₦airaland Forum

Nihilstjnr:
Why do you need to top spending chart when you already have the best team in the league?

All you have to do is keep adding a new superstar every year .

By that 2001 that You're talking about, Ferguson had already broken the British transfer record at least twice, and I think maybe even the world record for a defender sef...and that's before Rio Ferdinand.

Na Ferguson dey set transfer record those days. N.a. him go still come break the record, on top of already having the best team on the island.

PDP was the original PEP.

That best team he was adding to was built from young talent, he didn't have to win tranfer market to develop that same best team he was adding to.

He did it at Aberdeen, carrying young players to topple the Rangers/Celtic hegemony and finally rod Real Madrid and Bayern Munich in the Cup Winners Cup.

Put some respek on his name, and swallow your 10yrs of Ls in peace.

Nihilstjnr:
Also I think Eruditor's logic is sound.

We must never forget that Ferguson was breaking British and World transfer records upandan until Roman came to save the EPL from the clutches of the Scottish devil.

Ferguson even broke transfer record twice in the same window on at least one occasion.

The mathematics of the equivalent value is just an irrelevant distraction that Scummies are using to deflect from the simple fact that PDP was the original PEP.

His logic is not sound. He has tied himself in a tortuous knot of his own pseudopods, the flagrant amoeba.

Now let us bury this Fergie misconception once and for all.

Fergie won the EPL 7 times in 9 seasons from 1992 to 2001 AND NEVER ONCE TOPPED the Total spending chart.

The first time Fergie topped the total spending charts in the EPL was in 2001 after he had already won 7 league titles, 3 FA Cups and 1 champions league title.

For those who don't have A1 in Further Mathematics. Throughout the 90s when Fergie was truly dominating the EPL with 7 EPL titles, 3 FA cups, and also won 1 champions league title he never was the top spender in the EPL in any season

joeace2020:
You can trust that he will.. Ignorantly lost in his buffonery

Erudite nonsense.

We showed with net spend that Pep was no 1 while Ferguson was no 6 and no 3, he changed shape to total spend.

We showed with total spend that Pep was still a bigger spender than Ferguson compared to contemporaries, he changed shape with pre-EPL spending.

Now we have shown with pre-EPL that Pep was even a much bigger spender, i expect another shape change.

Gentlemen we are combating an amoeba here. While Dayo merely turns amala, this one extends and retracts pseudopods.

Eruditor:
760 in GRE Q should be a top score for a doctor.

Please, don't tell me Fergie came 1992. He had coached since 86 so did he not sign then? Can we calculate how much he spent compared with the world recording signings of that era to see what the value will be today?

Cantona and Brian Robson cost over £2.5M together. Those were not shabby figures in that day.

Hehehe this guy went to rifle through my records. Well i have to say i was impressed with my scores also, thanks for mentioning it. LOL

A1 should be top score for an erudite person, so Ferguson signed Bryan Robson? Abi wetin concern Robson with this matter?
You want to add Robson that was bought 5yrs before Fergie became Utd manager? Are you well sir?

Okay Mr A1, in Ferguson's 1st ever season in English league (86/87) his net spend was -3m pounds which was DEAD LAST in the league.
Oya change to another shape you irredeemable shape shifter. hehehe

Eruditor:
Cheeky. Your clever infusion of net spend.

Well it was not net spend that Fergie had £500m. And £500M for Pep in 2 seasons for City is not net spend either.

Lol Mr A1 you don enter sunken place. Oya hear this one.....

In Fergie's 1st EPL season (92/93) his TOTAL spend was 3.53 m pounds which was (wait for it) SIXTH, behind Blackburn Rovers, Spurs, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa.
In Pep's 1st EPL season his TOTAL spend was 213m pounds which was 1ST in the league.

In Fergie's 2nd EPL season his TOTAL spend 8.5m pounds which was 2ND in the league behind Blackburn Rovers.
In Pep's 2nd EPL his total spend was again 315m pounds which was AGAIN 1ST in the league.

Again for those who do not have A1 in Further Maths, Fergie was 6th and 2nd in total spend in his first 2 seasons in the EPL while Pep was 1ST in each of his first 2 seasons in total spend (and led by a mile).

Since we can't derive an almighty formula to adjust money value over different eras and we can't agree on CIES findings, the next best thing is to compare the advantages this financial might and purchasing power gave each person compared to his contemporaries.

In Ferguson's 1st EPL season (92/93) his net spend was 1.4m pounds which was 6TH in the league, behind Blackburn Rovers, Sheffield Wednesday, Aston Villa, Oldham Athletic, Leeds United.
In Pep's 1st EPL season his net spend was abut 180m pounds which was 1ST in the league.

In Ferguson's 2nd EPL season his net spend was 7.53m pounds which was 3RD behind Blackburn Rovers and Man City.
In Pep's 2nd EPL season his net spend was 223m pounds which was again 1ST in the league.

So to clarify for those without A1 in Further Maths, Pep has led the league in net spend in his first 2 seasons in the EPL while Fergie was 6th and 3rd in his first 2 seasons.

Erudite and protean shape-shifting.

See as my people turn this guy to contortionist, even Dayo would be jealous. Isn't our God a wonderful God?

Cruxifizio:
I no know about our end oh on a more serious note....I never really see where person go enter thread dey rake say e get this and that.... na only una guys we dey find all these characters......and I call cougar name join cuz na him start to declare annual salary here,one post gown,another one post acc balance,etc dem Tampa for here doc

Lol you made me remember Binghi's graduation pic, dat him brogues wey e wear na colonial classic.

You have a point sha, but like i said e dey una body too........maybe just less pronounced.

Anyhow you guys should thank us for helping you beat City that bullied you.

Cruxifizio:
But you know say no be today dis matter start na? It is the default setting of many of your guys from the days of lord cougar to the present nl millions for your thread.

E dey una body too, only that it has gotten a bit more pronounced on our thread lately. Coogar own different, the guy surely get personality disorder on top him criminal tendencies.

nitrogen:
All these Mourinho fanboys that call others small boys.

Fvck you all!

They are internet chairmen. Even those living in face me i face and whose closest contact with Old Trafford is touching their TV screens have the unmitigated gall to be calling others fake fans and small boys.

Lana1:
U say?
https://images2.imgbox.com/22/a8/x1KE1fUH_o.gif

You be wicked sombori, see as you woze Nihilist ogo? That is someone's father o.

We came in from the back!!!

See as we PEPper dem for 2nd half, Jose must have delivered a really great PEP talk in the dressing room.

Raumdeuter is on point here, Bernd Schuster was sacked and saying anything different is revisionist history. Many times when managers are sacked the official line is that it was "by mutual consent" or "amicably".

hensbrain. Oh my, such a dunderhead.

Pep's problem in those champions league exits has always stemmed from his attempts to be conservative. Yesterday he played 5 defenders (3CBs and the WBs), brought Gundogan into midfield and dropped Sterling. He then compounded that by still trying to play out from the back, as if all the gengenwhozing Klopp has given him all these years is not enough.

Players would even have been confused with the mixed messages, you set up defensively and yet ask them to play out from the back tiki-taka style.
And Klopp has his number, the overall record between them is even with Klopp having the inferior team practically every time they have met.

.

Skimpledawg:
Egbon, just let it go..

Don't talk again mbok.
[b]You cannot eat your L and have it[/b]

Oh boy, see yens! I have to borrow this yens for another day.

RIP Ray Wilkins.

RIP Ray Wilkins.

Nihilstjnr:
Sadly it's not even about money.

There's a particular kind of madness that afflicts many americans to justify the need to own guns.

Many gun owners in America dont just own 1 gun - they own like 3 or 4. Some even have tens of guns.

When you ask them what for, then Raumdeuter will tell you about how they all live in rural communities etc.

I was watching the news only on Monday, and they've already started allowing teachers to take concealed firearms into some secondary schools in America.

When I was at school, it was dangerous enough giving some psychotic teachers access to cane. I'm just imagining if Mr Martins had access to a concealed pistol. I certainly wouldn't be here today.

Many of them have been brainwashed and the right wing spin machine is very sleek. Imagine teachers, janitors, parents all entering schools with concealed weapons. Very soon people that have been misplacing cell phones, car keys e.t.c will start misplacing guns. Also who defends students when a teacher like old Mr Martins turns psychotic?

I used to watch Fox for comic relief and to better understand how the mind of the American right wing citizen works. Only America has rural areas, only America has a government that can turn dictatorial so the people have to arm themselves.

Logic and the statistics do not support the pro-gun stance, however ignorance and dogmatism is solidly behind it.

Laws that were made before the days of Geronimo and Billy the Kid are being defended in the 21st century.

A40:
The good old days when we were told 8 Chelsea players would walk into Bayern starting XI.

Wetin dey really scatter my dada is that niggas legit thought Hidden was going to win Balon D'or in this decade

Even if he becomes Peter Pan and remains this age for the next 100 years he will never win the Balon D'or. There never will be a time when someone with his skill set, mentality and limitations will win that award.

raumdeuter:
This is Victor Moses. If only he had interest and hunger, He would have been better than Messi. afrodoc2

https://j.gifs.com/4RqvQ2.gif

You are right. He is very humble that is why he has no interest in being the best player on earth. He is more interested in being a headless runner.

Hazard has no interest in scoring because scoring goals make him feel depressed, so i understand why he prefers to drimble all over the pitch like Haruna Ilerika and does not release the ball on time to his team mates.

Even when they criticize Pius they still make excuses for him. Interest ko, Principal ni.
If Odonkor had interest in passing and scoring goals he woluld have been as good as Messi, if Harrison Omokoh had interest he would have been as good as Nesta.

Making runs behind the defence is not only by interest, if not everybody would be doing it. Frank Lampard, Dele Alli have the talent to know when to make the run and they see the space before others, that is why they score those goals.

Passing the ball with speed, accuracy and the correct timing is not just by interest, it requires a level of skill and football intelligence. That was Xavi's talent, Hazard's talent is drimbling, same as Stanley Okoro, Phillip Osondu, Lomana Lua Lua and his namesake Pius Ikedia.

A song by Shekpites worldwide appreciating Caballero. He is indeed a famous man in town.
Sponsored by Diggz.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Egt_ppJKcRc

A romantic song from Morata to all Shekpites worldwide.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVNOBKb5eE8

MaziOmenuko:
Welcome to Thursday night football.

Maccabi Tel Aviv, Young Boys and Sparta Prague awaits you.

A message from the Yoruba league to Chelsea.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNey0PR46F4

We are going old skool up in this bish.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSC9cgvtkRs

So Diggz no dey this thread? No Diggz?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KL9mRus19o

Please let us appreciate dele alli.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFVLTyrZA6M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx14hca1z_c


The bridge is surely over.

Leyqute:
Whatever you say afrodoc. I question his attitude for moments in the game.

It is not about attitude or quality or mentality. It is about being fair and logical in apportioning blame. You can't ignore the facts and blame Darmian for every goal United concede when he is on the pitch just because he is a poor defender, same way you can't ignore the facts and blame Rudiger for a goal that had nothing to do with him.
There were 2 defenders on Alli, a straight ball came over the top and he ran in BETWEEN the RCB and MCB and you are blaming the LCB? Those are the facts, not his attitude or his antecedents or his quality (or lack thereof).