Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,625 members, 7,813,054 topics. Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 at 05:48 AM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (193) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (985791 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (190) (191) (192) (193) (194) (195) (196) ... (667) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:44pm On Jun 25, 2017
JDAM-type PGM from drdo

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:48pm On Jun 25, 2017
test firing of DRDO Advanced Area Defence Endo-Atmospheric Interceptor Missile

it is capable of 35G maneuvers

it will most probably be the basis of XRSAM with 250km range under development

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:54pm On Jun 25, 2017
javelin type man portable ATGM under development "MPATGM"

it will have both "top attack" and "direct attack" capabilities with soft launch feature

it will operate on LOBL mode with passive IIR seeker

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:00am On Jun 26, 2017
.....

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:24am On Jun 26, 2017
storm shadow

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:02am On Jun 26, 2017
various types of Indian light field guns 105mm, these were designed in the 80s.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:12am On Jun 26, 2017
KALYANI upgrade of these Indian light field guns 105mm,with reduced weight ,soft recoil technology, digital fire control system etc

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 1:26am On Jun 26, 2017
I take the first! Mama mia would I be able to concentrate if she were in my section grin


nemesis2u can take the 2nd...I even added a 4 legged souvenir.. Am I not generous grin

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:34am On Jun 26, 2017
Odunayaw:
I take the first! Mama mia would I be able to concentrate if she were in my section grin


nemesis2u can take the 2nd...I even added a 4 legged souvenir.. Am I not generous grin

hehehe

the dogs mouth is very strategically positioned grin

lol i would not even dare think of it

1-2 cm vertical downward misplaced positioning of "my gun" and it will end up as dog food grin grin grin

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:53am On Jun 26, 2017
Belarusian T-72 BME

wondering whats on the ladies mind 2ndpic grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 2:07am On Jun 26, 2017
nemesis2u:


hehehe

the dogs mouth is very strategically positioned grin

lol i would not even dare think of it

1-2 cm vertical downward misplaced positioning of "my gun" and it will end up as dog food grin grin grin
grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 2:18am On Jun 26, 2017
Henry240:


There is this tracked IFV, Jake posted sometime back. It has the same guns as a BMP-4. Both the Chinese vehicle looked better protected with better mobility.

The J-10 is one fighter i wish everyday we went for. MBT-3000, as in VT-4 is a brilliant tank.

The HQ-9 is an S-300, so i read. The LY-80 can't remember the spelling, it's in service with Pakistan is also a brilliant SAM.

Ships, they build tons and tons of them, almost for fun. The Corvette sold to Algeria, the Type-056, and some very beautiful LPDs.
IMO i'd do a hard reset for our Armor-Tanks & IFVs

For ADS..gimme the skydragon 50 and I'd leave d mountain
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 2:20am On Jun 26, 2017
nemesis2u:
Belarusian T-72 BME

wondering whats on the ladies mind 2ndpic grin
Probably

if only I could ride this to the shopping mall..heck it would be a yard sale

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:26am On Jun 26, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X3-2qUwcCs

director of national intelligence US, however did not mention that they r alarmed becz it signifies Indian capability to deploy large number of MIRVs on their missiles and have them delivered accurately.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:04am On Jun 26, 2017
IAF C-17A

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 3:22am On Jun 26, 2017
Norinco BRM1 90 Laser guided rocket

Range - 8km

weight- 16.8kg

CX-1 cruise missile. Apparently nemesis2u must have pissed the Chinese off with the constant pictures of the brahmos grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:32am On Jun 26, 2017
not many know there was a time when Norway used to support insurgency in India especially the christian militant groups. they still do ,but limited in scope nowadays.

NSCIM militant group leadership used to operate from Norway, also surprise surprise LTTE was provided considerable support.

they also used to fund evangelist groups to convert Hindus etc

so in the 1980s Indian intel orgs got a small payback , they vanished a Norwegian cargo ship , loaded with Norwegian heavy water (used in nuclear reactors) from European waters.

the Norwegians were clueless at first but later satellite pics of an Indian salvage yard gave them hints to what might have transpired with their ship.

they went to ICJ against India , but nothing happened as there was no hard evidence only circumstantial ones .

what happened to the crew nobody knows ,maybe sea food ,but i aint shedding tears.

note: all this was not only limited to making cargo ships disappear ,their air cargoes used to vanish too lolzz

this is how to a small extent Norwegian interference in Indian state matters was curtailed

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:40am On Jun 26, 2017
Odunayaw:
Norinco BRM1 90 Laser guided rocket

Range - 8km

weight- 16.8kg

CX-1 cruise missile. Apparently nemesis2u must have pissed the Chinese off with the constant pictures of the brahmos grin

grin

anyways CX1 is different from brahmos , only the aesthetics grin grin are similar

its propulsion is a rocket engine unlike a ramjet engine in brahmos

i wonder why they went for the conical air intakes or any air intakes for the matter , given its zero need in a rocket engine propulsion based missile.

guess (pun intended and just my opinion) they wanted to market and sell it as a brahmos clone .
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:32am On Jun 26, 2017
Odunayaw:
grin grin

maybe...........approach from the back side of the lady wink grin


or since the girl is attractive (without the dog ), with a dog mouth restrainer maybe.......


grin grin grin


nah! back side doggy position grin approach is the best and safest option cool

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:50am On Jun 26, 2017
khukri in IA they r beautiful

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:21am On Jun 26, 2017
Bangladesh is reportedly looking into buying 8 MiG 35s in the first phase, unit cost pegged at 46 million dollar

using special $500 million line of credit to Bangladesh from India to enable it to strengthen its armed forces

i can understand financing afghan defense needs but why Bangladesh

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:43am On Jun 26, 2017
USS BunkerHill VLS Mk41 self-loading crane for VLS refill while at sea without the need of Fleet Replenishment Vessel

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:50am On Jun 26, 2017
Marlin Mk3 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:52am On Jun 26, 2017
Indian navy IL 38 SD carrying 2 Kh35 ASHM

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:06am On Jun 26, 2017
Filipino army fights (trolls grin ) ISIS with swag grin grin grin

cant really comment on the improvised Armour

but i am surely a fan of their sense of humor cool

some graffiti

mad max grin

free wifi

amour of god grin

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:11am On Jun 26, 2017
@newafricaken254

this is why i had my doubts..............

every MRAP has V shaped hull which deflects the blast force outwards or atleast tries to inorder to mitigate extensive hull damage.

that is why MRAPs tend to loose their suspension and tires in a IED blast,
unless a EFP based IED was used , which due to imperfect machining of the liner and due to loosing its energy via penetration of the hull would find it hard to inflict damage to the roof . plus EFP based IED blast effects r localized at point of impact only as it simply cuts through Armour , not blow doors and shatter the whole body/hull.

also i tried to google about the blast ,came up with non official twitter link only

u have photos of the surgical gloves and cloths etc on site ?

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:19pm On Jun 26, 2017
newafricaken254:
look at the floor panel,which direction does it show the explosion emanated from ?

noticed that but not 100% sure about it ,

anyways lets quit the topic

so u could be correct 99% grin

1% for my theory ,just to be safe grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:54pm On Jun 26, 2017
HUD .......

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:02pm On Jun 26, 2017
nemesis2u:
HUD .......

Yes, that HUD. Why that HUD instead of the types we see in the Rafale?

What advantages?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:27pm On Jun 26, 2017
Henry240:


Yes, that HUD. Why that HUD instead of the types we see in the Rafale?

What advantages?

why ?

lack of advance tech compared to what the french have (one of the reason maybe) grin

Indians had to start some where , so they started with the safest and mature option available with them inhouse, these r locally developed.

as i mentioned before in a similar query from u, HUD types r dictated mainly by what the designers want (or have at their disposal ) and its suitability with the systems / cockpit features onboard

some parameters

1.the FOV of the frontal cockpit directly facing the pilot
2.technology implemented via the collimation systems used
3.suitability of combiner supports
4.data projection (symbology) technology being implemented , and importantly aircraft's ability to generate and fuse relevant data together for feed to HUD with high fidelity.

etc

as for indian HUD advantage

it is locally made
it is affordable
suits the requirements

grin grin grin

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:43pm On Jun 26, 2017
nemesis2u:


why ?

lack of advance tech compared to what the french have (one of the reason maybe) grin

Indians had to start some where , so they started with the safest and mature option available with them inhouse, these r locally developed.

as i mentioned before in a similar query from u, HUD types r dictated mainly by what the designers want (or have at their disposal ) and its suitability with the systems / cockpit features onboard

some parameters

1.the FOV of the frontal cockpit directly facing the pilot
2.technology implemented via the collimation systems used
3.suitability of combiner supports
4.data projection (symbology) technology being implemented , and importantly aircraft's ability to generate and fuse relevant data together for feed to HUD with high fidelity.

etc

as for indian HUD advantage

it is locally made
it is affordable
suits the requirements

grin grin grin


Good, this is a more elaborate answer. Much better than the answer you provided in the past.

Moving on, the Iskander missile, I've read a bit on it, but what is it actually, what's it's blast radius and on what sort of targets can it be used?

Your opinion on the Iskander generally.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:04pm On Jun 26, 2017
Mig-29smt, Russian Air Force

I have never seen a Russian Mig-29 carry out an intercept, i wonder why this is?

(1) (2) (3) ... (190) (191) (192) (193) (194) (195) (196) ... (667) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 48
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.