advance society you so cherish is the one producing this child which makes me wonder why you are busy calling me hovel dweller for supporting her.
I love my hovel and I support and encourage those who want to develop skill and knowledge in my HOVEL no matter their age.If a one month old loves the sound of guitar and starts wanting to handle one as soon as he can hold his head upright, I let him knock himself out playing the guitar.
You the city dweller on the other hand, likes to kill dreams under flimsy exuses. I don't want to live in that your fake paradise.

delishpot:


No cry again. E too pain you. The girl is living her life, you are here crying blood. Call me a village person but the WHITE man's advance society you so cherish is the one producing this child which makes me wonder why you are busy calling me hovel dweller for supporting her.
I love my hovel and I support and encourage those who want to develop skill and knowledge in my HOVEL no matter their age.If a one month old loves the sound of guitar and starts wanting to handle one as soon as he can hold his head upright, I let him knock himself out playing the guitar.
You the city dweller on the other hand, likes to kill dreams under flimsy exuses. I don't want to live in that your fake paradise.

No problem, Mr. "I will allow ten year olds drive".
Na you sabi. Enjoy.

DeepSight:


No problem, Mr. "I will allow ten year olds drive".
Na you sabi. Enjoy.

LoL. Na you sabi. Use Google and see how kids younger than her are even doing more demanding things. You no get point. Go and rest somewhere. Squiring skill is not a crime or something to discourage. That she acquire s the knowledge doesn't mean she is ready to jump into a career full time. Learn to distinguish the two.

delishpot:


LoL. Na you sabi. Use Google and see how kids younger than her are even doing more demanding things. You no get point. Go and rest somewhere. Squiring skill is not a crime or something to discourage. That she acquire s the knowledge doesn't mean she is ready to jump into a career full time. Learn to distinguish the two.

No, on the contrary, it is you who does not have a point: because nowhere has it been asserted that kids should not learn. What has been in contention is the proper and advisable stages and degrees of learning having special regard to the needs of a child for balanced social and emotional development at its level.

Please read the red above at least ten times okay, for that has always been the point which you miss. Forcing a five year old into the world of forty year olds because you have detected a special skill in him is and will always remain destructive to that child.

Your arguments that you would permit kids to drive, vote and enter into contracts are so comical that there is hardly any need to properly address them.The reasons why such things are inadvisable are well documented and known to all literate persons. Your argument otherwise is as banal as saying that since 13 year olds are capable of having se.x, then the age of sexual consent should be reduced. This shows that you have no idea about the fundamental underpinnings and cardinal understandings which have guided the principles of child development and protection. Period.

To underscore your confusion you even brought up the question of child mornachs. My friend, you know, there is a saying that a little education is a terrible thing. I can write all the epistles in the world, but it is obvious that you are of a rank that just is incapable of understanding these simple things. You belong to the pathetic rank of "e dey pain you" debaters. Really sad.

No epistle i write will sum it up better than the poster up there who simply stated that a 13 year old needs to be allowed to be a 13 year old for the simple reason that she wouldn't ever be 13 year old in her life again. If this simple and eloquent missive still misses you, brother, abi you be sister - wetin I fit do?

Nathin.

DeepSight:


No, on the contrary, it is you who does not have a point: because nowhere has it been asserted that kids should not learn. What has been in contention is the proper and advisable stages and degrees of learning having special regard to the needs of a child for balanced social and emotional development at its level.

Please read the red above at least ten times okay, for that has always been the point which you miss. Forcing a five year old into the world of forty year olds because you have detected a special skill in him is and will always remain destructive to that child.

Your arguments that you would permit kids to drive, vote and enter into contracts are so comical that there is hardly any need to properly address them.The reasons why such things are inadvisable are well documented and known to all literate persons. Your argument otherwise is as banal as saying that since 13 year olds are capable of having se.x, then the age of sexual consent should be reduced. This shows that you have no idea about the fundamental underpinnings and cardinal understandings which have guided the principles of child development and protection. Period.

To underscore your confusion you even brought up the question of child mornachs. My friend, you know, there is a saying that a little education is a terrible thing. I can write all the epistles in the world, but it is obvious that you are of a rank that just is incapable of understanding these simple things. You belong to the pathetic rank of "e dey pain you" debaters. Really sad.

No epistle i write will sum it up better than the poster up there who simply stated that a 13 year old needs to be allowed to be a 13 year old for the simple reason that she wouldn't ever be 13 year old in her life again. If this simple and eloquent missive still misses you, brother, abi you be sister - wetin I fit do?

Nathin.

leave her alone.

African leaders are hypocrites,they hate ppl that are better than them.
They dont celebrate geniuses. That is why they can hardly go to moon.

This new generation is a complete deviance from the unproductive status quo we've held for too long and the earlier we realize this the better. Asking question that what can a 13-year girl doing with PhD is a kind of question that emanates from a rigidly complacent & bitter mindset. Also saying there's nothing worth Celebrating about a 13-year old girl who is set to obtain a PhD looks like this statement is coming from a man who is already afraid of the horrific feets of achievements of the newer generation. This is a new generation totally incredible than anything we have ever seen & they're out to rubbish anything we ever upheld as big achievement. I cannot joint you in discrediting a genius as this, genius as this cannot be stopped by anybody not even you Mr. Tolu

delishpot:


leave her alone.

na so

DeepSight:


No, on the contrary, it is you who does not have a point: because nowhere has it been asserted that kids should not learn. What has been in contention is the proper and advisable stages and degrees of learning having special regard to the needs of a child for balanced social and emotional development at its level.

Please read the red above at least ten times okay, for that has always been the point which you miss. Forcing a five year old into the world of forty year olds because you have detected a special skill in him is and will always remain destructive to that child.

Your arguments that you would permit kids to drive, vote and enter into contracts are so comical that there is hardly any need to properly address them.The reasons why such things are inadvisable are well documented and known to all literate persons. Your argument otherwise is as banal as saying that since 13 year olds are capable of having se.x, then the age of sexual consent should be reduced. This shows that you have no idea about the fundamental underpinnings and cardinal understandings which have guided the principles of child development and protection. Period.

To underscore your confusion you even brought up the question of child mornachs. My friend, you know, there is a saying that a little education is a terrible thing. I can write all the epistles in the world, but it is obvious that you are of a rank that just is incapable of understanding these simple things. You belong to the pathetic rank of "e dey pain you" debaters. Really sad.

No epistle i write will sum it up better than the poster up there who simply stated that a 13 year old needs to be allowed to be a 13 year old for the simple reason that she wouldn't ever be 13 year old in her life again. If this simple and eloquent missive still misses you, brother, abi you be sister - wetin I fit do?

Nathin.

All what you're saying are old concept which they called chronological age, this generation are far beyond what you have ever seen & many of her age grades have undermine such old Theoretical construct. These guys are incredibly better & they set their own rules.