Ruling on depositing money in the bank, and interest
---------------------
The Scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:
The interest which the banks pay to depositors on the money that they deposit in them is regarded as riba (usury). It is not permissible to make use of this interest, and the customer must repent to Allaah from depositing his money in riba-based banks. He should withdraw the money that he deposited and the interest, keep the original amount and donate the extra to charity, to the poor and needy or for renovating public facilities etc.
Fataawa Islamiyyah, 2/404
And Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
With regard to the interest that the bank gives to you, do not give it back to the bank and do not keep it, rather spend it on charitable causes such as giving it to the poor, renovating public washrooms, helping debtors who are unable to pay off their loans, etc.
Fataawa Islamiyyah, 2/407

I remember growing up this subject used to be debated. We do not agree with saying "I divorce you" 3× in one sitting. Maliki school doesn't agree with it either.

Some consider it valid. Do you have evidence of Sayyidina Umar made the ruling @ albaqir?

Empiree:


I remember growing up this subject used to be debated. We do not agree with saying "I divorce you" 3× in one sitting. Maliki school doesn't agree with it either.

Some consider it valid. Do you have evidence of Sayyidina Umar made the ruling @ albaqir?

# Check: Sahih Muslim, chapter of Divorce
https://sunnah.com/muslim/18

chapter 2: Threefold Divorce.

QUESTION AND ANSWER WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI (HAFIDHOHULLAAH)

Questioner: I heard that the meaning of Jihaad is “Ijade” ‘outings of the Tableegh Jama'ah’…

Dr Sharof: We have explained this issue! We have explained this issue!! It is not Jihaad. See, the Tableegh Jamaa’ah is as a result of the ideology of Kandahlavee. He invented the Jamaa’ah on the ideology that there is no Jihaad. They are agents of the British just as the Ahmadis, that is, the Qadiyaaniyyah; they are the mere tool for achieving the goal of the British. They were used as an ‘inside job’ to fight Islaam.

During the colonization of Pakistan and India when they were the same country, the Muslims confronted the colonizers in the name of Jihaad, (but) when the whites entered Nigeria, they easily penetrated the Yoruba Land because there was no one who taught them that they should disagree. History even reveals that the Yoruba Land was handed over to Alaafin (by the colonizers) just to manage it. That is why the Yorubas are more slaves to the whites (than others) because the whites civilized them. You know that the Yorubas are reticent; they became long-winded when the whites came.
If you closely study the northern Nigeria, (you will discover that) it wasn’t easy for the whites (to enslave their intellects) because they had Islaam. Islaam teaches us that we must not allow anyone to strip us of our Land. That is why they have maintained their status for them to certain extents even till today. Sharee’ah law got there; they were unable to cancel it. They only decreased its power. Once you get there, you will see Islaam because the whites were unable to take it from them. But unfortunately, they met many of the Yorubas as idolaters, and the leaders of the Yorubas gave lands to them free of charge.

The whites encountered great difficulties in hijacking areas where Muslims dominate. They used some of the Muslims as ‘inside job’ to fight Islaam. That is what happened in India and Pakistan. That was when they raised Ahmadiyyah; its ideology is that there is no more Jihaad. All his (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) claims that he is the Mahdi and others are lies; he only said those preposterous statements so as to establish that there is no more Jihaad. Before he died he wrote statements claiming he worked for England throughout his life. He is the Prophet of England.

The Congregation: Laughing mode activated!

Dr Sharof: (Ironically, Shaykh said) ‘you know that Indians and Pakistanis are whites. Aren’t they?’ You know he said his revelations were in English. Great lair! Allaah says, ‘And We did not send any Messenger except with the language of his people…’ [Soorah Ibrooheem (14):4]. Are the Indians and the Pakistanis whites? That is it.
This is also the same thing with the Tableeghees. From their ideologies is that there is no more Jihaad; useless ‘outing’ is the remaining thing. And we know that Jihaad will continue to exist till the Day of Qiyaamah. It would be fought behind a leader who is righteous or a sinner anytime he calls for Jihaad. A person may ask why we have not been engaging in Jihaad. We would say to them that we don’t have a leader who has called us to one. If we are summoned for Jihaad, we would move to the battle field. So you should (make them) understand.
But in their own case, they are only strolling the nook and cranny of the world and deceiving themselves. They are used to fabricating untrue stories. They may get to a place telling cock and bull stories and yet calling themselves brothers (upon ignorance) including those who are Arabs amongst them. Birds of a feather flock together. Having understood this, it (the outing of the Tableegh Jama’ah) is not the way. It is sorrowful that many Yorubas do not follow the Sunnah; they follow ideologies that are innovations. Why? (Figuratively Shaykh said) all (perfect) praise is for Allaah (alone), they say they would stop it.

Congregation: Laughing mode activated!

[SOURCE: QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION DURING THE EXPLANATION OF MA’AARIJUL QABUUL; VENUE: IBADAN, TIME OF THE TRANSCRIBED QUESTION AND ANSWER IN THE CLIP: 47 minutes 06 seconds to 50 minutes 51 seconds]
Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey

Pls do not derail the thread Messrs

Dr sharafdeen fiqh classes, lecture mode is Yoruba and each class is less than 30mins... its 9 for now


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8QdV6AmT7M


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ELKh4BKc-o


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vplLFT-Fz7o


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHHNRA2Im-s


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIPqP9baSlI


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrNu2ztd9E4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFPISlNx6yg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dghq3SELHSI


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7qm0xuLEYE

.

Please let's endeavor not to drift from the aim of this thread.

What do the scholars say? You can drop your question and someone digs the answers from the scholars out for you or you can
just post already answered questions. Simple! It's no rocket science

Clipping nails
The first question of Fatwa no. 19771
Q 1: What is the ruling on letting the nails
grow long?
A: It is not permissible to let one's nails grow
long because it is against Sunan-ul-Fitrah
(natural hygiene) which the Prophet (peace
upon him) has exhorted us to adhere to.
Clipping the nails is one of Sunan-ul-Fitrah,
which also include plucking the armpit hair,
shaving the pubic hair, and cutting the
moustache short; and this should be done at
most every forty days, according to the Hadith
related by Muslim in his Sahih (Authentic
Hadith Book) on the authority of Anas (may
Allah be pleased with him) who said: We have
been given a time limit that we should cut the
moustache short, clip the nails, and shave the
pubic hair at most every forty nights.
Therefore, those women, who practice this bad
habit, should repent to Allah (Exalted be He)
and abstain from this bad habit which is against
the command of the Prophet (peace be upon
him). Allah (Glorified and Exalted be He) says:
And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ) gives you, take it; and
whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it).
Allah (Glorified be He) also says: And let those
who oppose the Messenger’s (Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ) commandment (i.e. his Sunnah -
legal ways, orders, acts of worship, statements)
(among the sects) beware, lest some Fitnah
(disbelief, trials, afflictions, earthquakes,
killing, overpowered by a tyrant) should befall
them or a painful torment be inflicted on
them.
May Allah grant us success! May peace and
blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his
family, and Companions!
Permanent Committee for Scholarly
Research and Ifta'
Source: alifta.com/Fatawa/FatawaChapters.aspx?languagename=en&View=Page&PageID=309&PageNo=1&BookID=10

Ruling on dogs in islam.. Only for hunting or hunting and security ... With reference pls

Wiping the Face with the Hands After Du’a – alifta

Fatwa no. 2396

Q: Some callers to Allah (Exalted be He) told us that a Muslim should not wipe over his face after making Du`a’ (supplication), because this is a form of Bid`ah (innovation in religion), as they say. They further say that if the Mu’adhin (caller to Prayer) says while performing Iqamah (call to start the Prayer): “The time of Salah (Prayer) has come”, it is not permissible for prayers to say: “May Allah establish it and cause it to continue.” Kindly give us the legal opinion in this regard.

A: First, the slave’s calling upon his Lord and asking Him for his needs is valid and encouraged, and raising the hands while performing Du`a’ (supplication) to beseech Allah (Exalted be He) and turn to Him, is an established act of worship.

Concerning wiping over the face after making Du`a’, there is Hadith which is classed as Da`if (weak) and is related by Ibn Majah from the narration of Salih ibn Hassan Al-Nadry on the authority of Muhammad ibn Ka`b Al-Qurazhy from Ibn `Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them) that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, When you supplicate Allah, do so with the palms of your hands, not with their backs. After you have finished, wipe your face therewith. [1]

This Hadith is Da`if due to the weakness of Salih ibn Hassan. He was classified as a weak narrator by Ahmad, Ibn Ma`in, Abu Hatim, and Al-Daraqutny. Al-Bukhari said that his narrated Hadith are rejected, and the same was said by Abu Nu`aym Al-Asbahany who said that his (Salih’s) Hadith are rejected and he is Matruk (a narrator whose Hadith transmission was discarded due to unreliability). Ibn Hibban said: He used to listen to songs and singers and also used to narrate fabricated Hadith while falsely ascribing them to trustworthy narrators. It is also said by Ibn Al-Jawzy concerning this Hadith, it is unauthentic because of the presence of Salih ibn Hassan.

There is another Hadith in this regard related by Al-Tirmidhy in his Sunan: Abu Musa Muhammad ibn Al-Muthanna and Ibrahim ibn Ya`qub and others said: We were told by Hammad ibn `Isa Al-Juhany on the authority of Hanzhalah ibn Abu Sufyan Al-Jumahy from Salim ibn `Abdullah from his father, from `Umar ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) that he said: Whenever Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) raised his hands for supplication, he would not lower them until he had passed them over his face.[2] Muhammad ibn Al-Muthanna said in the Hadith he narrated: “He did not put them back down until he had wiped them over his face.” [3]

Abu `Isa said: This is a Sahih Gharib (a Hadith with a single narrator usually at the beginning of the chain of narration) Hadith which has only one narration by Hammad ibn `Isa and he is the only narrator of it although his narrations are few. Hanzhalah ibn Abu Sufyan is a Thiqah (trustworthy) narrator, as judged by Yahya ibn Sa`id Al-Qattan. However, the Hadith has in its Sanad (chain of narrators) Hammad ibn `Isa who is a weak narrator as well as being the only narrator of the Hadith as mentioned by Al-Tirmidhy in his Sunan.

As Du`a’ is a prescribed `Ibadah (worship), and there is no authentic evidence from the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be upon him), whether in his words or actions to support that; rather, only Da`if narrations, it is preferable to abandon that act in favor of the authentic Hadith in which there is no mention of wiping over the face after finishing Du`a’.

Second, the basic rule concerning acts of worship is that they are Tawqifiy (bound by a religious text and not amenable to personal opinion), and Allah (Exalted be He) is only to be worshipped in the manner that He ordained.

Furthermore, it has not been authentically narrated from the Prophet (peace be upon him) upon hearing the Iqamah, that he said: “May Allah establish it and cause it to continue”. But this was narrated by Abu Dawud in his Sunan from a weak narrator. He said: We were told by Sulayman ibn Dawud Al-`Ataky who said: We were told by Muhammad ibn Thabit who said: I was told by a man from the Levant (the region covering Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Palestine) on the authority of Shahr ibn Hawshab from Abu Umamah or from some of the Sahabah (Companions of the Prophet) that Bilal started to declare Iqamah, and when he said, “The time of Salah has come,” the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said, “May Allah establish it and cause it to continue.” The reason behind the weakness of that Hadith is that its Sanad had an unknown narrator whose narration is not considered reliable. Therefore, the saying “may Allah establish it and cause it to continue” is not prescribed, because it was not authentically reported; rather, it is preferable on the part of anyone hearing the Iqamah to say as the person who declares it says, because it takes the same ruling as Adhan (call to Prayer). The Prophet (peace be upon him) said, When you hear the Mu’adhin (caller to prayer), repeat what he says.

Footnotes:

[1] Abu Dawud, Sunan, Book on Salah, no. 1485; and Ibn Majah, Sunan, Book on supplication, no. 3866.

[2] Al-Tirmidhy, Sunan, Book on supplications, no. 3386.’

[3] Al-Tirmidhy, Sunan, Book on supplications, no. 3386.’

May Allah grant us success. May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and Companions.
The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’

Member Member Deputy Chairman Chairman
`Abdullah ibn Qa`ud `Abdullah ibn Ghudayyan `Abdul-Razzaq `Afify `Abdul-`Aziz ibn `Abdullah ibn Baz

Posted from: http://alifta.net/Fatawa/fatawaDetails.aspx?languagename=en&BookID=7&View=Page&PageNo=1&PageID=9523

QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI (HAFIDHOHULLAAH)
Questioner: There is a sister whose father is from the people of innovation. She wishes to marry a brother who is upon the Sunnah of the Prophet (sollaLloohu ‘alayhi wa sallam) but her father insists that she mustn’t marry him. What should she do?
Dr Sharof: She should continue to beg her father. She should continue to persuade him and make him know that the brother is the only person showing a yearning desire to marry her. She should sarcastically tell her father that the brother would change. Although her father may interpret it to mean that the brother would join him in innovation, she should have the aim that her father would change to a Sunni. It is left to her. Ladies should be very wise; they should have a way of convincing their fathers. If her father does not agree, she should try to convince her mother. Her mother may agree with her (and thereafter help her convince her father). There is a sister who wishes to marry a brother; she declared that she wouldn’t stop propagating Tijaaniyyah. The brother asked us to advise him. We asked him to go ahead; if Allaah wishes, she would agree to follow the right way if you are wise enough. Allaah makes it permissible for the Muslims to marry the Ahlul Kitaab (people of the book) because men are to guard their homes with commands. It is easy for men to convince women, although we see some men who later followed the misguidance of their wives. For this reason, as for the sister in question, she should plead with her parents because there is no parent who wants forlornness for their children. They are harsh with her because they desire goodness for their daughter. She should strive to convince them till they agree. May Allaah make them agree!
If they disagree, she should use her family members to beg them. If they still disagree, ask the scholars in your area to beg them. If they still disagree, there is no harm if the people who understand the Sharee’ah marry her to the brother. This is applicable when every trial has been to no avail. Her parents want her to marry a person who would misguide her to hell while she does not desire this. She can’t be neglected. That is it. Na’am.
[SOURCE: "CONCEPT OF NIKAAH, tape 4"] Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey

Shaykh ibn uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: Are the cheeks part of the beard?

He replied: Yes, the cheeks are part of the beard, because this is what is implied by the language in which sharee’ah came. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Verily, We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’aan in order that you may understand”

“He it is Who sent among the unlettered ones a Messenger (Muhammad) from among themselves, reciting to them His Verses, purifying them (from the filth of disbelief and polytheism), and teaching them the Book (this Qur’aan, Islamic laws and Islamic jurisprudence) and Al‑Hikmah (As‑Sunnah)”

Hence it is known that the meanings brought in the Qur’aan and Sunnah are the meanings indicated by the Arabic language, but if there is a particular shar’i meaning it should be interpreted in that manner. For example, salaah in Arabic means supplication (as in du’aa’), but in shar’i terminology it refers to the specific, well known act of worship (prayer), so when it is mentioned in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, it is to be understood in the shar’i sense, unless there is any indication to the contrary.

Based on this, Islam does not ascribe any particular shar’i meaning to the word lihyah (beard), so it is to be understood in its linguistic sense, and in Arabic it refers to the hair that grows on the cheeks and chin, from the cheekbone that is level with the channel of the ears to the jawbone.

It says in al-Qamoos: Lihyah (beard) is the hair of the cheeks and chin. Similarly it also says in Fath al-Baari, p. 35; vol. 10, al-Salafiyyah edition: It is a name for that which grows on the cheeks and chin.

Thus it is clear that the cheeks are part of the beard, and the believer must be patient in obeying Allaah and His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), even if it is strange among his own race or people. Glad tidings to the strangers.

It should be noted that truth is weighed according to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him); it is not weighed according to what people do that goes against the Qur’aan and Sunnah. We ask Allaah to make us and our Muslim brothers steadfast in adhering to the truth.

From Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, 11/question no 50.

^^

Shaykh Muhammad al-Safareeni said:

The reliable point of view, as it says in al-Iqnaa’ and elsewhere, is that it is not makrooh to remove hair that is beneath the pharynx.

Source: https://islamqa.info/en/69749

QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION WITH SHAYKH, DR SHAROF GBADEBO ROOJI (HAFIDHOHULLAAH)

Questioner: Is it permissible to delay the marriage banquet for few years after the marriage contract?

Dr Sharof: After the marriage contract! Why do you want to delay the marriage banquet? Do it as early as possible. Do not lavish your money; do whatever you are capable of doing. There are people who delay it saying it would be combined with the ‘aqeeqoh; what if Allaah does not make you live till that time? If a concoction of garri (cassava flakes) and water plus kuli kuli (roasted peanuts made into paste and mixed with spices, salt and sometimes ground pepper, then made into a desired shape) is available, by Allaah, it suffices as the marriage banquet if there is love amongst the people. Let them take your case as the first example (of such lovely gathering).
The Congregation: Laughing mode activated!

Dr Sharof: There is no problem about this. Na’am.

[SOURCE: "CONCEPT OF NIKAAH", tape 5]
Translated by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey

Amoto94:
Ruling on depositing money in the bank, and interest
---------------------
The Scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas said:
The interest which the banks pay to depositors on the money that they deposit in them is regarded as riba (usury). It is not permissible to make use of this interest, and the customer must repent to Allaah from depositing his money in riba-based banks. He should withdraw the money that he deposited and the interest, keep the original amount and donate the extra to charity, to the poor and needy or for renovating public facilities etc.
Fataawa Islamiyyah, 2/404
And Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
With regard to the interest that the bank gives to you, do not give it back to the bank and do not keep it, rather spend it on charitable causes such as giving it to the poor, renovating public washrooms, helping debtors who are unable to pay off their loans, etc.

Fataawa Islamiyyah, 2/407

@bolded are you saying it is OK to fix my money into bank to get interest and then invest the accrued interest into charity course? Is it cool??

Nafizzey:
@bolded are you saying it is OK to fix my money into bank to get interest and then invest the accrued interest into charity course? Is it cool??

I don't know because I'm not an alim.

Salam alaykum

So something happened in class today and we ended up with divided opinion so I thought I would bring it here. Imagine a clinent/ patient wanted you as a HCP to make the cross sign or say the father son and holy spirit before doing a procedure to make them feel comfortable, would it be permissible in Islam to do it?

* I don't know if I should say my thoughts now or wait for answers*

cc: Abdelkabir Rabiushile04

snapscore:
Salam alaykum

So something happened in class today and we ended up with divided opinion so I thought I would bring it here. Imagine a clinent/ patient wanted you as a HCP to make the cross sign or say the father son and holy spirit before doing a procedure to make them feel comfortable, would it be permissible in Islam to do it?

* I don't know if I should say my thoughts now or wait for answers*

cc: Abdelka.bir Rabius.hile04

No.... That's encouraging shirk...

Nafizzey:
@bolded are you saying it is OK to fix my money into bank to get interest and then invest the accrued interest into charity course? Is it cool??

Salam alaykum
I am not sure if I am getting your question right but I am assuming ( and I may be wrong) that you mean intentionally putting money in bank so to get interest so that you can spend it for a charitable cause. If that is what you mean then it is haram. A person shouldn't be putting money in a riba based bank in the first place. Riba is impermissible money and spending it on charity is a way of getting rid of it. It does not count as sadaqa. In an Ideal world, one wouldn't have gotten it in the first place. One cannot sin with the intention to do good.

I will modify and post the links in sha Allah

AbdelKabir:


No.... That's encouraging shirk...

That's interesting because I did not think about this at that time. What I was thinking was if all he wanted as a cross sign, I will just make the multiplication sign and have the intention that it is a multiplication sign and get away with it.

Regarding the other option, it's a bit more complicated. If I get someone else to do it, would it still be encouraging shirk?

Changing the patient might not be an option.

I guess even it might not be the easiest thing to do, I'll just say I feel uncomfortable doing that?

snapscore:


Regarding the other option, it's a bit more complicated. If I get someone else to do it, would it still be encouraging shirk?

A non-muslim doing that, brings no blame on you but you doing it will send a message that "she is a Muslim and she agreed doing it, so it means it's OK according to her faith", but a non Muslim doing it in your place will send a message contra to the first....

Changing the patient might not be an option.

I guess even it might not be the easiest thing to do, I'll just say I feel uncomfortable doing that?

Maybe....

AbdelKabir:


A non-muslim doing that, brings no blame on you but you doing it will send a message that "she is a Muslim and she agreed doing it, so it means it's OK according to her faith", but a non Muslim doing it in your place will send a message contra to the first....

I just wanted to be sure it wouldn't be encouraging shirk in a way. Shukran

Jzakallahu khyran

Wa iyyaki insha Alaah

snapscore:


I just wanted to be sure it wouldn't be encouraging shirk in a way. Shukran

Jzakallahu khyran

I should also add that, you must detest it in your heart when the useless process is going on, it should disgust you, no such thing as "respect the faith of others", respect shirk? A'udhubillaah..

And as for the multiplication thing, when I drew the sign, it still looked like a cross but a slightly bent one.....

My ustaadh narrated a hadeeth to me(I've not checked its authenticity), that the prophet once came across (if I remember clearly) sticks lying on each other in form of a cross, with much disgust, he(sallallaahu alayhi was sallam) separated them.... My point is, it does not have to be the cross we know, as far as it looks like a cross, its a cross....

SELFIES” AS PROFILES PICTURES ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK? | SHAYKH ‘UBAYD Al -JABĪRĪ ANSWERS ⬇

Questioner:

May Allāh reward you with good O our Shaykh! And this is the twentieth question; a questioner from Morocco is asking about the ruling on placing personal photos (“selfies”) by members on [internet] forums, specifically on Facebook pages and Twitter?

Shaykh al‘Allāmah ‘Ubayd al-Jābirī:

I say, pictures of living things with souls are ḥarām, and it is from the major sins. The messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: “The most severely punished people on the day of judgement will be the picture-makers.”

And he (صلى الله عليه وسلم) informed us that every picture (of living things with souls) the picture-maker made will be made an entity and he will be told to blow a soul into it (bring it to life) and surely he will not be able to do so. And hopefully Abū Ziyād will remind us about this [issue/question] at the next meeting, as the matter requires detailed explanation.

On that basis, it should be understood that it is impermissible to spread personal photos (“selfies”), whether it is spreading them on Twitter or on forums. Yes, the authorities, when they request pictures for specific reasons, like driving authorities (for example driver‘s license), security affairs (e.g. national security I.D. cards etc.), or government bodies that require everyone to hold individual identification documents etc., then this is in accordance to the degree of necessity or the degree of need, and one does not go beyond that [need].

Source: http://www.miraath.net

https://www.salaficentre.com/2016/04/selfies-as-profiles-pictures-on-twitter-and-facebook-shaykh-ubayd-answer

Nafizzey:
@bolded are you saying it is OK to fix my money into bank to get interest and then invest the accrued interest into charity course? Is it cool??

Don't banks gets client's approval before adding interest to their account?. I dont know how they operate there but most bank where i live MUST have my authorization before making that move. There is something they have to click like "agreement". Then you have the option to turn it down.

So i see my bank update and statement and it says "Interest Earn Year To date: $0.00"

However i do agree with bolded statement up there in case you are not given option to choose. Use the money as described

snapscore:
Salam alaykum

So something happened in class today and we ended up with divided opinion so I thought I would bring it here. Imagine a clinent/ patient wanted you as a HCP to make the cross sign or say the father son and holy spirit before doing a procedure to make them feel comfortable, would it be permissible in Islam to do it?

* I don't know if I should say my thoughts now or wait for answers*

cc: Abdelkabir Rabiushile04

https://islamqa.info/en/45200


To add to it, wherever a Muslim person maybe, be it work, school, market, etc let them know u av a firm stand On deen matters. I have Christian friends well n we joke, play etc but weN it comes to deen stuffs dey never engage me in it.

Y so U myt ask? first tym together u set ground rules n so on in a subtle way that will b understood by all Of them, even the so called secular muslims as regards B-Day msgs n oda bidia.

They myt at first feel like u r a fanatic or going extreme in deeny matters but wen dey see our jovial, friendly, playful etc weN u guys gist Or play In matters unrelated to deen. They get to understand that 'ahhh, Abu Sulaim is serious with his deen' etc except d fanatics among dem. Even if a new xtian comes later to join u guys thr, d ones already their wud tell dat person to back off weN he/she wants to go dat Lane.

And a very understanding Christian, who's good will take it quite well.

But if u r saying, sEbi it is just once dat u will do their biddng, my ukhtii, dat na iro nla O. They keep bringing new styles for U, u myt b oblivious abt it. Rasulullaah already said they want nothing more than mK muslims xtian n Jew.

Allaahu must'an.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvhg3PVeOkY

The Ruling On Disliking Polygamy/ The 'Allaamah Shaykh 'Abdul-'Azeez ibn Baaz


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Whh3742HDQ

What is the best way for women to give da’wah? – Shaykh al-Albaani
[40] Question: What is the best way for women to give da’wah?
Answer: I say to the women: “Remain in your homes.” [Surah Ahzaab: 33]
And you should not concern yourselves with da’wah. I reject the use of the word “da’wah” amongst the male youth by them making it seem like they are from the people of da’wah – as if the word da’wah has become the fashion of modern times. So every individual that knows something about the Religion becomes a Da’ee (caller to Islaam)! And this matter did not stop with the male youth until it was carried over to the female youth and housewives. And in many instances, they have begun to turn away from fulfilling the obligations of their households and their husbands and their children, turning away from these obligations towards something that is not obligatory upon them, such as establishing the da’wah.
The general rule concerning the woman is that she is to stay in her home. And it has not been legislated for her to leave it unless she has a dire need. This is based on the statement of the Prophet,sallAll
aahu ‘alayhi wa sallam: “And (praying in) their homes is better for them”, i.e. than the (congregational) prayer in the masjid.”
Today we see a prevalent phenomenon amongst the women in that they go out often to the masjids in order to pray the congregational prayer, not to mention the Jumu’ah prayer. In spite of this, their homes are better for them – unless there is a masjid in which the Imaam is a scholar who teaches those attending some aspects from the sciences of the Religion. So in this case, the woman could go out to pray in the masjid in order to listen to the knowledge. There is nothing preventing her from that. As for the woman preoccupying herself with the da’wah (!), then let her sit in her home and read from the books that her husband or brother or other male relatives provide for her.
Furthermore, there is nothing preventing her from setting a day in which she calls the women to come to her house or she goes out to attend the house of one of them. That is better than a group of women going out (to her). One woman going out to a group of women is better for them than all of them going out to her. As for her moving about and traveling, perhaps traveling without a mahram, and she justifies that by claiming that she went out for the purpose of da’wah, then these are from the presentday innovations. And I do not specify the women only with that, rather, even some of the male youth speak excessively about the da’wah and yet they have very little knowledge.
[Al-Asaalah, Issue #19]
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah)
From Al-Asaalah Magazine Issues 1-21, Translated and Arranged by: Isma’eel Alarcon

The Humility of Shaykh Al albani

He said " فانما انا طالب العلم لا شيئا"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFzTPHR3Ukk