carefreewannabe:


Before I tell you how much money I make, what does age have to do with nannies and caregivers?

MizMyColi:
Okay, I don't know much about gender equality and honestly, I could care less.

But from what I've just read up there, bar the OP's personal opinion:
I have to point this out that, that perk has very greedy and selfish underlying motives.

I know some people will allude/agree to this, but tbh, if this practice is adopted by the majority, a time will come when it'll become a social trend to not have a child until you're forty, a time will come when the idea of marriage would be utterly useless, where working class women will look down on other working class women who have chosen to give priority to both their work and husband/family as "less".

Honestly?
I fear for this kind of future.

Call me old-fashioned, IDC.

But then, in our pursuit of life's vanities, let's not forget the things that matter most, let's not relegate them to the background where they may never see the light of day.

itstpia1:


i'm not asking for how much money you make, i said are you as rich as those celebrities?

as per the age and caregivers thing, its not easy coping with raising a baby- you lose sleep, they cry, they need constant care and attention, etc etc- all these do take their toll on the parents, especially the mother.

celebrities can afford to hire people to help with childcare and thus reduce the stress level involved in caring for the baby. So, it doesnt necessarily matter, relatively speaking, what age they decide to have kids.

moca:
Why are guys always hyperventilating anytime a topic to better d life of women are raised?

Why d fear?

Some hv started talking down on d ladies who will take advantage of d package already.
Again why d fear?

I remembered when d famous KK said she want to freeze her egg so whats d big deal. Its their life,their choice,their world. U guys r in ur world,let them be biko!
Lots of female celebs froze their eggs. Science has made a lot of things easy for mankind.

If at d end d female workers found out d dis outways d ad, they can protest or lobby. At least its done in a civilized nation not african jungle where u leave ur work, ur papa name, ur everything to become a sit at home mom whose daily bread solely depends on d husband.

Haba!

Infact, ive been reading so many whinning threads from guys lately, so i ask again, why r u guys shifting on ur seats?

Family section is no longer fun.
People whining here and there.

TopFlightCeo:
....And someone will still get up and say some employments are not modern day of slavery even if you are earning $10, 000, 000 a month.


Be your own boss with a vision and a bigger vision for your employees.

carefreewannabe:


I have enough money to pay for nannies if I want.



And what makes you think that women in their 40s are too weak to do so?



What makes you think that I cannot afford to hire people?
And what makes you think that I will not be able to take care of my kids in my 40s all by myself?

itstpia1:




all these things could be discussed on the 40s thread.

mods, clean up plz, thanks.

carefreewannabe:


I am too young for the 40s thread.

itstpia1:


well, it could still be discussed there.

i might post the question later.

carefreewannabe:


@bold
No, it isn't.
I don't aspire to look like my daughter's age mate. I have more important things to do with my kids.

Regarding your first question:

fairheven:

You just showing me celebrities...that has noting to do with the topic,we r not talking about fame but life

Dexema:
This is Good news in the long run which means; More “open marriages/relationships,less wife issues,reduction in world population.

For those accusing men of insecurity towards girl/woman power,one thing I know is most women still find a way to locate a mans shoulder to cry on (whether brother or lover) when they have either made a grevious mistake or succeeded in destroying their lives.
So no matter how much issues with the female folk meanders the buck still somhow somway stops at our table.Guess we are the cleanup experts/fixers.

carefreewannabe:


Come on, I have seen enough tough men cry for one reason or another and ask a female to console them.

coogar:


you are likely to be suffering from down syndrome.....



nah!
i have passed the stage where i have to spoonfeed troglodytes like yourself. if you have any theory that says there's no risk of down syndrome in older women, kindly present it.

the source or the lack of it does not dispute the facts....you are the biggest fool this forum has ever produced & that's a mean achievement considering the number of posters here.



get off your crüsty obese arsë & find the source yourself.

coogar:


the source is not the problem but how accurately the experiment was conducted. were the other factors capable of causing birth defects controlled to isolate the older dads?

older dads most likely means older moms & since older moms are capable of producing kids with birth defects then the experiment is flawed. that's the point here as stated clearly in the research study.



the year of publication means shyte in this context.....the steps taken to get the results is the crux of the matter.



this is the graph again, i can see you are struggling to cope with the pace of the duscussion....


[img]http://igniss.blog.hr/slike/l/autizam_sizofrenija_i_dijabetes_s_muskom_dobi.png[/img]

the red line is almost linear with a slight increase as the age rises. for the women(black line), there's a sharp increase after a certain age.

you better go & freeze your eggs before it's too late. genetically, you are already likely to birth an autistic child even if you have had a baby at 20......leaving it till 40 means you might be the first woman to give birth to a goblin.

crackhaus:
Just for the fact that a woman is a woman and that a man is a man, there can never be equality in certain things...and if there's no total equality in all things, then that leaves us with total inequality.

Positive(+) + Negative(-) = Negative(-)

coogar:
welcome to the 21st century.
as usual, the capitalist slaves would jump at this singing kumbaya.

blakky97:

So (-2) + (+7) = (-5)?

crackhaus:

I really hope you asked me this question because you truly want to know the answer, and not in sly sarcasm.

Dude,
-2 + 7 = 5

-2 is negative, and counting upwards from -2 to +7 gives 9 digits (-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7).

The position of 5 on that number line is lesser than 7, and the answer 5 itself is also lesser than 9 if you are to add 7 to 2.

The point is that at the end of any calculation involving positive and negative in whatever order they're placed, the answer will still be a reduction from the highest digit on the LHS of the equation and not an addition...

Do you get it?

UjSizzle:

Hian. Didn't you learn the short version of things in school?

-+ is - but your answer will have to take the sign of the larger number. Sharp way to pass exams