Aca77's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Aca77's Profile › Aca77's Posts
Funny thread. Busted indeed. But for real I think any girl would cooperate anywhere with a 'buster' that catches her fancy - maybe one that is goodlooking, cool, attractive, rich or whatever. She knows she might never see him again if she plays hard to get and fails to exchange numbers with him. There are always double standards in life. That a girl doesn't respond to one guy at a bus stop does not mean that she wouldn't respond to a different kind of guy at the same busy bus stop. It all depends on the guy, and perhaps the girl's mood on a particular day. |
You would hear some girls say they like a guy that has 'swag', you would hear guys brag that with their 'swag' they can get any girl they want. Even girls also claim to have their own 'swag' too. But nobody bothers to explain the main elements of this so-called swag or swagger. The term is now so vague. Please my people, what is SWAG? ? ? |
Why not just marry someone in the same class as youSo Eva Longoria and Tony Parker are not in the same "class"? So Mark Zuckerberg should marry Oprah Winfrey just to have peace of mind that one blood sucking thing would not dupe him off the fortune his brain and hard work earned him? You women have to show that you have some sense in your skulls. Make the gender equality crusade real by demonstrating you can actually reason. Otherwise the moderators could as well lock this darn thread. Lets call it a day. |
it is not my fault if anyone chooses to reason at a simplistic level or derail arguement from the main micro points from which it all started. I read philosophy and so I am trained to argue laterally. Nekai:If you refused to sleep with him or be attracted to him ab initio at that point, then that would make you a truly decent girl - which is my point. But if, despite all his so-called bragging, you still fell for him (or his money), with the vain hope that he would or should stick to you alone, then your so-called decency would only be superficial, and therefore false. That is essentially my whole point with Mr. Brown jay, I wonder why it is turning to one thing two things. some of us have been around and we talk reality that happens: i.e. What IS, not what OUGHT to be. Forget few exceptions here and there, we are talking about overwhelming majority. If a super rich young man chooses to be faithful to one girl, it is a rare occurence, a 5% case, and in any case it is HIS choice. It is unrealistic for a so-called decent girl to EXPECT such a guy to be faithful to her alone. If she has any sense at all, she would know ab initio that such a guy is PRONE to unfaithfulness due to the fact that he has wat 90% of girls want. And that girls would throw themselves at him so she should not claim to be truly angry if she hears of or sees his unfaithfulness. If she doesn't want all that wahala as a truly 'decent' girl, she would have gone for moderate guys that are less PRONE to all that drama. Again one has to consider the 3 scenarios I created in the first post on this thread. Maybe a richer girl than the guy would have a sense of entitlement, and so on, but not a poorer girl, however decent - why did you fall for him in the first place? These are facts of life that we see everyday. I don''t need to convince anyone about anything. |
@ Ferhyntorian, Pro1 and Filani, the 2 main reasons why most women here have been supporting the nonsense called divorce settlement is that either the wife gave up "her best years" to serve as the man's housewife, or she did the great job and serious wahala of taking care of "the man's" children. Now, just wondering, did Eva Longoria and Parker have children together? Or, did Eva Longoria give up her acting career and her "best years" to be Parker's full time housewife? Just in case the answer to these 2 questions is no, that means something must be wrong somewhere. I wouldn't waste my time arguing this anymore. I can only thank god that nigeria law system doesnt encourage such nonsense. |
In addition to my earlier point about rich guys and "their kind of girls" that are often never TRULY decent girls, I just remembered a perfect example. Back in school there was this very rich Igbo student called Champion. He was 'crowned' champion after he successfully slept with four fine roommates in one of the female hostels. Apparently one was his supposed girlfriend, while the others just wanted a piece of champion's crazy money (His dad was an illiterate multi-millionaire importer in Onitcha who thought the more money he gave his son, the higher grades he would make - so champion operated on a blank cheque throughout; his account was always in the millions as a young student in his early twenties, with a flashy kompressor c-class mercedes). When the four girls later found out that this guy had slept with them all, instead of getting mad at him, they turned on each other - and he kept sleeping with all because they all wanted to outdo the other to be his 'first lady', these were all normal fine chicks, not aristos or 'bad girls' so to say. And the whole school knew his playboy reputation and vast wealth. Is this the kind of drama a TRULY decent girl would want to be involved in? Of course not. A truly decent girl should never fall for the temptation of dating such a guy in the first place, and later complain that he is cheating - that would be hilarious. |
bhusayor:Isn't it even more silly that you want to understand what you've already declared silly? Its amazing how you people like to throw unprovoked punches on this forum, and if one retaliates he becomes the villain. You ought to be unsilly enough to know that you can make your point or counter-point without insulting a poster, or just ignore a post altogether if it pains you too much. |
MRBrownJ:Seems you chose to understand my point too simply. Remember I was responding to your claim that some 'decent' girls would dump their rich guys if they 'fork up'. And by 'fork up' I know you meant cheat. So I am assuming that you mean that decent girls can't stand guys that cheat, no matter how rich? if those assumptions are correct, then here is what I'm saying: a so called decent girl would be truly daft or to put it mildly, deluded, if she thinks she can lock in - for example Paddy Adenuga - who is filthy rich, and madly sought after by every random girl in Lagos. A girl who falls for a 'bad' boy or player (which is precisely what most young rich naija men necessarily are) cannot convince me of her so-called decency. Lets face it, the fact is that it would be almost impossible to possess such a hot property (as in have him all to yourself sexually and emotionally). In my experience, truly decent girls dont want all that drama, they prefer a quiet life with the one they love and that loves them back, if their boyfriend later becomes rich, that is a different matter altogether. On the other hand, the 'big boys kind of girls' are the remaining 90 percent of Nigerian girls including (those with superficial decency) who really just desire a rich guy at all costs (for the obvious benefits) no matter how he treats them or how many other girls he has. I think my point is simple enough for anyone who knows what a truly decent girl is, I sure do. No wonder they are so hard to find. |
Judging from most women's responses here, it seems that the end always justifies the means with women. Just do it first by force or fire, and if they enjoy the process or outcome, then they're fine with it. But if you ask them for permission first before you do, they might never grant the permission. So in essence, with women, don't ask, just do it. Thats very bad. Only a very selfish and irrational person would even contemplate keeping such a baby. If you want a child so badly, you can adopt or something, rather than bear a child for a filthy armed robber. Where is your shame and dignity, oh woman? |
MRbrownJAY:Well I've not seen that happen, - especially in Nigeria. A truly truly decent girl that doesnt want wahala should not be attracted to a widely sought after rich young man in the first place - does she truly think she can possess him alone? Real decent girls leave the 'big boys' to their kind of girls, I think. Besides a big problem with this kind of theory (for discussion sake) is that every random girl in the city would hug that viewpoint and claim that she belongs in the rare category of "decent girl". Who are the gold diggers then? I've never seen any girl that admits she's a gold digger. |
tpiah!:Derailing from a thread's topic to a trifling matter might suggest a possession of 'high' IQ to some. While you're at it, why not take your 'high' online IQ to the education section and give them your English lessons there? |
freecocoa: desholah:Of course we don't expect most people, especially girls, to admit they were dumped. They would rather claim that "I dumped him joor, he was cheating on me", just to save their pride. If one investigates well, you would see that even if the guy didnt dump her officially (like, "hey Tilewa, from today I declare you officially dumped" , but he must have stopped picking her calls or calling her long ago so that she would get the message. |
I really sympathize with the husband in that situation. For 20 years you've been shooting off target while it took a ruthless bandit just a few minutes to pump hot shot into the wife and score a goal. The husband's ego and self-esteem would be permanently shattered if he ever knows. He might even kill the baby with his own hands. God forbid such. |
ThiefOfHearts: ThiefOfHearts:Yes, only a delusional lunatic would repeatedly declare a thread "daft" and yet repeatedly yield to the temptation of posting daftly in such daft thread - instead of leaving it for "daft" people like the rest of us. Only a delusional lunatic would. |
MRbrownJAY:But Tiger Woods is not Nigerian. Besides he wasn't dumped per se. He was conned into marriage and then divorced, big difference if you ask me. That nanny may not have dumped him for his infidelity if they were merely dating instead of married - because there'll have been no tantalizing prospect of multi-million dollar divorce settlement of the sort she got after divorcing him. So he wan't dumped, he was conned. |
I ask this question because I've noticed that all the rich guys I've ever known right from secondary school all through University always did the dumping. The only 3 exceptions I've seen are: 1. If the girl is richer, 2. if the guy is the soft wimpy silver-spoon type who doesn't realize the power of his money and falls in love too deeply with (a comfortable) girl who gets tired of his clingyness, 3. If the guy is the very stingy type that doesnt give the girl money or gifts despite his wealth (but this is not so sure as many girls would stick around hoping). Other than these, it seems most Nigerian girls are simply incapable of jilting a rich guy who they gain things from - no matter how terrible the guy is in other aspects. Even if the girls meet a richer guy, they still keep the previous one on the side just in case. All the rich friends I have, I've never heard of relationship troubles they have due to one girl leaving them or breaking their heart, instead, they do all the dumping and seem to change girls like diapers. Last weekend, I witnessed where one such girl a rich friend of mine dumped had her mother phone the guy to beg for peace on her behalf. And the girl is very pretty from a decent middle class background! How come rich guys (especially in Nigeria) hardly get dumped? |
tpiah!:So that confirms why you are all interested in marrying a wealthy man? So you can run off with a huge fortune in case divorce happens? chaircover:Your arguements are uncoordinated. What exactly do you stand for? If there are so many women earning more than their husbands, why are you still supporting divorce settlement? Seems like women just can't help eating their cake and stll wanting to have it. chaircover:Is it the same women that earn more than their husbands, according to you, that would be chased out? After putting 'things' together, what things? You say the law is good because it protects such women, protect them from their own greed or what? What I find rather puzzling is that on one hand, you've insinuated that we 'poor' men should just shut up because it's not men like us you hope to get divorce settlemennts from. But if you end up marrying men like us (after unsuccessfully hunting for wealthy men), you would go out and work, and earn more than us (wait a minute, who would then take care of the children, since we both work?). But if God answers your prayers and you land a billionaire like Tiger Woods, you'd gladly give up your career because you know that you'd earn more and enjoy more luxury as his wife than you ever would as a career woman even in three lifetimes. Then you'd stay home in his mansion with plenty house helps and bottomless pit of cash as domestic-expenses to 'put things together' (who send you work?), put what together? And if divorce ever happens, you would then want a huge part of his millions or billions as 'protection'. Protection from what? What happened to the savings you have from the millions at your disposal for shopping etc while you were married to him? Would you have even earned up to what he gave you as shopping allowance during the marriage if you were working as a career woman? Your arguements are neither here nor there. Only Atreides has made clear sense about all this. The rest of you females are just running from pillar to post out of sheer, typical 'eat your cake and have it' greed. |
Usually i never believe that there is anCan you imagine this? Yet another reason why "women would always be women". |
dayokanu:God bless you! This nairaland website has opened my eyes to just how manipulative women are. Always clever by half. College degrees nonsense. . .how does that correlate to the divorce settlement we are talking about? Why didnt they earn the millions and billions with their so called empty college degrees so that men would be the ones scheming for divorce settlements? How many SELF MADE women (I only know of Oprah and JK Rowlings) are in the Forbes top 500 list of billionaires? |
I've just read all the arguments and, and I regret to say that it is true that "women would be women". They are always in support of their gender no matter what. All of them have proved their biased emptiness except Atredes who is the only woman here that said the truth. I'm particularly disappointed in Chaircover who I've seen as a realistic person from her previous posts on Nairaland before now. Harakiri. pro01, Day Kanu and Sagamite have made deeply analytical points that no logical person can argue with. There is no reason why a man should give a woman money he worked for, unless he freely chooses to. That is just it. If raising or taking care of children is such a 'big deal', then nannies should be the highest paid people in the world. Nonsense. |
armyofone:Sorry to disappoint you. Nigeria would never get to the point where such nonsense would take root. Most women here are already leeches sucking on their boyfreinds/husband's finances. It shouldn't get any worse. MRbrownJAY:Dont mind these clever by half women. Its amazing how they think their 'hard work' as a spoiled wife with a retinue of nannies, cooks, cleaners, drivers etc. entitles them to a multi-million dollar payday when they divorce their benefactor. What kind of brain even tries to find any justification for that? |
MRbrownJAY:There is a big difference between Divorce settlement and child support. Of course most men would gladly provide child support (that is if it is decided for whatever reason that the woman should have custody of the children). But what is the idea of paying settlement to some woman who decides/agrees to divorce a man. If she is so interested in divorcing the man, why not also divorce his money? I agree with you that only fools would marry without signing prenups. |
ThiefOfHearts:Yeah, it's a daft thread, that is why a daft leech like yourself feels the need to post in it. After all, daft threads attract daft posters like you. Innit? |
I just dont get it. Why should a man work so hard for his money, marry one liability of a wife and then due to some reason they get divorced - only for the liability woman that did not contribute anything whatsoever to the money made by the man to claim portions of his fortune as divorce settlement? Settlement for what? If the woman is so pissed by his cheating or whatever caused the divorce, why not simply leave him without greedily lusting after some of his money. And these women that claim feminists and independent women, but they still want to take a man's money that they did not help in making. I just thank God that such nonsense is not applicable in Nigeria. |
Here's a funny 'joke' I found in my email inbox this morning; thought to share it with my NL people. Dearest One, |
Frigid in the sense of female sexuality. . . I've heard some of my friends argue that a wife with an extremely low sex drive, who in fact hates sex or is at best indifferent to it, is the "safest bet" for a husband's peace of mind if you know what I mean. In a way I think they have a point. Just that they have not quite explained how they (the husbands) would get their groove on with such wives. |



, but he must have stopped picking her calls or calling her long ago so that she would get the message.