₦airaland Forum

airmark:
The person that drew and used this line below must have worked and rigged for Inec before.

Jodera:
What happened to spurs vs Liverpool 2nd goal if I may ask?
Let's also pretend that Kane should have been shown a red card in that same match but he wasn't and jota would have been awarded a clean penalty but was denied.

CAPdan21:
I'm the one being emotional because I called you out for posting a gif that you can't even see what is going on...d way d line was drawn there was comedic, you can't see the origin, even d gif did not support anything you are trying to prove...
Wow so now Rodri did not handle the ball, LMAO the way you're twisting facts you should be an employee of Putin nor wasting your talents here on nairaland...
PS: The pictures you posted mean nothing
1) The don't cancel goals for inconspicuous handling of ball by attackers again...go and read updated rules of EPl before you disgrace yourself
2) Penalty when the ball was clearly handled by a city player before Arnold....stay salty though

A001:
It's obvious you type before you think. If not, you would know devout is primarily used for religious people.

Its secondary meaning, committed, isn't what you meant in those posts, which is why I said you don't describe an agnostic as devout in that context.

I don't blame you anyway; oyinbo le, especially for a typical religionist who doesn't read books on philosophy.

A001:
You're delusional. Agnosticism isn't a religion, and that's a fact.

You don't understand the meaning of these words you use.

Agnostics don't do devotions like religious people, and that's they can't be described as devout.

Stop saying nonsense. In most societies, there are religious people (Christians, Muslims, and the likes) and irreligious people (agnostics, atheists, secular humanists called freethinkers generally).

Snap out of delusion.

CAPdan21:
Lol...did u look at your own gif...the angle here is bad/inconclusive, richarlison is not offside there it's not by drawing fancy white line...I've watched the highlights where a better angle was used and he was clearly onside

AnfieldFan:
Subtle and not so subtle decisions have been going for City...
It did vs Arsenal...
Vs Newcastle...
Vs Everton today...
And some more matches I don't remember...

It's the Webb years all over again...
What can we do except play our best football and hope for the best....

CAPdan21:
Ok I'll bite....post a gif of the incident showing where and who was offside in that phase of play

CAPdan21:
This is irrelevant as it's not the official source...I gave u the response of PGMOL to the incident and you give me this...why don't u look up what Micah Richards and other pundits stated concerning it

andrewbaba44:
When ref Dey FAVOUR una you no make noise

The most favoured team in the epl remains manure and Liverpool

I remember when ref refused to sent off James Milner against mancity

A001:
Lols, devout is commonly used to describe religious people.

You're very confused.

CAPdan21:
Another epistle proving nothing...there was no offside in that phase of play... you're the one ignoring the PGMOL explanation, if the VAR team were not sure they had enough evidence why did they not refer the Ref to the pitchside monitor....Keep falling over yourself trying to defend what even a 3 yr old knows is handball,even Rodri from his reaction knew it too

A001:
Isn't a Christian religious before? This man na clown

CAPdan21:
Lol... you're talking nonsense...the PGMOL even clarified that it was not given not because of any imaginary offside but because the VAR team were not sure if it touched his hand 'properly' which is all manner of hilarious...keep pulling facts out of your arse sha all in a bid to defend Fraudiola

A001:
That's why I said you don't understand the meaning of these words you're using.

Devout can mean different things in different contexts. It can mean religious or committed.

But there's nothing like a devout agnostic the way you used it.

It's simply a misnomer.

A001:
And Google told you agnosticism is a religion?

Is it a religion in the world of irreligion?

Are you even sure Nairaland isn't also a religion?

Lols.

It's clear you don't know what agnosticism is all about.

A001:
Lols, you're very confused.

When an agnostic or atheist says he doesn't have a religion or believe in God and other imaginary entities of religion, there's no need to mischievously form a new religion for them which doesn't exist in reality, but only in your mind.

Whether people choose to have a religion or not is solely their own decision to make.

Kloppo:
Offside,and dem no check for am or draw line

A001:
I don't need to waste my time replying this simply because you said religious agnostic. What does that mean

You don't obviously understand the meaning of the words you used here. It's just like someone calling another person religiously irreligious.

Lols

A001:
I'm dogmatic because I said prayers are mere wishes? Lols. You don't even understand the meaning of the word you use.

Some students engage in hours of prayers and devotion, which affect their academic performance in school.

When they're supposed to be reading, they spend a long time praying and engaging in religious devotion, and consequently, their grades in courses become poor.

That's different from the type of students that only prays for a few minutes before an exam.

What I pointed out is a simple issue that's easy to understand. Time is the major factor.

Another example of such folly is when some religious zealots waste time praying to god when they're sick instead of seeking medical care in a hospital.

A good example is the pastor conman that died recently due to his negligence and delusional beliefs: https://www.nairaland.com/7002557/pastor-ezekiel-atang-dies-after

This is just one of your many delusions as a religious person. You can twist the definition of religion anyhow you like to suit your parochial agenda.

But it's a fact that agnosticism isn't regarded by sane people anywhere as a religion.

Kloppo:
Sit this one out

andrewbaba44:
Many of them here Dey wait make man city drop point so that they can come and masturbate like they did last weekend

A001:
It's a fact that for you to solve any life's problem, whether simple or complex, you need to think rationally and apply the brain.

Thus, Reason is the number one requirement needed to proffer solutions to any problem one faces in life, not devotion, not prayers.

That's just reality.

I don't have any bias against religion. Being a rationalist and realist, what I said about religion and prayers is a simple truth.

Nigeria, which consists of over 180 million religious people, can't solve basic problems of life, namely power supply, food sufficiency, good hospitals.

Yet they're very religious, reciting millions of prayers daily. Even so, they're very corrupt and wicked.

Of what use are the prayers and religious devotion when a country of 200 million people can't enjoy basic amenities of life such as uninterrupted power supply, good roads, good education, quality health care?

Whether you like it or not, prayers are mere wishes that mostly don't get granted and only come to pass sparsely by coincidence being a natural phenomenon.

That's reality.


No, I'm not dogmatic because I don't have fixed beliefs, and generally, I don't do beliefs but knowledge.

My approach to life is to reason things out first before taking or accepting anything as true, apply the scientific method in solving life's issues, and deal with the generally accepted beliefs sceptically.

Also, I'm not insular because while I'm an agnostic, I highly value the local cultures.

Where's the logic in this your assertion?

If a student relies on prayers and religious devotion to pass exams like some undergraduates do instead of reading, isn't it obvious that if they fail, such beliefs are responsible for their failure in the exams?

And once the student reduces the time spent praying and worshipping or even stops it
altogether and reads more, their performance in the exam will most likely improve.

Give me examples of such irreligious Nigerian politicians.

Even there are such people in Nigeria's political class, the fact is, "religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful," as Seneca said.

That's one of your delusions as a religionist calling an agnostic a religious person.

The last time I checked agnosticism isn't regarded anywhere as one of the world's religions since an agnostic doesn't have dogmas, fixed beliefs, and doesn't follow strict rules.

A001:
Being a rationalist or a freethinker doesn't automatically make one a millionaire; but it gives one a better chance of solving myriads of problems life throws at one.

But don't worry; just keep on praying daily to Jesus or Allah for a better Nigeria while the leaders steal Nigeria's resources with reckless abandon.

I'm sure all the great countries Nigerians run to now and then were developed with fervent prayers and religious devotion.

The witches and wizards and demons are the thieving politicians and their cronies, not imaginary entities that only exist in the head of believers, not in reality.

Khanben:
So it was Bron that let Caruso go, not Pelinka? Hmm the plot thickens

andrewbaba44:
I been dey rush Dey read Baba

The side he was talking about man city and 3rd position and simeone on track to finish a runner up is pure trash

Lamasta:
Sure we will get the maximum point against Everton

AnfieldFan:
You've been posting these threats of sanctions against Abramovich but I'm curious, nothing's been found on the man yet. In fact, the author who alleged he had close ties to Putin apologized to him not so long ago...
So where's all this coming from?
If they think Abramovich is complicit then by all means sanction him, they don't need to make threats every time there's an issue with Russia...
What does it say about them (Tories ) considering the rumours of them receiving funding from Russia....