Sweetnecta:

may Allah assign a good destination to every muslim, male or female. Amin.

yemmy1:

With the above numeral presentation of sons of God, how can christians claim that Jesus is the only unique son of God?

MEANING OF THE TERM ''SON OF GOD''
According to the bible, anyone that love God and did the act of righteousness is born by God. (I John 2:29).
The above logical explanations of the sons of God shows that the word is not a literal expression but is metaphorical. The bible also describe Jesus as the son of man in many places. What a contradiction! Jesus is neither the son of God nor son of man.

If Jesus is the begotten son of God as the bible falsely call him, he must look like God. But the bible says ''For who, can be compare unto the LORD, who among the sons of the most high will be compare to him'' (Isaiah 40:18 and 25). Finally, if Mary was the mother of Jesus and God was the father according to the christians particularly the catholics, what is the relationship between Mary and God?

billyG:

jemmy1,sweetnecta & jayriginal Why are you and fellow your brothers the BOKO HARAM always causing trouble in nigeria?

chinedumo:


Jesus himself defines his sonship
John 10:30
I and the Father are one."

John 10:36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'?

chinedumo:

Just as i said earlier Jesus being a messenger does not stop him from being GOD

I can act the role of a son

Jesus is a servant and more than a servant

vedaxcool:


You see why wise individuals do not follow the way of Christainity, it seeks to undermine even statements that Jesus made, Hear what Jesus says
30 I and the Father are one.”

31 Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, 32 but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”

33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”

34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”’[d]? 35 If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside— 36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? 37

Please anyone with common sense should read the bold statements, Jesus was in essence saying If you are called gods in the scriptures then Son of god is no way close to blasphemy, If Jesus was really the Son of god then he would have insisted and say go ahead and stone me, I am God's son yet he made a concincing argument against the Jews by saying in essence this is how we Jews speak. but Trust Jp, he will not claim to know the gospels more than Jesus but he will also cherry pick statements of Jesus to support his blasphemous beliefs as he has shown in the quote above.

vedaxcool:





All three statements are meaningless and shows great confusion in explaining what the tenets of Christianity really is. One can not be a servant and more than a servant at the same time. Jesus can never be God, as any god that cannot save himself from death and was defeated to the extent that he was left shouting my lord my lord why have thou forsaken me can never be taken on common sense to be God, you deluded claim that his messenger-ship does not stop him from being God only shows how well indoctrinated you are, how does this statement reconcile with the statement with the fact the before he died he apparently called out to the real God to save him, in your misguided view why didn't the messenger turn to God and help himself, in essence your claim will mean he blamed himself for forsaking himself, could he then have saiod myself Myself why have I forsaken Myself, that would have proven he was god yet as they say common sense is not really common

Bible has numerous contradictions

the lack of original manuscripts

Attempt to set Paul against Jesus

Misrepresentation of Christian doctrine

Misinterpreting various Scripture passages

aletheia:

At least you are getting closer to understanding how Jehovah has manifested Himself to men in history. From your interaction with Christians, you now know far better than Mohammed and Allah that:
(1Jn 5:7) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Whereas your false god al-ilah also known as Hubal and his false prophet are really confused as to Who God is as is recorded in this sura 5:116:
And when Allah saith: O Jesus, son of Mary! Didst thou say unto mankind: Take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah? he saith: Be glorified! It was not mine to utter that to which I had no right. If I used to say it, then Thou knewest it. Thou knowest what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Thy Mind. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower of Things Hidden?

Perhaps, one day you will believe that Jesus of Nazareth is the son of God and that there is no name given under heaven (no, not even Mohammed), by which men will be saved. You must be born again.

fitzkenny:

IYOU ARE SINCERE BUT SINCERELY WRONG. It is rather unfortunate that you guys fail to cross check with historical background to make the veracity of the authencity of the Holy Bible the oldest surviving book in the world. There are archeological facts too that lend credence to the fact of event recorded in the bible. Unfortunately, Islam started during the dark age of Christianity (more than 600 yrs after the resurrection of Jesus Christ). Did prophet Mohammed not had contact with Damascus where Paul got converted? Of cause he did and married a young Jewish girl. Was prophet Mohammed a Jew? No but why did Koran contain some stories about Jewish nation? Who is fooling who here?

Let us be objective here, with time I will prepare historical background to help you understand that you don't just say what you dont know.

frosbel:

Ibn Humayd – Salamah – Muhammad b. Ishaq – Yazid b. Ziyad al-Madani – Muhammad b. Ka'b al-Qurazi: When the Messenger of God saw how his tribe turned their backs on him and was grieved to see them shunning the message he had brought to them from God, he longed in his soul that something would come to him from God which would reconcile him with his tribe.

With his love for his tribe and his eagerness for their welfare it would have delighted him if some of the difficulties which they made for him could have been smoothed out, and he debated with himself and fervently desired such an outcome. Then God revealed:

By the Star when it sets, your comrade does not err, nor is he deceived; nor does he speak out of (his own) desire…

and when he came to the words:

Have you thought upon al-Lat and al-‘Uzza and Manat, the third, the other?

Satan cast on his tongue, because of his inner debates and what he desired to bring to his people, the words:

These are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is accepted with approval.

When Quraysh heard this, they rejoiced and were happy and delighted at the way in which he spoke of their gods, and they listened to him, while the Muslims, having complete trust in their Prophet in respect of the messages which he brought from God, did not suspect him of error, illusion, or mistake.

When he came to the prostration, having completed the surah, he prostrated himself and the Muslims did likewise, following their Prophet, trusting in the message which he had brought and following his example.

Those polytheists of the Quraysh and others who were in the mosque likewise prostrated themselves because of the reference to their gods which they had heard, so that there was no one in the mosque, believer or unbeliever, who did not prostrate himself. The one exception was al-Walid b. Al-Mughirah, who was a very old man and could not prostrate himself; but he took a handful of soil from the valley in his hand and bowed over that. Then they all dispersed from the mosque.

The Quraysh left delighted by the mention of their gods which they had heard, saying, "Muhammad has mentioned our gods in the most favorable way possible, stating in his recitation that they are the high flying cranes and that their intercession is received with approval."

The news of the prostration reached those of the Messenger of God's companions who were in Abyssinia and people said, "The Quraysh have accepted Islam." Some rose up to return, while others remained behind. Then Gabriel came to the Messenger of God and said, "Muhammad, what have you done? You have recited to the people that which I did not bring to you from God, and you have said that which was not said to you."

Then the Messenger of God was much grieved and feared God greatly, but God sent down a revelation to him, for He was merciful to him, consoling him and making the matter light for him, informing him that there had never been a prophet or a messenger before him who desired as he desired and wished as he wished but that Satan had cast words into his recitation, as he had cast words on Muhammad's tongue.

Then God cancelled what Satan had thus cast, and established his verses by telling him that he was like other prophets and messengers, and revealed:

Never did we send a messenger or a prophet before you but that when he recited (the Message) Satan cast words into his recitation (umniyyah). God abrogates what Satan casts. Then God established his verses. God is knower, wise.

Thus God removed the sorrow from his Messenger, reassured him about that which he had feared and cancelled the words which Satan had cast on his tongue, that their gods were the high flying cranes whose intercession was accepted with approval. He now revealed, following the mention of "al-Lat, al-‘Uzza and Manat, the third, the other," the words:

Are yours the males and his the females? That indeed were an unfair division! They are but names which you have named, you and your fathers.

to the words:

to whom he wills and accepts.

This means, how can the intercession of their gods avail with God?


Read The Rest Here

Ruqaya:

My question goes thus:al-qur'an was written in its simplicity so dat a common man will read and understand the message,why is it dat u need some holy people 2 explain d meanings of messages in the bilble(e.g i came across a thread dat dere was a verse in d bible were jesus said:i've come 2 u wit the sword and i've not bring 2 u peace.during d argument a christian fellow said jesus referred 2 d sword of truth not for killing)how do i know u're not interpreting 2 suit your own frame of mind?why is dere diversification in your religion,in islam,all muslims in d whole word worship in d same way which profess its unity?

Ruqaya:

My question goes thus:al-qur'an was written in its simplicity so dat a common man will read and understand the message,why is it dat u need some holy people 2 explain d meanings of messages in the bilble(e.g i came across a thread dat dere was a verse in d bible were jesus said:i've come 2 u wit the sword and i've not bring 2 u peace.during d argument a christian fellow said jesus  referred 2 d sword of truth not for killing)how do i know u're not interpreting 2 suit your own frame of mind?why is dere diversification in your religion,in islam,all muslims in d whole word worship in d same way which profess its unity? 

congoshine:

Al Qur'an was written for arabs not Yoruba people .

Its for ARABS !!