Amujale's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Amujale's Profile › Amujale's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 151 pages)
saxha:It's obvious that you haven't whatsoever. |
Amujale: |
saxha:It's obvious you have comprehension issues. Kindly take the time to actually READ what is being said before responding, that way it won't sound as being nonsensical gibberish. Amujale: |
saxha:Is that your response? Really? I'm asking you to go and research on anything that you may find hard to comprehend and this is your response? |
saxha:I ain't asking you to believe anything, rather go and research everything that's being said here. Does your own research based on the clues presented here today. Furthermore, there's a good reason that us historians would often resort to etymology and perform perusals of certain opaque terminologies. That's all I'm saying. |
saxha:I will does you one better. Firstly, I would reiterate the fact that there in excess of ten terms in the Spanish Languages that translate to the colour black. Eventhough I retain my reservations for the use of the colour "black" as a description of any one person, however for arguments sake and for the sake of putting things into their correct perspective, I will accommodate the use in this particular context. Now, back to the fact that there are in excess of ten terms that translate to the colour black in the Spanish Languages. The heck, there are in excess of ten terms that are more appropriate and was in use prior to the 16th century, still in use today. It's important to note that the most appropriate term to use to describe the African and or anyone of African ascent is - you guessed it - AFRICAN. Now that has been cleared up, in the Spanish and Portuguese Languages, the more appropriate terms, the ones that was in use prior to the 16th century are "Amulatado", "Bruna", "Bruno", "Bù-io", "Pele Escura"(Portuguese) "Piel Oscura", "Preto" (Spanish), "Morena"(Spanish & Portuguese), "Moreno" (Spanish & Portuguese) e.t.c According to a reliable source such as Wiktionary, the N-word was borrowed from the Spanish and Portuguese Languages, alluding to the fact that this is actually from where it originates. The N-word was first recorded in the 16th century (the 45th - 55th years of that century to be precise) from the Spanish and Portuguese Languages; coinciding with the era of the Conquistadors. Learn true history for all that it's worth, and be one with reality. |
saxha:You? Teach us history? ROFL, no thanks I will take my chances with my own years of research as an under study of the master teachers. It goes to show that you're poorly read on history. Instead of you to take to correction, you instead choose to make my point for me. Now, go and research the era of the Conquistadors and come back here to tell us what period in time they existed. 1619? What era was that of the Conquistadors? Search engine use is allowed, go ahead tell us what period in time this was. |
saxha:What has this got to does with anything? Btw, assuming you actually check the same Wikipedia regarding the origin of the "N-word" instead of citing from an unreliable source, perhaps you just might be able to comprehend the actual facts. |
saxha:All that is inconsequential gibberish. Learn to reel yourself in line with reality. As stated earlier, the N-word came about during the era of the Conquistador. The last time I checked, these was Spaniards. The Spanish Language is from where the N-word derives, I thought everyone knew this. I guess everyone doesn't know that, well at the very least, you don't know this. Again, take the time to actually read what was being said before you respond, that way it won't sound nonsensical. Btw, the same Britannica that states that "Oba" is a Benin term, when everyone who is anyone knows that to be wholly false. The source you posted is unreliable. www.britannica.com/biography/Jesus Here you have your source giving credence to a fictional character. Is that the source you expect anyone to take serious? Try again, this time find yourself a neutral source such as the one intervening here today. There's no difference from you sourcing from the Pope's journals regarding the fictitious character they called Jesus Christ. What else are you expecting the journals to say? World history is my field of study, I'm not reliant on Eurocentric jibberjabber, I actually put in the work to reach these conclusions. Hence I can state categorically that the N-word came about due to the Conquistadors, was later perpetuated by the Portuguese and had its highest usage during colonisation coupled with the horrific transatlantic atrocities. Again, there was never a point in human history whereby the N-word wasn't made use of as a derogatory term, from its inception up until today. Assuming you have any proof to the contrary, kindly provide them here. Therefore, you can pass me with all that nonsensical gibberish you wrote. The bottom line is that the N-word is toxic and based on derogatory remarks. |
Jesus is a fictitious character that never existed. |
Islam is one of the worst ideologies ever to set foot on African soil. |
saxha:Thats a pure nonsense. The N-word is toxic. Furthermore, that toxic term actually derives from the Spaniards. Yes, Spanish is a derivative of Latin, however, lets put things into their correct perspective. Furthermore and having cleared that up, there are in excess of ten Spanish terms that translate to the colour black. The history of that malicious term stems from the Conquistadors. That is to say, and as a fellow NLander already pointed out (correctly may i add), that toxic term isnt factual, as in, its a Eurocentric contruct thar was invented solely to use as a derogatory term. There has never been a point in human history whereby the 'N-word wasnt used as a derogatory term, from its inception up until today. |
rev2214:History books such as:- "The African Origin of Civilisation" authored by Cheikh Anta Diop. "Christopher Columbus" authored by Dr John Henrik Clarke. "Black People Invented Everything" authored by Dr Sujan Kumar Dass. "The Destruction of Black Civilisations" authored by Chancellor Williams. "Caesar Messiah" authored by Joseph Atwil |
Its pretty simple, we MUST bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality. And the reality here is that, African history comprises of Agriculture, Architecture, Arts, Commerce, Economics, Fishing, Law, Mathematics, Medical Sciences, Mining, Metallurgy, Philosophy, Physical Sciences, Ship-building e.t.c These are the things that used to be our bread and butter prior to foreign intervention, these are the things we MUST return to studying extensively and master (dare i say) better than our parents brilliantly mastered all these disciplines during their time. |
Foreigners came to our continent, found out about our divine principles and decided to call them God. Hence, the African Gods are the only true and proper ones. Not to be conflated with the Almighty God. |
Based on OP's sumation, CJN got this one inch perfect. The CJN was absolutely correct in ordering Her Lordship to retake to the order of such activities in Law based on the faulty initial one. |
Its pretty simple, we MUST bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality. And the reality here is that African history is comprised of Agriculture, Architecture, Arts, Astrology, Astronomy, Commerce, Economics, Fishing, Law, Mathematics, Medical Sciences, Metallurgy, Mining, Philosophy, Physical Sciences, Ship-building e.t.c These are the things we ought to get back to studying extensively. |
rev2214:The Christian bible isnt a history textbook. Assumung you're really interested in knowing the actual facts, then, my advice is for you to bin all the nonsense you're currently reading and instead go and pick up proper history books. |
rev2214:The Christian bible isnt a history textbook. Hence, it really doesnt count whatever you're peddling the narrative as being, its based on fakery and falsehood anyways. |
timbros:Indeed, one of the reasons us need a local media out let such as Ray Power and their peers to create for us a proper sports app that can cater for all the sports enthusiasts. These are common sense initiatives that doesn't cost too much. |
Biodun556:Technically and based on historical evidence, apart from Somalians (whom majority aren't Arabs but African), those are all Arabs. Eventhough, the original communities that existed in the region they now call the Maghreb was all African. Such however changed due to countless invasions from Asia and Europe making the demographic unrecognisable. |
Biodun556:There's no such people as jebusites or canaanites, those are all based on fiction. |
N3cR0mAZc3R:Yes, sir |
The Eurocentric Salvation concept was first introduced into the continent during Ptolemaic Egypt. They pushed that same concept for their god. They had a thing for salvation, they called soteriology. |
Olu317:Given that these foreign extremist ideologies are solely based on fakery and falsehood, the communities that Eurocentric historians, and Eurocentric Egyptologist would loosely call Coptic Orthodox christians, wasn't at all, these was Roman-Greco communities that worshipped many deities, Yeshua wasn't one of these deities. They worshiped, the Kemetic Gods, Greek gods, Roman gods and their own personal created gods in olden days Egypt. i.e Serapis Hellenistic religions, was the dominant ideology for the ruler class in Ptolemaic Egypt, everyone else in olden days Egypt simply worshiped the Kemetic Gods. When the Romans took back control of olden days Egypt, they absorbed various communities such as the one in question. Another reason that the ideology is fake. |
Olu317:Ethiopia was indoctrinated into Christianity all the same. Ethiopia was one of the earliest communities that got indoctrinated into this foreign extremist ideologies. They seemingly hold rank over everyone else that subscribes to their foreign extremist ideology, except perhaps Italy and Russia for this precise reason. These are the reasons one ought to study extensively. Brothers and sisters we need to read to our hearts content. By the powers that are invested in me, us hope to provide some ebooks by the start of 2022. |
Olu317:You can pass me with all that rhetoric. Provide us with the evidence of your false narratives and fictional characters. There was never a person who walked this Earth called Jesus Christ. Assuming you have any proof to the contrary, provide them here. You can call your Professors with their emiritus status to engage us here. |
Olu317:You're delusional. My advice is for you to bin all the nonsense you're currently reading and go and pick up a proper history book. Yeshua, Jesus, whatever you want to call that character is all based on fakery and falsehood. Foreigners came to our continent, found out about our divine principles and decided to call them God. The African Gods are the only true and proper ones. Not to be conflated with the Almighty God. For instance, The Orisa are Gods. Sopona is a god. Jesus /Yeshua is a fake god. |
GeneralDae:Provide us with the sources. It's important to note that the Christian bible is an unreliable source, therefore, provide us with sources outside of this diabolic and malicious book. Apart from the fact that the Christian bible is based on fakery and falsehood, and as such is an unreliable source, one of the contextualised reasons that the Christian bible cannot be used to source for the dates partaining to your fictional character, is the contradictory narratives given by the authors of "Matthew" and "Luke". The authors of "Matthew" claims one date for your fictional character, whilst the authors of "Luke", claims a different date. Bearing in mind that one of the claims falls within an unforgettable event in Roman history. Goes to show how false and unreliable is the Christian bible. The authors of the Christian bible wrote their stories so as to situate them amongst certain historical events, however, that doesn't make their stories a part of history. |
musicwriter:Spot on. |
Olu317:What is the process of extracting raw materials from the planet? Perhaps there's a different process other than mining you would want us to know about. Explain, what other process did our miners use, assuming you cannot comprehend these simple truths. While you're proving my initial point, what is your understanding of 'Metallurgy'? Africans have been performing technological and scientific procedures for thousands upon thousands of years, and that includes breakthroughs in "metallurgy"; iron, copper, brass, steel, that's correct, steel, e.t.c It's on this great continent that steel became an invention. check the information you seek regarding the first steel smelting anywhere on the planet that begins on the African continent here: http://thinkafrica.net/steel-in-africa Only those of us that refuse to research or those of us who simply cannot be bothered to research and study come up with the incorrect viewpoints about our continent's contribution to Science and Technology. Our parents invented all the better things in life. Simply put, us Africans invented almost everything. These are partly the reasoning that we MUST return to studying these extensively. Hence, the emphasis on returning to study, meaning that these intellectual properties was once our daily activities, things that we partook naturally, our bread and butter. Ignorance cannot be used as an excuse anymore. The reason we MUST bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality. |
Olu317:You can pass me with all that nonsensical rhetoric. Wake yourself up when you cannot find any evidence of a person called Jesus in any parts of the so-called Annals. How about taking what was said into consideration. You choose to deceive yourself. And according to your warped and baseless argument, you are attempting to argue your angle in support of a fictional character by citing to problematic piece of writings. Perhaps you ought to examine the facts, they're right there. The material you're claiming as your evidence is not only insignificant, scraps, the information in Tacitus writings doesn't mention the name Jesus anywhere in the content. Furthermore, latest information has rendered the Tacitus Annals as being tampered with, a forgery. When a thorough perusal of the script was performed, the experts in writing analysis found irregularities in the writing patterns, so much that they conclude that it's a forgery. The irony is that, apart from the fact that if one was to take the words of that material for it's worth (eventhough there's undisputable evidence that has allowed it to become inadmissible due to the works of Poggio Bracciolini - da Strada Boccaccio, was said to make use of the Annals in the writing of his own books before Poggio was even born.), there were characters of that time period that answered to the title Chrustus i.e Sarapis. More importantly, where the irregularities was found is in the actual insertions of the term Chrustus and Chresteans as explained by the writing analyst. They stated that out of the entire piece of writing, the only parts whereby the grammatical pattern is alien to the rest of the content is at thos insertions of "Chrustus" and Chrestrean. source: •Tacitus and Bracciolini: The Annals Forged In The XVth Century authored by John Wilson Ross. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/9098/pg9098.html As for the Josephus writings, he's credited as the writer who invented the Jesus storyline, that obviously discounts that particular writer. You're argument is flawed. There are no historians of the first century from who wrote about this fictional character, and there were hundreds of them in Rome and Greece at that time period. And yet you are presenting two problematic writings as your argument. It doesn't add up and you know that on your own accord. The mathematics doesn't add up, out of hundreds of historians from the first century up to the 4th century, there's only one historian that you can come up with? And to add to that, the material is unreliable. Cannot you see the absurdity of your argument? |
Or your village history book. Tell me more, please.
