DieVluit:


Meaning Nigeria cannot give Chad instructions other than denying them the right to advance further than they already have. Which right was denied after Chad had seen significant success. Also, meaning claims cannot be made that Nigeria contributed to Chad's victories.

http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKBN0LZ0DS20150303

When battle-hardened Chadian troops overran a Boko Haram camp in northern Nigeria last week, they wanted to press deep into territory controlled by the Islamist group but Nigeria refused to let them.

Chadian forces INSIDE Nigeria below.

Why should they be allowed? So they are glory hunting while we have been battling BH on multiple fronts and they want to claim an easy victory while wee are engaging BH? No, their job is with our other neighbours at the border regions.

DieVluit:


Chad IS Nigeria's favour without a doubt. Everyone knows knows it. Not just "foreign media". And for as long as media have contact with people on the ground, they beat you any day.

I again refer you to the General, go and read his statement. Foreign and local media with an agenda. They are ignoring facts on the ground and trying to rewrite history. It won' t work. Stop wasting my time as you are clearly in the above category.

rka1:


Why should they be allowed? .

The ONLY point is that out of shame, their advance was stalled.

They ALREADY entered Nigeria multiple times and liberated Nigerian towns. There's no such thing as an almost-Nigerian town.

rka1:


I again refer you to the General, .

I refer the propaganda general to the picture below.

Dikwa + Chad = Nigerian shame.

DieVluit:


The ONLY point is that out of shame, their advance was stalled.

They ALREADY entered Nigeria multiple times and liberated Nigerian towns. There's no such thing as an almost-Nigerian town.

Hey, ignorant juvenile, Chad has a right to enter Nigeria to a limit of kilometers under MNJTF agreement signed 8 years ago before Boko Haram ever existed....Nigeria has the same right to enter Chad. Regional military cross border area agreement was signed 8 years ago when there was nothing called Boko Haram, and such similar agreements exist all over the world. Maybe you don't read international affairs, you stuck in a baby bath tub in ANC republic.

Ignorant and poorly informed juvenile
.

agaugust:


Hey, ignorant juvenile, Chad has a right to enter Nigeria to a limit of kilometers under MNJTF agreement` `signed 8 years ago before Boko Haram ever existed....Nigeria has the same right to enter Chad. Regional military cross border area agreement was signed 8 years ago when there was nothing called Boko Haram, and such similar agreements exist all over the world. Maybe you don't read international affairs, you stuck in a baby bath tub in ANC republic.

Ignorant and poorly informed juvenile
.

And they used that right to good effect.

1. They entered nigeria.

2. They operated in nigeria.

3. They liberated nigerian territories.

What a shame

agaugust:


Hey, ignorant juvenile, Chad has a right to enter Nigeria to a limit of kilometers under MNJTF agreement signed 8 years ago before Boko Haram ever existed....Nigeria has the same right to enter Chad. Regional military cross border area agreement was signed 8 years ago when there was nothing called Boko Haram, and such similar agreements exist all over the world. Maybe you don't read international affairs, you stuck in a baby bath tub in ANC republic.

Ignorant and poorly informed juvenile
.

I see only shame!!! shame!!!! shame!!!!

There is nothing like Chad was in agreement to penetrate Nigeria only to a certain limit. Nigeria stalled Chad's mission out of shame because the public was already commending Chad's troops than Jonathan. I have even saw this on a certain documentary on TV.

The mighty Chadian Army.



http://news.yahoo.com/chad-president-tells-boko-haram-leader-surrender-face-191731700.html

agaugust:


[size=16pt]

Fool

Those data have been posted there on SIPRI over one year ago 2013 !

SIPRI says SANDF has 238 Badger IFVs, yet you have only 6 which you have admitted as correct number only 6 units NOT 238 units

Also, SIPRI says 222 of those Badgers were PRODUCED (PAST TENSE IN ENGLISH MEANS DONE) in South Africa, yet NO SINGLE BADGER was ever produced in South Africa, talk less of a whole 222 units.

SIPRI information is ALL WRONG, only 6 Badgers paid for and delivered by Finland as produced in Finland .

Almost every South African information in this world has some fraud in it's manipulated deceitful content, you even feed the world with false information like you did to SIPRI .....thieves and crook control your Rainbow nation of fraudsters.

GAME STILL ON !
.[/size]

No SIPRI says the deal for the aquisition of 236 has been confirmed and paid for - not that it is conpleted

It says deliveries start in 2015 (this year) and end in 2022 (cant remeber exact date)

and the use of "including 222" is actually present continous and not past tense - which you would know if you had an education

So the entire basis of you argument is flawed

If you are delusional enough to argue with SIPRI then that is your problem not mine, Badger aquisition is now indisputable

agaugust:


[size=25pt]France's world power military force was in Chad in 1984 and still operates there today 2015 on a permanent Defence Pact Agreement.

Mumu
.[/size]

Not according to your own citation

Chad humiliated Libya

Chad now liberates nigeria

Best military in the region

agaugust:



[size=20pt]

The French troops that withdrew came back again to rejoin the French troops that stayed behind as permanent base forces of France in Chad.

They came back because Libya did not truly withdraw.

" Libya's failure to honor its commitment to remove its troops followed by a Libyan air attack across 16° north latitude in February 1986, triggered a new French deployment, Operation Epervier. "

http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-2377.html

You don't know war history beyond the little part that I tell you...Fool

.[/size]

According to your own source the only french soldiers in the combat area were 150 engineers

agaugust:


[size=16pt]No single Badger IFV has EVER being produced in South Africa. You got only 6 experimental Badgers all made in Finland. You wanna fool Nigerians? You will sweat tired
.[/size]

Explain tbe factory built to build badgers in south aftica

You prove nigerians are overly emotional fools - facts stare them in the face yet they refuse to accept them because it hurts their feelings

agaugust:


Those SA parts were all shipped to Finland as components to be fixed in Finland. The Badger IFV assembly plant is NOT yet existing in South Africa....or you make Badger IFV in your own personal house? Mumu
.

Plant in South Africa begins production of 222 vehicals this year

Finland is responsible for the delivery of 14 vehicals

agaugust:


Beegeagle helped SIPRI correct their mistakes several times on African weapons data....so keep quiet you fighter pilot half yellow man, beast of no nation
.

Sure he has

and i wrote the freedom charter

agaugust:


Nigeria produces Igirigi in Nigeria, not imported from Finland.

South African sources from DENEL say contract terms demand the first bath of many dozens of Badgers will be manufactured in Finland and imported by South Africa, Finland eats the Badger production money, you buy from Finland...hurts your pride ....sorry o ....Finland owns Badger, you borrow from them
.

222 built in RSA
Less than 20 built in finland

Who is winning in this deal?

agaugust:


Yes no cure for South African's genetic, endemic, and epidemic Stupiidity, go read the Badger IFV contract terms signed by DENEL and Finland based patent holder, Finland owns you like their white Dutch brothers own South Africa
.

Have you read the deal?

agaugust:


Nigeria produces Igirigi in Nigeria, not imported from Finland.

South African sources from DENEL say contract terms demand the first bath of many dozens of Badgers will be manufactured in Finland and imported by South Africa, Finland eats the Badger production money, you buy from Finland...hurts your pride ....sorry o ....Finland owns Badger, you borrow from them
.

That's a misinformation sorry. In that case SA could have instead imported Patria AMV as it is.

agaugust:


I quoted sources for everything I said, web links, photos, videos, etc. If you don't agree with those sources which I did NOT create, then hack into those sources websites and delete their data from internet.

Simple

You and your imaginary sources et al are big liars.

MduZA:


with your own conclusion,to me you remain a Nigerian,do you know what does that mean?You deserve not to be considered or recognized...your artificial muscles are not visible

Being a Nigerian means I'm your superior in every conceivable way.

DieVluit:


I refer the propaganda general to the picture below.

Dikwa + Chad = Nigerian shame.

They are allowed you misinformed excuse of a troll. Taking photos like that just proves they are glory hunting.

patches689:


Not according to your own citation

Chad humiliated Libya

Chad now liberates nigeria

Best military in the region

during the Libya invasion of chad, chad was undergoing a civil war.

A faction of chad was supporting lybia which was occupying norther chad. This Chadian faction provided scouts and infantry. Libya was proving Arial support and artillery.....so lybia wasn't fully engaged.


France was backing and supporting the other Chadian faction. Later in the war, the two Chadian faction united against Libya who still didn't have her own foot soldiers and infantry in Chad

And with heavy FRENCH SUPPORT, Lybia was defeated.

You have never told a complete truth in your entire nairaland existence.

DieVluit:


And they used that right to good effect.

1. They entered nigeria.

2. They operated in nigeria.

3. They liberated nigerian territories.

What a shame

Over 30 communities cleared by Nigerian troops as they slowly encircle BH and all you and your trolling lackeys can do is celebrate 2 Border towns.

Shame on you. And you wonder why they are restricted to the border.

Well, well. About a year ago, the same people claiming Boko Haram captured or does not occupy any town/s in Nigerian territory are now talking about "Nigerian town/s liberated from the occupation of Boko Haram''. Another thing is, to support their claims, that they are winning, they use reference to their ''own' General's statements", and I suppose nothing is subjective about that, right? Another point proven, for quite some time it was debated here that Nigeria needs outside help to defeat Boko Haram, but again Nigerians disagreed, look who's getting helped now and there's much more progress since Nigeria is no longer the sole contributor in combating Boko Haram. Oh, and that dude Agubugu, your pathetic man, you were once a good debater and now there's no longer any substance in your posts, what happened?

DieVluit:


Given that here isn't a single post of mine you haven't responded to, you're definitely engaged.

And again, I read this whole post of yours and nowhere do I see the following:

1. A denial that chad feed nigerian towns.

2. A denial that chad progressed into nigeria.

3. A denial that Nigeria stopped chad from making further inroads.

4. A denial that chad's success is an embarrassment to nigeria.

5. Links and evidence in support of any of your statements.

All I see are words. Lots of them. But the words remain empty. Quantity =/= a reasoned argument.

What you need to do is to be ashamed

How could one deny what didn't exist?

Why would one rebuff an assertion that is bogus, malicious and utterly devoid of facts?

You're hurting and frustrated because the Nigerian army is making a mince meat of boko haram.

Bokoharam has 2 dangerous headquarters- the vast sambisa forest and baga. But the Nigerian army has unilaterally smoked them off and out.

That's your frustration and disappointment.
Now you can choke on your rage and pain, no one would even notice.

Egypt has acknowledged the might of the Nigerian army officially.
Even your president has officially begged for a defence pact.


Tell me why would the opinion of a clerk like you worth the effort of rebuffing?

We remain the pride of the continent, of the entire black race. You should be proud of us if only you aren't a scum.

rka1:

Over 30 communities cleared by Nigerian troops as they slowly encircle BH and all you and your trolling lackeys can do is celebrate 2 Border towns.
Shame on you. And you wonder why they are restricted to the border.

Under Nigeria's watch:

1. The highest number of persons internally displaced by conflict in africa.

2. Tons of refugees into neighbouring countries, who keep arriving as we speak.

3. Thousands of deaths and injuries.

4. Olympic grade soldiers who run at the speed of light.

5. A raging insurgency unabated for 5 years and counting.

DieVluit:



Under Nigeria's watch:

1. The highest number of persons internally displaced by conflict in africa.

2. Tons of refugees into neighbouring countries, who keep arriving as we speak.

3. Thousands of deaths and injuries.

4. Olympic grade soldiers who run at the speed of light.

5. A raging insurgency unabated for 5 years and counting.

. We only see losers like you who hope for the worse and pray for death.

You are ashamed the AU didn't lift a finger.

The UN didn't send troops.

Nigeria takes care of Nigeria.

You can save your tears for the pathetic force you call the sandf, what a joke.

lezz:
Being a Nigerian means I'm your superior in every conceivable way.

Unfortunately, it does not show in every conceivable way and even statistics deny it.

rka1:


They are allowed you misinformed excuse of a troll. Taking photos like that just proves they are glory hunting.

Chad have saved your a.ss.

lezz:
. We only see losers like you who hope for the worse and pray for death.

You are ashamed the AU didn't lift a finger.

The UN didn't send troops.

Nigeria takes care of Nigeria.

You can save your tears for the pathetic force you call the sandf, what a joke.

Nope, Chad took care of Nigeria, confirmed by the citizens of Nigeria when they showed trust in Chadian military instead of the local forces, this as a result caused your jealous authorities to hamper Chad's mission in Nigeria out of shame.


FACT…FACT…FACT…FACT…FACT…FACT…FACT…FACT…

lezz:
. We only see losers like you who hope for the worse and pray for death.

You are ashamed the AU didn't lift a finger.

The UN didn't send troops.

Nigeria takes care of Nigeria.

You can save your tears for the pathetic force you call the sandf, what a joke.

Personal attacks and emotion eill never advance your argument.

Every second spent focusing on me means the following:

1. The fact that under nigeria's watch we've seen the highest number f persons internally displaced by conflict is unchallenged.

2. The fact that nigerian soldiers are Olympic grade sprint stars is unchallenged.

3. The fact that the insurgency sits unabated for 5 years and counting is unchallenged.

4. The fact that tons of nigerian refugees are streaming into neighbouring countries is unchallenged.

5. The story of thousanda of deaths and injuries is unchallenged.

That I'm the subject of your anger means I have struck a nerve with ye above points.

It also means that you can't deny them.

lezz:
How could one deny what didn't exist?

Why would one rebuff an assertion that is bogus, malicious and utterly devoid of facts?

You're hurting and frustrated because the Nigerian army is making a mince meat of boko haram.

Bokoharam has 2 dangerous headquarters- the vast sambisa forest and baga. But the Nigerian army has unilaterally smoked them off and out.

That's your frustration and disappointment.
Now you can choke on your rage and pain, no one would even notice.

Egypt has acknowledged the might of the Nigerian army officially.
Even your president has officially begged for a defence pact.


Tell me why would the opinion of a clerk like you worth the effort of rebuffing?

We remain the pride of the continent, of the entire black race. You should be proud of us if only you aren't a scum.

Egypt has only commended you because you are both facing the same threat to National security. Simple!!!!

lezz:
How could one deny what didn't exist?

Why would one rebuff an assertion that is bogus, malicious and utterly devoid of facts?

You're hurting and frustrated because the Nigerian army is making a mince meat of boko haram.

Bokoharam has 2 dangerous headquarters- the vast sambisa forest and baga. But the Nigerian army has unilaterally smoked them off and out.

That's your frustration and disappointment.
Now you can choke on your rage and pain, no one would even notice.

Egypt has acknowledged the might of the Nigerian army officially.
Even your president has officially begged for a defence pact.


Tell me why would the opinion of a clerk like you worth the effort of rebuffing?

We remain the pride of the continent, of the entire black race. You should be proud of us if only you aren't a scum.

Saying an assertion is bogus is a denial. But without evidence, that denial is a bare denial. It's meaningless.

So, you have already tried to deny the facts but your denial is meaningless.

Egypt and Nigeria are suffering under the same malice. So their speaking on Nigeria, like your denial, is meaningless.

Seeing as you're the ONLY person talking about "hurting", it follows that you long crossed over to the emitional side and are only projecting your feelings on others

It's understandable. It's not like you can counter the points raised. So, resort to personal attacks or your mainstay, racism.