Don't worry. I won't be bias. And you can count on me to be true to you.

I will present the merits and demerits of both phones' cameras.

Please understand that this is not a full review.

I am focusing on the cameras alone.

Well let's do this, shall we?

First up is Xiaomi Redmi Note 4...

One thing I like about the Note 4 camera is how it pays attention to colour details. Sometimes it feels like it overdoes it anyway...more like oversaturation.
Moreover, in low light, this camera performs well for a 13MPer.

I'm impressed.

The two pictures you see below are taken in broad daylight.

Please note that I did not tamper with both devices' settings.

I just snapped like that.

Okay, let's wait for the other contender before I comment

Dandsome:
Okay, let's wait for the other contender before I comment

what about infinix note 4 vs redmi note 4? camera

Up next is the Tecno Camon CX

I am impressed as well and I love the way the CX adds life to images, brings out colours and make stuff look finer than it is in real life.

Tecno's Camon CX does fantastically well in daylight, without flash.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 indoors..

1 without flash

2 with flash

Tecno Camon CX indoors...

1 without flash

2 with flash

We are here, Team MTK
I see my oga Gptech, dats why I call ur name

Camon CX sha

Freelancerx:
Camon CX sha

You better speak your mind...

spartacus11:
We are here, Team MTK
I see my oga Gptech, dats why I call ur name

Really?
So why do you like MTK?

I have always believed that Snapdragon is the best.
I still believe so.

But with the Snapdragon 625 processor on Note 4 and the MTK on Camon CX, I have caught myself saying "well, what's the hype all about sef?"

That said, I don't know whether it's because the Note 4 packs more battery life at 4100mah, while that of CX is 3200mah.
All I know is that the battery of Note 4 lasts longer than CX.

bigdot1759:

what about infinix note 4 vs redmi note 4? camera

You can start from here https://www.nairaland.com/3092803/xiaomi-thread/1458

spartacus11:
We are here, Team MTK
I see my oga Gptech, dats why I call ur name

Hahahahahahahaha, I go soon use Redmi note 4x battle ur Mi Max 2 .

buchito1:
Xiaomi won it for me

More crystal and matured

My winner would be the CX.

Ordinarily there would be no need for this comparison, camera specs wise.
because, the CX has greater megapixels.
But then, I have heard so much of how tecno's CX pales in comparison to Note 4, despite all that. So I really wanted to see stuff for myself and I can honestly say that I think otherwise. I do not really think of any as a winner. If any, then it would be by very slight margins.

I was given the impression that I would throw away Camon CX if I touch Note 4. I have to admit that Note 4 packs stuff that makes the device interesting. I still love my Camon CX none the less and there are reasons, cogent reasons why I would not trade it for a Xiaomi note 4.

There are also reasons why I would not trade Note 4 with CX.

So, for me, they are both great devices really. but I'm inclined to Love CX more.

From this review, I'll go with the cx. The pictures from the note for ain't bad either but I prefer that of the cx

MizMyColi:


Really?
So why do you like MTK?

I have always believed that Snapdragon is the best.
I still believe so.

But with the Snapdragon 625 processor on Note 4 and the MTK on Camon CX, I have caught myself saying "well, what's the hype all about sef?"

That said, I don't know whether it's because the Note 4 packs more battery life at 4100mah, while that of CX is 3200mah.
All I know is that the battery of Note 4 lasts longer than CX.

D day dey show me how SD does it better Dan MTK until den it is over hyped

Wen i use MTK na rough rider mode but My Mi Max 2 I Dey respect myself if I'm using it.

Gptech:

Hahahahahahahaha, I go soon use Redmi note 4x battle ur Mi Max 2 .

See come battle but shall My Max 2 i Dey carry am like egg, dats y I need u for Max 2 conner so I go get confidence dey do rough rider mode

I don't even like snapping pictures with Flash so I'm judging without flash and tbh they are both great, very close really, the CX tho has the edge for me because it's brighter and looks better.

MizMyColi:


My winner would be the CX.

Ordinarily there would be no need for this comparison, camera specs wise.
because, the CX has greater megapixels.
But then, I have heard so much of how tecno's CX pales in comparison to Note 4, despite all that. So I really wanted to see stuff for myself and I can honestly say that I think otherwise. I do not really think of any as a winner. If any, then it would be by very slight margins.

I was given the impression that I would throw away Camon CX if I touch Note 4. I have to admit that Note 4 packs stuff that makes the device interesting. I still love my Camon CX none the less and there are reasons, cogent reasons why I would not trade it for a Xiaomi note 4.

There are also reasons why I would not trade Note 4 with CX.

So, for me, they are both great devices really. but I'm inclined to Love CX more.

U na legend. Respect

MizMyColi:


My winner would be the CX.

Ordinarily there would be no need for this comparison, camera specs wise.
because, the CX has greater megapixels.
But then, I have heard so much of how tecno's CX pales in comparison to Note 4, despite all that. So I really wanted to see stuff for myself and I can honestly say that I think otherwise. I do not really think of any as a winner. If any, then it would be by very slight margins.

I was given the impression that I would throw away Camon CX if I touch Note 4.

Wrong, the reverse is the case, it was the Camon Cx that was overhyped for its camera, some even said its on par if not better than the iPhone 6. You are also wrong to say the CX should have a better camera because of its higher mega pixel, there are whole lots of factors that affect how good a camera will perform.
Even though people may think I am biased, the Redmi note 4 did better, it shot the cloud better without overexposing it like the Camon did, it also has more details from the indoor shots.

MizMyColi:
Up next is the Tecno Camon CX

I am impressed as well and I love the way the CX adds life to images, brings out colours and make stuff look finer than it is in real life.

Tecno's Camon CX does fantastically well in daylight, without flash.

Yet to see the bolded ooooo.

Plus, please do low light shots and also compare the front cameras please, this might explain the megapixel ish .

Csn somebody borrow madam her iPhone 8 plus, HTC U11 or Google pixel Xl 2 for camera comparison? I think they all have 12mp

Gptech:

Yet to see the bolded ooooo.

Plus, please do low light shots and also compare the front cameras please, this might explain the megapixel ish .

For those who know

Gptech:

Yet to see the bolded ooooo.

Plus, please do low light shots and also compare the front cameras please, this might explain the megapixel ish .

Lol
Will do so later.

Lemme eat

on behalf of all the xiaomites wey dey Nairaland

we no gree say the camera of xiaomi did over saturate.

where I come from in Mogadishu it's termed 'detailing'

buh that CX no bad Sha

MizMyColi:


Lol
Will do so later.

Lemme eat

Nr fail to use the food for the camera battle ooo, snap make we see .

Gptech:

Wrong, the reverse is the case, it was the Camon Cx that was overhyped for its camera, some even said its on par if not better than the iPhone 6. You are also wrong to say the CX should have a better camera because of its higher mega pixel, there are whole lots of factors that affect how good a camera will perform.
Even though people may think I am biased, the Redmi note 4 did better, it shot the cloud better without overexposing it like the Camon did, it also has more details from the indoor shots.

That's the beauty of opinions really. We can all have one.

So, I'd say in my opinion, after all said and done, I choose the CX as far as camera functionality is concerned.

Yes, the note 4 has this colour detail-ish about it, but it kyna makes the image dull.
There's this conservative feel, whereas, the CX adds more life and buoy to the photography.

You mentioned something about the clarity of the sky, and that's how I know that Note 4 Overcancels exposure to light rays, because in the picture I posted here, it would seem like it was going to rain at the time. But in reality, the sky was sunny, like you can't look up without feeling direct sun rays impact your eyes, but the note 4 did not depict.

About the megpixels, I did not say anywhere that CX should have a better cam, instead, what I said was that "specs wise" the MP of CX is greater than that of Note 4.

I have used a 2MP iphone front camera in broad dayight and I was amazed at the output quality.

I have complained on the overexposure ish on CX, but that not withstanding, I appreciate it for its vivid imagery.

Let's just accept that both cameras do have their apparent flaws and strengths.
So it's simple. if you love colors in a flamboyant, more expressive way, CX does it.
But if you love colours in a conservative manner, Note 4 kills it.

Gptech:

Nr fail to use the food for the camera battle ooo, snap make we see .

you want me snap to plain garri, abi?

I nuh cary the Note 4 come out.
I leave am for office. Na only my CX I carry comot.

princetom1:
Csn somebody borrow madam her iPhone 8 plus, HTC U11 or Google pixel Xl 2 for camera comparison? I think they all have 12mp

12mp too much sef.

Yu for reason 8mp for these devices you just mentioned.

What I can say is that 8mp iphone is same as 12mp android.

Too close to call. Let me goan see again

Let me take the last seat on the First page