dragonking3:
You are a big idiot. Did you not see the video? Is Sahara reporters not the ones carrying her case and granting the interview? Am sure if it was the other way round and it was against the apostle then Sahara reporters becomes legit right? Dunce

u have no case bloody miasma. Suddenly, a prostitute is loved and cherished but you won't marry one, right.

AntiWailer:


Why are you mixing what is not .

That DUMB DUMB u are screaming I won't go that line.


Guess u are planning a reply and a report to mode strategy like you people did before.

Did she say she had a baby for Apostle that DNA can be done on?

The answer is no.

Chia, you claimed that she never said she had a baby. Why are you lying now that I shamed you and provided the video were she said so. If you know that she doesn't have a baby that a DNA test can be done why are you attacking the pastor and not the lady who can proof her claim to having a baby in the first place?

robotix:
u have no case bloody miasma. Suddenly, a prostitute is loved and cherished but you won't marry one, right.

What concerns me with marrying a prostitute? Are you high on shiit and weed? Let her provide proof in court and stop video ranting. We are tired of hearing the same thing over and over again

dragonking3:
You see the problem with you guys, you lack wisdom. Now what is the issue here? Was it rape? She claimed that they had sex which isn't a criminal offence. What she is sueing for is that apostle suleman failed to keep his promise to marry her, which she also doesn't have evidence to such promise. So better remove your mind from rape and be realistic or better still keep shut and let the judge do his work

Sex by mutual consent between two adults is not a crime anywhere . however in this case you have to keep it in view that suleman is a pastor . An apostle for that matter . no matter what people say about no one being infallible , there is an expected behavioural code for pastors . even apostle responded that someone can not carry the kind of anointing he has and be messing around .


I am very happy he has taken this step. Definitely someone will be worse off even before the conclusion of this case . can't say who it will be.

Stephanie's claims:
1. there was a relationship and meeting in various hotels
2. there was sex,
3. Huge sums were transfered to her account.
4. there was some form of introduction ,
5.there was pregnancy
6. there was an abortion which was not by mutual consent and her life was put in danger .

For her to claim damages and get financial compensation 4,5,6 have to be proven . my take is that her chances are very slim here . this is where I find inconsistencies in her claims .

For apostles reputation to be badly hit and possibly threaten ministry 1,2,3 have to be proven . I don't want to say what I think here . just judge it dispassionately and you will see whose chances are brightet here .

Don't also forget that Sahara reporters have been joined in the suit . which gives them the real need to take a deeper dive into the matter .

dragonking3:
What concerns me with marrying a prostitute? Are you high on shiit and weed? Let her provide proof in court and stop video ranting. We are tired of hearing the same thing over and over again

Ahan... good. No b who get evidence go go court?

brotherly:


Sex by mutual consent between two adults is not a crime anywhere . however in this case you have to keep it in view that suleman is a pastor . An apostle for that matter . no matter what people say about no one being infallible , there is an expected behavioural code for pastors . even apostle responded that someone can not carry the kind of anointing he has and be messing around .


I am very happy he has taken this step. Definitely someone will be worse off even before the conclusion of this case . can't say who it will be.

Stephanie's claims:
1. there was a relationship and meeting in various hotels
2. there was sex,
3. Huge sums were transfered to her account.
4. there was some form of introduction ,
5.there was pregnancy
6. there was an abortion which was not by mutual consent and her life was put in danger .

For her to claim damages and get financial cimpensatuon 4,5,6 have to be proven . my take is that her chances are very slim here . this is where I find inconsistencies in her claims .

For apostles reputation to be badly hit and possibly threaten ministry 1,2,3 have to be proven . I don't want to say what I think here . just judge it dispassionately and you will see whose chances are brightet here .

Don't also forget that Sahara reporters have been joined in the suit . which gives them the real need to take a deeper dive into the matter .

Simple. This is the logical reasoning Nigerians should be doing. Now the prostitute will have to provide tangible proof to her claim which will be extremely difficult. She knows that and Sahara reporters knows that as well as they are in deep mess if they can't prove that she was pregnant or an abortion was done by the pastor or traditional introduction.

robotix:


Ahan... good. No b who get evidence go go court?

So she no get evidence and she dey rant yet all of una believe her right?

dragonking3:
So she no get evidence and she dey rant yet all of una believe her right?

lmaoooo.... e clear say me and u dey same side but misunderstanding no let us see am. Yeah, don't mind the ugly duckling

robotix:
lmaoooo.... e clear say me and u dey same side but misunderstanding no let us see am. Yeah, don't mind the ugly duckling

okay

After all the saga that have been going on and seeing this girl rant like this. I conclude that this lady have been saying the truth all the while.
I believe she is actually saying the truth.
The problem with this tithe collecting pastors is that they easily forget what Christ said.
"it is easier for the camel to pass through the eyes of the needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God"
All the pastor want to be is be millionaires and billionaires at the expense of their followers.

dragonking3:
Simple. This is the logical reasoning Nigerians should be doing. Now the prostitute will have to provide tangible proof to her claim which will be extremely difficult. She knows that and Sahara reporters knows that as well as they are in deep mess if they can't prove that she was pregnant or an abortion was done by the pastor or traditional introduction.

You can't be too sure she does not have what it takes to prove 1,2,3 anyway

dragonking3:
Chia, you claimed that she never said she had a baby. Why are you lying now that I shamed you and provided the video were she said so. If you know that she doesn't have a baby that a DNA test can be done why are you attacking the pastor and not the lady who can proof her claim to having a baby in the first place?

Is aborted pregnancy a baby ?

And why do u want to isolate your argument ?

It starred from the guy that said they should do DNA on her baby so we proof if the baby belongs to the Pastor.

I hope you are not in his legal team because you will mess him up because of your lack of understanding and contextualising a discuss.

AntiWailer:


Is aborted pregnancy a baby ?

And why do u want to isolate your argument ?

It starred from the guy that said they should do DNA on her baby so we proof if the baby belongs to the Pastor.

I hope you are not in his legal team because you will mess him up because of your lack of understanding and contextualising a discuss.

She claimed that she was pregnant for the pastor? Please what was inside her during the pregnancy before the claimed abortion ? Baby or something else? I await your response.

brotherly:


You can't be too sure she does not have what it takes to prove 1,2,3 anyway

You don't get it. 1,2,3 is not a criminal offence and will not do more harm than it has already done. But she not being able to prove 4,5,6 will land her instantly in prison for defamation because she has no evidence to such claims.

dragonking3:
She claimed that she was pregnant for the pastor? Please what was inside her during the pregnancy? Baby or something else? I await your response.

Apparently i might demand IQ test before engaging you further.

It is called a foetus not a baby.

Secondly, bring this discussion back to the original context.

Stop arguing blindly it makes you appear less intelligent.

Check the bolded and stop wasting your precious time if you have any.


This is what started the argument.

OreMI22:
Why do they always go to London,USA or Canada to stay and cause troble in Nigeria?


If she is saying the truth that she had a baby for Suleman, Oya let us do the DNA test.

We could also do a polygragh test. if she isn't ready to do any scientific investigation and just running her mouth from Canada, can lalasticlala do the needful and transfer to jokes section PLEASE ?

Answer your question again. Did she claim that she had a baby ?

euromilion:
This woman makes my blood boil,did she not know that the pastor was married before jumping into bed with him?what exactly does she want?.

I see nothing but an attention seeker.

Why is your blood boiling like the pharisees that condemned the adulteress in John8 and left the adulterer? Why did the apostle have her arrested in the first instance? Why did he send money to her account?

dragonking3:
You don't get it. 1,2,3 is not a criminal offence and will not do more harm than it has already done. But she not being able to prove 4,5,6 will land her instantly in prison for defamation because she has no evidence to such claims.

Once 1,2,3 can be proven , even if the others can't be proven defarmation can NEVER STAND .

thesicilian:
Jesus did not file a billion silver denarius suit against the Pharisees when they accused him of casting out demons by Beelzebub.

and no lady said that Jesus impregnated her and aborted it or claimed to have his nudes as well

AntiWailer:


Apparently i might demand IQ test before engaging you further.

It is called a foetus not a baby.

Secondly, bring this discussion back to the original context.

Stop arguing blindly it makes you appear less intelligent.

Check the bolded and stop wasting your precious time if you have any.


This is what started the argument.


Answer your question again. Did she claim that she had a baby ?

You definitely need a mental evaluation if you don't know what pregnancy means and what a foetus means.
A foetus is also a prenatal human which is also described as the child or baby in the womb. When one says she is pregnant it means that she has a child or baby in the womb

brotherly:


Once 1,2,3 can be proven , even if the others can't be proven defarmation can NEVER STAND .

Wrong. Did she agree to have sex, if yes then it is not a criminal offence. But did she say that he killed the baby in her womb when pregnant? Take note, it implies that she is calling the pastor a murderer. Now she will have to provide proof to this claim or else she will be charged for defamation and allegation that the pastor poisoned her with concoction and killed the baby in her womb. Big offense

dragonking3:
Wrong. Did she agree to have sex, if yes then it is not a criminal offence. But did she say that he killed the baby in her womb when pregnant? Take note, it implies that she is calling the pastor a murderer. Now she will have to provide proof to this claim or else she will be charged for defamation and allegation that the pastor poisoned her with concoction and killed the baby in her womb. Big offense

OK . so you believe the pastor is more interested in clearing his name on the abortion claim than adultery claim ?

eph123:
For this girl to be this bold about her accusations, something is not right somewhere.

Modified:
Why are people getting defensive and quoting me? Was a simple observation and we are all entitled to express our opinions

Yea u r right. Just like Nollywood and the rest.

brotherly:

OK . so you believe the pastor is more interested in clearing his name on the abortion claim than adultery claim ?

Is adultery a criminal offence in the court of law? If no then he took this case to court on the claim that he killed an innocent child via concoction and abortion. And yes it is a crime to kill and commit illegal abortion

dragonking3:
Is adultery a criminal offence in the court of law? If no then he took this case to court on the claim that he killed an innocent child via concoction and abortion. And yes it is a crime to kill and commit illegal abortion

May be we need to see the details of the defamation suit first . because I doubt if he will be bold to say yes I committed adultery but I am suing her for soiling my name that I committed an abortion.

Mind you Stephanie will still be claiming that she was actually pregnant and I doubt if the court will pronounce that she is lying . what the court will say is that she has not been able to prove beyond doubt that there was an abortion or pregnancy as the case may be.

My guy if 1,2,3 are proven even his lawyers will not have the energy to press further charges . its so simple

dragonking3:
You definitely need a mental evaluation if you don't know what pregnancy means and what a foetus means.
A foetus is also a prenatal human which is also described as the child or baby in the womb. When one says she is pregnant it means that she has a child or baby in the womb

Lol.

You are trying.

It is not easy to act stupid without a script.

You still ignored the origin of ur useless and fruitless argument.

brotherly:


May be we need to see the details of the defamation suit first . because I doubt if he will be bold to say yes I committed adultery but I am suing her for soiling my name that I committed an abortion.

Mind you Stephanie will still be claiming that she was actually pregnant and I doubt if the court will pronounce that she is lying . what the court will say is that she has not been able to prove beyond doubt that there was an abortion or pregnancy as the case may be.

My guy if 1,2,3 are proven even his lawyers will not have the energy to press further charges . its so simple

It is obvious that you are being sentimental here. Have you ever heard of the word "whatever you say will be used against you in the court of law "? Guess what, otobo has been saying alot which will make her loose this case if she can't provide proof to all her claims and allegations. The court won't select some part (1,2,3) and leave the others(4,5,6) hanging. It is even a shame that her lawyers didn't advise that she keep quiet or reduce her ranting.
The best thing she did was to flee back to Canada because she will most likely join aunty Kemi in port Harcourt prison

@kindnyce
Then she should show the world her evidence, you dated someone for a long time, and there was no pictures of you two together.

AntiWailer:


Lol.

You are trying.

It is not easy to act stupid without a script.

You still ignored the origin of ur useless and fruitless argument.

Dummy, you are now short of words once again. I will keep exposing your foolishness for everyone here to see.

dragonking3:
It is obvious that you are being sentimental here. Have you ever heard of the word "whatever you say will be used against you in the court of law "? Guess what, otobo has been saying alot which will make her loose this case if she can't provide proof to all her claims and allegations. The court won't select some part (1,2,3) and leave the others(4,5,6) hanging. It is even a shame that her lawyers didn't advise that she keep quiet or reduce her ranting.
The best thing she did was to flee back to Canada because she will most likely join aunty Kemi in port Harcourt prison

See you don't build a case from the sky . na from ground them dey start. I have said earlier that the inconsistencies in her story will affect 4,5 and 6 but nobody . judge or lawyer will start case from there . you must address 1,2,3 first . don't understand how you are mentioning sentiments here .

dragonking3:
He is a man like you. He that is without sin should cast the first stone.

Really? Then himself and people (like you) should stop parading him as infallible.

Men of God, scammers of Men.

Ok. She has seen your nude.
It's no longer private.

Just show us one side of it.
We don't want to see all like she did.

Waiting o!

You decided to wear clothe on this particular release. I tot u dont wear this kind of cloth. May be ur senses are gradually coming back.