greiboy:
Bro be humble and stop talking trash

A quick search on google should do the trick

Stop chatting crap!

Do you know the meaning and origins of morals?

Where is your ethic "globally accepted"?

Sagamite:


Did you not learn in school that correlation is not the same thing as causation?

Do you read the fucking report at all?

They highlighted that as a reason for taking other related mental problems into account to solve any potential issues correlation could bring into the research

Correlation shows a statistical relationship between two variables but it doesn't necessarily mean one of the events actually led to another event . The scientists took metal health problems out of possible equation (what could have brought about the relationship) to improve the results and the correlation was still there.

That was the whole point of the research

Sagamite:

Stop chatting crap!
Do you know the meaning and origins of morals?
Where is your ethic "globally accepted"?

Why don't you lecture me
It seems you are only good at asking unrelated questions

greiboy:
Do you read the fucking report at all?

They highlighted that as a reason for taking other related metal problems into account to solve any potential issues correlation could bring into the research

Correlation shows a statistical relationship between two variables but it doesn't necessarily mean one of the events actually led to another event . The scientists took metal health problems out of possible equation (what could have brought about the relationship) to improve the results and the correlation was still there.

That was the whole point of the research

Why should I read the whole report?

Show me your "scientific research and facts" that shows having multiple sex partners would lead to people taking drugs, alcohol and develop psychological problem.

I am not the type you can obfuscate.

greiboy:
Why don't you lecture me

It seems you are only good at asking unrelated questions

Defend your lame arguments.

I should defend them for you?

You don't know your own arguments before you made it?

That proves my point: "You say things you don't for a second believe nor that reflects you or your true beliefs; just things to get female affirmation. You are a Simp!"

Sagamite:


Why should I read the whole report?

Show me your "scientific research and facts" that shows having multiple sex partners would lead to people taking drugs, alcohol and develop psychological problem.

I am not the type you can obfuscate.

Well, I have shown more than one, even of you don't accept the research approach. it is normal in academics

Now! Show me yours to prove having more than one sex partner is a good thing and not alternative reality

greiboy:
Well, I have shown more than one, even of you don't accept the research approach. it is normal in academics

Now! Show me yours to prove having more than one sex partner is a good thing and not alternative reality

You have shown nonsense!

Show me your "scientific research and facts" that shows having multiple sex partners would lead to people taking drugs, alcohol and develop psychological problem.

You can't deflect arguments from me, boy.

Sagamite:


Defend your lame arguments.

I should defend them for you?

You don't know your own arguments before you made it?

That proves my point: "You say things you don't for a second believe nor that reflects you or your true beliefs; just things to get female affirmation. You are a Simp!"

I have defended my "lame arguments" from the third page of this thread and the beginning of this discussion.

All you have done is to question my arguments without providing any substantial counter whatsoever.

I am no longer interested in running around with you, if you are not ready to contribute meaningfully to the arguments

Sagamite:


You have shown nonsense!

Show me your "scientific research and facts" that shows having multiple sex partners would lead to people taking drugs, alcohol and develop psychological problem.

You can't deflect arguments from me, boy.

okay I am your boy

What is your substantial counter? besides questions

This has turned into an interview session, rather than a constructive discussion.

greiboy:
I have defended my "lame arguments" from the third page of this thread and the beginning of this discussion.

All you have done is to question my arguments without providing any substantial counter whatsoever.

I am no longer interested in running around with you, if you are not ready to contribute meaningfully to the arguments

You call crap and nonsense "defending"?

I should not question your crap and nonsense?

Run, boy. If you had more sense you would have done that much earlier instead of thinking you are smart enough to pull the wool over my eyes in an argument.

100 of you can't!

Next time don't be talking crap you cannot defend, especially when I am on the thread. That would be fcking smart!

greiboy:
okay I am your boy

What is your substantial counter? besides questions

This has turned into an interview session, rather than a constructive discussion.

Cut the crap and show me your evidence for your reetarded assertion.

You pull "facts" from your arse and the hope you can deflect from your stupidity when challenged by putting burden of proof on the other person?

Sagamite:


Cut the crap and show me your evidence for your reetarded assertion.

You pull "facts" from your arse and the hope you can deflect from your stupidity when challenged by putting burden of proof on the other person?

ok

Its very rare to find men who can’t be manipulated with sex. That’s every mans weak point, and women know this and that’s why they use it to their advantage. If more men could halve self control, then women will not be able to use their pussy to get what they want from you. But unfortunately, that will never happen. Women will continue to take adantage of your weakness. And men will continue to shout that’s all they offer when indirectly that’s all you value. It’s a cycle

true true

great point man