Bobbyguirella:
Once a governor always a governor

Not when you're removed from the office as a first term governor

NumeroUno7:
Any Nigerian voting for APC is a mad person.. The amount of people who vote APC will determine the amount of mad people we have in Nigeria

you must be an illiterate, not about party, na yahoo boy dey represent Labour Party for my house of assembly here, r u telling because he is LP candidate, he is now perfect, vote personality not party

See wail

Of course!.... till the supreme court ruling

maasoap:


What do you mean? You prefer the election riggers to remain in office? Even Osun INEC said that they won't appeal the judgement. They rigged with no common sense, is that want you want to identify with?

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Doyhe8TJHjE

And for your mind LP will win any state in Nigeria

Danisaint112:
APC fighting dirty to remain in power. I'm expecting them to fight PETER OBI like this next month but Gods willing he will prevail and Nigeria set free from grilling and looting vultures and BATS that have been sucking this country dry for a long time. 😐

Meanwhile, If you are a labour party faithful/Supporter then share this video of Datti below until our Northern brothers are well enlightened. 🗣️📢

Video of Datti explaining the Labour Party symbol and how/where voters should vote;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3Zk6GjHoqI

NumeroUno7:
Any Nigerian voting for APC is a mad person.. The amount of people who vote APC will determine the amount of mad people we have in Nigeria

..and what that say about you that was born and grew up among mad people?

FuckTheMod:

Tell us Buharì's message to the CORRUPT OSU PIG.

look at the ugly old druggie lips u postin his pics up and down? The pics doesn’t look presentable nor enticing...so pls stop spoiling people’s day with ur village oracle’s pics pls.

NumeroUno7:
Any Nigerian voting for APC is a mad person.. The amount of people who vote APC will determine the amount of mad people we have in Nigeria

But people can still vote Pdp in Abia since 1999 without any development

Look there is over voting in both sides, both pdp and APC over vote. The thing is pdp own was more. There was vote reduction from both candidates. In the original results the pdp guy scored 403k while the APC guy scored 375k but now, the APC guy has 315k while PDP guy has 270k. So there was over voting on both sides. quote author=Brendaniel post=120441339]

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.


[/quote]

JAMO84:
The case is solid, if APC can avoid all technical errors, they will maintain the winning up to Supreme Court.

Lolz people power have mandated Adeleke you want to use kangaroo judgement

jumper524:
See your dad wasn't cheated.
Due process took its tool.
Overvoting was cancelled.
The best he can do is ask for a rerun in those affected pooling unit which we both know, would be a hard task to meet up the contest.
Stop raising eye brow. Due process removed you.
Same thing that removed governor of Bayelsa that year.
Unlike Imo state, this is clearly understandable.

imo is very understandable. Once you read and understand electoral act with objectivity, you would know that legally the supreme court judgment on imo was correct.

Looooooooooooool
Under what law, it's like you and your father want to spend time in jail. You clowns have 5-6 months to appeal and waste your money. Pls PAK n GO

swiftuzor:
That one na for your pocket at the end of the day.

The law has taken it's course.

Go back to the studio with B red and Davido so you can drop more hits.

Lolz kangaroo judgement

SunMusk:
Look there is over voting in both sides, both pdp and APC over vote. The thing is pdp own was more. There was vote reduction from both candidates. In the original results the pdp guy scored 403k while the APC guy scored 375k but now, the APC guy has 315k while PDP guy has 270k. So there was over voting on both sides. quote author=Brendaniel post=120441339]

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

The problem is not the over voting but cancelling of polling units, it is wrong when there is BVAS, read my article again.

Well if there really was over voting then it's difficult to fault that verdict.

SunMusk:
Look there is over voting in both sides, both pdp and APC over vote. The thing is pdp own was more. There was vote reduction from both candidates. In the original results the pdp guy scored 403k while the APC guy scored 375k but now, the APC guy has 315k while PDP guy has 270k. So there was over voting on both sides. quote author=Brendaniel post=120441339]

After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting
Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.


Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest, the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

these are elementary questions with very elementary "solutions" you proferred. How is overvoting done? How do you think APC will manipulate form EC8A at the polling unit in a stronghold of pdpand vice versa. How do you determine from whom to subtract excess invalid votes since all the parties are voted for. In a rerun, there can't be overvoting. There is actually nothing like"overvoting". It's inflation of results. Such result will not tally with the BVAS accredited number. Reason it's termed "overvoting". The court was right to cancel the votes.

NumeroUno7:
Any Nigerian voting for APC is a mad person.. The amount of people who vote APC will determine the amount of mad people we have in Nigeria

When you have the numbers of mad people in nigeria, what next?

Brendaniel:


After finding out the method used for the judgement on the election tribunal that gave victory to Oyetola over Adeleke, I would say it is a recipe for disaster, the method applied was cancelling all the votes of a polling unit because of over voting in that particular polling unit.


The questions I ask are:

1. As it happened that there were over voting in various polling units in the Osun election, what if each opposition connives to perpetrate over voting in polling units in each opposition strong holds?

Opposition connived? Don't take this nonsense to extreme. Your statement even shocked me!

2. What then is the use for BVAS in over voting if after the BVAS is able to identify the number of over votes only to end up cancelling all votes(valid) and over votes(invalid)?

BVAS did its job. INEC officials later tampered with it but that wasn't before APC received the initial results. Too late for INEC and PDP with their nonsense synchronisation.

3. If there is an election tribunal like this and a rerun takes place, what if the same over voting keeps occurring over and over, would they keep repeating the election tribunal process and back to rerun again?

Nothing like rerun in the amended electoral law if there is over voting or voting didn't take place in some units.

In my opinion, the law is just an error or a purposeful scheme to rig an election using what I call reverse voting

Your opinion doesn't matter in this case. Thanks

Just simply tamper with your opposition strong holds and invalidate their votes, So we might be having a case where a carefully selected and protected minority will determine winners of an election instead of the majority carrying the votes.

That's practically impossible. You can only do what you want in your strong hold, not in your opposition strong hold. You are not a politician, I won't blame you for not knowing this.

Implications:

1. It will make elections become very dirty because politicians will be all about scheming to invalidate votes in opposition strong holds.

2. It will make the voters lose confidence in the electoral process, because a voter will not be sure if his vote will be invalidated or not by someone else scheming with a politician in his/her polling unit.

3. It will make voters wear out easily and may cause voter apathy when you have reruns after stressful elections, thereby reducing voters turn-up in reruns.

4. It may not reflect the true will of the people and also reduce the total number of voter participation, just like the Osun election tribunal, the total number of votes cast for both PDP and APC after the cancellation doesn't reflect the true will of the people to declare Oyetola the winner.

5. Elections will cost more because of Tribunal, reruns and time wasting.

6. It could lead to anarchy and total chaos, like in some volatile states in the north where they riot over political results, just imagine after election and INEC says they have cancelled over 20,000 polling units across the north which were all stronghold of a particular candidate, because of over voting of less than 2000 voters, imagine what will happen in the aftermath of such news.

Solution:

In situations of over voting, Why not just deduct the invalid votes(over votes) and count the rest,

Really? This must be silliest argument I have ever come across, I don't mean to insult you.

the BVAS already identifies the number of over votes(invalid votes), doing so, INEC will avoid a lot of election tribunals, scheming by politicians, reduce cost of doing reruns, make more accurate results, increase voters confidence, reduce time wasting, reflect the true will of the people and avoid anarchy.

chukel:
these are elementary questions with very elementary "solutions" you proferred. How is overvoting done? How do you think APC will manipulate form EC8A at the polling unit in a stronghold of pdpand vice versa. How do you determine from whom to subtract excess invalid votes since all the parties are voted for. In a rerun, there can't be overvoting. There is actually nothing like"overvoting". It's inflation of results. Such result will not tally with the BVAS accredited number. Reason it's termed "overvoting". The court was right to cancel the votes.

Don't mind him, he simply doesn't want the rigger to be punished.
If you over vote (inflation of result) in your stronghold just because it is your stronghold and nobody will challenge you, you will have yourself to be blamed at tribunal

maasoap:


Opposition connived? Don't take this nonsense to extreme. Your statement even shocked me!


BVAS did its job. INEC officials later tampered with it but that wasn't before APC received the initial results. Too late for INEC and PDP with their nonsense synchronisation.


Nothing like rerun in the amended electoral law if there is over voting or voting didn't take place in some units.


Your opinion doesn't matter in this case. Thanks


That's practically impossible. You can only do what you want in your strong hold, not in your opposition strong hold. You are not a politician, I won't blame you for not knowing this.




Really? This must be silliest argument I have ever come across, I don't mean to insult you.

it's obvious you don't want a better election process so there is no point arguing with you...

Ur article is clear and good. I get you now

Brendaniel:



The problem is not the over voting but cancelling of polling units, it is wrong when there is BVAS, read my article again.

Brendaniel:


it's obvious you don't want a better election process so there is no point arguing with you...

Sorry, I don't see practicality of your solution.

maasoap:


Sorry, I don't see practicality of your solution.

your problem...

The tribunal did the right thing. Election riggers will not rule us again. Thanks to Mr President Buhari

Brendaniel:


your problem...

It is your problem.
Assuming there is over voting in X unit.
Accreditation= 300
Total votes = 400

PDP 200
APC 150
LP 50
Since you suggested that 100 votes should be removed. My question is, from which party? If from all, how do you determine the number? You're creating more problems in an attempt to solve problem

Toneypen247:
This same scenario happened during the time of Oyetola when Senator Adeleke took him to court and won via tribunal. The Supreme Court gave the final verdict in favour of Oyetola.✔ A possible scenario is about to replay.🤷‍♀️

Tribunals are always for the highest bidder. Both politicians are possibly guilty of the charged "overvoting" but what surprises me most is how the INEC officer in charge of the area involved was compromised to carry out their ill activities. This simply gives an insight into the outcome of the oncoming presidential election.

We need to be watchful and vigilant to avoid the evil ones from taking our glory.





My signature below provide you with qualitative academic assistance. Just a dm away🙋‍♀️📚

I keep wondering why you people are surprised.



Did you all think corruption ended in Nigeria at the introduction of BVAS?



This is Nigeria where as soon as a system for beating irregularities is created, someone would also have created a way to beat the system.

FuckTheMod:

Tell us Buharì's message to the CORRUPT OSU PIG.

Your generation is invested in Osu

All these kain children sef. Are you the spokesperson to the governor?

Lazy children everywhere depend on their parents' political appointments to survive.

Like Seyi,Yusuf and co.

Obi's son will not talk about his father's political this and that.

It's high time we look at the life of politicians' children before voting for them.

chukel:
these are elementary questions with very elementary "solutions" you proferred. How is overvoting done? How do you think APC will manipulate form EC8A at the polling unit in a stronghold of pdpand vice versa. How do you determine from whom to subtract excess invalid votes since all the parties are voted for. In a rerun, there can't be overvoting. There is actually nothing like"overvoting". It's inflation of results. Such result will not tally with the BVAS accredited number. Reason it's termed "overvoting". The court was right to cancel the votes.

Simply deduct the over votes that was done for any party involved and count the rest, leave long story...