mrlaw93:
If u wnt to knw if God exist or not. Go to 3rd mainland bridge and jump down or rather stAnd in front of a brt bus in motion and come tell us wateva u see after death. Fo0lish people always disturbing me with religious wahala..

UyiIredia:


God isn't absent. The existence of God is factual. However I have learnt that atheism isn't based on facts but poor thinking.

Emmalot121:
You know what I meant by Genesis being inclusive? It means it gives room for explanation from God. Scientists haven't even being able to disprove the existence of God, yet they go on with their findings, independent of Him. To me, scientists have explained nothing, all they have done is to give hopelessness, thereby making the body rule over you.
Can science explain the existence of magic? Though they claim magic is part of science, yet it defies the basic rules and principles. 5 days ago, I went to a cultural dispay, come see how humans were swallowing fire. Two years ago, G-Bam show sponsored by glo, brought a man who eats broken bottles and razor blades. Doesn't this defy the principles of food and the digestive system in biology? Why can a man swallow fire hotter than 200 celcius and go without a single scratch? If this link does not show the source of magic, then its nonsense.
Tell me a single question the account of Genesis cannot answer.

HerexG:


Can Genesis explain the advert of Dinosaurs 6000 years before man

Timmytimmy:


I've read most of the arguments here. It's interesting how atheists accuse Theists of guess work and imagination. You guys should keep going oh.

Chy22, weldone sir. God bless you.

The first question that begs for answers from atheists is where did the matter(or energy if you will) originate from? Some of you guys wouldn't admit to save your lives but science does not in any way disprove God's existence. Singularity, the big bang theory and evolution are processes that explain the re-arrangement or re-formation of matter or the multiplalication of matter. Where does all the matter and EVEN space come from.

Things don't just come to be. Space doesn't just exist. Our stand is that an an Infinite being did this. Why is it sillier than what you guys believe?

I almost became an atheist once, you guys should be honest already. Atheism is still guessing at least in this century.

Emmalot121:
You know what I meant by Genesis being inclusive? It means it gives room for explanation from God. Scientists haven't even being able to disprove the existence of God, yet they go on with their findings, independent of Him. To me, scientists have explained nothing, all they have done is to give hopelessness, thereby making the body rule over you.
Can science explain the existence of magic? Though they claim magic is part of science, yet it defies the basic rules and principles. 5 days ago, I went to a cultural dispay, come see how humans were swallowing fire. Two years ago, G-Bam show sponsored by glo, brought a man who eats broken bottles and razor blades. Doesn't this defy the principles of food and the digestive system in biology? Why can a man swallow fire hotter than 200 celcius and go without a single scratch? If this link does not show the source of magic, then its nonsense.
Tell me a single question the account of Genesis cannot answer.

Emmalot121:
Why not? Where in the Bible did it say the Earth is 6000yrs? I hope you read this with all openess, the gap theory has long being in existence before Darwin was born. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/gap_theorists_defended.htm

anex4real:

theory predicts that the
universe is only about 8 billion years old,
which
is billions of years younger than the age of
many stars in our galaxy.

anex4real:

Most of those researches were carried out this year, if truly you are following science the way you claim to do you would realize the theory of big bang can not and will not stand the test of time because scientist are finding flaws in the theory every year and when the big bang theory is finally disproved am sure you will still believe in another theory that will be proposed by the same scientist. Have you ever witness a miracle? Do you have scientific explanation for miracle?

all4naija:
Bwahaha...Are you for real? Which theory are you talking about? Did you see the image of the expanding universe I posted earlier? The universe age is about 14 billion years after the first explosion.

datopdlink:

I dey tell u!!!Not an atheist o,but RESPECT Plaetton,Davien,allfornaija and everyone making reasonable,logical arguments here.Damn!

davien:
Sources are cited so you could follow up any claim...

chy22:


Are you joking or what? Do you know how many mechanism go on during the synthesis of these biological matter. The stone has definitely got no amino acids, and does not contain any genetic code.

Ape has different genetic information compared to humans. Just think about the serious health complications one will go through if any mismatch of DNA occur. Also think about the outcome of transplanting any organ from ape to human with or without immune suppression.

Blaqsmith:

Arguments no dey tire u at all?

U forgot ignorance is a disease?.a chronic one at that!

blym4real:

Darwin theory of evolution is the most acceptable theory of evolution in biology, darwin claim had been disproved severally by so many scientists .
Evolution is unscientific, because it is not
testable or falsifiable. It makes claims about
events that were not observed and can never
be re-created.
This blanket dismissal of evolution ignores
important distinctions that divide the field into
at least two broad areas: microevolution and
macroevolution. Microevolution looks at
changes within species over time--changes that
may be preludes to speciation, the origin of new
species. Macroevolution studies how taxonomic
groups above the level of species change. Its
evidence draws frequently from the fossil
record and DNA comparisons to reconstruct
how various organisms may be related.
Why hasn't man developed to another advance creature yet?

davien:
I said I could give evidences that support the big bang....proofs I cannot give...because proofs are mathematical and I have no consensus to use conjectures about the cosmic microwave background(i.e I'm not an astrophysicist)..
If you are looking for proofs...then consult an astrophysicist for mathematical conjectures(proof)

davien:
Actually it does..to be concise I left it out.
The hardy weinberg equation(the basis for paternity tests) is used with distinct gene markers(plus differential equations) to determine when life-forms diverged...
This was used to determine europeans breaking up from africans 50,000 years ago,the homo genus breaking off 6 million years ago etc...
If the results are correct then the genetics and distribution of fossils in the geological column should refect that and indeed it does...
we never found amphibians in sediments older than the devonian...
we never found primates older than sediments in the cretaceous...
you will find only aquatic life older than the silurian....
and you will never find a fossil bunny in the precambrian...
etc
Peer reviewed papers are used to work on testable models...you asking me to provide a peer reviewed paper on homonid history without evolution would be like me asking you to provide one that is about the motion of planets without newtonian mechanics and relativity...
It is because the prospects are testable that a paper can actually cite evolution...untestable models don't stand peer review.
No conclusions stands without the assumption....same with how a christian theist can't conclude being "saved" without the assumption of "jesus" being involved...
That said....for the hypothesis to be referred to as a theory it's predictions have to be verified...and it also has to have a myriad of evidences..
Even still it has to be peer-reviewed rigorously.
And evolution has withstood peer review for over 150 years.

all4naija:

You are blabbing without having understanding of what I am talking about. I know more about Genetic Mapping than you are speculating here. What I am talking about is that those genetic codes in digging deep are still in a nutshell parts of a fundamental particle like the quarks(at the moment which I think is still divisible just as scientists used to think atom is indivisible in the old), etc. Are you really paying attention to what I am saying at all?

all4naija:
You are now throwing jabs after failing to point to the theory. Bwahaha...

all4naija:
It has been observed in bacteria.

Emmalot121:
Why not? Where in the Bible did it say the Earth is 6000yrs? I hope you read this with all openess, the gap theory has long being in existence before Darwin was born. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evolution%20Hoax/gap_theorists_defended.htm

Blaqsmith:

I'm less faced with your theoretical analysis.maybe you are right,maybe you aren't,that won't stop me living my life.

Maybe there's God,maybe there's no God.

. God and religion is out of the equation as you are presented with facts of universe.

chy22:

Which bacteria please?
What article proved that claim, please put a title of the journal article.

all4naija:
. God and religion is out of the equation as you are presented with facts of universe.

chy22:


You may be a specialist in genetic mapping which is a good thing, but amino acids has not be demonstrated to be divisible till date and that makes it a speculation till it is proven.

Pause for a moment and think this your statement through: THOSE GENETIC CODES IN DIGGING DEEP ARE STILL IN A NUTSHELL PARTS OF A FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE this statement is absolute non-sense because the information that directs a human embryo to develop eyes and brains has not be represented in any stone what so ever.
And remember I was referring to your argument that humans and stone have no difference. You can always put a peer reviewed article title on here to prove how stone developed the ability to store information and replicate.

asalimpo:


without God or an objective moral standard you choice to do good rest on d whims of ur will .

Your reasong bcomes ur moral standard and the pull of ur desire may overwhelm ur conscience (if there's still much left of it after the searing).

The issue is without a moral standard with time society will degenerate into depravity and not even know this because they'll b convinced theyre living right.

The only reason we cud look at past cultures and shudder at their depravity and inhumanness is because we hav experienced the perspective of life under better standards enforceable by a legal system.

Wen u've been in d light u can see how bad distasteful darkness is. But wen in d dark you grope and fall and not know where ur going.

The best legal systems of d world were predicated on biblical principles.
World prosperity is a religious thing.

As men spurn the light, they'll enact laws to their liking,in other wrds legalisng darkness, e.g gay rights, animal rights, etc.

The so called smartness of man will only b used to advance his depravity, eventually with d bible completely outta d way, we'll go back yet again to d dark ages.

Man will b ruled by his desires, the logical justification for this wud b - survival of d fittest.

Blaqsmith:

I'd be lying if I say I understand u.

all4naija:
You can eat it, if you like!
http://www.genetics.org/content/154/3/985.short

all4naija:

Oh, sh*t! Oh, sh*! The image below would be helpful to you. A fourth grader in almighty USA reason more than you can.