5solas's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 5solas's Profile › 5solas's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 34 pages)
An2elect2:Thanks. As you have observed most Protestants do not know what Luther and the other reformers preached. How I wish most know for example that Luther took more than 300 pages to show that ''freewill'' does not exist in ''The Bondage of the Will''. During Luther's time the false doctrine that salvation can be lost (Arminianism) was not in existence. Most people assume Calvinism (the view that salvation cannot be lost) is more recent, but how wrong they are! |
An2elect2:It is good for believers to know what they believe. Is it Roman Catholic or Protestant. These are the dominant school of thoughts.Reformed churches are churches which are Protestant and their belief on predestination is here set out. It is disheartening that most Protestant Churches now teach what is at variance with their creeds.The average Protestant does not know about predestination, even argues against it, holding forth ''freewill'' one of the errors of the Roman Catholic Church which the early reformers proved to be a lie. God ordains all that come to pass (Rom. 13:1,2) evil rulers or good rulers,good or evil.And for all that, he is not responsible for the sin of the wicked. We don't accuse God to be responsible for the sins of those who crucified Christ even though He ordained the crucifixion . (Acts 2 ) 22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:Acts 4 24 And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: And further, "Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions; yet hath He not decreed any thing because He foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions." This doctrine of Predestination represents the purpose of God as absolute and unconditional, independent of the whole finite creation, and as originating solely in the eternal counsel of His will. God is seen as the great and mighty King who has appointed the course of nature and who directs the course of history even down to its minutest details. His decree is eternal, unchangeable, holy, wise, and sovereign. It extends not merely to the course of the physical world but to every event in human history from the creation to the judgment, and includes all the activities of saints and angels in heaven and of reprobates and demons in hell. It embraces the whole scope of creaturely existence, through time and eternity, comprehending at once all things that ever were or will be in their causes, conditions, successions, and relations. Everything outside of God Himself is included in this all-embracing decree, and that very naturally since all other beings owe their existence and continuance in existence to His creative and sustaining power. It provides a providential control under which all things are hastening to the end of God's determining; and the goal is, "One far-off divine event Toward which the whole creation moves. Since the finite creation through its whole range exists as a medium through which God manifests His glory, and since it is absolutely dependent on Him, it of itself could originate no conditions which would limit or defeat the manifestation of that glory.Amen! Nothing happens by chance! God not only has control over man , He has control over animals, plants and non-living things-rains,floods,volcanoes, earthquakes,e.t.c He determined before time what shall be and how far there are to extend. Amos 3 6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?Job 38 8 Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb? From all eternity God has purposed to do just exactly what He is doing. He is the sovereign Ruler of the universe and "does according to His will in the army of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay His hand, or say unto Him, What doest thou?" Daniel 4:35. Since the universe had its origin in God and depends on Him for its continued existence it must be, in all its parts and at all times, subject to His control so that nothing can come to pass contrary to what He expressly decrees or permits. Thus the eternal purpose is represented as an act of sovereign predestination or foreordination, and unconditioned by any subsequent fact or change in time. Hence it is represented as being the basis of the divine foreknowledge of all future events, and not conditioned by that foreknowledge or by anything originated by the events themselves.Amen!!!!!!! Have you been deceived to overlook predestination whenever/wherever you see it in the Bible? Reconsider it. Is predestination unfair? What about grace? Any interpretation of the Bible (especially as it pertains to salvation) that does not take into account the fact that there is predestination is totally flawed. Thanks An2elect2 for energizing me. ![]() |
KingEbukasBlog:Jude 4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Peter 2:8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed. |
KingEbukasBlog:'Freewill ' is the most subtle lie . |
An2elect2:So true! Which calls for patience and prayers. |
An2elect2:Nice one! My greatest shock is how he or anyone else can argue salvation can be lost from Philippians 3! It is so anti-work (for salvation ). |
An2elect2:Thanks so much for the question. No, it is for believers. Though if it is warranted, it can be explained to them. For example, if an unbeliever has heard about it and asks to know the Bible's position,the child of God must not flinch at all in their answer.The truth breaks and heals. It can offend them temporary and later be the means God uses to save them. It can also offend permanently , but in that case the believer has done their job faithfully. The outcome of our labours depends on our God and not us. Also to be noted is that this doctrine strikes at the root of ''freewill '' which is the direct opposite of predestination. The sooner the sinner knows that their salvation is not in their hands to turn on and off like a light bulb, as they please, the better for them. Predestination of course is comprised of two parts- election and reprobation . Election is the choice of certain persons unto everlasting life by God before the foundation of the world. Not because of their merits but for His own purpose and grace .Reprobation is God’s passing by of certain persons and leaving them in their sins. Yes! There is not only an election of persons unto salvation there is also a bypass of persons by God. John Wesley said he would have believed the doctrine of election if it did not imply predestination.Half of his heresies have not been told. The early Protestants however believed in both and their writings give witness to this. Election is a very comforting doctrine for believers and it ought to be taught to them . What if it is done during the church service? What if it is done in a bible study or Sunday school? How can we be sure we will not have an unbeliever present ? And must we teach it in a corner? Thus to teach election we must also be ready to teach reprobation, as far as it is warranted. For reprobation see Jude 4 and 1 Peter 2:8. It is not only implied by election but affirmed by the Bible. |
An2elect2: ![]() |
menxer: ![]() It is not derailed though. @An2elect Make your comments on the chapter and let's move on. The focus should be on the book! |
An2elect2:The author defines his purpose.He is not saying anything new. Only to give witness that Calvinism-the system that affirms salvation CANNOT be lost is TRUE!Another name for it, he says, is the Reformed Faith.This is the faith of the reformers. They didn't believe salvation could be lost.Calvinism is also synonymous with,"Once Saved, Always Saved",the doctrine of the "Perseverance of the Saints", "Eternal Security", the "Doctrine of Grace, e.t.c The doctrine of Predestination receives comparatively little attention in our day and it is very imperfectly understood even by those who are supposed to hold it most loyally. It is a doctrine, however, which is contained in the creeds of most evangelical churches and which has had a remarkable influence both in Church and State. The official standards of the various branches of the Presbyterian and Reformed Churches in Europe and America are thoroughly Calvinistic. The Baptist and Congregational Churches, although they have no formulated creeds, have in the main been Calvinistic if we may judge from the writings and teachings of their representative theologians. The great free church of Holland and almost all the churches of Scotland are Calvinistic. The Established Church of England and her daughter, the Episcopal Church of America, have a Calvinistic creed in the Thirty-nine Articles. The Whitefield Methodists in Wales to this day bear the name of "Calvinistic Methodists." Among the past and present advocates of this doctrine are to be found some of the world's greatest and wisest men. It was taught not only by Calvin, but by Luther, Zwingli, Melanchthon (although Melanchthon later retreated toward the Semi-Pelagian position), by Bullinger, Bucer, and all of the outstanding leaders in the Reformation. While differing on some other points they agreed on this doctrine of Predestination and taught it with emphasis. Luther's chief work, "The Bondage of the Will," shows that he went into the doctrine as heartily as did Calvin himself. He even asserted it with more warmth and proceeded to much harsher lengths in defending it than Calvin ever did. And the Lutheran Church today as judged by the Formula of Concord holds the doctrine of Predestination in a modified form. The Puritans in England and those who early settled in America, as well as the Covenanters in Scotland and the Huguenots in France, were thorough-going Calvinists; and it is little credit to historians in general that this fact has been so largely passed over in silence. This faith was for a time held by the Roman Catholic Church, and at no time has that church ever openly repudiated it. Augustine's doctrine of Predestination set against him all the half-hearted elements in the Church and arrayed him against every man who belittled the sovereignty of God. He overcame them, and the doctrine of Predestination entered the belief of the universal Church. The great [b][/b]majority of the creeds of historic Christendom have set forth the doctrines of Election, Predestination, and final Perseverance, as will readily be seen by any one who will make even a cursory study of the subject. On the other hand Arminianism existed for centuries only as a heresy on the outskirts of true religion, and in fact it was not championed by an organized Christian church until the year 1784, at which time it was incorporated into the system of doctrine of the Methodist Church in England.The writer asserts that the doctrine of predestination is given so little attention (in his day). It is even less so now. He asserts the importance of this doctrine which the early reformers were all at one with though they had their disagreements.He states that it was in the creeds of all Protestants. It is in the creeds still of some churches which teach against Calvinism. The creeds of the early Protestants was Calvinistic. In contrast to Calvinism, Armnianism existed as a heresy for centuries! Arminianism is the view that a believer CAN lose salvation. It existed for centuries as a heresy! It was not championed by an organised church until 1784!Imagine that! The great theologians of history, Augustine, Wycliffe, Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Zanchius, Owen, Whitefield, Toplady, and in more recent times Hodge, Dabney, Cunningham, Smith, Shedd, Warfield, and Kuyper, held this doctrine and taught it with force. That they have been the lights and ornaments of the highest type of Christianity will be admitted by practically all Protestants. Furthermore, their works on this great subject have never been answered.All notable Christians believed in Predestination and were Calvinistic in their theology. Then, too, when we stop to consider that among nonChristian religions Mohammedanism has so many millions who believe in some kind of Predestination, that the doctrine of Fatalism has been held in some form or other in several heathen countries, and that the mechanistic and deterministic philosophies have exerted such great influences in England, Germany, and America, we see that this doctrine is at least worthy of careful study. From the time of the Reformation up until about one hundred years ago these doctrines were boldly set forth by the great majority of the ministers and teachers in the Protestant churches; but today we find far the greater majority holding and teaching other systems. It is only rarely that we now come across those who can be called "Calvinists without reserve." We may quite appropriately apply to our own churches the words of Toplady in regard to the Church of England: "Time has been when the Calvinistic doctrines were considered and defended as the Palladium of our Established Church; by her bishops and clergy, by the universities, and the whole body of the laity. It was (during the reigns of Edward VI, Queen Elizabeth, James I, and the greater part of Charles I) as difficult to meet with a clergyman who did not preach the doctrines of the Church of England, as it is now to find one who does. We have generally forsaken the principles of the Reformation, and Ichabod, or 'the glory is departed,' has been written on most of our pulpits and church-doors ever since." [Preface to Zanchius' Predestination, p. 16.] The tendency in our enlightened age is to look upon Calvinism as a worn-out and obsolete creed. At the beginning of his splendid article on "The Reformed Faith in the Modern World," Prof. F. E. Hamilton says, "It seems to be tacitly assumed by a large number of people in the Presbyterian Church today that Calvinism has been outgrown in religious circles. In fact, the average church member, or even minister of the gospel, is inclined to look upon a person who declares that he believes in Predestination, with a glance of amused tolerance. It seems incredible to them that there should exist such an intellectual curiosity as a real Calvinist, in an age of enlightenment like the present. As for seriously examining the arguments for Calvinism, the idea never enters their heads. It is deemed as out of date as the Inquisition, or the idea of a fiat world, and is looked upon as one of the fantastic schemes of thought that men held before the age of modern science." Because of this present day attitude toward Calvinism, and because of the general lack of information concerning these doctrines, we regard the subject of this book as one of great importance. It was Calvin who wrought out this system of theological thought with such logical clearness and emphasis that it has ever since borne his name. He did not, of course, originate the system but only set forth what appeared to him to shine forth so clearly from the pages of Holy Scripture. Augustine had taught the essentials of the system a thousand years before Calvin was born, and the whole body of the leaders of the Reformation movement taught the same. But it was given to Calvin with his deep knowledge of Scripture, his keen intellect and systematizing genius, to set forth and defend these truths more clearly and ably than had ever been done before. We call this system of doctrine "Calvinism," and accept the term "Calvinist" as our badge of honor; yet names are mere conveniences. "We might," says Warburton, "quite as appropriately, and with equally as much reason, call gravitation 'Newtonism,' because the principles of gravitation were first dearly demonstrated by the great philosopher Newton. Men had been fully conversant with the facts of gravitation for long ages before Newton was born. These facts had indeed been visible from the first days of creation, inasmuch as gravitation was one of the laws which God ordained for the governing of the universe. But the principles of gravitation were not fully known, and the far-reaching effects of its power and influence were not understood until they were discovered by Sir Isaac Newton. So, too, was it with what men call Calvinism. The inherent principles of it had been in existence for long ages before Calvin was born. They had indeed been visible as patent factors in the world's history from the time of man's creation. But inasmuch as it was Calvin who first formulated these principles into a more or less complete system, that system, or creed, if you will, and likewise those principles which are embodied in it, came to bear his name." [Calvinism, p. 2.] We may add further that the names Calvinist, Lutheran, Puritan, Pilgrim, Methodist, Baptist, and even the name Christian, were originally nicknames. But usage has established their validity and their meaning is well understood. The quality which gave such force to Calvin's teaching was his close adherence to the Bible as an inspired and authoritative book. He has been referred to as preeminently the biblical theologian of his age. Where the Bible led, there he went; where it failed him, there he stopped short. This refusal to go beyond what is written, coupled with a ready acceptance of what the Bible did teach, gave an air of finality and positiveness to his declarations which made them offensive to his critics. Because of his keen insight and power of logical development he has often been referred to as merely a speculative theologian. That he was a speculative genius of the first order is, of course, not to be denied; and in the cogency of his logical analysis he possessed a weapon which made him terrible to his enemies. But it was not on these gifts that he depended primarily when forming and developing his theological system. Calvin's active and powerful intellect led him to sound the depths of every subject which he touched. In his investigations about God and the plan of redemption he went very far, penetrating into mysteries concerning which the average man seldom if ever dreams. He brought to light a side of Scripture which had as yet been very much in the shade and stressed those deep truths which in the ages preceding the Reformation had comparatively escaped notice in the Church. He brought to light forgotten doctrines of the apostle Paul, and fastened them in their full and complete sense upon one great branch of the Christian Church. This doctrine of Predestination has perhaps raised a greater storm of opposition, and has doubtless been more misrepresented and caricatured, than any other doctrine in the Scriptures. "To mention it before some," says Warburton, "is like shaking the proverbial red flag before an enraged bull. It arouses the fiercest passions of their nature, and brings forth a torrent of abuse and calumny. But, because men have fought against it, or because they hate it, or perhaps misunderstand it, is no reasonable or logical cause why we should turn the doctrine adrift, or cast it behind our backs. The real question, the all-important question, is not: How do men receive it? but, Is it true?" [Calvinism, p. 23.] One reason why many people, even supposedly educated people, are so quick to reject the doctrine of Predestination is because of pure ignorance of what the doctrine really is and of what the Bible teaches in regard to it. This ignorance is not at all surprising when one considers the almost complete lack of Bible training in our day. A careful study of the Bible would convince many people that it is a very different book than they assume it to be. The tremendous influence which this doctrine has exerted in the history of Europe and America should at least entitle it to a respectful hearing.He goes on to commend Calvin for his work on predestination. He also notes rhat Calvinism is not about Calvin but the gospel. |
An2elect2:Pelagians, Semi-Pelagians (Arminians ) and Open Theists will never interprete this verse correctly,65 as well.. John 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. |
JMAN05:The most important question is, does the scripture teach predestination? Even the predestination of the non-elects? Consider the verses below: Jude. 4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.. 1 Peter 2:8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed. |
JMAN05:Thanks for your comments. It would have thrilled me to see you answer John 6:44,45 . Rather than do that you jumped to John 6:45! It is clear from the context God draws whom He wills just as He quickens whom He wills not as a result of our MERIT. For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.John 5:21 . So ''drawing'' is a gift of His grace, not a reward for our efforts ![]() Modified. Thanks for your comments. It would have thrilled me to see you answer John 6:44,65 . Rather than do that you jumped to John 6:45! |
menxer:Those who are saved where predestined to be saved and believe in time. |
Splinz:Could God have justly condemned all men as a result of Adams sin? Was He under obligation to save ALL men? Would He be unjust if He decided to save SOME and not ALL? |
menxer:Whoever believes in time was preordained. We can cast predestination aside as is being done in most Churches and be faithful in our preaching. I t is directly opposed to freewill. In chapter 2 of the book, I believe, we will have a better rendering of it.This is an introduction! |
menxer:Can you know for sure a person is born again? Whoever is born again was predestinated. Did you not read Paul talking of vessels of wrath fitted for destruction? Did you not read of God consoling Paul and telling him to abide in a city because He has much people there? |
menxer:The doctrine of predestination was taught by Christ' himself, why should it pose a problem to His gospel? Read John 6:44,65, John 10 and 17. Jesus continously talked of those GIVEN to Him and of His ''sheep'' and of those who could not hear His Word because they were not His ''sheep''. He also declared that it took the ''drawing '' of the Father for anyone to come to Him . Read also Matthew 11:25-27. |
menxer:It doesn't! Paul knew there were some chosen for salvation (the elects, 2 Th.2:13 ) but he didn't know whom they were , so he preached the message to all. He endured hardness for their sakes (not for all!) Even though he didn't know them. Reformed theologians such as Calvin, Luther, Knox, Thomas Cranmer, in short or Protestants before the scorge of Arminianism did the same. In modern times William Carey is a notable example. Arminianism is the belief that Salvation can be lost. It was alien and is to the teachings of the Reformers. The Arminian break from Protestantism in the early parts of the 17th century was the first break ever from Protestantism. 2. I can't understand what you mean by safely ''saved'' nor can I understand how someone can be saved if they were predestinated for death. |
''This doctrine of Predestination has perhaps raised a greater storm of opposition, and has doubtless been more misrepresented and caricatured, than any other doctrine in the Scriptures. "To mention it before some," says Warburton, "is like shaking the proverbial red flag before an enraged bull. It arouses the fiercest passions of their nature, and brings forth a torrent of abuse and calumny. But, because men have fought against it, or because they hate it, or perhaps misunderstand it, is no reasonable or logical cause why we should turn the doctrine adrift, or cast it behind our backs. The real question, the all-important question, is not: How do men receive it? but, Is it true?" [Calvinism, p. 23.] One reason why many people, even supposedly educated people, are so quick to reject the doctrine of Predestination is because of pure ignorance of what the doctrine really is and of what the Bible teaches in regard to it. This ignorance is not at all surprising when one considers the almost complete lack of Bible training in our day. A careful study of the Bible would convince many people that it is a very different book than they assume it to be. The tremendous influence which this doctrine has exerted in the history of Europe and America should at least entitle it to a respectful hearing. Furthermore, we submit that according to all the laws of reason and logic a person has no right to deny the truth of a doctrine without first having studied in an unprejudiced manner the evidence on both sides.'' |
menxer:The bolded always gladens my heart. |
Splinz:Why this may be true, the idea of predestination is in virtually every page of the Bible. Almost every where you see the words ''ordain(s)'', ''ordained'', ''appoint(s)'',''appointed'' e.t.c, you will see the idea there. So, we must certainly admit that the word is in the Bible. It is only its meaning that is still in question. Let’s read the four verses and then return to them for explanation.So true! The first two places are in Ephesians 1:4-5 and 1:11-12: “According as He has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption [Greek: sonship] of children by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will…In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of Him who works all things after the counsel of His own will: That we should be to the praise of His glory, who first trusted in Christ.”The bolded is painful to read and very misleading.The obvious conclusion rather is that some persons have been chosen for salvation before time began and such persons must necessarily pass through the five steps listed above and cannot but be saved. When did God decide to call those who are alive in this age?Again your post is misleading. You rightfully answered the question when God decided to call us in this age-it was from eternity.How does the purpose of His call affect the time of His call or the call itself that instead of bringing in the purpose of His call to support the call, you are using it to diminish the force of the call? How can you admit that certain persons are predestinated to the purpose of becoming sons of God by Ephesians 1:5,11 and yet none are predestined to be saved?This is pure sophistry! Carefully notice verse 12 and the phrase “being predestinated…That we should be to the praise of His glory, who first trusted in Christ.” Paul is recording the fact that God is harvesting a few “firstfruits” now—of those “who first trusted in Christ.” The world will come second, but a few are being called and trained now to be first in God’s plan! This is an amazing and wonderful understanding. Do you grasp it? Can you see the potential within this understanding for how God might use you?Don't let the word ''first'' trip you.The essential part of this verse is that we should be to the praise of His glory who are presently in Christ. As such, anyone who has believed should be assured he was predestinated to that purpose.The predestination is the cause of the belief not the belief the cause of the predestination. Romans 8 requires some further explanation. It actually describes five separate steps or stages as God works with a Christian from the very beginning all the way to the completion of his salvation. To “foreknow” just means to know before. There is nothing mysterious in the word and, of course, God did know us before we knew Him. At some point in God’s examination and foreknowing of any single person, He predestines, or determines, that person to be “called.” When God’s predetermined time arrives, He calls the person. The person now comes to know who God is (remember, God “foreknew” him, knew him before the one called was aware) because He is revealing Himself during the calling process. If a person responds to the call, and is converted, then that one becomes “justified”—forgiven of his sin and made just before God. Likewise, if the person continues to yield to God throughout his or her life, it will lead to “glorification”—salvation. These are the five steps describing how God works with each person—foreknow, predestine, call, justify and glorify.Again a very misleading post! Romans 8:28-30 is a reference to believers, NOT the world. There is no getting round the fact that not everyone was chosen in eternity. Those chosen in eternity are called in time, justified and will be certainly glorified . Therefore, the subject of predestination has nothing whatsoever to do with being saved or lost, but with being called. More specifically, it has to do with those who are called FIRST.Totally false! So then, God decided long ago (“before the world began”) to call a group, over a 6,000-year period, to be trained to rule with Christ. He did not know their names in advance or He would have had to cause all of the fornication, rape, incest and interracial marriage that, to a certain degree, would have been involved in the 6,000 years of events required to produce any particular person. God determined to call the weak, foolish, base and despised of this world to “confound the wise…[and the] mighty” that God will call later (I Cor. 1:26-29).Lol. Nothing in the contexts of 1 Cor. 1:26-29 suggests that the ''wise and mighty'' would be called later. The bolded is sad indeed as already observed by menxer. |
michaelwestern:The bolded, is your own deduction.It is faulty. Paul said the same thing and yet urged preaching. Preaching is needful firstly, because we are commanded to preach. Secondly, it is the means by which God saves those whom He has chosen (the elects). 2 Tim.2 10 Therefore I endure all things for the elect's sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory. This is a very dangerous doctrine and surprisingly am hearing it for the first time.It was the teaching of the reformers. This is why they were so hated. |
An2elect2:Thanks. Reading! |
An2elect2:Thanks An2elect. I am excited. I will be posting later. We should have a reading plan, say a chapter a week which may be posted. Thereafter observations, comments, questions can be asked . Who was Loraine Boettner? |
freeradical:I hope one day you will be so ashamed of the above, you will delete it. You are appealing to sentiments and aligning yourself to popular belief while you ignore the word of God. Did the choice of the Israelites over the other nations make God unfair? Did the choice of Jesus disciples make God unfair? The choice of Saul? The healing of the Syrian Naaman? The feeding of the widow at Zarephath? (Lk 4:26) If your answer is ''no'', then why would He be unfair to choose anyone for salvation? We read in Ephesians 1:3-5 that He chose us before the foundation of the world. It follows that any who are in faith are of that number of persons so chosen. For more on this read Acts 2:47;13:48; John 6:44,45;10:26;17:2,6,9-12,24; 2 Th 2:13 e.t.c See why I say you guys should look up to the teaching body of the Church to guide your interpretation of sacred Scripture. God's omniscient nature is the reason behind those passages you guys are misconstruing for predestination. When we say God is omniscient it's because he exists outside time. So he knows the end even from the beginning. In the end he has seen it all play out and this inspired the writings we hold sacred as scripture.We don't need that when we have verses so clear: Romans 8 28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.Those called according to His purpose are foreknown, predestinated,called (in time), justified and glorified. Of course the glorification is future but certain. Everything that is written exists in time. So God knows about it. This doesn't mean he directly interferes with our choices. He respects them so much that he made us masters of our own destinies. If u deceive yourself that because u think u were chosen and you fail to live justly u will suffer the loss of your soul.The delusion ''freewill'' gives its adherents is obvious from the bolded. We are chosen to be holy. Saved to show forth God's good works. This is not in contention. Focus on ''freewill''! So let's be Wise and pray to God for the strength to follow him all the way to the end, trusting not in our own righteousness but in his bountiful, merciful and awesome saving power.Lol at the bolded. You are correct here but glaringly inconsistent with the rest of your post. Why should we not trust in that which makes us ''masters of our own destinies''. I avow that it is worthy of worship! Lol. God bless you allGod bless you! |
ichuka:That's good! I will do that, by His grace. |
ichuka:Precisely my point. Those that come are those GIVEN to Him. Those GIVEN to Him are drawn to Him (the incentive ) . John6:44,65. Good to hear from you bro. Ichuka. |
Julivas:Unfortunately all of them are not given this incentive. So the assumption does not hold. What is clear is that all who grab the opportunity will always be of that 60%. |
Julivas:The assumption is non-existent. In this anology you will find that all who ''grab'' the opportunity are all who had the incentives. Romans 8 |
CandidSeeker:You ignore the fact that God chose from eternity all those who presently are in faith. |
Julivas:To attempt to match your anology closer to what Christ did, let us suppose this wealthy man, for this 60% that took his offer up, provided incentives for this 60% (and them alone) that made it inevitable that they would take up his offer. |
Thank you 5Solas. Glory to our Lord and Sovereign God!!!