Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,574 members, 7,820,063 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 09:12 AM

In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership - Religion (6) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership (10587 Views)

Apostle Kenneth Kenny Kills A Dog, Eats It Raw In Church And Feeds Members / Why Do People Go To Church And Still Go Other Places For Solutions? / Lightning Strikes Rwandan Church And Kills 16 Members (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Johnrake69: 3:05pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
lol. Wolves in sheeps clothing. In one breath u were totally against anything religion nd in another u r giving advice on how Christianity ought to be.. Sir wit all due respect, we know ur type nd dis thread was specifically created to warn Believers of ppl like u


Well... If you say so cool. Anybody that challenge your self serving doctrines is an enemy of the church. It's good. I take solace from the fact that Christ also challenged the man made doctrines and was considered the enemy of the church.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by BluntBoy(m): 3:07pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
picking a phrase or verse of the scripture and making a doctrine out of it is the foundation of all heretic teachings.. Jesus is the head of the Church quite alright but he made men apostles.. Jesus sent letters to seven churches tru John to d angels of each of those 7 churches.. Who were the angels, (spirits or men) if ur answer is spirits den i don't know wat u r saying. Jesus sent 7 letters to the 7 leaders of the seven churches in Asian minor. Jesus recognizes the position of an overall leader in n every particular church. If Jesus Christ does den why do u think ur opinion would count for anything?

So, the angels (or more apt, messengers) were general overseers?

A teacher is evidently a light. A star can effectively symbolize a teacher. But is a teacher the same thing as a general overseer?
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 3:13pm On Dec 03, 2017
BluntBoy:


So, the angels (or more apt, messengers) were general overseers?

A teacher is evidently a light. A star can effectively symbolize a teacher. But is a teacher the same thing as a general overseer?
dey may not av been called GO at dat time but dey were d head of each of those 7 churches. GO is just a title given by men. Could as well av been pope or wat not
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by ivolt: 3:16pm On Dec 03, 2017
Biety:
Now, this is holy spirit inspired message, whoever disagrees with it is not of God.

We need more of this type of

message from you. We can not fold our hands and allow people who know nothing concerning spiritual things to keep misleading the babes in faith.

God bless you and happy sabath.

grin
Think for yourself, don't let others do your own thinking!
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by ivolt: 3:18pm On Dec 03, 2017
OBAGADAFFI:


Christianity in Finland- 72%
Christianity in Denmark-76%
Christianity in Switzerland-52%
Christianity in Nigeria- 40%

The major factors in growth of Religion in Population and standards of living.


This is bunkum
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by BluntBoy(m): 3:18pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
dey may not av been called GO at dat time but dey were d head of each of those 7 churches. GO is just a title given by men. Could as well av been pope or wat not

They were overseers and not General Overseer. They were shepherds, not Shepherd. And they were each overseeing a regional body of the one Church of Christ, and not the Church they founded. It was not a one-man Church, not like the religious organizations of Oyedepo and Adeboye. If Adeboye is the General Overseer, then what is God?
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by nicemuyoo: 3:31pm On Dec 03, 2017
There is a clear difference between scriptural-historical truth and theological teachings on tithe/ tithing and various other topics. Today i would be mentioning some conclusive statement on tithing based on scriptures and historical facts.
1. Tithe are natural agricultural produce and never money. You 're allow to covert It to money under certain circumstances but you must convert back to acceptable agricultural produce before paying your tithe. If you don't you have to pay a penalty fine on top of your tithe money and once paid it s converted back to food by levies in charge. This was to discourage money tithing.
2. The tithe was a tax system to cater for levites( administrators, judges, teachers etc), widows, orphans, strangers etc. 
3. Only increase from selected natural produces from the land of Isreal are acceptable as tithe .you can not pay tithe on from produce from another land 
4. A carpenter, farm labourer, fisherman etc do not tithe. Disciples, jesus, never paid tithe. Only people with farmland and livestocks paid tithe on their increase.
5. The tithe is never used for anything other than to feed levites, widows, orphans etc.never used for temple/ church building or any other services. It is an abomination. 
6. Temples/ services are run with temple tax a token contribution from each adult. Building is done by voluntary participation and donations.
7. Only a priest/ levites/ tithers/ less privileged eg widows are allowed to enjoy the tithe.
8. Today all who have accepted salvation are priest of the most high , we have one HIGH PRIEST, THE MESSIAH HIMSELF.
9. Tithe was never collected in the early churches. BUT was introduced by roman Catholic church to fund building of huge cathedrals and to pay fat salaries to priest/ bishops. It was Actually imposed on people backed by government law. It was a polished after a public revolt by the people.. It was also abolished in UK after a massive riot. The historic peasant riot.
10. This tithe system was adopted by many countries in Europe to cater for less priviledge in the society hence benefit payments/ food stamps etc. This is completely absent in many African countries today.
Folks know the truth and it would set you free.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 3:32pm On Dec 03, 2017
BluntBoy:


They were overseers and not General Overseer. They were shepherds, not Shepherd. And they were each overseeing a regional body of the one Church of Christ, and not the Church they founded. It was not a one-man Church, not like the religious organizations of Oyedepo and Adeboye. If Adeboye is the General Overseer, then what is God?

lol u r just beating about the bush playing with semantics.. They had total control of the churches as was apparent in their admonition as the messages to each pf them was different. And that is the same thing with these churches here. Its not a one man show or a family business. Pastor Adeboye didn't found redeemed church and if God calls him home today, Another person would occupy his position.. And that is the same thing with most of the old generation pentecostal churches. The church wasn't registered in Adeboye or Kumuyi or Babalola family name but as a ministry and if anyone goes home, the family can't lay claim on anything. As the Lord will, another person would occupy that position
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by nicemuyoo: 3:34pm On Dec 03, 2017
The bible verses mentioned below has been twisted and abused to support tithing. I would give you the true scriptural interpretation of it not the twisted theological version of it preached in churches. Jesus asked to see the coin they used for payment. He said whose property his this? Caesars. Who's inscription is on it? Caesars . who has authority over this coin / who created this coin? Caesars. So the money belongs to Caesar it is his creation. So this monetary note has nothing to do with God , God does not want it, it is a creation of man for mankind, so give it to Caesar if he demands for it! But give unto God was he demands your soul, heart, love, obedience, worship, your body as a living sacrifice holy and acceptable which is truth worship. GOD a spiritual external being demands all this things. David said silver and Gold , riches he does not want.
There is a difference between theological teachings and truth scriptures; that you have to understand if you want to know the truth and accept it.

4They came and said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are truthful and defer to no one; for You are not partial to any, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay a poll-tax to Caesar, or not? 15“Shall we pay or shall we not pay?” But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, “Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to look at.” 16They brought one. And He said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” And they said to Him, “Caesar’s.” 17And Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they were amazed at Him.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by OBAGADAFFI: 3:37pm On Dec 03, 2017
ivolt:


This is bunkum

LOL, I know you are shocked, because it's contrary to what you people tell yourselves.

Bring you fact let's debate it
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by BluntBoy(m): 3:38pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
lol u r just beating about the bush playing with semantics.. They had total control of the churches as was apparent in their admonition as the messages to each pf them was different. And that is the same thing with these churches here. Its not a one man show or a family business. Pastor Adeboye didn't found redeemed church and if God calls him home today, Another person would occupy his position.. And that is the same thing with most of the old generation pentecostal churches. The church wasn't registered in Adeboye or Kumuyi or Babalola family name but as a ministry and if anyone goes home, the family can't lay claim on anything. As the Lord will, another person would occupy that position

You are the one refusing to understand what is being discussed here.

The Church was established by Christ and was non-denominitional.

Whether it was the Church in corinths or in Rome or in Thessalonica, it was one church with one head (Christ). Not the religious organizations of today founded by men and where many pastors are subjected to one pastor who is the General Overseer or Senior Pastor.

Do you want Bible verses to show that there is a difference between shepherd and Shepherd?

1 Like

Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 3:41pm On Dec 03, 2017
nicemuyoo:
The bible verses mentioned below has been twisted and abused to support tithing. I would give you the true scriptural interpretation of it not the twisted theological version of it preached in churches. Jesus asked to see the coin they used for payment. He said whose property his this? Caesars. Who's inscription is on it? Caesars . who has authority over this coin / who created this coin? Caesars. So the money belongs to Caesar it is his creation. So this monetary note has nothing to do with God , God does not want it, it is a creation of man for mankind, so give it to Caesar if he demands for it! But give unto God was he demands your soul, heart, love, obedience, worship, your body as a living sacrifice holy and acceptable which is truth worship. GOD a spiritual external being demands all this things. David said silver and Gold , riches he does not want.
There is a difference between theological teachings and truth scriptures; that you have to understand if you want to know the truth and accept it.

4They came and said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are truthful and defer to no one; for You are not partial to any, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay a poll-tax to Caesar, or not? 15“Shall we pay or shall we not pay?” But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, “Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to look at.” 16They brought one. And He said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” And they said to Him, “Caesar’s.” 17And Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they were amazed at Him.
y derailing the thread? This thread isn't about tithing. There are several threads on tithing Infact i created one some days back.. Where there is usually misunderstanding among Christians is in the area of tithe, no true beliver will argue about offering. Mal 3 didn't just mention robbing God in tithes alone but in tithes and offering.. So why pick only tithe to talk about? Why not offering? As a matter of fact in churches where tithing is preached, 80% of the congregation aren't faithful with it so why d so much fuss about it? Tell me where giving offering is wrong according to ur Bible
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 3:47pm On Dec 03, 2017
BluntBoy:


You are the one refusing to understand what is being discussed here.

The Church was established by Christ and was non-denominitional.

Whether it was the Church in corinths or in Rome or in Thessalonica, it was one church with one head (Christ). Not the religious organizations of today founded by men and where many pastors are subjected to one pastor who is the General Overseer or Senior Pastor.

Do you want Bible verses to show that there is a difference between shepherd and Shepherd?
lol i smell Catholic or orthodox Christianity or anti pentecostal movement.. Correct me if am wrong.. Any Church that believes and preaches the full gospel of Jesus is for Jesus.
Luke9:50, mark 9:40, matt12:30..
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by nicemuyoo: 4:00pm On Dec 03, 2017
The offerings in that verse referred to the tithe of the tithe which the levites bring to the temple Leviticus 18:26. Not the freewill offering you need to study this scripture properly and stop following theology . They are two different things.
"Speak to the Levites and say to them: 'When you receive from the Israelites the tithe I give you as your inheritance, you must present a tenth of that tithe as the LORD's offering.
[qquote author=salvation101 post=62944603] y derailing the thread? This thread isn't about tithing. There are several threads on tithing Infact i created one some days back.. Where there is usually misunderstanding among Christians is in the area of tithe, no true beliver will argue about offering. Mal 3 didn't just mention robbing God in tithes alone but in tithes and offering.. So why pick only tithe to talk about? Why not offering? As a matter of fact in churches where tithing is preached, 80% of the congregation aren't faithful with it so why d so much fuss about it? Tell me where giving offering is wrong according to ur Bible [/quote]
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 4:03pm On Dec 03, 2017
HOW DOES "GO YE AND PREACH THE GOSPEL" CORREPOND TO ALL THE TIME BEING SPENT TELLING PEOPLE TO PAY TITHES.?
IS THERE ANY WHERE IN THE BIBLE WERE CHRISTIANS WERE COMMANDED TO PREACH OR CAMPAIGN FOR PEOPLE TO PAY TITHES.?
THE CHURCH AND THE SO CALLED BIG MEN OF GOD HAVE MISSED IT, THEY SHOULD SWALLOW THEIR VOMIT AND GO BACK TO THE ALMIGHTY. EVERY TITHER, THOU AUTONOMOUS HAS THE RIGHT AND MORAL STANDING TO QUESTION HOW THEIR TITHES IS BEING SPENT.
THE CHURCH MUST TELL THE PARISHIONERS.
ENOUGH OF ALL THESE SCAM.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by bezimo(m): 4:03pm On Dec 03, 2017
ponziponzi:


Stop defending stupid things, I live in Canada. Even if you work minimum wage, you can pay your bills. You can only be homeless if you do drugs or make some terrible fininacial decisions. About 45% of Nigerians are living in extreme poverty, Nigerians don’t even understand what it means to have constant power in their homes for a week. If you are in the west as you claim and attend a white church, you should know that many of the teachings in the African churches are false and are just for enriching the pastors. They brainwash human beings and make them do foolish things that can be equated with slavery. I volunteer in a charity organisation run by a church that feeds the homeless and provides accommodation for them, for free, daily. Stop defending what is improverishing your people, it’s your duty to humanity!

Defending which stupid things..You are are the one confused. you are not a christian so pointing things out is just a futile waste of time because you are not in a position to understand. There are poor folks in the Canada and dont attempt to downplay the existence of the poor folks who lack food and are homeless yet magnifying the poverty in Nigeria and holding church as responsible.. your logic is upside down. you mean church carering for the needy in Canada but not in Nigeria. You are super ignorant.there is no point even going further.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by BluntBoy(m): 4:08pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
lol i smell Catholic or orthodox Christianity or anti pentecostal movement.. Correct me if am wrong.. Any Church that believes and preaches the full gospel of Jesus is for Jesus.
Luke9:50, mark 9:40, matt12:30..

cheesy

And where is that Church? Where is that Church where the teachers preach the full gospel of Christ?

Did Christ preach prosperity theology? Is seed faith a gospel of Christ?

1 Like

Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Iamzik: 4:17pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
Now another narrative put forward is that the church ought to be more involved in philanthropy and welfarism than expanding. That it makes sense does not make it right. Giving to the poor is good but expansion of the kingdom is paramount. This was Jesus mandate to the church is this.
And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover. So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
Mark 16:15‭-‬20 KJV


Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Matthew 28:19‭-‬20 KJV


This is the mandate Jesus gave to his disciples before he ascended.. U will notice dey were the very last words of those books and very important. Social welfare programs are good but not the primary purpose of the church of Christ. The Church of Christ was established Him and he determines what is important and nobody's opinion is greater than His will.

As a matter of fact, the first dispute that existed in the early church was as a result of the Apostles leaving the main task Jesus gave to them and involving theirselves in welfare programs.

[b]And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business. But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word. And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch: Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them. And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith.
Acts 6:1‭-‬7 KJV[/b]

Welfarism is not the way to advance the kingdom of God but by preaching the word of God

There is atleast one church on street in Nigeria. Come to lagos and see.... 8-10 churches on a single Street. What more expansion do you need? The era of buildings big cathedrals and openings endless parishes situated right next to them self, the era of proliferation of church buildings is gone. This is the era to preach salvation, righteousness and show practical love to the lost world.

Don't confuse expansion of Gods kingdom with establishing new Churches. The Church of Christ universal is beyond your denomination or Church building. How many people in your church are truly saved? Enough of this undue emphasis on financial and population Target.

welfar is a big part of the gispel. Jesus preached a complete Gospel. Healed the sick, raised the dead, fed the multitudes twice, opened blind eyes and also thought the people (education). Seven deacons were ordained just to look after believer's welfare in the Early Church and you are here down playing the matter.
Is your church registered as an NGO or limited liability company?


When the missionaries came, they brought education, health care, roads, etc without asking us for tithes. Our present religious leaders went to these same mission schools practically tuition free, many with scholarships and good job after graduation. Isn't it funny that they turn round to establish schools that only the rich can afford? Widows, orphans ,father less in the congregation are no longer a priority. Welfare is one of the factors that made the early church to grow and spread. Go read the book of acts. and this is the very basis of tithing even from the old testament.

God did not create Poverty. We human beings did when we stopped sharing with our neighbours. Tithing was originally meant to strike a balance between the rich and not so rich.

I'm not against tithing but the church must wake up to her responsibilities. Let's start making practical impact on the lives of people in the local church.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nnemuka(f): 4:20pm On Dec 03, 2017
senrique:
If you can build your house to taste so you can habit, why cant you build an edifice for people to gather to worship God. Solomon built a temple with impeccable finishing using materials ranging from gold, silver and the rest (1kings 6, 2Chron 3 or visit http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-first-temple-solomon-s-temple for better description of the temple he built. Now I ask, is there any church building in Africa, let alone the world that is close in comparison to this? the answer is NO. If he wasn't questioned in the past but praise for building such for God, why are we then questioning the pastors of present age. Dont get me wrong, am not saying going about building edifice in detriment of the work of God (soul winning, giving alms to the poor, evangelism). There is no pastor that forces anyone to give, in giving you are not doing them good but yourself. so if you dont give, be quiet and let others give. dont go about lashing out......


Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 4:30pm On Dec 03, 2017
nicemuyoo:
The offerings in that verse referred to the tithe of the tithe which the levites bring to the temple Leviticus 18:26. Not the freewill offering you need to study this scripture properly and stop following theology . They are two different things.
"Speak to the Levites and say to them: 'When you receive from the Israelites the tithe I give you as your inheritance, you must present a tenth of that tithe as the LORD's offering.
[qquote author=salvation101 post=62944603] y derailing the thread? This thread isn't about tithing. There are several threads on tithing Infact i created one some days back.. Where there is usually misunderstanding among Christians is in the area of tithe, no true beliver will argue about offering. Mal 3 didn't just mention robbing God in tithes alone but in tithes and offering.. So why pick only tithe to talk about? Why not offering? As a matter of fact in churches where tithing is preached, 80% of the congregation aren't faithful with it so why d so much fuss about it? Tell me where giving offering is wrong according to ur Bible
how easy was it for u to believe dis convolution? The book of malachi 1:1 said it was the prophecy of God tru malachi to the nation of Israel not a tribe.. The word asked, will 'a man' (not will a levite?) rob God? The truth is that alll these words u r saying marks unbelief. It wasn't stated there that d offering mal was talking about here was tithe of tithe but u can believe it. In verse 4 of dat same chapter 3, it talked about the offering of judah nd Jerusalem. Was dat also a tithe pf tithe as well?
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by ponziponzi(m): 4:31pm On Dec 03, 2017
bezimo:


Defending which stupid things..You are are the one confused. you are not a christian so pointing things out is just a futile waste of time because you are not in a position to understand. There are poor folks in the Canada and dont attempt to downplay the existence of the poor folks who lack food and are homeless yet magnifying the poverty in Nigeria and holding church as responsible.. your logic is upside down. you mean church carering for the needy in Canada but not in Nigeria. You are super ignorant.there is no point even going further.

I am sorry my brother, I can’t help you.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by Nobody: 4:46pm On Dec 03, 2017
Iamzik:


There is atleast one church on street in Nigeria. Come to lagos and see.... 8-10 churches on a single Street. What more expansion do you need? The era of buildings big cathedrals and openings endless parishes situated right next to them self, the era of proliferation of church buildings is gone. This is the era to preach salvation, righteousness and show practical love to the lost world.

Don't confuse expansion of Gods kingdom with establishing new Churches. The Church of Christ universal is beyond your denomination or Church building. How many people in your church are truly saved? Enough of this undue emphasis on financial and population Target.

welfar is a big part of the gispel. Jesus preached a complete Gospel. Healed the sick, raised the dead, fed the multitudes twice, opened blind eyes and also thought the people (education). Seven deacons were ordained just to look after believer's welfare in the Early Church and you are here down playing the matter.
Is your church registered as an NGO or limited liability company?


When the missionaries came, they brought education, health care, roads, etc without asking us for tithes. Our present religious leaders went to these same mission schools practically tuition free, many with scholarships and good job after graduation. Isn't it funny that they turn round to establish schools that only the rich can afford? Widows, orphans ,father less in the congregation are no longer a priority. Welfare is one of the factors that made the early church to grow and spread. Go read the book of acts. and this is the very basis of tithing even from the old testament.

God did not create Poverty. We human beings did when we stopped sharing with our neighbours. Tithing was originally meant to strike a balance between the rich and not so rich.

I'm not against tithing but the church must wake up to her responsibilities. Let's start making practical impact on the lives of people in the local church.
That is false. Go back to the book of Acts . Wen d early church started the love was so strong dat dey were selling their properties and laying at the feet of the apostles to share among brethren but wat did dat bring about? It brought carnality, it became a competition nd dats where d incidence of ananias and saphira came up, right after dat in verse 6 we see disagreement among brethren as some felt dey were being cheated. D dispute made the apostle call for d appointment of deacons and left welfarism to dem and dey focused on the gospel. In their words dey said "it is not appropriate for us to leave the work of God and serve tables".. In case u don't know, persecution was wat made the church to grow beyond leaps and bounds. Jesus asked them to take the gospel to all the ends of the world but dey were settled in Jerusalem until persecution came wch scattered dem abroad... Welfarism will only produce carnality cos u can't please everyone. Its important but not primary.

U talked about poverty and said its d fault of the church dat ppl r poor, dats false again. Infact dey were poor people in Jesus days, wen mary poured d ointment on him, judas said it should have been sold nd given to the poor but Jesus said "the poor ye have always with you...".
By d way, Jesus didn't die on the cross to help us manage our bad conditions but to help us out of it and the only way is to trust and obey
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by nicemuyoo: 5:02pm On Dec 03, 2017
The tithe and the Lord's offering mention together refers to the tithe and tithe of the tithe. I have given you where it was defined to Moses by almighty but you don't want to yield to scriptural truth, you prefer theological extrapolations the teachings of men.
The offerings of judah refers to the tithe of the tithe ( the Lord's offering) for that region of land. If you read the whole of Malachi the actual robbers were levties not ordinary people or do you what to dispute that as well?? This are scriptural facts levites were the ones stealing but theology would never teach you that!!!
salvation101:
how easy wasq it for u to believe dis convolution? The book of malachi 1:1 said it was the prophecy of God tru malachi to the nation of Israel not a tribe.. The word asked, will 'a man' (not will a levite?) rob God? The truth is that alll these words u r saying marks unbelief. It wasn't stated there that d offering mal was talking about here was tithe of tithe but u can believe it. In verse 4 of dat same chapter 3, it talked about the offering of judah nd Jerusalem. Was dat also a tithe pf tithe as well?
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by farem: 6:02pm On Dec 03, 2017
stevejomo:
as written by the pastor's wife.
Adeboye is getting richer while church members are getting poorer.

Poor brain, please cite references to your allegation. This what a human being is expected to do with this kind of comment.
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by 9inches(m): 7:20pm On Dec 03, 2017
Protestant congregations are individualized and have no authority outside their own denomination. If an individual is removed from a ‘congregation’ then he/she can go down the street and join another ‘congregation’ of the same denomination. That is not true with the Catholic Church. If removed from the Catholic Church, one cannot go to another city and join another Catholic Parish. No Evangelical/Protestant Church has the authority to remove someone completely from the church.

Remember, Jesus gave specific instructions regarding dealing with members of the Church who were in sin. Matthew 18:15-18 says “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have won over your brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, so that ‘every fact may be established on the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church. If he refuses to listen even to the church, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector. Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by PointZerom: 7:35pm On Dec 03, 2017
salvation101:
No matter what, the Church will stand.
Talk is cheap. The same freeze guy that is always on social media advising pastors on what to do with church money was posted his pics with hushpuppi in dubai nd dey were flaunting their rolex wristwatches.. Wat happened to all his sermons? Why not sell d watch or use the money h spent to travel on the poor people around him? Now isn't it obvious dat this ppl are simply out to tarnish the image of these men of God? The gates of hell are fighting, Christians be wise so u don't end up joining the devil to fight the Church of God


Well said. Freezer should goan pay the dowry of his wife, he should stop parading her as baby mama. The disciples he said we should follow their footsteps didn't endorse BABY MAMA.

2 Likes

Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by loomy(m): 9:33pm On Dec 03, 2017
Judgement belongs only to GOD, what we see as wrong seldom turn out to be right (vice versa )
Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by MikaelsonRx(m): 8:42pm On Dec 04, 2017
Hiccups:
shocked

No church is under attack, some pastors have been criticized though. Why do OP see Freeze as an unbeliever? Do all of Christ Embassy Teachings agree with RCCG? Does this in any way makes them unbelievers?

The problem with people like OP is their inability to realized Pentecostal churches is a product of disagreement with some teachings in protestant churches. Until OP clarify how pentecostal churches sprang up, you lack every reasons to demonize Freeze

Nobody is demonizing freeze... He's a demon already.

1 Like

Re: In Defense Of The Church And Its Leadership by kolawoleibukun1: 11:44pm On Jun 02, 2018
scatter this useless topic. i killed t useless swine

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (Reply)

Dear Christians, Doesn't The Front Page Prove The Atheists Point? / God Is Unquestionable (my Pastor) Prophet Akinade Of Lion Of Judah Is Dead / Pastor Anita Oyakhilome: Life Before And After Divorce

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 103
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.