₦airaland Forum

engineerboat:
This are all hearsay say,

I rest my case.

Follow the case

Lol, hearsays is what the pdp is presenting in court sir. You have nothing to say. Asue should rest

engineerboat:
what you failed to realized is that the LGA and Ward Agent for the Aboves PU had already testify, but because you are not interested in them since it doesn't suite your narrative.


this is where the person you're referring to post is better than Yours

You are only cherrypicking what suite your narratives while ignoring the whole process.

Once again it shows you're not following the tribunal.

However stop comparing yourself to the person you're referencing.

If your post is FP worthy it will go there However stop calling out the MOD

What stops daily trust and vanguard from reporting the accurate events? Why didn't they capture the correct proceedings and headlines? The evidence of those two are trash however..
You are the one not following the tribunal because if you did, you will agree that all PDP agents fumbled. One claimed he was an agent but had no tag, another claimed to witness rigging but was never at the units, another said there was over voting until the respondents proved him otherwise with bvas, one clown claimed there added wrong results until Barr Ikpeazu showed him otherwise, another said Asue lost the election. Is it the one that said he only based his reports from irev or one that claimed he saw bvas but later denied or the other that rejected his statements? Read the handwriting

engineerboat:
If I say that you're not following the tribunal but choosing what to write this is one of such by you.

Oga sir, don't deviate or digress. You lost out as usual. We where talking about the daily trust headlines from a unit agent to mislead people. You and that fellow where totally wrong or misunderstood me. I never said only unit agents testifies. A unit agent lied that the whole LGA was rigged according to daily trust. There was no testimony from a ward or LGA agent according to that very post he posted from daily trust concerning Etsako east. Why are you introducing another different topic and matter when we haven't exhausted that one? Accept that you made a mistake and that your party fumbled first...

What you posted from vanguard is from Ikpoba okha another different LGA entirely... The evidence is also useless because it was given by the LGA agent instead of the ward agent. Only the ward agent or different unit agents can correctly testify what happened at that ward and not the LGA agent..another big loss

Like I said earlier, ogugwa chooses what he writes and I do same. So what is your problem

engineerboat:
It's not only unit agent that comes to testify


ward agent also testifies.


That is why I asked That you balanced your report


This is the Message You're Quoting Yet you did bring the complete message

What is your problem? Did you read the whole message? There was no ward agent who testified, only the unit agent. Show me where there was a ward or unit agent. Does ogugwa balance his reports? He always writes about pdp winning, why can't I do the opposite

gbengayandipo20:
APC supporter who was not present in court writing to deceive their followers. APC is known for lies and misrepresentation of facts. The Witnesses answered correctly what he was asked based on what he observed on election day and the result in his hand.

Yes and during cross examination, he fumbled and his lies started showing. It's a dead case

gbengayandipo20:
You don't even know the witness in question. We have LGA agents witnesses, we have ward agent witnesses and unit agent witnesses and they're being called one after the other based on the duties they performed on election day

By
Daily Trust
Fri, 31 Jan 2025 6:02:03 WAT
A key witness for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) testified at the Edo State Election Petition Tribunal on Friday, detailing instances of over-voting in alleged favor of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Etsako East Local Government Area.

Appearing before the tribunal as a Polling Unit Agent, the witness demonstrated how the total number of votes cast at his polling unit exceeded the number of accredited voters recorded by the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).

There's nothing I don't know about electoral matters. As you can see above, it was a mere unit agent. You see why PDP are always failing against APC. A unit witness can only testify for only his unit and not another talk less of ward or a whole LGA. Asue has failed

sirgoody:
Another misleading piece from the coven of akpakoman... they don't go to court hearing but are the first to write on what they don't know

Asue Ighodalo and the PDP are dealing with them mercilessly by exposing the massive electoral fraud by inec

If there is anyone that should go to jail (of course, someone must go), it is definitely inec rec or their staff that stole Edo people's mandate

Ighodalo is coming

Lol, was your so called witness everywhere in the LGA? APC are dealing with Asue

IfnobeGod20:
Mr. Man, did you followed the case at the tribunal at all. It was INEC that was subpoena to bring the BVAS records to court and I think 148 BVAS records were brought in the contentious 133 polling units.
Meanwhile, the witness Ossei Anenih wasn't an expert witness but a key witness for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
Hear what the news said about him:
"The witness, a data analyst and director of research and strategy for the PDP, Mr. Osei Anenih, presented detailed evidence of alleged widespread irregularities in the September 21, 2024, gubernatorial election".
https://edoupdates.com/politics/pdp-witness-shocks-tribunal-with-explosive-testimony-oshiomhole-storms-out/

Stop confusing yourself and the public, he is not an expert witness as you alluded to since but a key witness liken to the one done by Bamidele Daramola for APC in the presidential election tribunal.

You are the one confusing yourself. Any subpoena that is at the request of the petitioner is a nullity. They were supposed to have inspected the bvas before the trial began. In any case, since they are not backed by inec witnesses, it is useless..

What he presented is an expert report sir because it is a data analysis and he is a data analyst and only a data analyst can present it so hence the expert report. Unfortunately, he is of the pdp and cannot be relied on.... Opeyemi bamidele did not present any expert report, he only identified some documents and answered some questions without preparing any analysis.

ValarDoharis:
Setting the ground for miscarriage of justice.

The judiciary is compromised

Setting the ground? Did you read the post at all

Wickedfacts:
The will of PDP slaves from the East who want to foist Pdp on Edo people.
The same unfortunate fellows are cursing PDP in Abia state.

Yes

engineerboat:
You can do better in your reportage of what actually happened in the court regarding such witnesses not just picking up a bit of what was said said.

My reportage is superior to that of ogugwa if we must be honest

Bobloco:
The people of Edo lost

They voted massively for Okpebholo

Bobloco:
Why should I be pained?

Your party is losing

Bobloco:
Another piece of gibberish from Akpakomiza2's propaganda media mills

You sound pained

In a startling development at the Edo 2024 Governorship Election Tribunal in Abuja, a 61-year-old witness for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Mr. Muitaru Yusuf, may face significant legal consequences after being accused of lying under oath.

This incident unfolded during the tribunal’s proceedings on Friday, where Mr. Yusuf’s credibility was called into question during cross-examination by Barr. Ferdinand Orbih, counsel for Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo.

Mr. Yusuf initially testified that he based his statement, made on October 11, 2024, on screenshots of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) results. However, it was revealed that the PDP had only acquired certified true copies of these results on January 8, 2025, long after his claims were made.


This inconsistency indicated that Mr. Yusuf had provided false testimony, as the evidence he referenced did not exist at the time of his statement.

During the cross-examination, Barr. Orbih pointed out the discrepancies in Mr. Yusuf’s testimony. When questioned if he still stood by his initial statement,

Mr. Yusuf retracted his claim, admitting that he had merely relayed what the PDP instructed him to say.

Lying under oath in a court of law is a serious offense in Nigeria, punishable under Section 118 of the Criminal Code, which carries a potential prison sentence of 14 years. Perjury undermines the integrity of legal proceedings and threatens the authority of the judiciary.

As the tribunal weighs the implications of this revelation, the situation casts doubt on the credibility of the PDP’s entire petition and raises questions about the authenticity of the allegations made.

Political analysts are now pondering how many more such statements were constructed without basis, driven by the grievances of a few party leaders unwilling to accept the election results.

The PDP, led by its governorship candidate Asue Ighodaro, appears to be in a precarious position.

Facing accusations of desperation and attempts to manipulate the judicial process, they struggle to maintain their narrative amidst mounting evidence of potential misconduct.

Observers note that this development not only jeopardizes the credibility of the PDP’s claims but also poses a significant threat to the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic processes.

As the tribunal proceeds, the public remains attentive to developments, eager to see the repercussions for those who threaten the judicial system with falsehoods.

The tribunal continues its proceedings as the PDP attempts to navigate a challenging landscape in their quest to overturn the electoral victory that Senator Monday Okpebholo and the All Progressives Congress secured by a substantial margin with the support of Edo voters.
https://infopowerng.com/2025/01/31/drama-at-edo-election-tribunal-as-61-year-old-pdp-witness-risk-jail-term-for-perjury/


Mynd44
Nplfmod
Nlfpmod
Fergie001
Seun
Seunmsg
Cajal
Highestpopori
Casualobserver
Ovb123
Oredopikin
Meum
Michaelsokoto
Chinjo2

engineerboat:
This is a baseless Accusation


Can You substantiate your said post

All posts by ogugwa gets to fp instantly. Why

HIGHESTPOPORI:
So why did Oshomole storm out of court

Did you see him storm out? Watch the press conference granted by both parties and you will see who is winning

IfnobeGod20:
My brother, is tribunal going to be sourcing for neutral report or it going to base its ruling on information before it as presented by the petitioner, INEC and the respondent? Why should I be looking for neutral source when information has been provided by the parties in court?
Please did expert told you he is a card carrying member of PDP or where did you get your info from? Please stop this straw you're clutching to, there was huge irregularities and rigging of the Edo election. This is what we have been saying, always looking for technicality to discredit fact and not dwelling on the main issue.
Well, I don't blame some of you because the judiciary had made mess of the whole thing . There is a common saying that says, there cannot be judgement without justice. Most of their rulings are only judgement delivered but no justice delivered.

Oga, the supreme court has settled the matter of expert reports. Ossy Anenih was the director of research of Asue Ighodalo campaign. Infact, if the report was from inec, it would have been better. In the obi and atiku vs tinubu case, all the expert reports where from non partisan sources. You are the one clutching at straws. Again, a lot of pdp evidences are through subpoenas and not part of their petition and the court has dealt with this matter in Ombugadu vs Sule supra. This is beyond technicalities..

All the bvas pdp brought to court where not even marked as required. Instead of them to call inec witnesses who knows the workings of bvas to testify on bvas, they are calling on their agents... Blame opposition and leave the judiciary

Bobloco:
Akpakomiza2, You have been severely dealt with, and now you manufacture your own fake, and propaganda news.

Dealt by who? PDP have lost out

IfnobeGod20:
Please where did you see your own evidence? The evidences still tally. Can you bring the one PDP shown and the one INEC released and let us compare. The stat witness for APC claimed that in his analysis PDP win the election but you're here saying all their evidences tally with what INEC announced. Please I need that results of the witnesses and that of INEC.
One need to fear you in real life, how you are quick to twist matter. O ga o.

You are only looking at the pdp reports. If you had compared it with that of Apc or neutral sources, you would get a balanced reportage...
The star witness presented an expert report and an expert report can only be prepared by neutral or non partisan witnesses with objectivity. Mr Anenih publicly admitted to working for pdp... See Adeleke vs oyetola 2022, obi vs tinubu 2023 supra.. again, he failed to present proofs showing he is an expert. He also claimed votes will be invalidated based on inec manual rather than the law

IfnobeGod20:
It's now evidences are scanty and no more there is no rigging. PDP governors were the first to raise the alarm of outright rigging but they were countered. They even gave the results scored at each LGAs and moving forward, people have been showing areas that were heavy rigging. People complaints are still on the net and not just today.

Even the famous 1993 elections still had minor rigging sir. What PDP have presented will go no where. Before PDP raised alarm of rigging,APC has been crying before the polls. The figures pdp governors gave where for only 11 lgas and mostly tallied with what inec gave. A simple cross examination of all pdp evidences in court have shown that it was false alarm or exaggeration of minor incidence

Asue Ighodalo witnesses have turned the court to a circus

The ongoing proceedings at the Edo State election tribunal have taken an unexpected twist, particularly for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

A witness for the party, Abubakar Uzairu, has admitted that Asue Ighodalo did not win the governorship election that took place on September 21, 2024.

This admission came to light during cross-examination by Ferdinand Orbih SAN, counsel for the ruling party, All Progressives Congress (APC),.


Uzairu’s confirmation undermines the assertions made by Ighodalo concerning his victory.

This raises significant questions about the legitimacy of the PDP’s claims regarding the election results. While Uzairu did introduce the notion of “over voting” occurring in certain PDP strongholds, which could indicate potential electoral irregularities, it complicates the defence the PDP is attempting to construct.

The implications of Uzairu’s testimony have severely weakened the PDP’s position in the tribunal, as it simultaneously acknowledges the APC’s victory while attempting to highlight issues that could suggest electoral misconduct in specific areas.

The proceedings are being closely watched, and further developments are anticipated as the tribunal continues to investigate the claims and counterclaims made by PDP…
https://infopowerng.com/2025/01/31/twist-as-pdp-witness-says-asue-ighodalo-lost-edo-governorship-election/
Mynd44
Nlfpmod
Seunmsg
Seun
Chinjo2
Isokoiscool
Donphilopus
Ovb123
Helinues
Ejimatic
Fergie001
Zoedew
Canadabust
Michaelsokoto
Sagitariusbaby

ValarDoharis:
You guys are just setting the grounds for miscarriage of justice

You mean pdp because there are the ones tumbling

ValarDoharis:
Are you new in Nigeria?

From what I am seeing here, the evidences are scanty

membranus:
Okpebholo going! going!....

Naive

ValarDoharis:
Forget the judiciary, they're compromised!

How

temisartana:
Story for the gods

This is the usual way in favour of the losers at the beginning. Just watch out, PDP will still lose at last even with the damning evidence

There's nothing damning here

Evergreen4:
APC is receiving it hot. Evidence choke. It's just that PDP will win at the tribunal while APC will manipulate judgement and be declared winner at the supreme court .

Which evidence? Evidence that failed under cross examination

gaby:
Asuen will likely reclaim his stolen mandate if the Judiciary will for once be fair in their judgement.

With all these watery evidences

Wickedfacts:
One post, no comment. Straight to frontpage.

The mod that pushed it to the front page knows what he's doing.

As in,Fergie is the one doing it meanwhile I posted something since morning on Edo and it has been neglected