itsme01:


you clearly dont know him if you think its because of just a woman he left british royal service, he has alway being a bad boy and a party hard guy he was not the ussual royal hypocrite, he has being cought partying with many naked women in las vegas and he is just not the uptight guy they wanted him to be..

For someone like you, you might think the British Royals have it easy.. but they dont they live a controlled , diplomatic life without freedom.. that is why Queen Victoria was said to be an Adict, and Charles a drunk.. Even Queen Elizabeths Father only got to the thrown because his brother King Edward intentionaly resigned from british monarchy to enjoy his private life and wealth


.

.

funmisticqueen2:
There's no point arguing with some kind of people especially those that have been brainwashed into something. Redpillerz are one example, Boko Haram is another.

@ the bolded, that thread was as a result of the wrong done against me in one thread. But when I was exonerated on that thread and my viewpoint proved right, those BOYS who were butthurt by my comment, refused to apologise. They were blindly siding with OP just because he has balls.
Since then, I couldn't be bothered just because a MAN or woman is socially akward, financially unstable or plain undesirable to the opposite sex. I won't coddle you when there are real people with real problems I can give a F**k about.

MajorWarren:


Have you seen her? I’d fly her out to wherever she wants if I was him.

And people keep referencing the divorce.... people divorce everyday b, this ain’t 1920.

MajorWarren:


Nah don’t get me wrong I get all of that, dunno if you’ve heard of AMS on YouTube, my guy still.

But cmon sometimes you just have to think and know when there’s unwarranted bias an vilification on a woman.

funmisticqueen2:
True, I actually don't support them leaving the royal family either, Harry has a very tough road ahead of him. I wish him the best.

But what I don't support is these masturbating incels opening a thread on top Meghan and Harry's matter. No matter how woke they are, Ubunja are Co are not even worthy to lick their boots, they can never be the man prince Harry is, them calling him a simp is from a place of self hate, spite and jealousy.

Learn to recognize your betters redpillerz

Kennedyiheme:
lol all those while he was being a bad boy, he didn't leave, he still stayed... till when she came in. Twist this all you want but she caused all this

MajorWarren:


He’s still set for life so it doesn’t matter. Dunno how people don’t get this. They’re basically ex royal celebrities so they’ll surely land any gig they want.
He still gets the royal family money. To me that’s a win win

itsme01:


guy the prince just said fvck the throne my niggar, i gotta ball hard.. dont worry you would soon see the real him after his retirement is accepted and he moves to US where he ussually hides to chop his life, or when you see him in Dubai choping life

Kennedyiheme:
he is royalty.. there are different roles in the British monarchical system.. it not about money, its about bloodline, history, legacy and loyalty... he left all that for a 36 year old
once divorced p*ussy

MajorWarren:


Prince Harry’s long time friend who happens to know Meghan organised a blind date for both of them. They met up again at a later date, went on more dates then he flew her out to Botswana.
Am I missing something?

Arthur21:

Wrong done against you?you gloated over someone in anguish because he was a male, who does that? A pro-man like myself will drop gender differences aside to sympathise with a lady that opens a thread.
Should the Op be right,and he wasn't proven wrong you will still have maintained your stand because of a a preconceived idea you have of men.
I remember the OP saying he didn't give facts but gave a representation of facts to protect his family identity. So when you people blatantly say he lied,I SMH.
That was an insensitive post of yours to be honest. It had nothing to do with whether he stated facts but because he was a male,that what why you made such statement.


There is nothing wrong in deciding to understand women and date from logic not love. That is the ultimate goal of redpill. However there are some misogynists among them who I don't support.
Likewise feminism,am engaged to a feminist,but one who believes men and women should have same rights but isn't a misandry that nags,shams and plays victim.
There will always be odds one in a movements that bring their personal beef and insecurities into it

funmisticqueen2:
it wasn't insensitive, and I wasn't gloating, but it was the plain truth.
And you are doing the same thing those other males were doing. Taking it personal.
A lot of people actually agreed with my comment, and many were male

Something was very wrong with the op's narrative and I called it out.

If a woman does something similar, I will call it out, for example, the thread where a girl destroys her older sisters relationship and makes her lose her job because of her NFA baby daddy. That was utter crap and I will never support that.

kokanepyramid:

She’s 38

funmisticqueen2:
it wasn't insensitive, but the plain truth, and you are doing the same thing those other males were doing. Taking not personal. A lot of people actually agreed with my comment, and many were male

Something was very wrong with op's narrative and I called it out.

If a woman does something similar, I will call it out, for example, the thread where a girl destroys her older sisters relationship and makes her lose her job. That was utter crap and I will never support that.

funmisticqueen2:
it wasn't insensitive, and I wasn't gloating, but it was the plain truth.
And you are doing the same thing those other males were doing. Taking it personal.
A lot of people actually agreed with my comment, and many were male

Something was very wrong with the op's narrative and I called it out.

If a woman does something similar, I will call it out, for example, the thread where a girl destroys her older sisters relationship and makes her lose her job because of her NFA baby daddy. That was utter crap and I will never support that.

Kennedyiheme:
ah there we go

kokanepyramid:

At bolder

The example is btwn two females, it doesn’t suffice

bukatyne:
Funny thread.

Most of the guys on this thread seek to fight the way it was from creation:

When a man genuinely loves a woman, he will do ANYTHING to please her and make her happy.

That is why the Bible teaches balance and says women should submit to their husbands. So you both are pleasing one another and putting yourselves first.

As per Harry & Meghan, I have not done much research.

However, I feel that
1. Meghan should have counted the cost of marrying into the royal family and be READY to abide to their idiosyncrasies which honestly would be only during official duties. I am sure they do not dictate how she has her bath or what cour to paint her room.

2. Meghan leaving movies, marrying the prince, them leaving the prince hood and she going back to her movies sound like a game plan to me. No matter how 'rebellious' Harry is, he was breed for a certain type of life and discarding it all seems somehow. Already, he was the 6th in line or so therefore, the royal office Must have cut him some slack.

3. I hope he really investigated why Meghan divorced the first time and working towards preventing it. Let's also hope Meghan is not the fickle 'irreconcilable differences so divorce' kind of woman.

It would be a shame for Harry to give so much up and end up a broken, lonely man.

Arthur21:
exactly,any stuff between a male and female funmisticqueen2 declares the man wrong.except when its a female and female she brings in her logic. Infact even between two females she will tend to support the one who is pro-woman and not give her support based on logic.

kokanepyramid:

At bolded

The example is btwn two females, it doesn’t suffice

Arthur21:

You didn't call the awkwardness in his thread out. Asking for details or inquiring from his wife perspective is calling out suspicion and not telling him to hand over his pants to his wife.

I didn't even comment on that thread.
In the thread of a lady destroying her sister,I know what you did. You called out the lady because you were angry she held her man tight and wasn't like you that have issues with dating a broke man. Your calling her out wasn't because of what she did to her blood,but the sight of a woman supporting /standing by a man who isn't rich triggers you.

Let's agree to disagree

posty56:
oga then u never love woman before,i swear if u like woman u go do anything to pls am,?note i am not an alpha male or a weak man i am just telling fact,at first u go they feel like strong man but love go mellow u

ubunja:
it's the Garden of Eden all over again. A Royal gives up everything for a woman.

You would think the cautionary tale of Adam's error in choosing woman over throne would be enough, but no! Here is a royal making the same exact mistake. Choosing woman over throne. Smh.

Its sad, but more and more simps are coming. Those who want to be saved will be saved. But most won't. True, the Red Pill will reach everyone but truth has never been popular on this planet.

Arthur21:

You didn't call the awkwardness in his thread out. Asking for details or inquiring from his wife perspective is calling out suspicion and not telling him to hand over his pants to his wife.

I didn't even comment on that thread.
In the thread of a lady destroying her sister,I know what you did. You called out the lady because you were angry she held her man tight and wasn't like you that have issues with dating a broke man. Your calling her out wasn't because of what she did to her blood,but the sight of a woman supporting /standing by a man who isn't rich triggers you.

Let's agree to disagree

funmisticqueen2:
what of this thread, my support is definitely with prince Harry, who is being bullied on this thread and can't defend himself here.

Keep obfuscicating facts to push your narrative. That's what you seem good for anyways.

bukatyne:
Funny thread.

Most of the guys on this thread seek to fight the way it was from creation:

When a man genuinely loves a woman, he will do ANYTHING to please her and make her happy.

That is why the Bible teaches balance and says women should submit to their husbands. So you both are pleasing one another and putting yourselves first.

As per Harry & Meghan, I have not done much research.

However, I feel that
1. Meghan should have counted the cost of marrying into the royal family and be READY to abide to their idiosyncrasies which honestly would be only during official duties. I am sure they do not dictate how she has her bath or what cour to paint her room.

2. Meghan leaving movies, marrying the prince, them leaving the prince hood and she going back to her movies sound like a game plan to me. No matter how 'rebellious' Harry is, he was breed for a certain type of life and discarding it all seems somehow. Already, he was the 6th in line or so therefore, the royal office Must have cut him some slack.

3. I hope he really investigated why Meghan divorced the first time and working towards preventing it. Let's also hope Meghan is not the fickle 'irreconcilable differences so divorce' kind of woman.

It would be a shame for Harry to give so much up and end up a broken, lonely man.

Arthur21:
lol...are you sure you are smart? Your intent in saving Harry was because he did this for a woman. If harry made a choice for himself against her wish(a non-sacrificial choice) will you come defend him as having right to a choice?
If a female decides to sacrifice for her man like he did will you support her as having the right to her choice or you will tag her pickmesha? When a man is the giver/helper you respect his choice. When a woman is the giver/helper you bully her and call her pickmesha. Look at your crystal clear hypocrisy....SMH

Omar09:


Are you serious? Like this shit is happening?

Arthur21:
wow,so you suddenly believe people opinion should be respected now without calling them names because i am serving you a bowl of the broth you dish out? How about when you call guys broke,and dish out unsavory comments about them for their opinions?or when you call ladies that don't agree with you shera7en word "pickmesha" ? Now you don't want to be called names?

I have always suspected you have a dual personality. At times you take a break and become humane towards others and the next minute you are gloating over someone, I almost sheds tears when I saw your new year thread of suicide and then days later you took on a maleficent personality.

Its all cool though. I respect you for one thing,you are not the type to keep malice and hold up to grudge. Cheers though!, I pray this current personality of yours last long

funmisticqueen2:
ARE YOU REALLY SURE HE DID THIS FIR MEGHAN?

It's the royal family, there's more to what we see, or what media potrays at us.

Growing up in the royal family is not faint of heart or simps as you called it.

Megan decided to sacrifice her comfort zone of an acting career to marry into the murky waters of the royal family, where there's plot within plot threatening your life and sanity. I wasn't happy with that.

Belafonte:


It’s not a dual personality. It’s the typical feminine manipulative tactics she uses along with generous utilisation of gaslighting. You have to understand that manipulation is a wonderful weapon.