lexy2014:
Why should the supreme court not be able to sit on monetary issues brought before it?

Again, English is not that difficult…

No one said the Court cannot sit on monetary issues brought before it…
What the Court is not empowered to do (beyond nullifying the policy) is make its own currency policy.

A nation of ANYHOWNESS and increasing LAWLESSNESS….
By the executive, legislature, even citizens - and now, apparently the judiciary! SMH
>

9jaRealist:


Dude, English is not that difficult to comprehend…

The Constitution AFFIRMATIVELY lists powers that is granted to different branches/bodies/etc..
Accordingly, if the Constitution does not grant you a power, it is perfectly valid to say that you don’t have such power.
>

talking about difficulty in comprehending english, is "powers listed" in the constitution the same thing as "policies"? do you have policies in the constitution?

lets try again....this time take note of the highlighted

Where is it in the constitution that "the law courts (including the Supreme Court) are neither empowered nor equipped to determine which policies of the executive branch are substantively ‘good’ or ‘bad'"?

9jaRealist:


Again, English is not that difficult…

No one said the Court cannot sit on monetary issues brought before it…
What the Court is not empowered to do (beyond nullifying the policy) is make its own currency policy.

A nation of ANYHOWNESS and increasing LAWLESSNESS….
By the executive, legislature, even citizens - and now, apparently the judiciary! SMH
>

you are right "English isnt that difficult" but who is the "no one" that "said the Court cannot sit on monetary issues brought before it…"?

Pls read the comment to which my question was initially directed:

"My first comment was whether the supreme court has a limit on what it can or can't sit on.


My comment wasn't about whether or not we will obey the SC. It was whether IT can sit on monetary policy issues brought before it."

i thought English isnt difficult?

lexy2014:

you are right "English isnt that difficult" but who is the "no one" that "said the Court cannot sit on monetary issues brought before it…"?

Pls read the comment to which my question was initially directed:

i thought English isnt difficult?

This dude is now responding to his own comments…
Dude, I am not responsible for your or someone else’s comment.

And yes, making policies is a ‘power’…
Dude, English really is not THAT difficult! SMH
>

"no-information-on-supreme-court-ruling-says-cbn".

CBN IS CLOWNING.
THE SUPREME COURT IS SIMPLY TELLING YOU AND YOUR BOSS TO MAKE NEW NAIRA NOTES AVAILABLE SUFFICIENTLY TO MEET YOUR CUSTOMERS' DEMANDS.

JUST LOOK AT HIM CLOWNING. SUCH AN IDIOT. PLAYING WITH THE RIGHTS OF EVERY NIGERIAN AND BECAUSE HIS BOSS PROMISES TO MAKE NIGERIA UNGOVERNABLE AFTER HIM.

BANKING IS A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BANKS AND THEIR CUSTOMERS. THE CBN IS AN IRRELEVANT "AMEBO FOR GOVERNMENT".

SUPPORTED.

I have promised to make NIGERIA UNGOVERNABLE AFTER me so this DELTA IBORI DEVIL IS A SATANIC ICON.

manutdrichie:
I am one of the few Nigerians keying into the CBN's cashless policy because the gains are too numerous to mention

No.1.....Kidnapping dissappeared with the speed of light

They're retraining to kidnap you and your POS.

"no-information-on-supreme-court-ruling-says-cbn".

Get information from the PRESIDENCY.
The PRESIDENCY reserves the right to obey or not to obey THE SC. NIGERIANS KNOW THAT EMEFIELE IS PLAYING ASSASSIN AND TERRORIST ON THEIR LIVES.

EMEFIELE IS A CLOWN IN JEOPARDY.

FULANI HERDSMEN ARE TERRORISTS AND BUHARI IS BEHIND THEM BY CHRISTANA AMANPOUR CNN.
I WILL MAKE NIGERIA UNGOVERNABLE AFTER ME.
AND SO EMEFIELE IS JUST BEING USED AS ASSASSIN AND A TERRORIST TOOL TO DESTROY THE RIGHTS OF NIGERIANS.

9jaRealist:


This dude is now responding to his own comments…
Dude, I am not responsible for your or someone else’s comment.

And yes, making policies is a ‘power’…
Dude, English really is not THAT difficult! SMH
>

How am I responding to my own comment? Can you explain?

Who told you that you are responsible for my or someone else’s comment?

If you say I am responding to my comment, how come you mentioned "someone else's comment"? Who is the someone else?

Where in the comment you responded to was any mention of "policy" and "power"?